Connect with us

Published

on

Former US climate envoy and Secretary of State John Kerry has lamented the lack of progress in global climate negotiations on transitioning away from fossil fuels over the last two years.

Kerry told an audience of climate professionals at London’s Chatham House think-tank on Tuesday that he was still “reeling a little bit” from the COP30 climate summit in Belém, which he did not attend.

When going through papers at his home in Boston recently, he said he had found the front page of The Guardian from December 2023 with the headline: “Landmark COP28 deal agreed to transition away from fossil fuels”.

Kerry said that deal in Dubai, which he was involved in as the US’s lead negotiator at the time, was the “most important single mission statement since Paris”. But, he asked in London two years on, “what happened to the promise that we made future generations?”

    According to Kerry, at COP30, a draft text of the main political decision was put forward that was “so weak that our friends from the European Union, backed by the [UK’s] Starmer government, actually had to take the unusual step of threatening to walk out and protest”.

    Kerry said this was because – in the words of the EU’s top climate official Wopke Hoekstra – the text contained “no science” and “no transitioning away, but instead weakness”. In the end, they had to back down on getting a roadmap in the text, amid strong push-back from major fossil fuel producing nations.

    He also cited the New York Times’ headline on Saturday which ran, “Oil producers – but maybe not the planet – get a win as climate talks end”. Kerry said “that headline underscores that there’s really been a change in the last two years – a change that has been purposefully fought for and achieved by the expenditure of billions of dollars to pass on disinformation and to attack common sense itself”.

    China escapes scrutiny

    He blamed this backtracking since COP28 partly on the administration of Donald Trump pulling the US out of the Paris Agreement, which gave “new life” to “old excuses” for other countries like China.

    Kerry, a semi-retired diplomat who enjoyed cordial relations with his Chinese counterpart, said China now “enjoys newfound freedom from scrutiny”, adding that in his time in the Obama and Biden administrations, the US had successfully pressured China to do more on climate change.

    One developed-country diplomat told Climate Home News that, at COP30, China and Saudi Arabia were under less pressure to support a roadmap away from fossil fuels than would have been the case if a Democrat-run US had been at the talks. This time the US sent no official delegation.

    Kerry said he would push Australia, which will run negotiations at COP31, to get discussions back on track by summoning the 20-25 nations most responsible for climate change, whose emissions cover about 80% of the global total, and try to get them to agree to a roadmap.

    Australian climate minister Chris Bowen, who is set to lead the talks next year, said on Saturday that he and the Pacific Islands would “push to advance” a transition away from fossil fuels.

    Instead of a negotiated plan, the COP30 Brazilian presidency has promised to produce a global roadmap on transitioning away from fossil fuels outside of the UN climate process, and report back on it at the next COP. Colombia and the Netherlands will co-host an international conference on the issue in April.

    To laughter, Kerry ended his speech by saying that the battle can still be won if the opponents of fossil fuels “get your ass in gear to do the things you need to do”.

    The post John Kerry laments lack of fossil fuel transition in COP30 agreement appeared first on Climate Home News.

    John Kerry laments lack of fossil fuel transition in COP30 agreement

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Greenpeace will not rest until justice is served

    Published

    on

    Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US filed on 27 March 2026 a motion for a new trial in North Dakota District Court. This demand for justice follows the absurd and flawed US$ 345 million judgment issued by the same court in Energy Transfer’s SLAPP lawsuit against the Greenpeace parties returned on 27 February 2026. Energy Transfer’s back-to-back SLAPP lawsuits are attempts to erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock Movement, punish solidarity with the ongoing resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline, and intimidate environmental activists from speaking out against Big Oil companies. 

    The motion for a new trial should be granted to prevent one of the largest miscarriages of justice in North Dakota’s history. We are demanding the court right the wrongs committed at trial and to ensure the rights and freedoms promised under the US constitution are protected.

    Greenpeace will not rest until justice is served and Big Oil can no longer use and abuse the legal system in North Dakota or anywhere else.

    Greenpeace International General Counsel Kristin Casper

    There is no question the Greenpeace defendants were denied a fair trial — even a concise summary of the errors and injustices that marred the trial runs to over 100 pages.

    Among the numerous egregious flaws documented in the motion for a new trial are:

    1. The Greenpeace defendants could not receive a fair and impartial trial in Morton County.
    2. Seven out of nine jurors that decided the case had clear biases due to fossil fuel industry ties, experiences with the Standing Rock protests, and/or preexisting negative views of the Greenpeace defendants.
    3. Despite the fact that thousands of individuals and hundreds of organisations were involved in actions at Standing Rock and speaking out against DAPL, and North Dakota law clearly requiring damages to be split among everyone who contributed to alleged harms, the jury and the court assigned 100% of the claimed damages to the Greenpeace defendants. 
    4. The jury’s verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence on each and every count. 
    5. The jury verdict was tainted by the inclusion of inadmissible, prejudicial information. 
    6. The jury was improperly prevented from hearing relevant, admissible evidence that was favorable to the Greenpeace defendants. 
    7. The jury was provided erroneous and incomplete instructions and a flawed verdict form.

    Greenpeace will not rest until justice is served

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Water-Use Restrictions Follow Snow Drought and Heat Wave in the Western U.S.

    Published

    on

    From shutting off sprinklers to closing ski resorts, communities and business owners are adapting to parched conditions out West. Things could get much worse, experts say.

    Officials were already sounding the alarm bells in early March across the Western United States after a winter with historically low snowpacks, which supplies water for communities as it slowly melts throughout the spring and summer.

    Water-Use Restrictions Follow Snow Drought and Heat Wave in the Western U.S.

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    The Trump Administration’s New Biofuels Targets Threaten Carbon-Rich Rainforests

    Published

    on

    The U.S. doesn’t have enough bio-based diesel to meet the administration’s new mandate, so blenders will have to import yet more foreign crop-based oils.

    President Donald Trump stood on the Truman Balcony at the White House during the “Great American Agriculture Celebration” last week and announced what he called a “historic” boost to the nation’s farmers.

    The Trump Administration’s New Biofuels Targets Threaten Carbon-Rich Rainforests

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com