The telecommunications sector is growing fast as demand for faster networks and greener operations rises. Telecom giants like Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile are competing for market share while also racing toward their net-zero and sustainability goals. They are facing pressure to balance business growth with environmental responsibility.
This article looks at each company’s financial results for Q1 2025. It also highlights their progress towards net-zero and their efforts to reduce environmental impact.
Verizon: Strong Financials and Focused Sustainability Goals
Financial Highlights:
- Revenue: $33.5 billion (1.5% increase year-over-year)
- Net Income: $5.0 billion (up from $4.7 billion in Q1 2024)
- Adjusted earnings: $12.6 billion (4% year-over-year growth)
- Wireless Service Revenue: $20.8 billion (2.7% increase year-over-year)
Steady Revenue Growth and Operational Efficiency
Verizon posted a solid financial performance in Q1 2025, with revenues of $33.5 billion, marking a 1.5% year-over-year growth. This growth came mainly from the wireless segment. Wireless service revenue grew by 2.7%, hitting $20.8 billion.
The company’s net income also grew to $5.0 billion, compared to $4.7 billion in Q1 2024, reflecting a steady increase in profitability. Verizon’s adjusted earnings hit $12.6 billion. This is a 4% rise from last year. It shows how well the company controls costs and runs operations efficiently.

Verizon continues to show growth in its wireless business, with notable increases in its total customer base. The company focuses on 5G technology. Its strong position in the U.S. wireless market sets it up for more revenue growth.
The telecom’s strong finances let it reinvest in its infrastructure, innovation, and sustainability efforts.
Scaling Up Renewable Energy and Emission Reductions
Verizon aims for net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050. This goal matches the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). The company has already made significant strides in reducing its carbon footprint.
By the end of 2023, Verizon had reduced its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 44% and its Scope 3 emissions by 20% compared to a 2019 baseline. These cuts come from Verizon’s energy efficiency programs. They also result from investments in renewable energy and efforts to engage the supply chain.

Verizon’s renewable energy commitments are particularly ambitious. The company has signed 28 renewable energy purchase agreements (REPAs). These agreements will provide about 3.6 gigawatts of expected generating capacity.

Verizon’s renewable energy target aims for 50% of its energy consumption to be sourced from renewable sources by 2025 and 100% by 2030.
The telecom giant’s energy-saving efforts have modernized data centers and network systems. Since 2018, this has helped avoid over 93 million metric tons of CO₂e.
The company supports its efforts by focusing on sustainable products. It also helps industries use renewable energy. Other major sustainability and net-zero initiatives of this telecom titan include:
-
Green Bond Financing: Verizon was the first U.S. telecom company to issue green bonds, raising $6 billion to fund renewable energy projects, energy efficiency improvements, and other sustainability initiatives.
-
E-Waste Recycling and Circular Economy: In 2023, Verizon reused or recycled nearly 47 million pounds of electronic waste, including 1.3 million pounds of plastic and 1.9 million pounds of lead-acid batteries. The company strives to divert 100% of e-waste from landfills through reuse and responsible recycling.
- Tree Planting Initiative: As part of its environmental stewardship, Verizon has committed to planting 20 million trees worldwide by 2030.
AT&T: Robust Financials and Growing Sustainability Efforts
Financial Performance:
- Revenue: $30.63 billion (2% increase year-over-year)
- Net Income: $4.7 billion (up from $3.39 billion in Q1 2024)
- Adjusted earnings: $11.5 billion (4.4% year-over-year growth)
Gains in Wireless and Fiber Performance
AT&T showed strong financial results for Q1 2025, with total revenues reaching $30.63 billion, a 2% increase year-over-year. This growth was driven by the success of its wireless and fiber broadband offerings.
Postpaid phone net additions hit 324,000. Fiber subscriber additions reached 261,000, which shows strong customer demand. The company’s net income for the quarter was $4.7 billion, up from $3.39 billion in the same period last year, indicating improved profitability. AT&T’s adjusted earnings also saw a healthy increase of 4.4% year-over-year, reaching $11.5 billion.

AT&T’s growth in fiber and wireless customers shows it can grow its market share. This happens even in a tough, competitive market. The company continues to focus on broadband and 5G growth as key drivers of its future performance.
AT&T aims to keep its momentum going. Its investments in 5G, fiber optics, and upgrading the network should help boost financial growth in the next few quarters.
Targeting Carbon Neutrality with Supplier and Customer Engagement
AT&T’s commitment to sustainability is evident in its goal to achieve carbon neutrality across its global operations by 2035. To date, the company has reduced its Scope 1 and 2 emissions by nearly 52% from a 2015 baseline.
- AT&T’s science-based targets aim to reduce these emissions by 63% by 2030.

The company aims for 50% of its suppliers to set science-based GHG reduction targets by 2024. By the end of 2023, 55% of them had already done this.
AT&T’s renewable energy efforts have been a critical component of its sustainability strategy. As of 2023, the company sourced 25.7% of its electricity from renewable energy, up from 20% in the previous year.
The telecom titan has made great strides in its Connected Climate Initiative. This program helps business customers lower their carbon footprint. This initiative has helped avoid 227.2 million metric tons of CO₂e by the end of 2024 (or 38.9 million metric tons of CO₂e for that year). The long-term goal is to cut 1 gigaton (or 1 billion metric tons) of CO₂e by 2035.

AT&T is also investing in sustainable products and services. This includes energy-efficient data centers and energy-saving solutions for customers.
In 2024, AT&T agreed to purchase carbon dioxide removal credits from 1PointFive, the carbon capture unit of Occidental Petroleum. These credits will come from 1PointFive’s Stratos direct air capture facility. The plant could capture up to 500,000 metric tons of CO₂ annually when operational.
The telecom giant also has the following net-zero efforts:
-
Energy Efficiency and Network Optimization: The company drives operational and network energy efficiencies by updating systems and decommissioning obsolete assets to reduce annual energy consumption.
-
Low-Carbon Fleet Transition: AT&T aims to reduce fleet emissions by at least 76% by 2035, investing in electric vehicles (EVs) and the necessary infrastructure to support them.
T-Mobile: Impressive Financials and Industry-Leading ESG Initiatives
Financial Results:
- Revenue: $20.89 billion (6.6% increase year-over-year)
- Net Income: $3.0 billion (24% increase year-over-year)
- Adjusted earnings: $8.26 billion (up from $7.65 billion in Q1 2024)
Leads in Revenue Growth and Customer Additions
T-Mobile is doing well financially. For Q1 2025, they reported revenues of $20.89 billion. This is a 6.6% rise compared to last year. Net income surged 24%, reaching $3.0 billion, driven by strong operational performance.
The company also saw a 29% increase in earnings per share (EPS), which reached $2.58 for the quarter. T-Mobile added 495,000 postpaid phone customers, further bolstering its market position.
The company’s adjusted earnings were $8.26 billion, up from $7.65 billion in Q1 2024. This shows its strong financial health and skill in managing costs while also investing in growth.

T-Mobile’s success comes from its strong leadership in wireless. It focuses on growing its 5G network. The company can attract and keep customers, especially in postpaid and fiber broadband, which helps it succeed in the tough U.S. market.
Setting Industry Pace with Bold Net-Zero and Green Energy Goals
T-Mobile aims high with its ESG goal. It plans to reach net-zero emissions for its entire carbon footprint by 2040. This target, validated by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), reflects the company’s serious commitment to reducing its environmental impact.

As of 2023, T-Mobile has reduced its total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by 30% compared to 2020 levels. This includes sourcing 100% of its electricity from renewable energy, a milestone it has maintained since 2021.

T-Mobile has also made significant strides in improving energy efficiency. For example, the company has reduced its energy consumption per petabyte of data by 62% since 2019.
T-Mobile has started a big effort to collect and recycle old devices. By 2023, they recovered 10 million devices for reuse, resale, or recycling. T-Mobile invests in big wind and solar projects. These help the company reach its clean energy goals.
The telecom company also employs these initiatives to boost its net-zero journey:
- Network Optimization: Decommissioned tens of thousands of macro cell sites resulting from the integration of the Sprint network and retired legacy technologies to reduce energy consumption.
- Energy-Efficient Technologies: Replaced traditional air conditioning units at cell sites with direct air-cooling systems and implemented software features to optimize energy use based on network traffic demands.
- Collaborative Commitments: Signed The Climate Pledge, joining a global initiative to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2040, and participates in RE100 and the EPA Green Power Partnership to promote renewable energy adoption.
Telecom’s Net-Zero Race: Who Steals the Show?
Verizon leads in revenue and net income. But in terms of ESG and net-zero commitments, T-Mobile is clearly leading, with its 2040 net-zero target and aggressive renewable energy goals. This includes sourcing 100% of its electricity from renewable sources.
Verizon follows closely, with a 2050 net-zero target and substantial progress in reducing its carbon emissions. AT&T has made progress in cutting Scope 1 and 2 emissions. However, it falls short in renewable energy use at 25.7%. In contrast, Verizon is at 34.4%, and T-Mobile leads with 100%.

Verizon and AT&T have ambitious strategies. However, T-Mobile stands out because it focuses on energy efficiency, device recycling, and renewable energy investments. Its complete approach and strong focus on cutting its carbon footprint give it an edge in measurable ESG progress.
The telecommunications industry’s major players are making notable strides in balancing financial performance with environmental responsibility. T-Mobile emerges as a leader in sustainability, while Verizon and AT&T continue to strengthen their ESG efforts.
As the telecom industry evolves, these three companies’ net-zero and sustainability commitments will play a crucial role in shaping corporate responsibility and environmental success.
- FURTHER READING: How To Reduce Scope 3 Emissions: Key Strategies That Work
The post Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile: Who Wins the Financial and Net Zero Race? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

