English version below
Es beginnt der zweite Teil unserer Forschungsreise. Wir fahren im Moment Richtung Norden in die Labradorsee. Inzwischen ist es mit einer Lufttemperatur um 4°C richtig kalt geworden. Wir sind auf dem Weg zum 53. Breitengrad. Dort liegen fest verankerte Geräte, die zum Beispiel Temperatur, Salzgehalt, Sauerstoff und Strömungsgeschwindigkeiten messen können. Man kann sich das so vorstellen, dass die Messgeräte aufgereiht sind, wie an einer langen Perlenkette. An einem Ende der „Perlenkette“ befindet sich ein Anker, der alles an einer spezifischen Position festhält. Durch Schwimmkörper, die zwischen den Messgeräten positioniert sind, bekommt die ganze Kette Auftrieb und schwebt dadurch senkrecht in der Wassersäule. Diese sogenannten Verankerungen können 2-3 km lang sein und sind das erste Ziel unserer Reise.
Seit 1997 befinden sich Teile der Verankerungen schon an dieser Stelle in der Labradorsee und werden im Abstand von 2 Jahren kontrolliert. Die Position wurde aus gutem Grund gewählt. Die Labradorsee ist ein bedeutender Ort für die Zirkulation des gesamten Ozeans, denn hier befindet sich ein Ort an dem neues Tiefenwasser gebildet wird. Aufgrund von Dichteänderungen sinkt dabei sauerstoffreiches, kaltes und salzreiches Wasser ab. Die Stelle, an der sich die Verankerungen befinden ist besonders, da sich dort ein Knotenpunkt verschiedener Strömungen befindet. Alle dichten Wassermassen des Nordatlantiks kommen hier zusammen und bilden den westlichen Randstrom, der in der Tiefe Richtung Süden fließt. Durch die lange Messreihe ist es möglich Schwankungen in dieser Bildung der Wassermassen zu dokumentieren, was zum Beispiel Schlussfolgerungen über die Stärke des Golfstroms ermöglichen kann. So können auf lange Sicht potenzielle Auswirkungen des Klimawandels auf die Ozeanzirkulation abgeleitet werden.




In den nächsten Tagen werden wir die Verankerungen aus dem Wasser holen, gegebenenfalls reparieren, die Daten aus den Messgeräten auslesen und alles am Ende wieder ins Wasser werfen. Dieser Prozess läuft eigentlich immer gleich ab. Zuerst wird vom Schiff aus ein akustisches Signal ins Wasser gesendet. Dieses Signal löst die Verbindung zwischen Anker und dem Kabel mit den Messgeräten. Die Verankerung fängt dann an, zur Wasseroberfläche aufzusteigen – das liegt an den zu Anfang bereits erwähnten Schwimmkörpern. Anschließend wird von der Brücke Ausschau gehalten, wo die Verankerung genau an die Oberfläche treibt. Dann wird alles Stück für Stück an Bord geholt, gesäubert und demontiert. Erst, wenn die Messgeräte wieder mit neuen Batterien bestückt und die Daten ausgelesen sind, wird alles wieder zusammengebaut und Stück für Stück wieder ins Wasser gelassen. Als allerletztes wird der Anker ins Wasser gesetzt. Er fällt zum Meeresboden und zieht die Verankerung unaufhaltsam mit nach unten.
Abhängig von der Länge, braucht man einige Stunden für diesen Prozess. Pro Tag werden im Idealfall 1-3 Verankerungen abgefertigt. Eine wichtige Rolle spielt bei dieser Arbeit das Wetter. Drei Dinge sind hierbei wichtig: gute Sichtbedingungen, möglichst wenig Welle und Tageslicht. Im Moment ist der Nebel unser größter Gegenspieler, doch meistens verzieht er sich den Tag über und stört uns nur noch, beim Sterne oder Sonnenuntergang beobachten.
Mooring works
The second part of our research journey begins. We are currently heading north to the Labrador Sea. In the meantime, it has become really cold with an air temperature around 4°C. We are on our way to the 53rd latitude. This is the location of permanently anchored measurement devices that can measure, for example, temperature, salinity, oxygen and flow velocities. One can imagine that the measuring instruments are lined up, as if on a long chain of beads. At one end of the “pearl chain” there is an anchor that holds everything in a specific position. With the help of floating devices positioned between the measuring instruments, the entire chain receives buoyancy and thus floats vertically in the water column. These so-called moorings can be 2-3 km long and are the first destination of our trip.
Since 1997, parts of the moorings have been located at this point in the Labrador Sea and are checked at intervals of 2 years. The position was chosen for good reason. The Labrador Sea is an important place for the circulation of the entire ocean, because here is a place where new deep water is formed. Due to changes in density, oxygen-rich, cold and salt-rich water sinks. The location where the moorings are located is special, since there is a junction of different currents. All the dense water masses of the North Atlantic come together here and form the deep western boundary current, which flows in depth southward. Due to the long series of measurements, it is possible to document fluctuations in this formation of the water masses, which can, for example, allow conclusions about the strength of the Gulf Stream. In this way, in the long term, potential effects of climate change on ocean circulation can be deduced.




Over the next few days we will take the moorings out of the water, repair them if necessary, read the data from the measuring devices and finally throw everything back into the water. This process is usually always the same. First, an acoustic signal is sent into the water from the ship. This signal breaks the connection between the anchor and the cable with the measuring devices. The mooring then begins to rise to the water surface – this is due to the floats mentioned at the beginning. Then we look out from the bridge to see exactly where the mooring is floating to the surface. Then everything is brought on board piece by piece, cleaned and dismantled. Only when the measuring devices have been fitted with new batteries and the data has been read out will everything be reassembled and put back into the water piece by piece. The very last thing to do is to put the anchor in the water. It falls to the seabed and inexorably pulls the mooring down with it.
Depending on the length of the mooring, this process takes several hours. Ideally, 1-3 anchorings are completed per day. The weather plays an important role in this work. Three things are important here: good visibility, as little waves as possible and daylight. At the moment the fog is our biggest opponent, but it usually disappears during the day and only disturbs us when we are watching the stars or the sunset.
Ocean Acidification
Hälsningar från Åland och Husö biological station
On Åland, the seasons change quickly and vividly. In summer, the nights never really grow dark as the sun hovers just below the horizon. Only a few months later, autumn creeps in and softly cloaks the island in darkness again. The rhythm of the seasons is mirrored by the biological station itself; researchers, professors, and students arrive and depart, bringing with them microscopes, incubators, mesocosms, and field gear to study the local flora and fauna peaking in the mid of summer.
This year’s GAME project is the final chapter of a series of studies on light pollution. Together, we, Pauline & Linus, are studying the effects of artificial light at night (ALAN) on epiphytic filamentous algae. Like the GAME site in Japan, Akkeshi, the biological station Husö here on Åland experiences very little light pollution, making it an ideal place to investigate this subject.
We started our journey at the end of April 2025, just as the islands were waking up from winter. The trees were still bare, the mornings frosty, and the streets quiet. Pauline, a Marine Biology Master’s student from the University of Algarve in Portugal, arrived first and was welcomed by Tony Cederberg, the station manager. Spending the first night alone on the station was unique before the bustle of the project began.
Linus, a Marine Biology Master’s student at Åbo Akademi University in Finland, joined the next day. Husö is the university’s field station and therefore Linus has been here for courses already. However, he was excited to spend a longer stretch at the station and to make the place feel like a second home.

Our first days were spent digging through cupboards and sheds, reusing old materials and tools from previous years, and preparing the frames used by GAME 2023. We chose Hamnsundet as our experimental site, (i.e. the same site that was used for GAME 2023), which is located at the northeast of Åland on the outer archipelago roughly 40 km from Husö. We got permission to deploy the experiments by the local coast guard station, which was perfect. The location is sheltered from strong winds, has electricity access, can be reached by car, and provides the salinity conditions needed for our macroalga, Fucus vesiculosus, to survive.

To assess the conditions at the experimental site, we deployed a first set of settlement panels in late April. At first, colonization was slow; only a faint biofilm appeared within two weeks. With the water temperature being still around 7 °C, we decided to give nature more time. Meanwhile, we collected Fucus individuals and practiced the cleaning and the standardizing of the algal thalli for the experiment. Scraping epiphytes off each thallus piece was fiddly, and agreeing on one method was crucial to make sure our results would be comparable to those of other GAME teams.

By early May, building the light setup was a project in itself. Sawing, drilling, testing LEDs, and learning how to secure a 5-meter wooden beam over the water. Our first version bent and twisted until the light pointed sideways instead of straight down onto the algae. Only after buying thicker beams and rebuilding the structure, we finally got a stable and functional setup that could withstand heavy rain and wind. The day we deployed our first experiment at Hamnsundet was cold and rainy but also very rewarding!


Outside of work, we made the most of the island life. We explored Åland by bike, kayak, rowboat, and hiking, visited Ramsholmen National Park during the ramson/ wild garlic bloom, and hiked in Geta with its impressive rock formations and went out boating and fishing in the archipelago. At the station on Husö, cooking became a social event: baking sourdough bread, turning rhubarb from the garden into pies, grilling and making all kind of mushroom dishes. These breaks, in the kitchen and in nature, helped us recharge for the long lab sessions to come.

Every two weeks, it was time to collect and process samples. Snorkeling to the frames, cutting the Fucus and the PVC plates from the lines, and transferring each piece into a freezer bag became our routine. Sampling one experiment took us 4 days and processing all the replicates in the lab easily filled an entire week. The filtering and scraping process was even more time-consuming than we had imagined. It turned out that epiphyte soup is quite thick and clogs filters fastly. This was frustrating at times, since it slowed us down massively.
Over the months, the general community in the water changed drastically. In June, water was still at 10 °C, Fucus carried only a thin layer of diatoms and some very persistent and hard too scrape brown algae (Elachista). In July, everything suddenly exploded: green algae, brown algae, diatoms, cyanobacteria, and tiny zooplankton clogged our filters. With a doubled filtering setup and 6 filtering units, we hoped to compensate for the additional growth.
However, what we had planned as “moderate lab days” turned into marathon sessions. In August, at nearly 20 °C, the Fucus was looking surprisingly clean, but on the PVC a clear winner had emerged. The panels were overrun with the green alga Ulva and looked like the lawn at an abandoned house. Here it was not enough to simply filter the solution, but bigger pieces had to be dried separately. In September, we concluded the last experiment with the help of Sarah from the Cape Verde team, as it was not possible for her to continue on São Vicente, the Cape Verdean island that was most affected by a tropical storm. Our final experiment brought yet another change into community now dominated by brown algae and diatoms. Thankfully our new recruit, sunny autumn weather, and mushroom picking on the side made the last push enjoyable.

By the end of summer, we had accomplished four full experiments. The days were sometimes exhausting but also incredibly rewarding. We learned not only about the ecological effects of artificial light at night, but also about the very practical side of marine research; planning, troubleshooting, and the patience it takes when filtering a few samples can occupy half a day.

Ocean Acidification
What is Coral Bleaching and Why is it Bad News for Coral Reefs?
Coral reefs are beautiful, vibrant ecosystems and a cornerstone of a healthy ocean. Often called the “rainforests of the sea,” they support an extraordinary diversity of marine life from fish and crustaceans to mollusks, sea turtles and more. Although reefs cover less than 1% of the ocean floor, they provide critical habitat for roughly 25% of all ocean species.
Coral reefs are also essential to human wellbeing. These structures reduce the force of waves before they reach shore, providing communities with vital protection from extreme weather such as hurricanes and cyclones. It is estimated that reefs safeguard hundreds of millions of people in more than 100 countries.
What is coral bleaching?
A key component of coral reefs are coral polyps—tiny soft bodied animals related to jellyfish and anemones. What we think of as coral reefs are actually colonies of hundreds to thousands of individual polyps. In hard corals, these tiny animals produce a rigid skeleton made of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). The calcium carbonate provides a hard outer structure that protects the soft parts of the coral. These hard corals are the primary building blocks of coral reefs, unlike their soft coral relatives that don’t secrete any calcium carbonate.
Coral reefs get their bright colors from tiny algae called zooxanthellae. The coral polyps themselves are transparent, and they depend on zooxanthellae for food. In return, the coral polyp provides the zooxanethellae with shelter and protection, a symbiotic relationship that keeps the greater reefs healthy and thriving.
When corals experience stress, like pollution and ocean warming, they can expel their zooxanthellae. Without the zooxanthellae, corals lose their color and turn white, a process known as coral bleaching. If bleaching continues for too long, the coral reef can starve and die.

Ocean warming and coral bleaching
Human-driven stressors, especially ocean warming, threaten the long-term survival of coral reefs. An alarming 77% of the world’s reef areas are already affected by bleaching-level heat stress.
The Great Barrier Reef is a stark example of the catastrophic impacts of coral bleaching. The Great Barrier Reef is made up of 3,000 reefs and is home to thousands of species of marine life. In 2025, the Great Barrier Reef experienced its sixth mass bleaching since 2016. It should also be noted that coral bleaching events are a new thing because of ocean warming, with the first documented in 1998.
Get Ocean Updates in Your Inbox
Sign up with your email and never miss an update.
How you can help
The planet is changing rapidly, and the stakes have never been higher. The ocean has absorbed roughly 90% of the excess heat caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, and the consequences, including coral die-offs, are already visible. With just 2℃ of planetary warming, global coral reef losses are estimated to be up to 99% — and without significant change, the world is on track for 2.8°C of warming by century’s end.
To stop coral bleaching, we need to address the climate crisis head on. A recent study from Scripps Institution of Oceanography was the first of its kind to include damage to ocean ecosystems into the economic cost of climate change – resulting in nearly a doubling in the social cost of carbon. This is the first time the ocean was considered in terms of economic harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions, despite the widespread degradation to ocean ecosystems like coral reefs and the millions of people impacted globally.
This is why Ocean Conservancy advocates for phasing out harmful offshore oil and gas and transitioning to clean ocean energy. In this endeavor, Ocean Conservancy also leads international efforts to eliminate emissions from the global shipping industry—responsible for roughly 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year.
But we cannot do this work without your help. We need leaders at every level to recognize that the ocean must be part of the solution to the climate crisis. Reach out to your elected officials and demand ocean-climate action now.
The post What is Coral Bleaching and Why is it Bad News for Coral Reefs? appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.
What is Coral Bleaching and Why is it Bad News for Coral Reefs?
Ocean Acidification
What is a Snipe Eel?
From the chilly corners of the polar seas to the warm waters of the tropics, our ocean is bursting with spectacular creatures. This abundance of biodiversity can be seen throughout every depth of the sea: Wildlife at every ocean zone have developed adaptations to thrive in their unique environments, and in the deep sea, these adaptations are truly fascinating.
Enter: the snipe eel.
What Does a Snipe Eel Look Like?
These deep-sea eels have a unique appearance. Snipe eels have long, slim bodies like other eels, but boast the distinction of having 700 vertebrae—the most of any animal on Earth. While this is quite a stunning feature, their heads set them apart in even more dramatic fashion. Their elongated, beak-like snouts earned them their namesake, strongly resembling that of a snipe (a type of wading shorebird). For similar reasons, these eels are also sometimes called deep-sea ducks or thread fish.

How Many Species of Snipe Eel are There?
There are nine documented species of snipe eels currently known to science, with the slender snipe eel (Nemichthys scolopaceus) being the most studied. They are most commonly found 1,000 to 2,000 feet beneath the surface in tropical to temperate areas around the world, but sightings of the species have been documented at depths exceeding 14,000 feet (that’s more than two miles underwater)!
How Do Snipe Eels Hunt and Eat?
A snipe eel’s anatomy enables them to be highly efficient predators. While their exact feeding mechanisms aren’t fully understood, it’s thought that they wiggle through the water while slinging their beak-like heads back and forth with their mouths wide open, catching prey from within the water column (usually small invertebrates like shrimp) on their hook-shaped teeth.
How Can Snipe Eels Thrive So Well in Dark Depths of the Sea?
Snipe eels’ jaws aren’t the only adaptation that allows them to thrive in the deep, either. They also have notably large eyes designed to help them see nearby prey or escape potential predators as efficiently as possible. Their bodies are also pigmented a dark grey to brown color, a coloring that helps them stay stealthy and blend into dark, dim waters. Juveniles are even harder to spot than adults; like other eel species, young snipe eels begin their lives as see-through and flat, keeping them more easily hidden from predators as they mature.
Get Ocean Updates in Your Inbox
Sign up with your email and never miss an update.
How Much Do Scientists Really Know About Snipe Eels?
Residence in the deep sea makes for a fascinating appearance, but it also makes studying animals like snipe eels challenging. Scientists are still learning much about the biology of these eels, including specifics about their breeding behaviors. While we know snipe eels are broadcast spawners (females release eggs into the water columns at the same time as males release sperm) and they are thought to only spawn once, researchers are still working to understand if they spawn in groups or pairs. Beyond reproduction, there’s much that science has yet to learn about these eels.
Are Snipe Eels Endangered?
While the slender snipe eel is currently classified as “Least Concern” on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species, what isn’t currently known is whether worldwide populations are growing or decreasing. And in order to know how to best protect these peculiar yet equally precious creatures, it’s essential we continue to study them while simultaneously working to protect the deep-sea ecosystems they depend on.
How Can We Help Protect Deep-Sea Species Like Snipe Eels?
One thing we can do to protect the deep sea and the wildlife that thrive within it is to advocate against deep-sea mining and the dangers that accompany it. This type of mining extracts mineral deposits from the ocean floor and has the potential to result in disastrous environmental consequences. Take action with Ocean Conservancy today and urge your congressional representative to act to stop deep-sea mining—animals like snipe eels and all the amazing creatures of the deep are counting on us to act before it’s too late.
The post What is a Snipe Eel? appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.
-
Climate Change6 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases6 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
