Connect with us

Published

on

In the face of accelerating climate change, many scientific institutions rely on advanced technologies like satellite imagery, weather models, and big data to monitor environmental shifts. Yet, for thousands of years, Indigenous Peoples have observed and interpreted climate changes through finely tuned systems of relational knowledge, deeply embedded in land-based practices and generational memory.

These Indigenous climate indicators are not just data points—they are stories, teachings, and warnings, passed down through time and rooted in the interdependence of human and ecological systems. They reflect a worldview where the land, water, sky, and all beings above, among and below are living relatives—each communicating shifts in the Earth’s balance.  

What Are Indigenous Climate Indicators? 

Indigenous climate indicators are grounded in the seasonal and cyclical patterns Indigenous communities observe over millennia. These indicators are often place-based, holistic, and interdisciplinary, integrating physical, spiritual, and relational dimensions of environmental change.

Some examples include:

  • Inuit hunters observe ice thickness or quality changes, sometimes weeks before satellite images detect unsafe conditions. 
  • Unusual smells in freshwater bodies—an early sign of algal blooms or oxygen depletion. 
  • Mismatched seasonal events, like geese migrating before freeze-up, as reported by the Denesuline in the subarctic regions of Canada. 
  • The taste and texture of snow can indicate shifts in air composition or atmospheric pollution.

Unlike Western science, which often isolates variables, Indigenous knowledge systems understand change as part of a broader, interconnected ecological narrative, recognizing how a single disruption can cascade across entire ecosystems.

Language as Climate Memory

Indigenous languages are not only repositories of culture—they are also tools for reading the environment. For example:
 

  • The Inuit term “Uggianaqtuq” is used in Nunavut to describe weather that feels “strange” or “unusual.” It doesn’t translate directly into English, because it expresses more than just observation—it communicates concern, deviation from the norm, and emotional or spiritual dissonance. 
  • In Mi’kma’ki, Elder Albert Marshall introduced the concept of “Etuaptmumk” or “Two-Eyed Seeing,” which promotes the use of both Indigenous and Western lenses when approaching climate solutions, valuing each perspective as equally valid and necessary.  

These linguistic frameworks provide nuance and context that Western science often overlooks, particularly regarding early warnings and culturally appropriate responses to environmental change.

Why These Indicators Matter

Indigenous climate indicators often detect changes earlier than Western technologies, offering critical lead time to adapt or respond. For example:

  • Inuit hunters in the Arctic have long reported thinner, unpredictable sea ice—well before NASA satellites confirmed the shrinking ice cap. 
  • Anishinaabe harvesters have observed the decline of manoomin (wild rice) as water levels, fish patterns, and shoreline plants shift, signalling broader watershed changes not immediately visible in hydrological data.  

These indicators are also relational—they carry the weight of responsibility. When an Elder notices something “off” in the land, it is not merely recorded; it becomes a call to ceremony, action, or teaching.

Supporting the Integration of Knowledge Systems

Increasingly, collaborative climate initiatives are recognizing the power of Indigenous observation. Projects like the Indigenous Climate Change Observation Network (ICCON) and Two-Eyed Seeing research programs have begun to bridge knowledge systems through respectful partnerships.

However, more work remains to ensure that Indigenous Knowledge is incorporated and respected on its terms, with Indigenous data sovereignty, cultural protocols, and community ownership at the forefront.

Recommendations for Readers

  1. Advocate for Indigenous-Led Research 
  1. Support climate funding streams prioritizing Indigenous-led monitoring, research, and land-based education. Encourage governments and institutions to include Indigenous Knowledge Keepers in environmental decision-making bodies. 
  1. Promote Equitable Knowledge Partnerships 
  1. Encourage universities, climate organizations, and weather services to engage in ethical, co-designed research with Indigenous communities, where Indigenous Peoples define what is studied, how data is used, and how outcomes are shared. 
  1. Educate Yourself 
  1. Watch the CBC documentary on “Etuaptmumk: Two-Eyed Seeing” to understand how Indigenous and Western science can work in harmony. Explore additional resources through the Indigenous Climate Change Observation Network. 
  1. Respect Indigenous Data Sovereignty 
  1. Climate data shared by Indigenous Peoples must remain within their control. Advocate for policies and agreements that uphold Indigenous intellectual property rights and data stewardship protocols.

Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

(Image Credit : Teunard Droog, Unsplash)

The post Indigenous Climate Indicators: Reading the Land Beyond Western Metrics appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

Indigenous Climate Indicators: Reading the Land Beyond Western Metrics

Continue Reading

Climate Change

REPORT: WA Clean Energy, Jobs & Industry Plan

Published

on

Prepared by a coalition of nine Western Australian union, industry, conservation, and community organisations—including UnionsWA, the Conservation Council WA, and the Smart Energy Council—the WA Clean Energy, Jobs & Industry Plan provides a practical roadmap to transform Western Australia into a clean energy powerhouse while creating thousands of secure local jobs.

Western Australia stands at a pivotal crossroads: lead the global clean energy economy or watch investment, future industries, and secure jobs go elsewhere. The WA Clean Energy, Jobs & Industry Plan outlines a transformative blueprint to harness the state’s world-class solar and wind resources. Discover how legislated renewable targets, green iron manufacturing, and a dedicated regional training strategy can generate tens of thousands of local jobs, lower household bills, and build a resilient, net-zero future for all Western Australians.

WA needs a clear and forward-thinking plan if it is going to become a competitive renewable energy powerhouse and maintain its economic strength through the energy transition.
“Western Australians know a faster renewable energy transition will lower their household expenses and prevent harmful climate pollution. But the community also needs clear direction to ensure this transition will create jobs, lower costs and not cause undue environmental harm.
“Here, sectors representing a broad range of interests have laid the groundwork for those outcomes, clearly outlining what is needed to create a future for WA that is good for the environment, for the climate, for workers and for the economy.

Summary

  • Creating local employment.
  • Maintaining industrial competitiveness.
  • Lowering household energy costs

To realize this vision, the framework details actionable measures to follow on from the recent WA Government announcement of a 75% Renewable Energy Target by 2031 for the South West Interconnected System. This includes developing a statewide Renewable Energy Target, coordinating statewide workforce and training pipelines, strategically planning regional infrastructure to safeguard high-value biodiversity and cultural heritage, and ensuring equitable benefit-sharing through household electrification incentives and First Nations equity partnerships. Ultimately, the plan highlights that establishing clear policy and regulatory certainty will unlock lower energy bills, boost power reliability, and secure the state’s global competitiveness in emerging green commodity export markets.

Photo of wind turbines located near the sea at Albany Wind Farm in Western Australia.

Key Findings

  • Statewide Renewable Energy Target and Emissions Reduction Targets: The report calls for a statewide RET and 1.5°C aligned emission reduction targets to remove policy risk, lower capital costs, and attract clean energy investment.
  • Transformative Job Creation: Accelerating the transition offers massive employment prospects, including up to 8,800 solar and battery jobs by 2050, as well as 24,000 ongoing and 11,000 construction jobs in a commercial green iron industry.
  • Industrial Electrification & Competitiveness: Requiring large gas users to adopt binding electrification timetables and providing concessional financing will protect existing energy-intensive manufacturers from rising energy costs and impending domestic gas shortfalls.
  • Green Commodity Export Leadership: Western Australia can build new export markets in green iron, green ammonia, and offshore oil/gas decommissioning by constructing shared common-user infrastructure and setting dedicated Green Commodity Export Targets.
  • Coordinated Workforce & Training Pipeline: To address critical skill shortages the plan recommends establishing a WA Clean Energy Jobs Plan 2050, three regional training hubs, and dedicated pathways for female and under-represented apprentices.
  • Environmental Safeguards & Community Benefits: Fast-tracked development must be paired with State Planning Policies that avoid high-biodiversity and cultural heritage lands, mandate new data centres to run on additional renewable power, and deliver household electrification rebates and First Nations equity partnerships.
Workers at Keppel Prince in Portland manufacture and install wind turbines in Australia's burgeoning industry.

What you can do

WA has an opportunity to lead on sustainable, clean energy and associated industries. You can help by:

REPORT: WA Clean Energy, Jobs & Industry Plan

Continue Reading

Climate Change

COP17: Key outcomes agreed at the UN biodiversity conference in Yerevan

Published

on

Article Contents

Countries have completed the first “global review” of their progress towards reversing nature loss by 2030 at the COP17 biodiversity talks in Yerevan, Armenia.

The review “notes with deep concern” that, unless action is “rapidly accelerated”, the goal to reverse nature loss and meet a set of 23 targets by 2030 “will not be achieved”.

It “urges” countries to accelerate action, including by “increased ambition in addressing the gaps”.

Much of the discussions in Yerevan focused on how to raise the necessary funds to help developing countries protect nature.

Some major economies pushed to expand the range of nations that are expected to provide finance, with countries agreeing at the end of the two weeks of talks that non-donors that want to contribute can “signal interest” before COP18.

This came after developed countries failed to meet a target to significantly ramp up nature finance over the last few years.

It also came as a landmark fund agreed at COP16 in Colombia to pay communities for the genetic resources derived from nature stands nearly empty two years on.

The Yerevan talks marked the halfway point of the “Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework” (GBF), the “Paris Agreement for nature” first made in 2022 and due to be achieved by 2030.

During the nearly 12-hour-long final plenary, countries voted for Quito, Ecuador, to host the COP18 nature talks, which will be held in 2028.

Countries managed to sign off on all the major negotiation texts, marking a stark contrast to COP16, which ran so far over time that the Colombian presidency lost “quorum”, forcing talks to resume in Rome months later. 

Below, Carbon Brief has detailed analysis of all of the key outcomes from COP17.

Formal negotiations

Finance

Finance, predictably, was at the heart of the discord and deadloc