As climate change impacts worsen and aid budgets fall, leaders gathered in Spain for a UN conference on funding sustainable development this week threw their weight behind innovative tools such as taxes on extreme wealth, levies on polluting transport and debt swaps to raise more money to tackle the climate crisis.
UN Secretary-General António Guterres told journalists in the southern of city of Seville – sweltering in a heatwave with temperatures topping 40 degrees Celsius – that countries must now put their minds to implementing new ways to mobilise money, including carbon taxes and levies on flying and shipping.
“It’s time to seriously think about innovative forms of financing – to put a tax on carbon, to create levies in relation to several areas of activity, namely the impacts of maritime transportation in relation to climate change,” Guterres said. “There are many ways to multiply the resources available if we have the political will for that.”
Governments set to agree fees for ships that miss green targets
Eight countries – including France, Spain and Kenya – came together on the sidelines of the conference to push for taxation of premium plane tickets and private jet travel to pay for climate action.
The members of the new coalition said that, ahead of the COP30 climate summit in November, they would work to persuade more governments to apply flight ticket levies to support fair energy transitions and climate resilience both at home and in other countries.
Coalition set sights on taxing luxury air travel to fund climate action
Spain and Brazil, meanwhile, launched a separate coalition to advance work on taxing the super-rich, joined by South Africa and building on a G20 agreement in 2024.
According to a joint statement, the initiative aims to incentivise other countries and civil society to sign up and address policy, administrative and data deficiencies preventing high-net-worth individuals from being taxed more efficiently in line with their wealth. The statement also signalled growing support for international tax negotiations at the UN and promised to evaluate legislative initiatives on taxing the ultra-rich.
Comment: There is no climate finance gap – only a tax sovereignty gap
These announcements came as 192 governments at the conference adopted a 42-page document entitled the “Sevilla Commitment”. In it, they warned that time is running out to address the climate crisis, and noted that the world is “falling short in tackling climate change, biodiversity loss, and desertification”.
They stressed the urgency of increasing ambition for climate action through the UN’s climate process (the UNFCCC) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, adapt to a warming climate, and provide finance to developing countries to help them put their climate plans into practice.
The United States participated in the months-long negotiations on the development financing document but withdrew in the final stages and said it would not attend the conference in Spain. Under President Donald Trump, the US has ended the majority of its aid and climate spending for the Global South.
Here are some of the key measures endorsed by UN member states in the Seville declaration that would help to increase climate finance for the Global South:
Using national budgets
Countries agreed to take the environment, nature, climate and food security into account when planning national budgets, in line with their own unique needs and development priorities. Some of the recommended fiscal tools include green budgeting – which entails putting environmental protection at the heart of government revenue-raising and spending plans – and levying taxes on natural resource exploitation, environmental contamination and pollution.
Climate insurance
The declaration recommends tapping capital markets to fund climate action, including the issuance of green bonds as well as using insurance markets to protect smallholder farmers, cooperatives and small businesses against the adverse effects of global warming and price volatility, among other risks.
Pre-arranged disaster aid
In the face of rising climate shocks and stresses, there is support for more pre-arranged financing that is released before a disaster hits, based on warnings. It includes insurance and other forms of emergency support that can reach households and communities more quickly to reduce aid costs and accelerate recovery. The UK said it would launch a global coalition to scale up the use of this pre-planned finance and work with the insurance industry to help deliver it.
“It is unacceptable that only 2% of crisis finance is pre-arranged when 35% of shocks are modellable,” UK development minister Jenny Chapman told the finance conference in Seville.
Debt pauses and debt swaps for climate
Leaders agreed in the document that there is a need to increase grants as part of official development assistance, as well as offering more low-interest loans – especially to countries most at risk from disasters and climate threats such as floods, storms and rising seas. This would help small island developing states who have been asking for fairer treatment in accessing finance to reduce their debt burden.
Governments promised to promote a system that pauses debt repayments when countries are hit by a climate disaster to allow them to free up money for recovery and supporting affected communities.
In a world first, Grenada activates debt pause after Hurricane Beryl destruction
The Seville commitment also proposes that international efforts to help highly indebted poor countries service their debt burdens could be centralised at the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. Among other things, this new facility could support the scaling up of debt swaps – which restructure debt to free up money for sustainable development, including for climate and nature programmes – by simplifying their design and reducing transaction costs.
Rich-country climate finance obligations
The Seville declaration identifies the need to make it easier for developing countries to access money from international climate funds, as they have long called for. It adds that richer countries must lead in providing this money, in line with the Paris Agreement rule of fairness based on the greater responsibility they bear to help poor countries deal with climate change.
Leaders called for mobilisation of the “means of implementation” – which means funding and technical help – to meet the new climate finance goal agreed at COP29, the UN’s Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage and the Adaptation Fund among others, as well as supporting the implementation of national plans to cut emissions and adapt to climate change.
As part of a broader effort to boost funding, governments said they encourage multilateral development banks (MDBs) to increase and optimise their annual lending capacity “with a view to potentially tripling it” – although no time frame is specified.
MDBs said jointly at COP29 they expected that by 2030, their annual collective climate financing for low- and middle-income countries would reach $120 billion (including $42 billion for adaptation), up from nearly $75 billion in 2023.
Finance for ocean and nature protection
The Seville declaration calls for more resources to be channelled from all sources to address growing desertification, halt biodiversity loss, and advance ocean protection and the sustainable use of marine resources in developing countries.
Governments committed to establishing a new financial mechanism as envisioned under the Convention on Biological Diversity, whose main aim is to provide financial resources to developing countries to advance conservation.
Adding value to critical minerals extraction
Highlighting international trade as an engine for development, leaders highlighted the growing threats it faces including restrictions and tariffs. The document calls for concrete measures to improve poor countries’ abilities to trade in goods and services, and generate more foreign currency, as well as boosting jobs and tax revenue by turning raw materials into useful products within the countries where they are extracted.
To increase local processing of minerals that are critical to the clean energy transition, governments committed to strengthening the capacity of industries in developing countries to participate in regional and global value chains.
Ending poverty and gangs: How Zambia seeks to cash in on the global drive for EVs
This is in line with growing efforts in African nations like Nigeria and Zambia to set up processing plants for raw materials like lithium and copper – used in clean technology such as batteries and electric vehicles – to capture more of their value and boost their economies.
The post UN development conference backs innovative ways to boost climate finance appeared first on Climate Home News.
UN development conference backs innovative ways to boost climate finance
Climate Change
“Sink or swim”: WA Gov hugely underestimating decline in regional gas demand while sleeping on green exports, new report finds
PERTH, Tuesday 13 October 2026 — A new report from Greenpeace Australia Pacific and Springmount Advisory reveals green commodity exports are an untapped economic opportunity for Western Australia in a declining Asian gas market, while offering a genuine solution for decarbonising Asia.
From Gas to Green: Building Western Australia’s Future State is a comprehensive analysis of the declining gas market in Asia, and the untapped economic opportunity for WA to become a global leader in green commodity exports while driving the regional shift away from fossil fuels.
The report offers key recommendations for the WA Government to support regional decarbonisation through an orderly phase out of gas exports in favour of green iron and other green exports. It comes as global climate leaders from across business, politics and advocacy prepare to meet for the Global Citizen Now: Perth event focused on decarbonising WA.
Key findings:
- Gas demand is falling across WA’s core markets in Asia: Gas demand fell in 2025 and is projected to continue to decline, driven by a combination of global geopolitical factors and domestic concerns.
- Policy shifts in key markets since the war on Iran now prioritise renewables and nuclear over gas: Japan, South Korea and China have legislated energy plans that prioritise renewables and nuclear over gas.
- New WA gas would arrive in a saturated, uncertain Asian market filled with cheaper gas: The US is now the world’s largest liquefied gas producer and plans to double its capacity as it also targets Asian markets.
- Green commodities offer a real solution to sustain WA’s economy: WA can lead Australia’s green commodity exports, which by 2060 could be worth almost a trillion dollars.
- Exporting more WA gas is likely to delay or impede Asia decarbonisation: Despite claims by the gas industry, there is no evidence that WA gas is displacing coal in Asia, and in fact diverts resources from genuine decarbonisation options.
Geoff Bice, WA Campaign Lead at Greenpeace Australia Pacific said: “As our export partners in Asia shift away from expensive and polluting gas, the WA Government has a golden opportunity to pivot our economy to green exports, like green iron, which is the most effective way to help our region to decarbonise.
“The writing is on the wall: gas is in decline, renewables are our future. In this context, it makes zero sense for the government to encourage high risk projects like Woodside’s reckless Browse gas proposal at Scott Reef.
“This report clearly shows that the WA Government faces a choice: sink or swim. They can either allow the gas industry to keep ripping off West Australians and continue propping up its decline, or choose the path that will deliver enormous benefits to the state and the world by becoming a leader in the rapidly expanding green economy.”
Tom Quinn, Managing Director of Springmount Advisory: “Western Australia prospers when it looks to the future and builds for future demand. Twenty years from now, what the world needs is green commodities made using WAs abundant renewable resources. Just like it did with iron ore in the 1950s and gas in the 1970s, WA should look to the future and build what the world will need, not sunsetting industries like gas that are already past their peak.”
-ENDS-
Media contact
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
Lucy Keller on 0491 135 308 or lucy.keller@greenpeace.org
A report from Greenpeace Australia Pacific and Springmount Advisory reveals the untapped green economic opportunity for Western Australia in a declining Asian gas market, which also offers a genuine solution for decarbonisation in Asia.
Is Western Australia clinging to a fading gas industry while a thriving green future passes it by? As major Asian trading partners rapidly pivot away from volatile gas imports toward cheap solar and battery storage, this report exposes a high-stakes choice: risk becoming stranded in an oversupplied fossil fuel market, or harness WA’s unmatched sun and wind to lead the global clean energy transition.
Summary
From Gas to Green: Building Western Australia’s Future State reveals that Western Australia (WA) faces a critical juncture as falling Asian gas demand, geopolitical gas supply volatility and accelerating renewable energy deployment undermine the long-term economic viability of gas exports. By harnessing its world-class wind and solar resources, the report demonstrates that WA can execute an orderly phase-out of gas and pioneer a green commodity export economy that could generate $987 billion in economic value by 2060, create 24,000 ongoing jobs, and drive a 9.6% reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions.
Key Findings
- Gas demand is falling in Asia – WA can no longer rely on gas exports: Gas demand in core Asian markets fell in 2025 and is projected to continue to decline in 2026. Legislated energy plans in Japan, South Korea, and China now prioritise renewables and nuclear over gas.
- Asia is increasing renewables, importing gas just gets in the way: Evidence from markets like Thailand suggests that gas imports are increasingly crowding out cheaper renewable energy investments and battery storage rather than displacing coal, locking in more emissions over time.
- Green commodities offer a real solution to decarbonise Asia – this is a major win for WA: With world-class renewables, WA can lead Australia’s green commodity exports, which by 2060 could be worth almost a trillion dollars ($987 billion) and support a genuine 9.6% reduction in global emissions.
Recommendations to WA government
Recommendation 1: Plan an orderly gas phase-out aligned with a trading partner pivot plan
Implement a managed, orderly phase-out of gas exports aligned with trading partners’ decarbonisation pathways, rather than waiting for demand to collapse, by:
- Developing and implementing a staged phase-out of gas facilities aligned with feedstock supply expiry or typical end of facility lifespans.
- Committing to no new gas development for gas expansion, including Browse and Kimberley fields.
- Developing new, reciprocal trade relationships with existing gas trade partners, structured to progressively replace gas exports with green commodities – integrated with recommendation 2.
Recommendation 2: Develop an integrated green commodity export strategy, positioning WA as a global green iron manufacturing hub
Establish an integrated green commodity export strategy that immediately prioritises green iron development, positioning WA as a global green iron manufacturing hub, by:
- Committing to green commodity export targets to give industry and investors a clear demand signal.
- Prioritising green iron as the lead sector within the broader green commodity strategy, given WA’s iron ore endowment and first-mover potential.
Recommendation 3: Reject false solutions such as carbon dumping (CCS) and blue hydrogen
Reject carbon dumping (also described as carbon capture and storage, or CCS) and blue hydrogen as viable decarbonisation technologies, and prioritise green hydrogen and proven renewables for clean energy and fuel production by:
- Excluding blue hydrogen projects (and CCS-dependent projects) from all government support programs.
- Requiring existing hydrogen-based production (including ammonia, methanol, synthetic fuels) to have clear, near-term transition timelines to switch to green hydrogen production.
What you can do
Together, we can push for a prosperous green future.
You can help by:
- Sending an email to Environment Minister Murray Watt and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, calling on them to reject Browse.
- Sharing this story to help more Australians understand what’s at stake.
- Encouraging your friends and family to take action.
REPORT: “From Gas to Green” Building Western Australia’s Future State
Cleaner cooking projects in the UN carbon market will have to set aside a share of their credits to insure against the risk that the trees they save are lost to fire, drought or logging, after the market’s regulator rejected calls to exempt the sector.
The requirement is part of a new rulebook that the Paris Agreement carbon market regulator – the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body – approved last Friday for programmes that aim to cut emissions by distributing new and cleaner cookstoves in regions that still burn wood or charcoal for cooking.
These are the UN mechanism’s first rulebooks for cookstoves, one of the carbon market’s most popular credit types and also one of its most criticised for overstating climate benefits.
They consist of two methodologies: one for programmes that aim to cut greenhouse gas emissions by distributing more efficient cookstoves that burn less wood or charcoal, and a separate methodology for projects shifting households to lower-emissions cookers running on electricity or liquid petroleum gas (LPG).
Mkhuthazi Steleki, the South African chair of the Supervisory Body, said “this decision gives cleaner cooking projects a new pathway under the UN carbon market, with clear rules to ensure that each credit represents a real and credible emission reduction”.
Industry and NGOs lobby to weaken UN carbon credit rules in “coordinated” push
In copycat submissions and a private briefing to government officials, the groups have opposed a proposal to tighten safeguards for emissions offsetsLaunch of Africa Energy Bank delayed again in blow to oil and gas hopes
Repeated delays are raising questions about the bank’s momentum and whether it can mobilise investment to finance Africa’s oil and gas ambitions in an era of energy transition
Exemption push rejected
More efficient cookstove projects earn credits based on the amount of carbon they save by preserving trees that would have otherwise been cut down and burned for fuel. But if those trees later burn in a wildfire or are logged, the carbon stored would be released anyway, erasing the climate benefits of the credits.
Several carbon credit developers, conservation NGOs and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) disputed that cookstove projects face this risk, in what critics described as a “coordinated lobbying campaign”.
They argued that, unlike forest protection schemes, this type of credit represents a “flow” of avoided emissions rather than a “stock” of stored carbon that can be released. They also warned that requiring a buffer would impose disproportionate costs and undermine the financial viability of these activities.
But the UN carbon market regulator was not persuaded by the argument. It decided that projects would have to protect against this reversal risk by handing over a percentage of credits to a so-called “buffer pool” instead of selling them.
‘New paradigm’
The amount of credits to be given up is calculated by applying different methods for natural risks, like wildfires, droughts or hurricanes, and human-caused ones, such as logging or land clearing.
For natural risks, project developers will need to apply local risk values derived from new modelling published by a group of independent scientists.
Campaigners have broadly welcomed the decision. Federica Dossi, an expert at Brussels-based advocacy group Carbon Market Watch, said it sets a new paradigm for calculating reversal risk based on empirical data. “This approach is grounded in science and we hope to see this now being adopted by other carbon crediting mechanisms in the voluntary market,” she added.
Backers claim this method is more rigorous than current practice in the voluntary carbon market, which largely relies on expert guesswork.
Pre-COP draws attention to Pacific’s climate plight and 1.5C goal
Pushback over science
As Climate Home News previously revealed, the same industry and NGO groups that sought an exemption from the “buffer pool”, along with some corporate buyers, criticised the use of a study backed by the UN carbon market’s experts that recommended the new risk assessment approach.
The groups pushed for more flexible rules that would have allowed natural risk values drawn from other sources, including national databases, or from the project developers themselves.
While the Supervisory Body rejected this approach, it gave project developers and countries the option to propose alternative values that would first need to be vetted by the mechanism’s expert panel and then approved by the regulator.
A carbon market expert told Climate Home News that, while it is too early to say how this provision will be used, they expect requests will have to be backed up with solid scientific evidence, lowering the risk of unfounded claims.