Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Updates from ACP 2024, Thoughts on Vestas Q1 Financial Loss

Allen, Joel, and Phil record their thoughts on the show floor of American Clean Power 2024 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Which companies are in attendance? What seems to be the industry direction? And they also discuss Vestas’ Q1 financial results which show a loss.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com

Allen Hall: Welcome to the special edition of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall, and I’m here with Phil Totaro, the CEO of IntelStor and Joel Saxum, the chief commercial officer of Weather Guard. And we are in Minneapolis today for the opening of American Clean Power 2024. And we wanted to get everybody’s thoughts on what we have seen today, what the feeling is, what the number of people we’ve seen bouncing around, what the business atmosphere has been like, and, give everybody an update who couldn’t be here.

Obviously there’s a number of people out in the field fixing wind turbines right now. the people actually keeping wind turbines operating. give us a sense of what’s happening with some of the new technology we’ve seen today and what to expect on the remainder of the week. And Joel, I know early on this morning, it seemed like it was going to be pretty busy.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. So I walked in here, the agenda said 10 30, they opened. I walked in at 10 31 and it was already. Packed in here. I tried to get a cup of coffee. There’s 200 people in line. so I know Phil, you were saying that you, were the only one of us able to actually take a lap so far today around the show floor and saw a ton of people.

Alan and I have been basically in conversations back to back since we got here with whether it’s talking about podcast stuff or strike tape or fixing any other kinds of problems with everybody from the insurance industry, asset owners, ISPs all the above. So it has been swamped here at our booth.

Philip Totaro: Unfortunately, I got here late. I arrived because of some weather in Denver, at about 2. o’clock this afternoon. And so I’ve been here about, two hours now, three hours now as we record this, and I think I’ve already closed about three deals. So this is probably the, most productive I’ve seen an ACP event in, a long time.

which I guess is, good news. but just based on my walking around, I’d conservatively say there’s at least about 10, 000, if not maybe 12, 000 here, at this event. So it’s got a much better tenor to it, much better mood. people are, really quite engaged. so it’s, overall, I, think, better, better than everybody might have expected.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, Minneapolis, the Minneapolis Convention Center, that’s where we’re at. The weather’s great right now. but the Minneapolis Convention Center is huge. I’ve been in this, when I was a kid, we were, we’d come down here for sports shows and they’d have this whole thing full of boats and all kinds of stuff.

I remember it as a kid, I don’t remember it being this big. but it is, from end to end, we talked with Armando from Earthwind, our friend, and he’s Dude, we walked up and down every aisle basically just to check everything out. And it took them almost four hours. Yeah. There’s

Allen Hall: a lot of vendors here.

It’s a lot. And I think some of the feeling I got just talking to people who walked up to the booth and running into people we’ve had on the podcast is there’s more activity. the operators are focused. On getting their assets up and running and to, get to the solutions and the ones that I had talked to specifically have been trying different solutions, evaluating them over the last couple of years and are ready to start moving.

It’s no longer trial phases. We want to get going and deploy useful ideas, useful solutions fleet wide.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. And, Not only is it the asset owners that are looking at these things, the ISPs are asking, right? So what that means to me is that their clients, the asset owners, have been telling them, Find us a solution, or we’re looking for this solution.

I had an ISP come up and just say We’ve been tasked by our clients to find things to solve problems. When we came to this show, I said, you’re talking to the right people, lightning wise. that, I think is a, It’s real and it’s moving, right? People want to get their assets up and running and they want them to be running smoothly.

and they’re willing to spend money right now that people are allocating budgets to, to get things done and you can feel it.

Allen Hall: Yeah. Excited. I think the feeling on the OEM side and GE Vernova is here, but I haven’t seen Vestas. not to me, they haven’t been here, but I haven’t seen them and I haven’t seen, Siemens Gamesa.

Joel Saxum: No, I heard, of some people having meetings with people from Siemens Gamesa, but they don’t have a booth. Okay. Yeah. So I know there’s definitely representation here, but, not necessarily in a booth. I haven’t seen any Vestas. what do you call these things? Badges? I haven’t seen any Vestas badges walking around though.

Allen Hall: So that, that’s an interesting point because Vestas announced their first quarter results and they came to a loss of about 75 million, right? Which in the bigger scheme of things is, a small drop in the bucket. I think the bigger story there is the number of sales that they had is down.

And I attribute that, Phil, to the increase in prices. everybody’s talking about the OEMs increasing prices and looking to recover the money they lost over the last couple of years. that necessarily, I would assume, is going to drop the quantity of megawatts purchased, right?

Philip Totaro: to an extent, yes. there’s a couple of things at play here.

Number one, Vestas normally has a down first quarter anyway. but that’s something that a lot of equity analysts already price in and that sort of thing. so that’s been a part of it. Obviously, there’s year to year fluctuations. The other thing is, yes, to an extent, raising prices theoretically means less, demand.

But it’s, there’s been a consolidation in the U. S. market to an extent because Siemens Gamesa is not really offering turbans for sale, which is why any of the folks from Siemens Gamesa that are here are probably service, and the Nordex, while they’re, they’ve obviously got a presence in the U.

S. market with the N149, and now they’re trying to get the N163 product in here, and we have these, hints about, The fact that they’re going to be launching, probably a lower power rated version of the N163 to compete with the, Vestas V163, later this summer. that’s, reason to, be interested for them.

But I, I think it, it really has to do with interconnection cues. if I go, if I point the, indicator anywhere, it’s interconnection cues. Piling up are causing a slowdown in deal closures. That is then having a result of an impact on Vestas, not being able to, close deals and recognize as much revenue in, quarter by quarter as they, they otherwise would.

Allen Hall: So why is solar going so heavy right now? They’re in the same interconnection queues, right?

Philip Totaro: Yeah. And, that’s a great point because they’re actually taking up more space in the queue with a lot of projects that are never going to get built. than wind. However, the projects that are getting built, it’s still more capacity than what wind is doing.

and so for an IPP, for every dollar that they can spend on solar or storage, it’s one less dollar they have to spend on wind. grand scheme, I think this is not emblematic of a, industry wide issue. Or anything Vestas specific to be concerned about. Again, I think it’s one bad quarter that it’s not really that concerning.

If it starts showing, another quarter and by the third quarter, if it’s also down, then we worry that raising prices has resulted in lower sales. But for one quarter, I’m not that concerned about it.

Allen Hall: But Vestas, as seen by a lot of operators at the moment, is the number one choice. So if, Vestas is having a decrease in sales in Q1, I would assume GE and then Siemens Gamesa, who knows, but it’s going to be a pinch on GE, right?

Philip Totaro: to be honest with our order tracking that we’re doing at Intel store, it’s, that’s not necessarily the case there. So keep in mind that Vestas only receives revenue when projects go COD. And it’s commissioned and it’s, they’re online and operating, or at least the bulk of what they get paid.

there’s usually an upfront and et cetera, et cetera. Based on orders right now, Vestas didn’t have such a great quarter, but GE actually did in the U. S. Nordex also got a few orders, that they’ve closed in, the U. S. as well in the first quarter. But, it’s, everybody’s having to accept a higher price because even the Project CapEx cost is going up, which means the cost of finance is up, interest rates are still high, so everybody’s paying more.

And, especially when an OEM’s gotta pass on the cost of raw materials and increased, labor and overhead rates and all these other things that they have to incur, that’s necessarily gonna push the prices up for everybody.

Allen Hall: So is that a marker now that we need to focus on in terms of what to expect the remainder of this year?

If GE is starting to see a little bit of a, if GE is starting to see a little bit of a turnaround, which they have to, they have to be profitable this year. And Investus is obviously going to be profitable. I think by the end of the year, the full four quarters, they’ll be going to be profitable.

But GE is making

Joel Saxum: moves outside of sales efforts to be profitable. Yes, they are. They’re making a lot of internal changes. process changes, they’re, dumbing down their order or their order capability book and some other things as well, let alone getting rid of people.

Allen Hall: So does that then foretell of profitable GE by third quarter?

Joel Saxum: I think so. I think if you, I think GE’s, GE, the GE Vernova split right now looks great. If you watch the stock trackers and you want to listen to the street, again, of course now that, Wall Street is not always, a direct indicator of how the health of a company, right? But they, see it as we want to put money in here.

We want to invest in here because they looking good for the future. So since they split, it looks great.

Philip Totaro: and to be blunt, even Siemens energy, which is the parent of Siemens Gamesa, they’re even had, a great quarter in, the first quarter, but Siemens Gamesa is obviously still suffering.

So overall the power generation industry is doing well. Wind. Has been a bit impacted, but again, I don’t think it’s a long term problem. I think, even, with Vernova and the aerospace split, aerospace is now doing very well. And Vernova is actually also doing very well outside of the wind business, which they still have some work to do.

The onshore business is okay. Not as healthy as they want it to be. The offshore business, we’ve talked about ad nauseum on the show and, that needs to improve, but should happen if we can get, more of these, projects through a consenting and interconnection queue, which really comes down to market efficiency, companies signing corporate PPAs, utilities signing PPAs and transmission availability.

If we can get those things resolved, that’s going to start opening up more of the queue. More companies like GE, Vestas, Siemens, and Nordex are going to start closing deals and we’re going to see a much more, robust and healthy market. I think it hinges on transmission availability.

Allen Hall: But the DOE just announced a week ago about making that process faster to get the turnaround and get rid of some regulatory pieces there to turn it on.

But I’m not sure That is a short term fix, right? In a

Philip Totaro: year and a half when that happens, I’ll be excited about it.

Allen Hall: Okay, so from, I haven’t heard anybody mention that today. Or this week even, that hey, they’re going to open up the transmission lines and boom, here we go. That’s not the, that’s not the feeling.

But the feeling I’m getting, I talk to a lot of operators today, is we’re trying to produce the power we were asked to produce. How do we do that? Efficiently, yeah. It has really changed from, I would say, two years ago, where it was, we don’t really need to get too deep into some of these solutions that are out there today.

I think they have a lot of blade issues and turbine issues. They have bearing issues. They have blade issues.

Joel Saxum: Let’s think about one of the, what could be a macro reason for this. IRA Bill went through, two years ago now? Two years, year and a half. Two years ago in August, right? So that extended PTC credit.

So a lot of these wind farms are being PTC repowered. There’s been a lot of repowers go on in the last few years. Now that we’ve done those repowers and they’re finished, those farms are quote unquote new, right? they’re at that one, two years since COD of, repower. So now is the time when you want to spend money on upgrades and things like that for the life of that turbine, because it doesn’t make sense.

If you’re going to repower that thing at the end, at year eight to go, Strike tape on or something like that. Like you’re just going to read, but now all of those IRA bill driven PTC or, PTC fund repowers are fresh and there’s more of them coming down the pipeline. So at this point in time, maybe when you want to put some money into that wind farm, some capex to make sure that it’s running smoothly,

Allen Hall: but they’re not going for little percentage gains.

They’re going for big wins. Have you noticed that? if you mentioned we can make an a one or 2 percent increase in AEP, everybody’s just sloughs it off like. Yeah, we’re looking for 20 percent today because of bearing issues, because of blade issues, because of the operational issues that

Joel Saxum: they don’t Less AEP percentage gain and more just uptime availability.

Availability.

Philip Totaro: and I’ll tell you what too, based on the data that we’ve got at Intel Store, where we analyzed the delta between the old site and the repowered site, on average for the 105 or so sites that have been repowered in the U. S. so far, It’s only about a 3. 6 percent increase in AEP. Whoa. and there are actually some sites that have gone down.

Because they’ve had issues with the new turbines that they repowered the site with.

Joel Saxum: Yeah,

Philip Totaro: And teething issues. So the reality is, you’re right Joel, they’re not getting the AEP that they need necessarily out of the repower. The PTC is driving the repower. And availability. With that PTC is what they want because they want to eke out as much revenue as they can.

That’s going to have this extra 26 or 26. 80 or whatever it’s indexed to now. I forget. but that’s what they want. They want the PTC revenue. So availability and PTC farming is, the, industry we’re in. I coined that term, I think about a year and a half ago that we’re not wind farmers anymore.

We’re PTC farmers.

Allen Hall: You can

Philip Totaro: hear

Allen Hall: it. Phil, now you say it, it was clearly identified today to me by multiple operators that it’s availability. And it used to be AEP. Two, three years ago it was AEP. If we get another percent or two out of the turbines we have, it’s certainly fine.

Joel Saxum: With these newer, some of these newer turbine models that they’re running, like we talked with one operator today, we know what their wind farms are and what they run.

And they’re, six of their seven wind farms in the United States are the exact same wind turbine model. And that wind turbine model has specific issues to it. So they’re looking, so if you are having issues with that model, it’s not affecting one of your wind farms for those guys. It’s affecting every single wind farm they have.

So they need the solutions because it’s a plaguing issue that’s fleet wide.

Allen Hall: That opens up a number of doors here. What are those top three items that they’re going to be looking for this week? I think one of the big items that’s going to happen this week is the 3S lift climb auto system. because The adoption rate, from what I can understand, is increasing rapidly.

It improves availability, right? Getting a technician up and down is an availability answer. the CLI model system, boom, easy one, right? Leading edge erosion, I think people today were asking about leading edge erosion, what’s out there, and there’s a lot of different applications. We talked to Bergelin, obviously, but there’s others that, they think leading edge protection is the way to keep my availability up.

Then it comes to lightning, right? It comes to the lightning issue. Hey, we have turbines down because we have holes in our blades. So we gotta fix the holes before we can turn the turbine on. Again, back to Phil’s point, availability. If we’re in that availability mode, then who are the winners this week?

Who are gonna be the losers?

Philip Totaro: We’re actually, happen to be sitting next to one of the winners, potentially, which is, NextAir is actually here exhibiting at an ACP event. which for those of you who’ve been in the industry a long time, that’s pretty rare. They sponsor and, are usually a, title sponsor, but they almost never exhibit.

And what they’re doing is they’re actually offering their asset management platform now, for sale to other asset owners. they took their data analytics platform where they’re doing a lot of, analysis on, as least for O& M, on that side of the business, the work order prioritization, they also have, energy trading, tools built into this capability.

it’s actually quite impressive and, quite robust. And given, the, pedigree that they have as a company, that’s, definitely one. to, maybe answer a broader question, there’s, the, asset owners that are here that are in need of solution providers, it’s really matchmaking those, those companies together.

It’s, there are plenty of people that would be capable of providing, an asset owner better availability, depending on what they have. there are some asset owners that are dependent on. an OEM service contract and they’re not getting the OEM to fulfill their obligations under the contract.

is there a way that they can potentially supplement that OEM arrangement with, something else? and whether that’s an independent service provider, whether that’s a data analytics company, anybody that’s got information, data answers on, and Joel, you’ve brought this up before on the show, just tell me what to do.

Like, how do I run my asset? Those are the people that have answers to those questions. They’re the ones that are going to be winners. Alan. So the next era

Joel Saxum: three 60 platform that we’re, right next to them. I’m staring at their booth right now. The real winner here, to be honest with you is all of the other IPPs

Philip Totaro: who benefit, who

Joel Saxum: can benefit from that solution.

Because we’ve talked to Alan, you and I personally talked to people that are trying to develop some stuff like that. Like we’ve got to figure out a more efficient way to manage our assets better. Here you go. It’s in a box now next year. We’ll give it to you after the learnings from there. What are they?

12, 000 turbines or something like that?

Philip Totaro: Oh yeah. It’s, 20 gigawatts of wind. I forget precisely how much solar and the amount of energy storage that they’re deploying is insane because even if they’re going to just operate it on behalf of a financial focused asset owner, those asset owners that want energy storage, particularly in either Southwest Power Pool or air cot.

To take advantage of the arbitrage play with energy trading, it’s insane. California, Texas, they’re, they are seeing a significant amount of interest in deployment. And, again, it’s, next there is one company, and as I said, with the pedigree they’ve got, that’s gonna, attract a lot of interest and attention, I’m sure.

But really anybody that, we’ve talked on the show about, Onyx Insight, we’ve talked about Windesco, we’ve talked about, any number of companies that actually have that type of, asset management platform capability. Power Factors is still out there, Spark Cognition, et cetera, et cetera, just to name, a few.

Allen Hall: Okay, so that, that’s really interesting, because we have not really seen that until now. So even a next era, the next era thing is fascinating in multiple levels, right? Next era doesn’t need to sell any product. They have a pretty good system set up internally. They’re profitable. They have a lot of projects.

They know how to run their business. But now they’re offering to help others run their business. So like we saw this week with Elite, right? Elite is possibly being sold or maybe in the process of being sold. There’s a lot of regulatory hurdles there. We’ll Is that indicative of, hey, outside money coming in saying, Elite runs a pretty tight ship from what I’ve seen, operationally.

It’s looking at CPP as an investor,

Joel Saxum: right?

They’re just, cash. Yeah, but then why would they go

Allen Hall: after an asset like Elite?

Joel Saxum: Because it’s run well.

Allen Hall: Exactly. And,

Philip Totaro: and, GIP too, keep in mind, because they, both of them, okay, let’s talk about the, CPP investment board. They are invested in assets globally now, not just in, Canada where they’re, headquartered, but, this is potentially if this, deal for elite gets approved, this expands their, footprint in the U.

S. They’ve got assets in Brazil. They’ve got assets over in Europe. They set up a whole platform, to go invest in projects just for Scandinavia. so they’ve got a huge interest in. asset ownership while they may not have the requisite expertise in operations. That’s the play is they do want something that they can get hold of.

And, we even did some, on the spot analysis when this deal was announced Monday afternoon or morning, where, they’ve spent elite spent just on their wind portfolio, about three, a little over 3 billion, in CapEx. And the deal that was announced was, I think, for about 2. 2, 2.

3 billion, to acquire it. taking into account the, the depreciation of those assets and the, operating revenue. but they’ve got a fleet that, I, I wanna say something like 52%, operates at or above, a P50 energy yield. Based on, again, the Intel store analysis of the, IPP provided data to, FERC and the Energy Information Administration.

Thank you. they’ve got a pretty robust and healthy portfolio. Even their net profit per megawatt installed is 877, 000 per megawatt. So that’s right there at about the industry average. So if you were controlling the purse strings at CPP, that’s a good investment? Yeah, it’s a solid, it’s not Above average, but it is at least average.

And it’s also giving them access to a fleet that has an average, asset age of, something just below 10 years, which means that for the projects that are already 10 years, they gotta be looking at repowering. And for the ones that are six, seven, eight years, they’re in the queue to, to be repowered.

I

Joel Saxum: know they do

Philip Totaro: have

Joel Saxum: some, ripe for the repower opportunities where they will take the towers down because they’ve got some Zond Z 50s and stuff down in like Bentonville. So they’ll there’s definitely room for growth within that as well

Philip Totaro: yeah, and it’s well just one one thing on this is Companies like I mean look CPP investment board and GIP as Examples of infrastructure companies we and we’ve talked ad nauseum about that on the show as well that they’re plowing money into renewables at this point But the It’s funny because they’re not even necessarily looking at, this is so PTC driven, they’re not even necessarily looking at the financial performance and health and operational performance of the elite portfolio.

yeah, obviously they did their due diligence and that was a factor, but the fact that they can just get their hands on an asset portfolio that they can repower and capture PTC revenue from, that is the most lucrative thing right now. And so if you’re looking to sell a project, you’re going to have a pretty easy time of it.

Or if you’re a company that’s going to sell your company or sell a portfolio of projects, there are buyers out there. There are people that want that because the we’re finally Joel, to your point earlier, we’re finally seeing the impact of the IRA bill in this PTC extension that again, we’ve got 10 years worth of certainty on the PTC at this point.

the industry is starting to open the spigot.

Allen Hall: So what does GE Vernova do and Vestas do to fill that void?

Philip Totaro: They gotta get their game together with their factories and make sure that they don’t have more than, an 18 to 24 month order backlog. Which means factories, which means jobs, which is good.

But it also means partnerships and contract manufacturing opportunities. Which frankly might be good for LM Wind Power. and it’s definitely going to be good for TPI. and certainly other companies that are, supply chain companies to both GE Vernova and, and Vestas. The other thing it potentially does is, and again, this is why it’s so concerning for Siemens Gamesa not to be, offering a product for sale at this point.

I really wish they would Announce what they’re going to do and when they’re going to do it. Nordex will benefit. And here’s the real question. Is there another player who feels that now is the right time to plow some money into re establishing or reinvigorating or creating a presence in the U. S.

market? As An alternative to GE Investus.

Allen Hall: It can’t be a Chinese manufacturer. That just is not happening. The political atmosphere right now is going to be the worst time to do it. Okay, so there’s more to hear about during ACP 2024. We’re going to continue to check out all the vendors and all the new technology here this week and when we get back to our regular studio offices, we’re going to inform everybody about what’s happening and keep you up to date.

Thanks for joining the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. We appreciate all the listeners. Our numbers have been extraordinarily high the last couple of weeks and we appreciate all the new listeners to the program. So we’ll see everybody next week.

https://weatherguardwind.com/updates-from-acp-2024-thoughts-on-vestas-q1-financial-loss/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory

Vestas doubles second quarter profit and adds €4.7 billion in market value overnight. Plus EnBW finishes He Dreiht after a V236 blade break, the UK blocks Ming Yang’s Scottish factory, and India rules turbines are movable goods.

The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast is brought to you by Weather Guard Lightning Tech, creators of the StrikeTape Ultra LPS retrofit. Subscribe to Uptime’s Substack newsletter. And check out Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” Youtube channel. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

The Uptime Wind Energy podcast, brought to you by StrikeTape. Protecting thousands of wind turbines from lightning damage worldwide. Visit StrikeTape.com. And now, your hosts

Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall, and I’m here with Rosemary Barnes, Matthew Stead, and Yolanda Padron. And three out of the four of us will be in Melbourne Australia talking to a number of operators and interested parties about WOMA 2027. Matthew, where will we be the couple of days we’re in Melbourne?

Matthew Stead: So, um, first of all, we’ve got the Pullman, uh, East Melbourne, which is, uh, where the venue will be for, for 2027. Um, so that’ll be our home base. Um, we’ve got around about eight meetings planned already. So what we’re doing is we’re talking to the operators and a few other industry, um, players about [00:01:00] what we need to talk about, how we’re gonna move the industry forward in Australia.

Uh, so it’s gonna be jam-packed, but there’s a little bit of time left on the Friday afternoon if there’s any late-minute, um, people that wanna get in contact and catch up with us, um, for next Thursday, Friday, or actually Friday. Uh, so yeah, it’s gonna be a, a jam-packed time. I think we’re gonna be tired, too many coffees, and talking to all the key, all the key operators, uh, about what they wanna hear about and how we can move the, the industry forward.

Allen Hall: And if someone wants to put an input into the WOMA panel about what will be discussed at WOMA 2027, Matthew, how would they do that? How do they get ahold of you?

Matthew Stead: Well, we have a wonderful website, and that’s got all the details you could ever want. Um, you can also register on the website, so please register.

Otherwise, um, I’m sure we’re gonna be a sellout this year for sure. So woma2027.com.

Rosemary Barnes: I just wanna add that when people talk to [00:02:00] me about the event, they always say how they love that the topics are so relevant, and the reason why that they’re so relevant is because we make sure to go around to operators and find out what are the issues that they’re really dealing with.

So anybody that’s thinking of attending, even if you can’t, you know, meet us up, meet up with us in Melbourne, get in touch and tell us what are the, yeah, what are the topics that you’re struggling with that you’re not, um, you’re having trouble finding enough information, having trouble finding the people that can help you.

And y- yeah, like we take all of that information, and that’s how we come up with our agenda each year. And yeah, I mean, for us, that’s the, the main thing is that this has to be really relevant, up-to-date information for the industry, and we need your help to make sure it stays that way. I

Matthew Stead: mean, that’s what we’ve done the last two years, so this is– we’re just repeating the formula, um, listening to the operators and getting the good topics and the good speakers.

Allen Hall: Well, Vestas has had a good quarter. Uh, the, for the last couple of years, honestly, s- [00:03:00] Vestas has been really thin on margins. There was questions about it continuing on. Rising costs mostly, uh, supply chains, especially during COVID, were bad. Uh, and, uh, but for the most part, the shareholders stayed attached.

Well, that story is changing rapidly. The world’s largest turbine maker posted second quarter operating profits of $400- €46 million, more than double what the analysts had expected, and it’s raised its full-year margin guidance alongside half-year results for the first time in a decade. The shares climbed about 20% in Copenhagen, adding roughly €4.7 billion of market value in a single session.

Now, the chief executive, uh, Henrik Andersen, ha- put it plainly to, uh, uh, in a couple of news sources that something much bigger is happening and Vestas is gonna be the, the leader in wind. That’s how I read it, that everybody [00:04:00]at Vestas was super happy with the, the change in direction and things were moving up steadily.

But a 20% jump in a day is remarkable. You don’t see that in large industrial businesses like wind energy. Matthew, this has real implications on what happens next for Vestas because success like this usually means more orders.

Matthew Stead: Yeah, I wonder what’s going on under the hood there. Um, I mean, Vestas is a quality company, although, although can I just do a quick segue?

How many turbines were installed in Denmark in the last, uh, two years? Like last year and the year before?

Allen Hall: I don’t know. How many?

Matthew Stead: I believe it was eight turbines installed onshore in Denmark last year, and the year before it was 12. So, you know, maybe, maybe Vestas needs to focus on their own backyard a little bit as well.

Allen Hall: I’m not sure there’s a lot of opportunity there. Yeah, onshore.

Matthew Stead: How can you ever be full? I mean, there’s always, um, [00:05:00] uh, you know, um, you know, resiting or, um, you know, upgrades and-

Rosemary Barnes: You know what? Allen and I are probably gonna get some time in Jutland, uh, later this year, um, and that area and the old wind turbines there was actually the inspiration for my whole YouTube channel.

It just, ’cause there’s, you know, there’s turbines there from, the earliest one is, um, from the ’70s and still going. I think it’s one and a half megawatts, actually huge for, for that time. Um, and it was like community made, um, at Tvind. But anyway, I’m interested to revisit the site and have a look and see are these, you know, all these old turbines still there.

It’s only, like six years since I went through and did the experience but for the most part, they don’t seem to be yet pulling down the, the small old ones and putting up big ones. There’s a lot of, a lot of them are community owned. Um, and yeah, I mean, Danish people love wind turbines, but there’s only so many that you can have onshore.

Like, people are happy to live near them by, you know, the standards of people in other countries, but you don’t want [00:06:00] one in your literal backyard. I think that there is, there, there is a, a limit to how many more onshore wind turbines that you can get in that area and offshore expansion is the more likely way to go.

Um, and also I think it’s, it’s, it’s good to recognize that if you have a domestic only or a domestic first strategy, that will only get you so far and then you have to expand, and I think Denmark did that really well. I think Germany a little bit less. I think that Enercon were a bit surprised, um, by their strategy.

It, uh, they had a real hard time anyway when they had to transition away from mostly Germany to getting overseas. And obviously, like if you look at China, they have most of their installations are in China. They are trying so hard to get outside of China because it’s not, like even a market as big as China, it’s got decades to go before it will be full.

Um, you can still recognize that that’s not your, like long-term strategy for growth has to involve expansion, I think.

Allen Hall: I think Vestas, regardless of what happens in Denmark, is making a play for the United States. That seems to be [00:07:00] where a significant effort is happening at the moment and on offshore. Their– Vestas seems very excited about the offshore opportunities.

Of course, there’s a ton of wind turbines gonna be installed in the UK and, and all around Northern Europe. Offshore, the opportunities to buy turbines, there’s only a couple that you could get today. Uh, uh, the GE Vernova offerings I, I don’t think are gonna fit the mold, and I don’t know if GE’s even actively selling.

So their competitor realistically is Siemens Gamesa, which does seem like the smaller player at the minute versus Vestas, which is heavily pushing the V236 and will fill order books like crazy, I think, uh, just based upon the, the history they’ve had and everybody knowing who they are. So Also on the move in Australia, right?

Vestas is huge in Australia right now.

Rosemary Barnes: I think it’s really good that their, um, yeah, finances, uh, are [00:08:00] looking a bit better ’cause it’s been funny. Like, I tried early on in my wind career to invest in, you know, wind turbine manufacturers knowing that there would be immense growth, and I was right. There, there was immense growth.

Not that that was so hard to figure out that there would be, but it did not lead to any kind of, um, return on, on anything, you know. Like, that did not keep pace with the just general market. Um, so I, I stopped trying to, stopped trying to invest to that. But it has been really, really hard for the companies to, you know, raise money or y- you know, do any of the things that they need to do because they’ve always, like, they’re growing, growing, growing, but finances has been so tight that it has been a real constraint on the amount of engineering that they could do, and I really hope that Vestas are gonna take this opportunity that they’ve got compared to, you know, a lot of the other manufacturers.

Vestas do have really strong, um, innovation and, yeah, engineering capabilities for doing– you know, developing new technologies and improving them, and I really hope that they’re taking this opportunity to build that up. There are a lot [00:09:00] of very good engineers with a lot of experience in the industry in that area that are working in other fields at the moment because, you know, there’s been a lot of contraction in Denmark.

So I don’t know, it seems like a really good time to hire back some of that really in-depth knowledge and, yeah, get a- get ahead of, you know, some of the future quality problems. We’re going through such a hard time at the moment from the fast development that happened in the 20-teens when there wasn’t a whole lot of money around.

We’re dealing with quality problems now, so, you know, maybe we can get ahead and not have the next round of them if we can invest in just a lot more, uh, engineering capacity.

Allen Hall: When you have success like Vestas has, usually the upper level management and some of the executive team starts getting pilfered, that they’ll get offers to repeat that success at another company, and it sounds like that process has started already.

There’s a couple of executives that have recently departing or are in the midst of departing from Vestas. [00:10:00] I would see that continuing f- at least for the next six months, uh, because everybody wants to repeat that, right? If you can get a 20% increase in your valuation overnight, uh, I can, I can list a number of companies, regardless of industry, that would love to participate.

Even in a 5% increase, that would be remarkable. So, um, Vestas is gonna have a hard time holding onto this. That’s just the nature of the business where things are successful, people will wander. And Rosemary, I, I think they’re– And Yolanda In, in my book, Vestas should sort of s-stand down and just make quality products.

I’m not sure you sh-should tinker too much at the time being and just make the good stuff better. That seems like a way to really increase profits.

Yolanda Padron: Yeah, I mean, solving a lot of the issues that– And, and that’s not just a Vestas exclusive thing, right? All of these OEMs have some sort of issue that maybe– I know Rosie’s touched a lot on, on it, where [00:11:00] you build this version A and then version B solves one of the small little issues, but now it creates another little problem, and then you have version C, and then everything just kinda has its own niche little issue, um, that really expands over time.

So if they could solidify what they already have in, in a, in a model that, that would help them just even keep a lot of their customers, I think that’d be great, and it would help, certainly help them, um, not continuously, like, rotate around the customers, ’cause it almost feels like, at least in the States, right, you, you get GE to be really, really strong and have a huge market share, and then GE starts focusing more on gas turbines, so then they all go onto Vestas, and then they all go onto Ontara now.

Um, and then just, you know, just kind of everybody starts cycling through them because they just kind of want something that’s better quality than what they’re getting in the long haul.

Matthew Stead: Allen, you, you talked about you think there’s something big under the hood. I think you, you [00:12:00] thought that maybe Vestas was angling towards something or being quite bullish.

Do you think that they might take over GE Vernova?

Allen Hall: I don’t think they’re gonna grab Vernova, and I don’t think Vernova is for sale at the minute, but I wonder if Siemens Gamesa is, or Nordex. I mean, Nordex has done terrific the last couple of quarters and is making inroads in places that I didn’t think possible three, four years ago.

Uh, the European marketplace is be- becoming really unique in that sense that there’s a lot of money being put out. But is there a sole perfect solution for Europe? Not at the minute, ’cause you got two competitors there, and then China trying to, to work its way in. Will the Europeans come together and form something more united, even if it’s just a partnership, a loose partnership, versus letting China on the shores?

We’ll see. 64 of the largest machines that Vestas has builds are standing off the German coast, but one blade is missing a [00:13:00] piece. We’ll talk about that when we come back.

Speaker: Are you overspending on lightning repairs? Most operators are because solving lightning damage is complicated. Weather Guard Lightning Tech helps operators reduce lightning damage. Our innovative StrikeTape lightning diverter protects over twenty thousand blades worldwide. Now, StrikeTape Ultra installs faster than ever.

StrikeTape Ultra cures uptower in just fifteen minutes, even in cold weather. Visit weatherguardwind.com to schedule a call.

Allen Hall: Well, Germany’s largest offshore wind farm is now fully installed, and EnBW confirmed this, uh, past week that all 64 of the Vestas V236 15-megawatt turbines are s- standing at the He Dreiht wind farm about 85 kilometers northwest of Borkum. Uh, 960 megawatts, [00:14:00] 2.4 billion euros invested. Man, these offshore projects are expensive to get installed.

Uh, so it’s power for roughly 1.1 million households, and there’s no state subsidy behind any of it. And so this is a little bit of a u- unique situation. Uh, th- well, the one footnote about the wind farm is they had a V236 blade break and fall into the North Sea, and they had fished it out and I think I passed along s- pictures that I saw online of, uh, one of the police boats pulling the shear web out of the water I don’t know what to think anymore about some of these offshore blade issues.

Obviously, Vestas is very conscientious about it and will be doing RCAs and engineering reviews and all the above to go identify what the problem is. But it does just lead to a little bit of a pause of do– what is going on for some of these offshore [00:15:00] wind blade installations or, or whatever’s causing these blades to break?

Do we have a good handle on it? Yolanda, is– are we following up on all the design details so that we can prevent these things in the future?

Yolanda Padron: I mean, I’d, I’d hope you’d be following up on the design, right? Like, and, um, but I think there is still a little bit of a disconnect from, from what we’ve seen, and again, not just Vestas exclusive, um, between the people who are designing and the people who are manufacturing, the people who are in operations, right?

So, uh- The, from what we’ve heard, uh, this could have potentially been a, um, partially because of a transportation issue, which is what happens a lot in onshore. It’s a lot more common than we would like it to be. Um, and so that even goes beyond what would go on in the design studio and what would go on in the manufacturing and what would [00:16:00] go on even just for the people that are running the site, right?

So, so some sort of, um, in between, uh, EPC error. Um, but yeah, I just think that, like in a lot of industries, there should be a lot more communication between all of these teams on the lower level, so that way a lot of these problems can, can be avoided.

Allen Hall: I’m wondering if it’s actually an issue on the, the testing side.

And, uh, the one question that just popped up, and we saw from the ORE Catapult, uh, survey that’s being conducted at the moment, and if you haven’t participated in that, you just visit ORE Catapult and answer some of the survey questions. But torsion on a blade, which is very difficult to test for, and it really isn’t tested for today, but does happen during the move and the transportation of these big offshore blades.

Is it one area that we need to do a little more work in or maybe spend some more time focusing on it to see what is happening as blades are [00:17:00]moved?

Rosemary Barnes: The thing about te- torsion is that it is much more significant as blades get longer. I can’t, I can’t remember the equation off the top of my head, which is, um, bothering me.

But I think it scales with, like, the fourth power or something of, of length. And so whilst it was always a bit of a problem, it’s much more of a problem as it gets, as blades get bigger. I mean, they’ve never, like, fully tested a blade, and there was always a lot of reliance on, hey, y- you know, like we’ve tested certain things that is possible to test in a test facility on the ground.

But they also rely on their decades of experience of how blades actually behave in the field. But, you know, remember, that’s a real lagging, lagging indicator because y- you know, their decades of experience is mostly with lots smaller blades. Now, blades are really different because they’re longer and different effects are, are taking over.

It’s not just, uh, torsion, but it’s also the laminates get much thicker, and then y- you know, you, you have issues with the way that they’re curing, [00:18:00] and there’s a lot more just space for, um, defects to be present in a really thick laminate All of those things add up. Oh, yeah, then add in addition, like new materials, carbon fiber is new, and then new ways of producing it, you know, pultrusions, um, all kinds of different materials like balsa’s being replaced with foams and, um, like, you know, 10 times that number of what sounds like a small innovation, but all of these things have the potential for damage and don’t have a really long track record in the field to be able to kind of calibrate.

We do need to remember that, like, when you do something new, things are gonna break, uh, sometimes, they’re gonna fail sometimes. If they don’t, then you’re definitely being too conservative, and your product is costing more than it should, and nobody wants more expensive wind energy, right?

Matthew Stead: Rosie, Rosie, I, I know you’re doing some, some excellent work on, um, industry studies around erosion and temperature and so forth.

Um, I just wanted to let a little secret out of the bag that, um, in the future there will also be some [00:19:00] other studies on torsion and blade twist and blade dynamics. So, um, just a few things are in, in train at the moment, which I can’t share, share, but, uh, watch this space around better understanding blade twist.

Allen Hall: The Hydride wind farm runs on European turbines, but the next one might not. Two governments with two very different answers on who gets to build Europe’s wind fleet.

Delamination and bondline failures in blades are difficult problems to detect early. These hidden issues can cost you millions in repairs and lost energy production. CIC NDT are specialists to detect these critical flaws before they become expensive burdens. Their nondestructive test technology penetrates deep into blade materials to find voids and cracks traditional inspections completely miss.

CIC NDT maps every critical defect, delivers actionable [00:20:00] reports, and provides support to get your blades back in service. So visit cicndt.com because catching blade problems early will save you millions

Well, two countries and two decisions, one question. In Scotland, the UK government blocked plans for the Chinese manufacturer Mingyang to build a turbine factory, uh, near Inverness on national security grounds. 1.5 billion pounds of investment, up to about 1,500 jobs. And First Minister John Swinney has asked the new prime minister to reconsider.

And the UK energy secretary minister called that request irresponsible. Meanwhile, up in Denmark, Vattenfall has just won two offshore wind farms and will not say whether it will buy European turbines. Danish suppliers are not taking that quietly. So [00:21:00] the Scotland question about the Mingyang factory is at least being discussed again with the new prime minister in the UK.

It does seem like there’s a lot to do and get the government formed and make all this stuff happen. But I don’t see a Burnham administration changing the outcome for Mingyang, but I could be wrong. At the, the same time, Vestas is pushing for a more Eurocentric focus and to really keep out the Chinese.

Uh, something has to give here pretty soon.

Matthew Stead: I actually think Mingyang should, um, set up a factory in Scotland. I, I mean, what’s wrong with that? I mean, uh, why is that a security issue?

Rosemary Barnes: Set up the factory and put the, like, whatever you’re worried about, put protections in place for it, require it to be a local joint venture or whatever.

You know, we’ve seen the blueprint in many of what used to be, you know, less rich countries. That’s how they, you know, got a head start on some of these technologies. It’s not like, I don’t think that China [00:22:00] has a head start on wind, wind turbine technology, but they certainly have different ways of doing things that, um, yeah, we could, we could learn from.

But I think across the board, wind turbines, batteries, solar panels, whatever, let them set up factories, put the rules in place that mean that your country benefits from it and you’re getting the, you know, the information transfer.

Yolanda Padron: Do you think that’ll, like, impulse a lot of these more established European companies to maybe start fixing some of the issues that they’ve known about for, for a while, um, particularly regarding the blades and everything that we’ve talked about earlier?

Like, there’s enough competition there, so maybe they need to start looking a little bit more deeply into their problems.

Allen Hall: Do we think that Chinese operations have been out front, forward, honest, I’ll even use, about their blade issues?

Rosemary Barnes: No, but this is a good way to find out, isn’t it?

Allen Hall: Governments decide who is allowed to build a turbine after a discussion on Scotland.

Uh, but, but [00:23:00] occasionally, a court decides what a turbine legally is. India has just settled that question, and the reasoning should be of interest to anybody who ships machines across a border right after this. As wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial and let’s face it, difficult. That’s why the Uptime Podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine.

PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high-quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit peswind.com today. A tax fight in India has produced a definition every turbine supplier should read.

Is a wind turbine bolted to a concrete foundation movable goods, or is it immovable property? State tax authorities argued immovable, which would have [00:24:00] taxed erection and commissioning contracts at 18% instead of 5%. The Andhra Pradesh, uh, High Court disagreed, and on the 12th of August, the Supreme Court declined to interfere.

The reasoning rests on something this whole industry takes for granted. A turbine can be taken down, moved, and put back up. So a turbine is a movable object, and it has less taxation. Bonus. So this is a really interesting discussion that’s happening in India because it’s probably symptomatic of things we’re seeing elsewhere across the world about taxation for wind turbines, right?

That, um, if there’s a way to tax a wind turbine, we’re gonna try to do it. This is a unique way, uh, that happens in India where depending on if it’s permanent or movable, the tax rates are different. I, I guess that would apply to a lot of components inside a wind turbine too, Matthew, don’t you? Like the, the generator, the, the big heavy things, [00:25:00] gearbox, generator, blades, rotors, tower sections, would be taxed at a, a lesser rate.

Matthew Stead: I agree with the court case that it’s all movable and, uh, you can actually buy turbines on the secondhand market, can’t you? I mean, if I wanted to buy, yeah, whatever, whatever, I could buy one and, and put it up in my backyard if I had a bigger backyard. Um, so yeah, I vote for movable. I vote for lower taxes.

Yolanda Padron: The way that it would work a lot of times in the US is, I mean, it’s, you pay, the company itself pays a lot less than they would’ve over time, right? Just by pure, the, the regular kind of tax laws. Um, but the community, there’d be just direct donations to the community, so then they’d get, uh, like money would actually come into the community where the turbines were being built instead of just distributed around the state, which I mean, in a state as big as Texas, it gets, um, but easier for that c- um, that county to get a lot more, uh, funding than they would typically get if it was [00:26:00] through a big enough area.

Um, but yeah, no, I agr- I completely agree with you guys that, that this should be a movable good. I mean, how many times have we seen, uh, even just a blade, um, that it looks like it’s, uh, just a, a failed blade that they have to go in and replace, and then they take it out, fix it, and then just bring it back to the same site or take it to another site across the country.

And, and to that point, like if you were to h- judge it as something that’s immovable, would then any blade replacement just not be taxed? Because then it’s, you’re moving that one component and two, but it’s essentially the same turbine. Like, I don’t know how that all would make sense.

Allen Hall: I think the Uptime Supreme Court agrees with the Indian Supreme Court that wind turbines are movable, and that’s good.

Well, that wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you. [00:27:00] Reach out to us on LinkedIn. And if you found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review. It really helps other wind energy professionals discover the show.

And don’t forget to subscribe so you never miss an episode. For Rosa, Yolanda, and Matthew, I’m Allen Hall. We’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy podcast.

Vestas Shares Jump 20%, UK Blocks Ming Yang Factory

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vermont and Florida: A Key Difference

Published

on

Can’t swear that the story here is authentic, but it sure rings true.

Vermont is a somewhat quirky state, but it protects its citizens very well. FWIW, this is where I want MY tax dollars going too.

Florida is a deeply red state that, true to form, wants as much ignorance as it can possibly produce. Educated people aren’t voting for people like Ron Desantis.

Vermont and Florida: A Key Difference

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Republicans: Will This Work?

Published

on

The GOP is asking American voters to believe that “radical left Democrat extremists” are leading the country into socialism/communism. They’re hoping that this fear will outweigh the electorate’s understanding of the damage that Trump, with help of congressional Republicans, is inflicting on this nation in the form of the war in Iran, destroyed relations with allies, inflation, shoddy education, environmental collapse, and threats to Social Security and Medicare.

As we all know, the rate at which a lie becomes accepted as true is a function of the frequency that it is repeated.  And God knows, we see this crap about communism every time we turn around.

But this looks like an unwinnable battle.  Virtually no one wants to abandon free enterprise.  Moreover, Trump’s abysmal polling numbers reflect the fact that is largely despised as a criminal–the most corrupt figure in U.S. history.

How would you like to be campaigning to retired baby boomers on the platform that we cannot afford Social Security any longer, because we’ve siphoned off huge amounts of money, like our president’s “vanity war,” with only further downside in sight, that is costing $1 billion a day?

Republicans: Will This Work?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com