Connect with us

Published

on

Sustainable Energy 

 Sustainable Aviation Fuel 

8 minutes read

As the world continues to prioritize sustainability and environmental consciousness, the aviation industry faces increasing pressure to reduce its carbon footprint. 

One promising solution is the production and utilization of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), which offers a cleaner alternative to traditional jet fuel. This article delves into the production process of SAF, highlighting its environmental benefits, and explores the growing demand for this innovative fuel within the aviation industry.

Understanding Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)

Definition and characteristics of SAF

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) refers to a type of fuel specifically designed for aviation that is produced from renewable and sustainable feedstock sources. 

It is also commonly known as aviation biofuel or drop-in biofuel. SAF aims to reduce the environmental impact of aviation by significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional jet fuels derived from fossil fuels.

Characteristics of Sustainable Aviation Fuel

Renewable Feedstocks: SAF is produced from various renewable and sustainable sources such as biomass, waste oils, agricultural residues, algae, and other non-food biomass. These feedstocks can be cultivated or obtained from waste streams, reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Compatibility: SAF is designed to be a “drop-in” fuel, meaning it can be used in existing aircraft engines without requiring modifications or significant changes to infrastructure. It can be blended with or used as a substitute for conventional jet fuel, typically in varying ratios depending on certification requirements.

Carbon Reduction: SAF offers substantial greenhouse gas emission reductions compared to conventional jet fuels. Depending on the feedstock and production process, SAF can achieve carbon emissions reductions ranging from 50% to over 80%. It contributes to mitigating climate change by reducing aviation’s carbon footprint.

High Energy Density: SAF possesses a high energy density, similar to conventional jet fuels. This characteristic ensures that aircraft can achieve optimal performance and range without compromising safety or efficiency.

Quality and Safety Standards: SAF must meet stringent quality and safety standards, including those set by aviation authorities such as ASTM International. These standards ensure that SAF maintains the required specifications for aircraft operation and guarantees safety in flight.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SAF aligns with several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including climate action, affordable and clean energy, responsible consumption and production, and partnerships for sustainable development. Its production supports sustainable agriculture, waste reduction, and the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Life Cycle Analysis: SAF undergoes life cycle analysis, considering the environmental impact of its entire production cycle, from feedstock cultivation or collection to fuel refining and distribution. This analysis helps assess the overall environmental benefits and sustainability of SAF compared to conventional jet fuels.

Sustainable Aviation Fuel represents a crucial step towards achieving a more sustainable aviation industry. By combining renewable feedstocks, carbon reduction, compatibility with existing aircraft, and adherence to rigorous standards, SAF provides an environmentally friendly alternative that holds great promise in reducing the environmental impact of air travel.

Key Difference

There are several key differences between Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) and conventional jet fuel derived from fossil fuels. These differences highlight the environmental advantages and sustainability features of SAF. 

Here are the key distinctions:

Source of Feedstock: SAF is produced from renewable and sustainable feedstock sources, such as biomass, waste oils, and agricultural residues. In contrast, conventional jet fuel is derived from fossil fuels like crude oil, which are finite resources.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: SAF significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional jet fuel. It can achieve carbon emissions reductions ranging from 50% to over 80%, depending on the feedstock and production process. Conventional jet fuel, on the other hand, contributes to high levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to climate change.

Environmental Impact: SAF production focuses on minimizing environmental impact. It promotes sustainable agriculture, reduces waste, and avoids deforestation. In contrast, conventional jet fuel production involves extracting and refining crude oil, which can have significant environmental consequences such as habitat destruction, oil spills, and air pollution.

Compatibility: SAF is designed as a “drop-in” fuel, meaning it can be used in existing aircraft engines without requiring modifications or major infrastructure changes. It can be blended with or used as a substitute for conventional jet fuel. Conventional jet fuel, however, cannot be easily replaced with SAF due to differences in composition and properties.

Certification and Standards: SAF production adheres to specific certification standards, such as those established by ASTM International. These standards ensure that SAF meets the necessary quality and safety requirements for use in aviation. Conventional jet fuel follows different industry standards and specifications.

Renewable Energy Integration: SAF aligns with the goals of renewable energy integration. It can be produced from various feedstocks that can be cultivated or obtained from waste streams, reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Conventional jet fuel relies solely on crude oil, which is a non-renewable resource.

Sustainability Considerations: SAF production takes into account sustainability aspects, including life cycle analysis, social responsibility, and waste reduction. It aims to contribute to sustainable development goals and the transition to a low-carbon economy. Conventional jet fuel does not possess the same level of sustainability focus.

In summary, SAF offers a more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to conventional jet fuel. With reduced greenhouse gas emissions, renewable feedstocks, and adherence to stringent standards, SAF presents a significant opportunity for the aviation industry to mitigate its environmental impact and contribute to a greener future.

Importance of reducing aviation emissions and the role of SAF

Reducing aviation emissions is of paramount importance due to the significant impact of air travel on climate change and overall environmental sustainability. The aviation industry is responsible for a considerable share of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2) but also including nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other emissions that contribute to climate change and air pollution. 

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) plays a crucial role in achieving emission reduction targets and fostering a more sustainable aviation sector. 

Here’s an overview of the importance of reducing aviation emissions and the role of SAF:

Mitigating Climate Change: Aviation emissions contribute to global warming and climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that aviation is responsible for around 2-3% of global CO2 emissions. By reducing aviation emissions, particularly CO2, the industry can make significant contributions to global efforts in mitigating climate change and meeting the goals set out in international agreements, such as the Paris Agreement.

Environmental Sustainability: Reducing aviation emissions aligns with broader sustainability goals. SAF offers a viable solution for reducing the industry’s carbon footprint and minimizing the environmental impact of air travel. By transitioning to SAF, the aviation sector can demonstrate its commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship, addressing concerns related to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and other negative environmental consequences associated with conventional jet fuel production.

Regulatory Pressure and Compliance: Governments and international organizations are increasingly implementing regulations and policies to curb aviation emissions. These measures include emissions trading schemes, carbon pricing, and emission reduction targets. By adopting SAF, airlines can ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and position themselves as leaders in sustainability.

Technological Advancements: The development and utilization of SAF also drive technological advancements in aviation. As the demand for SAF increases, it encourages research and innovation in feedstock cultivation, conversion processes, and refining techniques. This, in turn, leads to the development of more efficient and sustainable production methods, helping to further reduce emissions and enhance the overall sustainability of the aviation industry.

Market Demand and Consumer Preferences: There is a growing demand for sustainable and eco-friendly travel options among consumers. Passengers are increasingly conscious of their carbon footprint and seek airlines that prioritize environmental responsibility. By offering flights powered by SAF, airlines can differentiate themselves in the market, attract environmentally conscious travelers, and enhance their brand image.

Collaborative Approach: The adoption of SAF requires collaboration among various stakeholders, including airlines, fuel producers, governments, and industry organizations. This collaborative approach fosters partnerships and knowledge-sharing, facilitating the development, production, and distribution of SAF on a larger scale.

Reducing aviation emissions is crucial for addressing climate change and promoting environmental sustainability. SAF plays a pivotal role in achieving these objectives by significantly reducing the carbon footprint of air travel. By embracing SAF, the aviation industry can demonstrate its commitment to sustainability, comply with regulations, meet consumer demands, drive technological advancements, and contribute to a greener and more sustainable future.

Production Process of SAF

Feedstock selection: Exploring renewable sources for SAF production

The selection of renewable feedstocks is a critical aspect of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) production. It involves identifying and utilizing sustainable sources that have minimal environmental impact and can be produced in large quantities to meet the growing demand for SAF. Here are some key renewable feedstock options commonly explored for SAF production:

Biomass: Biomass feedstocks include various organic materials derived from plants, algae, and agricultural residues. This category encompasses energy crops (e.g., switchgrass, miscanthus), agricultural waste (e.g., corn stover, wheat straw), and dedicated non-food crops (e.g., camelina, jatropha). Biomass feedstocks offer significant potential for SAF production due to their abundance, renewable nature, and potential for carbon capture and utilization.

Waste Oils and Fats: Waste oils and fats from food processing industries, restaurants, and other sources can be converted into SAF through processes such as hydroprocessing. These waste streams provide a sustainable feedstock option, as they utilize materials that would otherwise be discarded, reducing waste and environmental impact.

Algae: Algae-based feedstocks show promise for SAF production. Algae can be cultivated in various water sources, including wastewater or brackish water, without competing with food crops for land. Algae can accumulate lipids that can be converted into SAF, offering a potentially high oil yield per unit of cultivation area.

Residues and Waste Streams: Agricultural and forestry residues, such as corn cobs, rice husks, and wood chips, can be utilized as feedstocks for SAF production. These feedstocks are abundant and often considered waste materials, providing an opportunity for their valorization and reducing their environmental impact.

Municipal Solid Waste: Certain organic components of municipal solid waste can be used as feedstocks for SAF production. This approach promotes waste reduction and the production of renewable fuels from non-recyclable or non-compostable waste streams.

Lignocellulosic Biomass: Lignocellulosic feedstocks, such as switchgrass, wood, or agricultural residues, offer potential for SAF production. These feedstocks contain complex sugars that can be converted into biofuels through processes like biomass gasification or biochemical conversion.

Synthetic Biology: Advancements in synthetic biology enable the engineering of microorganisms to produce bio-based feedstocks with desired characteristics. For example, researchers are exploring the use of genetically modified microorganisms to produce lipid-rich feedstocks for SAF production.

It is essential to consider several factors when selecting feedstocks, including their availability, sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions, land use requirements, water usage, and potential impacts on food security and biodiversity. Feedstock selection should prioritize feedstocks that do not compete with food production, do not contribute to deforestation, and have minimal negative environmental and social consequences.

Exploring diverse and sustainable feedstock options is key to scaling up SAF production and ensuring the long-term viability of a low-carbon aviation industry.

Conversion technologies

Overview of different pathways (HEFA, F-T, Alcohol-to-Jet, etc.)

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) can be produced through various conversion technologies, each with its unique pathway and process. 

Here’s an overview of some commonly used conversion technologies for SAF production:

Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA): HEFA is one of the most established and widely used pathways for SAF production. It involves the hydroprocessing of plant oils or animal fats, such as vegetable oils or used cooking oils. The feedstock is subjected to hydrogenation, resulting in the production of SAF, along with glycerin as a byproduct. HEFA-derived SAF can be blended with or used as a drop-in replacement for conventional jet fuel.

Fischer-Tropsch (F-T): The Fischer-Tropsch process converts synthesis gas (a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) derived from biomass or other carbon sources into liquid hydrocarbons. This thermochemical process involves several steps, including gasification, gas cleaning, and catalytic reactions. The resulting product is a mixture of hydrocarbons that can be further refined into SAF. F-T SAF offers high energy density and can be used as a drop-in fuel.

Alcohol-to-Jet (ATJ): The Alcohol-to-Jet process involves the conversion of alcohol feedstocks, such as ethanol or butanol, into SAF. The alcohol is dehydrated and chemically transformed into olefins or other hydrocarbons, which are then further processed to produce SAF. ATJ SAF can be blended with conventional jet fuel or used as a drop-in replacement.

Catalytic Hydrothermolysis (CH): CH is a thermochemical conversion process that uses water, heat, and catalysts to convert wet biomass feedstocks, such as algae or sewage sludge, into biocrude oil. The biocrude oil can then undergo further refining processes to produce SAF. CH offers the advantage of utilizing wet biomass feedstocks, which reduces the need for energy-intensive drying processes.

Pyrolysis: Pyrolysis involves the thermal decomposition of biomass feedstocks in the absence of oxygen, resulting in the production of bio-oil, syngas, and biochar. The bio-oil can be upgraded through additional processes to obtain SAF. Pyrolysis offers flexibility in utilizing a wide range of feedstocks, including agricultural residues and dedicated energy crops.

Other Pathways: There are ongoing research and development efforts exploring alternative pathways for SAF production. These include biotechnology-based approaches that utilize genetically modified microorganisms or synthetic biology techniques to produce bio-based feedstocks and advanced conversion technologies like electrofuels, where renewable electricity is used to convert carbon dioxide into liquid fuels.

Each conversion technology has its advantages and challenges, including feedstock compatibility, energy requirements, process complexity, and scalability. The choice of conversion technology depends on factors such as feedstock availability, technological maturity, economic viability, and environmental considerations.

It is worth noting that different conversion technologies may have different sustainability and life cycle impacts. Factors such as feedstock sourcing, energy inputs, water usage, and overall greenhouse gas emissions should be carefully evaluated to ensure the sustainability and environmental benefits of the SAF produced.

As the SAF industry evolves, a combination of these conversion technologies may be employed to meet the growing demand for sustainable aviation fuels and advance the goal of reducing the carbon footprint of the aviation sector.

Key Step

Key steps in the production process: from feedstock preprocessing to fuel refining

The production process of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) involves several key steps, starting from feedstock preprocessing to fuel refining. 

While specific processes may vary depending on the chosen conversion technology, here is a general overview of the key steps involved:

Feedstock Collection and Preprocessing: The first step is the collection and preprocessing of the selected feedstock. This involves activities such as harvesting biomass, collecting waste oils or fats, or cultivating algae. Feedstock preprocessing may include cleaning, drying, grinding, or extracting oils, depending on the nature of the feedstock.

Feedstock Conversion: The next step is the conversion of the prepared feedstock into a suitable intermediate product. This step varies depending on the chosen conversion technology, such as HEFA, F-T, ATJ, or others. It may involve processes like hydroprocessing, gasification, alcohol dehydration, or thermochemical conversion.

Intermediate Product Refining: The intermediate product obtained from the feedstock conversion step undergoes further refining to remove impurities and optimize the desired fuel properties. This refining process can include activities like distillation, hydrotreating, hydrocracking, and separation techniques to obtain a high-quality fuel intermediate.

Fuel Blending and Additive Incorporation: Once the intermediate product is refined, it is blended with other components to meet the required specifications for SAF. This may involve blending the intermediate with conventional jet fuel or other compatible fuels to achieve the desired properties. Additionally, specific additives may be incorporated to enhance fuel performance, stability, and safety.

Quality Testing and Certification: The blended SAF undergoes rigorous quality testing and certification to ensure compliance with established industry standards and specifications. Testing may include analysis of key properties like density, viscosity, flashpoint, freezing point, and combustion characteristics. Certification by relevant aviation authorities, such as ASTM International, ensures the fuel meets the necessary requirements for use in aviation.

Distribution and Supply Chain Management: Once certified, the SAF is ready for distribution and supply chain management. This involves storage, transportation, and delivery to airports or fueling stations, ensuring a reliable and efficient supply of SAF for aircraft operators.

Aircraft Use: The final step is the utilization of SAF in aircraft. SAF can be used as a blend with conventional jet fuel or as a drop-in replacement, depending on the aircraft’s compatibility and regulatory requirements. Aircraft operators fuel their planes with SAF, enabling them to reduce their carbon emissions and contribute to a more sustainable aviation industry.

It’s important to note that throughout the production process, sustainability considerations, life cycle analysis, and environmental impact assessments are crucial to ensure the overall sustainability of SAF production and use.

The SAF production process is continuously evolving with advancements in technology and feedstock options. Research and innovation aim to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and further enhance the sustainability and scalability of SAF production to meet the increasing demand for environmentally friendly aviation fuels.

Sustainability

Ensuring feedstock sustainability and avoiding deforestation or other negative environmental impacts

Ensuring feedstock sustainability and avoiding negative environmental impacts, such as deforestation, is a critical aspect of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) production. 

Here are some key strategies and considerations to achieve feedstock sustainability:

Use Residue and Waste Streams: Prioritize feedstocks that are derived from agricultural residues, food processing waste, or other waste streams. By utilizing these materials, SAF production can minimize the need for additional land use and reduce waste, thus avoiding potential negative environmental impacts.

Avoid High-Risk Feedstocks: Identify and avoid feedstocks that are associated with high-risk activities, such as deforestation, habitat destruction, or biodiversity loss. Feedstocks like palm oil, soybean oil, and sugarcane have been associated with deforestation and land-use change. Choosing alternative feedstocks that do not compete with food production or have lower environmental impacts can help ensure sustainability.

Implement Certification and Sustainability Standards: Adhere to recognized certification schemes and sustainability standards to ensure responsible sourcing of feedstocks. For example, the Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB) provides a certification framework for biomass feedstocks, emphasizing social, environmental, and governance criteria. Compliance with such standards provides assurance that feedstocks are sourced sustainably.

Conduct Life Cycle Assessments: Conduct comprehensive life cycle assessments (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of feedstock production and conversion processes. LCAs analyze the entire life cycle of SAF production, including feedstock cultivation, transportation, conversion, and end-use. This enables identification of potential environmental hotspots and allows for targeted improvements to minimize negative impacts.

Engage in Stakeholder Collaboration: Collaborate with stakeholders, including local communities, indigenous groups, NGOs, and governmental bodies, to ensure transparency, inclusivity, and alignment with sustainability goals. Engaging with these stakeholders facilitates the identification of potential environmental and social risks, promotes responsible sourcing, and supports local economic development.

Promote Sustainable Agriculture Practices: Encourage sustainable agricultural practices for feedstock cultivation. This includes practices such as no-till farming, crop rotation, agroforestry, and water conservation. Sustainable agricultural techniques help minimize soil erosion, reduce the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and enhance overall ecosystem health.

Support Research and Innovation: Invest in research and development to explore new feedstock options and improve feedstock cultivation techniques. This includes investigating non-food energy crops, algae cultivation, and advanced agricultural practices to increase feedstock availability while minimizing environmental impacts.

Traceability and Supply Chain Transparency: Establish robust systems for traceability and supply chain transparency to ensure the origin and sustainability of feedstocks. This includes tracking the entire supply chain from feedstock sourcing to fuel production, and implementing mechanisms to verify compliance with sustainability standards.

By implementing these strategies, SAF producers can ensure feedstock sustainability, minimize negative environmental impacts, and contribute to the overall sustainability of the aviation industry. It is essential to prioritize long-term environmental and social considerations in SAF production to foster a truly sustainable and low-carbon aviation sector.

Environmental Benefits of SAF

Reduced greenhouse gas emissions: Comparing SAF emissions to conventional jet fuel

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) offers significant reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to conventional jet fuel. Here’s a comparison of the emissions associated with SAF and conventional jet fuel:

Lifecycle GHG Emissions: SAF can achieve significant lifecycle GHG emissions reductions compared to conventional jet fuel. Lifecycle emissions include emissions from feedstock cultivation, processing, transportation, and fuel combustion. Depending on the feedstock and production process, SAF can achieve emissions reductions ranging from 50% to over 80% compared to conventional jet fuel.

Well-to-Wake Emissions: Well-to-Wake emissions refer to the emissions associated with the entire fuel lifecycle, from the extraction of raw materials (well) to combustion in the aircraft engines (wake). SAF’s lower lifecycle emissions result in reduced well-to-wake emissions compared to conventional jet fuel. This reduction is primarily attributed to the use of renewable feedstocks and the potential for carbon capture and utilization during feedstock growth.

Direct Combustion Emissions: When SAF is used in aircraft, it produces similar or slightly lower direct combustion emissions compared to conventional jet fuel. SAF’s properties allow for seamless blending or direct use in existing aircraft engines without requiring engine modifications or compromising safety.

Carbon Intensity: SAF has a lower carbon intensity compared to conventional jet fuel. Carbon intensity refers to the amount of CO2 emissions produced per unit of energy generated. SAF’s lower carbon intensity contributes to overall GHG emissions reduction and helps mitigate climate change impacts.

Net GHG Reduction Potential: SAF has the potential to deliver net GHG emissions reductions when considering carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies. For example, feedstocks like algae can absorb CO2 during growth, and if coupled with CCU processes, the overall emissions can be further reduced. This enables SAF to potentially achieve even higher GHG emissions reductions compared to conventional jet fuel.

It’s important to note that the specific emissions reduction achieved by SAF can vary depending on factors such as feedstock type, production processes, supply chain efficiency, and the energy sources used during production. Continuous efforts are being made to improve the sustainability and emissions performance of SAF through advancements in feedstock selection, conversion technologies, and supply chain optimization.

The utilization of SAF in aviation is a crucial step towards reducing the carbon footprint of the industry and mitigating climate change. Its significantly lower GHG emissions compared to conventional jet fuel make SAF a valuable tool in achieving a more sustainable and environmentally responsible aviation sector.

Improved air quality and local pollution reduction

In addition to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the use of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) also contributes to improved air quality and local pollution reduction. 

Here are some key ways in which SAF helps mitigate local pollution:

Reduced Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions: SAF has the potential to reduce particulate matter emissions, including fine particles (PM2.5) and black carbon. These particles can have adverse health effects when inhaled and contribute to air pollution. The use of SAF in aircraft engines can result in lower PM emissions compared to conventional jet fuel, leading to improved air quality in and around airports and along flight routes.

Lower Sulfur and Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emissions: SAF typically has lower sulfur content and reduced levels of aromatic hydrocarbons compared to conventional jet fuel. Sulfur compounds and aromatic hydrocarbons contribute to air pollution and can have detrimental effects on human health and the environment. By using SAF, the emission of these pollutants can be minimized, leading to cleaner air and reduced local pollution impacts.

Reduction in Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Emissions: While SAF does not directly impact nitrogen oxide emissions, the use of SAF in aircraft engines can indirectly contribute to NOx emissions reduction. SAF’s lower carbon content and improved combustion properties can result in reduced fuel burn and lower overall engine emissions, including nitrogen oxides. NOx emissions contribute to air pollution and can lead to the formation of ground-level ozone, which is harmful to human health.

Decreased Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emissions: VOC emissions are released from the evaporation of fuels and solvents and contribute to air pollution and the formation of smog. SAF production processes typically involve lower VOC emissions compared to conventional jet fuel production. By promoting the use of SAF, the emissions of VOCs can be reduced, leading to improved local air quality.

Mitigation of Local Air Pollution Hotspots: Airports and surrounding areas, especially densely populated regions, often experience localized air pollution due to aircraft emissions. By adopting SAF, airports can mitigate their contribution to local air pollution hotspots. The use of SAF can reduce emissions of pollutants in these areas, benefiting the health and well-being of nearby communities.

It is important to note that the environmental and health benefits of SAF depend on factors such as feedstock sourcing, production processes, and emission control technologies. Continuous research, development, and optimization of SAF production and utilization are necessary to maximize its positive impact on air quality and local pollution reduction.

The adoption of SAF, alongside other measures like improved aircraft technology, air traffic management, and ground infrastructure, plays a crucial role in creating a more sustainable and environmentally friendly aviation industry that prioritizes cleaner air and healthier communities.

Mitigating the environmental impact of aviation on climate change

Mitigating the environmental impact of aviation on climate change is a critical objective for the aviation industry. 

Here are some key strategies and initiatives aimed at reducing the industry’s carbon footprint:

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Adoption: Increasing the production and use of SAF is a key strategy for mitigating aviation’s impact on climate change. SAF offers significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions compared to conventional jet fuel. Encouraging the use of SAF as a blend or drop-in replacement in aircraft can contribute to reducing aviation’s carbon emissions.

Technological Advancements: Advancements in aircraft technology, such as more fuel-efficient engines, lightweight materials, and improved aerodynamics, can significantly reduce fuel consumption and emissions. Continued research and development efforts are focused on improving aircraft efficiency and exploring alternative propulsion technologies, such as electric and hybrid-electric systems, to further reduce carbon emissions.

Operational Improvements: Optimizing flight operations can lead to fuel savings and emissions reductions. Strategies such as improved air traffic management, more direct flight paths, optimized climb and descent profiles, and ground operations efficiency can minimize fuel burn and emissions during different phases of flight.

Carbon Offsetting and Carbon Neutrality: Airlines and the aviation industry can participate in carbon offset programs to compensate for their emissions. Carbon offsetting involves investing in projects that reduce or remove greenhouse gas emissions elsewhere, such as renewable energy projects or reforestation initiatives. Some airlines have also committed to achieving carbon neutrality, aiming to balance their carbon emissions by implementing emission reduction measures and offsetting remaining emissions.

International Collaboration and Regulatory Measures: The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), along with governments and industry stakeholders, works to develop and implement global policies and standards to address aviation emissions. Measures such as the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) aim to stabilize net CO2 emissions from international aviation at 2020 levels through the use of offset credits.

Sustainable Infrastructure and Operations: Investing in sustainable airport infrastructure, such as renewable energy generation, energy-efficient buildings, and ground transportation electrification, can reduce the carbon footprint of aviation operations. Implementing sustainable practices in airport operations, such as waste management, water conservation, and renewable energy procurement, also contribute to reducing environmental impact.

Research and Development: Continued research and development efforts are essential to drive innovation and find new solutions for mitigating aviation’s impact on climate change. This includes exploring alternative fuels, sustainable materials, advanced air traffic management systems, and disruptive technologies that can revolutionize the aviation industry and enable more sustainable operations.

It is important to note that a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach is necessary to achieve significant reductions in aviation’s environmental impact. Collaboration among airlines, manufacturers, governments, and stakeholders across the aviation sector is crucial to implement these strategies effectively and drive positive change.

Contributions to achieving global sustainability goals (e.g., Paris Agreement)

The aviation industry plays a crucial role in contributing to global sustainability goals, including those outlined in the Paris Agreement. 

Here are some key contributions of the aviation sector towards achieving these goals:

Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions: The Paris Agreement aims to limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. The aviation industry is actively working towards reducing its GHG emissions by implementing measures such as adopting Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), improving aircraft efficiency, optimizing flight operations, and participating in carbon offset programs. These efforts contribute to the overall global efforts to mitigate climate change.

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Adoption: The use of SAF in aviation is a significant contribution to sustainability goals. SAF offers a lower carbon footprint compared to conventional jet fuel, resulting in reduced net emissions of greenhouse gases. By increasing the production and use of SAF, the aviation industry supports the transition to a low-carbon economy and helps decarbonize the transportation sector.

International Collaboration and Targets: The aviation industry actively collaborates through international organizations such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to set emissions reduction targets and develop global policies. The ICAO’s Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) is one example of a global market-based measure designed to address aviation emissions and contribute to the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Research and Innovation: The aviation industry invests in research and development to drive innovation and advance sustainable technologies. This includes efforts to develop electric and hybrid-electric aircraft, explore alternative propulsion systems, and improve operational efficiency. By fostering technological advancements, the industry contributes to the long-term goal of reducing emissions and achieving sustainability targets.

Sustainable Infrastructure and Operations: Airports and airlines are implementing sustainable practices in their operations to minimize environmental impact. This includes investing in renewable energy, energy-efficient buildings, waste management, water conservation, and sustainable ground transportation. Sustainable airport infrastructure and operations contribute to reducing carbon emissions and achieving sustainability goals.

Stakeholder Engagement and Awareness: The aviation industry engages with various stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, and communities, to promote sustainability and raise awareness about the industry’s efforts. By involving stakeholders and fostering dialogue, the aviation sector seeks to build support for sustainable practices and ensure a coordinated approach towards achieving global sustainability goals.

Contribution to Sustainable Development: Sustainable aviation supports broader sustainable development goals beyond climate action. It contributes to economic growth, job creation, connectivity, tourism, and the well-being of communities. By enabling people and goods to travel efficiently and safely, aviation facilitates social and economic development while striving to minimize its environmental impact.

The aviation industry recognizes the urgency to align with global sustainability goals, including those outlined in the Paris Agreement. Through collaborative efforts, technological advancements, and sustainable practices, the industry aims to play its part in addressing climate change and contributing to a more sustainable and resilient future.

Industry Adoption and Challenges

Regulatory and policy support for SAF production and usage

Regulatory and policy support for Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) production and usage is crucial to accelerate its adoption and maximize its impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the aviation sector. 

Here are some key regulatory and policy measures that support SAF:

Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS): Governments can establish Renewable Fuel Standards or similar policies that require a certain percentage of aviation fuel to be sourced from renewable and sustainable feedstocks. These standards create a market demand for SAF and provide a stable policy framework for its production and use.

Blending Mandates: Governments can mandate a minimum blend percentage of SAF in aviation fuel. This encourages fuel suppliers to incorporate SAF into their fuel supply chains and ensures a consistent market demand for SAF. Blending mandates help drive investment in SAF production facilities and stimulate innovation in feedstock sourcing and conversion technologies.

Tax Incentives and Financial Support: Governments can provide tax incentives, grants, or subsidies to promote SAF production and usage. These financial incentives help reduce the cost gap between SAF and conventional jet fuel, making SAF more economically viable for producers and airlines. Supportive financial measures encourage investment in SAF infrastructure and support the scaling up of production capacity.

Research and Development Funding: Governments can allocate funding for research and development programs focused on SAF technologies, feedstock development, and sustainability improvements. This funding supports innovation, enhances the efficiency and scalability of SAF production processes, and facilitates the development of new feedstocks with lower environmental impacts.

Public Procurement Policies: Governments and public entities, such as airports and government fleets, can adopt procurement policies that prioritize the use of SAF. By demonstrating a market demand for SAF, public procurement policies create a positive signal to the industry and contribute to market growth, attracting more investment and driving down costs.

International Collaboration and Standards: Governments can participate in international collaborations, such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and regional aviation associations, to establish global sustainability standards and harmonize SAF regulations. International cooperation ensures a level playing field for SAF production and usage across different jurisdictions and facilitates the global expansion of SAF markets.

Voluntary Carbon Offset Programs: Governments can encourage or support voluntary carbon offset programs specific to aviation. These programs allow airlines and stakeholders to offset their emissions by purchasing verified carbon credits or investing in emission reduction projects. Voluntary offset programs provide additional incentives for the aviation industry to adopt SAF and support the development of robust carbon markets.

By implementing these regulatory and policy measures, governments can create an enabling environment for SAF production and usage. Such support helps drive investment, incentivizes innovation, and accelerates the transition towards a more sustainable aviation sector, aligned with climate change mitigation goals.

Initiatives and partnerships driving SAF development

The development and adoption of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) are driven by various initiatives and partnerships involving governments, industry stakeholders, research organizations, and non-governmental organizations. 

Here are some key initiatives and partnerships that are actively driving SAF development:

Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative (CAAFI): CAAFI is a public-private partnership in the United States that brings together airlines, aircraft manufacturers, fuel suppliers, and government agencies. Its mission is to promote the development and deployment of alternative aviation fuels, including SAF. CAAFI facilitates collaboration, conducts research, and works towards overcoming barriers to SAF commercialization.

Aviation Climate Solutions: Aviation Climate Solutions is an initiative led by the Air Transport Action Group (ATAG), a global industry association representing the aviation sector. The initiative brings together airlines, airports, and industry partners to accelerate the development and deployment of sustainable aviation solutions, including SAF. It aims to showcase the industry’s commitment to climate action and promote sustainable practices throughout the aviation value chain.

Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB): RSB is a global multi-stakeholder organization that sets sustainability standards and certification schemes for biofuels, including SAF. RSB’s certification ensures that SAF is produced in a manner that meets rigorous environmental, social, and economic criteria. Its standards cover feedstock cultivation, processing, and supply chain operations, ensuring the sustainability and traceability of SAF.

World Economic Forum (WEF) Clean Skies for Tomorrow Initiative: The Clean Skies for Tomorrow initiative, led by the World Economic Forum, aims to accelerate the development and deployment of SAF globally. It brings together industry leaders, policymakers, and stakeholders to advance the sustainability agenda in aviation. The initiative focuses on promoting collaboration, innovation, and policy support to scale up SAF production and usage.

European Union Aviation Initiative (EU-AI): The EU-AI is an industry-led initiative supported by the European Commission to promote the development and uptake of SAF in Europe. It brings together airlines, fuel suppliers, airports, and other stakeholders to facilitate the commercialization of SAF and ensure its sustainable production. The EU-AI supports research, demonstration projects, and policy development to drive SAF deployment across Europe.

Sustainable Aviation Fuel Users Group (SAFUG): SAFUG is a global industry coalition composed of airlines, airports, fuel producers, and industry partners. Its mission is to accelerate the development and use of SAF through collaboration and knowledge sharing. SAFUG members collaborate on research, development, and advocacy efforts to support SAF commercialization and increase its availability in the market.

Public-Private Partnerships: Governments and industry stakeholders often form public-private partnerships to drive SAF development. These partnerships involve collaborations between airlines, fuel producers, research institutions, and government agencies to fund research projects, pilot plants, and demonstration flights. These initiatives aim to advance SAF technologies, explore new feedstocks, and improve the sustainability and scalability of SAF production processes.

These initiatives and partnerships are instrumental in fostering collaboration, driving innovation, and overcoming barriers to SAF development. By bringing together key stakeholders and aligning efforts, they play a significant role in accelerating the adoption of SAF and achieving sustainability goals in the aviation industry.

Current and future market trends

Airline commitments and demand projections

Current and future market trends in Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) are characterized by increasing airline commitments and growing demand projections. 

Here are some key trends:

Airline Commitments: Many airlines have made commitments to reduce their carbon emissions and incorporate SAF into their operations. Numerous major airlines have announced targets to achieve carbon-neutral growth, reduce emissions, or increase SAF usage. These commitments demonstrate the industry’s recognition of SAF as a crucial tool for decarbonizing aviation.

Mandates and Regulations: Governments and regulatory bodies are increasingly introducing mandates and regulations to promote the use of SAF. For example, some countries have implemented blending mandates or carbon intensity requirements, which create a regulatory framework and market demand for SAF. These measures drive the adoption of SAF and shape market trends.

Partnerships and Supply Chain Collaboration: Airlines, fuel producers, and other stakeholders are forming partnerships and collaborating along the SAF supply chain. This includes long-term offtake agreements, strategic investments, and joint research and development efforts. Such collaborations help secure SAF supply, drive innovation, and enhance the availability and affordability of SAF.

Scaling up Production Capacity: The SAF industry is witnessing investments in scaling up production capacity. This includes the construction of new SAF production facilities and the retrofitting of existing refineries to produce SAF. Increased production capacity is essential to meet the growing demand for SAF and achieve economies of scale that can make SAF more competitive with conventional jet fuel.

Feedstock Diversification: The SAF industry is exploring a broader range of feedstocks to diversify the supply and improve sustainability. While current SAF production primarily relies on waste oils and fats, there is increasing interest in alternative feedstocks such as cellulosic biomass, algae, and municipal solid waste. Feedstock diversification enhances the resilience and sustainability of SAF production.

Falling SAF Prices: As the SAF industry matures and production volumes increase, it is expected that the prices of SAF will gradually decline. Falling SAF prices, coupled with potential policy incentives, can make SAF more financially viable for airlines and increase its competitiveness compared to conventional jet fuel.

Growing Market Demand: Market projections indicate a significant increase in SAF demand in the coming years. Several studies forecast that SAF demand could reach substantial volumes by 2030 and beyond. This demand is driven by airline commitments, regulatory requirements, and the need to reduce aviation emissions. As more airlines seek to decarbonize their operations, the demand for SAF is expected to rise.

Technological Advancements: Research and development efforts continue to focus on improving SAF production processes and exploring advanced technologies. This includes advancements in feedstock conversion technologies, catalysts, and production efficiency. Technological innovations can further drive down costs, improve the sustainability of SAF, and enhance its market competitiveness.

Overall, the market trends in SAF indicate a growing momentum towards its widespread adoption in the aviation industry. Increasing airline commitments, supportive regulations, supply chain collaborations, and advancements in production technologies are driving the growth of the SAF market. As these trends continue, SAF is expected to play an increasingly significant role in reducing aviation emissions and achieving sustainability goals.

Overcoming barriers and scaling up production

Technology advancements, cost considerations, and infrastructure requirements

Overcoming barriers and scaling up Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) production requires addressing several key factors, including technology advancements, cost considerations, and infrastructure requirements. 

Here’s a breakdown of these aspects:

Technology Advancements:

a. Feedstock Development: Advancing feedstock development is crucial to ensure a sustainable and diversified supply of SAF. Research focuses on identifying new feedstock sources, improving feedstock yields, and enhancing their conversion efficiency.

b. Conversion Technologies: Advancements in conversion technologies, such as hydroprocessing, gasification, and fermentation, can improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of SAF production. Research and development efforts aim to optimize these processes and develop new pathways to produce SAF from various feedstocks.

c. Catalysts and Process Optimization: Developing efficient catalysts and optimizing process parameters play a significant role in improving the conversion efficiency and reducing the costs associated with SAF production. Research focuses on catalyst design, process optimization, and integration of different conversion steps.

d. Emerging Technologies: Exploring emerging technologies, such as electrofuels, solar-to-fuel conversion, and synthetic biology, may offer new pathways for SAF production. These technologies have the potential to further improve the sustainability and scalability of SAF production.

Cost Considerations

a. Economy of Scale: Scaling up SAF production can help achieve economies of scale, reducing production costs over time. Increasing production volumes and optimizing production processes can lead to cost efficiencies and make SAF more cost-competitive with conventional jet fuel.

b. Feedstock Availability and Cost: The availability and cost of feedstocks significantly impact the overall cost of SAF production. Developing feedstocks with lower costs and high yields, as well as utilizing waste and residue streams, can contribute to cost reduction.

c. Research and Development Funding: Continued investment in research and development is essential to drive technological advancements and cost reduction in SAF production. Government funding, public-private partnerships, and industry collaborations can support research efforts and help overcome cost barriers.

Infrastructure Requirements:

a. Production Facilities: Establishing dedicated SAF production facilities or retrofitting existing refineries to produce SAF is essential to scale up production. Investment in infrastructure, including equipment, storage facilities, and distribution networks, is required to support increased SAF production and distribution.

b. Supply Chain Integration: Integration of SAF production into existing fuel supply chains and distribution networks is necessary to ensure a seamless flow of SAF from production to end-users, such as airports and airlines. Collaborations between fuel producers, refineries, logistics providers, and end-users are critical to developing an efficient SAF supply chain.

c. Infrastructure Investment: Governments and industry stakeholders may need to invest in infrastructure development to support SAF production and distribution. This includes incentives for infrastructure upgrades, support for the construction of new facilities, and the development of sustainable fueling infrastructure at airports.

Addressing these technological, cost, and infrastructure challenges requires a collaborative effort between governments, industry stakeholders, research institutions, and financial institutions. Continued research and development, policy support, and investments in infrastructure are crucial to overcoming barriers and successfully scaling up SAF production to meet the growing demand for sustainable aviation fuel.

Conclusion Production of sustainable aviation fuel

The production of Sustainable Aviation Fuel represents a significant step forward in reducing the environmental impact of aviation. 

Through the use of renewable feedstocks and advanced conversion technologies, SAF offers a viable solution for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and achieving sustainability goals. 

As industry adoption and regulatory support continue to grow, the future of aviation looks brighter, where sustainable practices and SAF production take center stage, ensuring a cleaner and greener future for air travel.

Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) production plays a vital role in decarbonizing the aviation sector and mitigating its environmental impact. SAF offers a promising alternative to conventional jet fuel, with reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved air quality, and sustainable feedstock sourcing.

Through advancements in technology, such as feedstock development, conversion processes, and catalyst optimization, the production of SAF is becoming more efficient and cost-effective. Ongoing research and development efforts, coupled with supportive policies and funding, are driving innovation and scaling up production capacity.

To realize the full potential of SAF, it is crucial to address barriers such as cost considerations and infrastructure requirements. Continued investment, economies of scale, and diversification of feedstocks are key factors in reducing the cost gap between SAF and conventional jet fuel. Additionally, the development of dedicated SAF production facilities and integration into existing supply chains and infrastructure are necessary to meet the growing demand.

The commitments and collaborations of airlines, governments, industry stakeholders, and research organizations are driving the development and adoption of SAF. Regulatory support, including renewable fuel standards, blending mandates, and financial incentives, is creating a favorable environment for SAF production and usage.

https://www.exaputra.com/2023/05/sustainable-aviation-fuel-saf.html

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

A New Battery Rebate Coming to Australian Households!

Published

on

Big News for Australian Households!

The Albanese Government has just unveiled a landmark commitment that could make it significantly easier and cheaper for families to install home solar batteries.  

If re-elected, the government plans to roll out the National Battery Booster Program, which will offer a generous rebate per kilowatt-hour (kWh) on the cost of eligible home battery systems. 

This announcement is a significant leap forward in Australia’s clean energy journey, and it has the potential to benefit millions of homes already using solar – and even more who are considering the switch.   

What is the National Battery Booster Program?

The National Battery Booster Program is designed to make solar batteries more accessible to everyday Australians by reducing upfront costs through a government-funded rebate.  

While the exact rebate value per kWh is yet to be finalised, the intention is clear: to make it more affordable for homeowners to store the energy they generate from their solar systems and use it when it’s most needed. 

This smart move aligns with Australia’s long-term climate goals and addresses rising concerns over electricity prices and energy security.  

Why a Home Battery Makes Sense Now More Than Ever

Home solar batteries are “the missing link” in Australia’s solar revolution. Over 4 million Australian homes now have solar panels – but only a small percentage have a battery to store excess power for later use. 

Without a battery, much of the solar power generated during the day is sent back to the grid, often for a low feed-in tariff.  

Then, in the evening when households use more power, they have to buy electricity from the grid, often at higher rates—installing a home battery bridges this gap. 

Here’s what a battery lets you do: 

  • Use that stored energy during peak usage times (usually at night) 
  • Reduce reliance on the grid 
  • Avoid high electricity prices 
  • Gain energy independence  

How Much Do Solar Batteries Cost?

The cost of home battery systems in Australia varies, depending on the size and brand. On average: 

  • A small battery (around 5 kWh) can cost between $4,000 and $8,000 
  • Larger systems (10 kWh and above) can go up to $15,000 or more 
  • Most batteries come with a 10-year warranty, making them a reliable long-term investment 

With the incoming rebate under the Battery Booster Program, these prices could drop significantly, putting energy storage within reach for many more Australian families.  

Government Regulations and Safety Standards

Not all batteries are created equal, and not all installers are certified to work with them. That’s why this program comes with strict safety and quality guidelines: 

  • Only batteries that have been assessed and approved by the Clean Energy Regulator will be eligible 
  • Installations must be completed by licensed electricians who have undergone certified battery installation training 
  • This ensures that households are not only getting cost-effective energy storage but also safe and high-performing systems.  

What This Means for You

If you’ve been considering upgrading your solar setup or adding a battery to your home, this is the perfect time to act.  

Whether you already have solar panels or are starting fresh, the National Battery Booster Program could help you: 

  • Significantly reduce your energy bills 
  • Increase the value and sustainability of your home 
  • Take control of your energy use 
  • Protect yourself from future price hikes  

How Can Cyanergy Help?

New Battery Rebate

At Cyanergy, we’ve helped thousands of Australians switch to smarter, more sustainable energy systems. We offer a range of high-quality solar batteries tailored to different household sizes and budgets. 

Our team of experienced energy consultants and CEC-accredited installers are here to help you: 

  • Navigate the rebate process when the program launches 
  • Ensure proper and safe installation 
  • Maximise your long-term energy savings 

Every home is different, and the best system for you depends on your energy usage, solar capacity, and long-term goals. We consider all that and provide expert recommendations every step of the way.  

Next Steps

The Battery Booster Program is set to roll out if the Albanese Government gets re-elected, so it’s wise to start preparing now. 

  • Want to know what kind of battery system fits your home?   
  • Need help understanding potential savings?   
  • Curious about how to qualify for the rebate? 

We’ve got you covered. 

Contact us for a free consultation.   

Visit us at: www.cyanergy.com.au  

Learn more about the program: Smart Energy Council: Battery Booster Program.  

Things to Consider

All home batteries must be approved by the Clean Energy Regulator and listed on the Approved Products List. 

Installation must be carried out by licensed electricians certified to work with batteries.  

Talk to the Experts

Every home is different – and so is every battery solution. That’s where we come in. At Cyanergy, our energy experts can help you find the best battery system for your needs and ensure you maximise this new rebate opportunity. 

Talk to an expert or get a free quote  

Your Solution Is Just a Click Away

The post A New Battery Rebate Coming to Australian Households! appeared first on Cyanergy.

A New Battery Rebate Coming to Australian Households!

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vattenfall 1.6 GW Farm, AI Learns to “Cheat”

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vattenfall 1.6 GW Farm, AI Learns to “Cheat”

Allen and Joel discuss Nylacast’s article in PES Wind Magazine about corrosion solutions in offshore wind and Vattenfall’s major investment in Germany’s largest offshore wind farm. They also talk about MIT’s strategic alliance with GE Vernova and the ethical concerns around AI in engineering.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on FacebookYouTubeTwitterLinkedIn and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Speaker: [00:00:00] You are listening to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by build turbines.com. Learn, train, and be a part of the Clean Energy Revolution. Visit build turbines.com today. Now here’s your hosts, Allen Hall, Joel Saxum, Phil Totaro, and Rosemary Barnes.

Allen Hall: If you checked your mailbox or checked online, the new PES Wind magazine is out and it is full of great content this quarter.

There’s a very interesting article because we’ve been talking a lot about offshore wind and some of the problems with offshore wind as one of them is corrosion. Just betw between us engineers, it comes up quite a bit. Like, why are we making things outta steel that you don’t need to make outta steel, why you’re not making them out of plastic?

And that’s what, uh, the people at, uh, Nylacast engineer products are doing, um, on some hang off clamps, Joel, uh, which are traditionally really cheap clamps that are made outta steel and rust like [00:01:00] crazy.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. You know, from my oil and gas offshore background, that was one of the things that was always a pain in the butt.

IIRM contracts, as they call ’em, offshore inspection, repair, and maintenance. There’s so much focus on coatings, paint coatings, paint coatings, and it’s a special coating, and it’s this, and you can only apply it during this, and everything has to be painted. And if you can’t allow rust to start anywhere on an offshore facility, it’s in a high corrosion environment, right?

You have salt water, salt spray temperatures, it’s always kind of wet. It’s a marine environment. And so erosion moves very fast, right? So in the, in the oil and gas world, they started creating some things out of like HDPE, which is high density, polyethylene, plastic. Um, it’s even so dense. You can mill it.

It’s really cool stuff. But that’s what, um, the PO the kind of Nylacast engineered products is working with some of these plastic products to replace some of those components in offshore wind turbines that are a pain in the butt to maintain. So when we talk about these hang off clamps. [00:02:00] They grab the cables and other things and they, and they hold them in place in the turbine as need be.

If those are made outta steel and have a coating on ’em, and you get a little bit of vibration and that coating starts to wear away or starts to get a little bit of rust, you’ve got a huge problem. You’ve gotta take the cables out, you gotta take the things off, you’ve gotta replace ’em. You gotta either replace them or you gotta grind on ’em and repaint them.

It is a nightmare. So they’re, what they’re doing with these, um, uh, hang off clamps that are, you know, basically plastic instead of metallic. Or a plastic type instead of metallic is there, they’re removing that need for IRM contracts in the future.

Allen Hall: I think it’s great. It makes a ton of sense. And I’m surprised you haven’t seen more of this because, uh, nylon and and derivatives in nylon are easily recyclable.

It does fit all the things that wind energy is looking for. It doesn’t. Rust recyclable, easy, lightweight, simple. We need to be moving this direction. So if you haven’t checked out PES Wind, you go to PS wind.com and download a [00:03:00] copy. Or if you are at Wind Europe when this episode comes out, it’ll be during the Wind Europe event.

Uh, there’ll be plenty of PES wind hard copies available just. Stop by and grab one. It’s well worth reading a lot of great material this quarter, so check out PESWind.com. Well, Swedish Power Utility Vattenfall has made final investment decisions for two wind farm projects in the German North Sea. The Nordic one project is set to become Germany’s largest offshore wind farm, which marks a significant expansion in Germany’s renewable energy capacity.

Now Vattenfall has approved construction of Nor Lake one and two wind farms. And they’ve also bought back Joel, uh, 49% stake that BASF had. And the, the total capacity of the projects is 1.6 gigawatts. That’s a lot of power with construction. It’s set to begin in 2026 and full operation is expected by 2028.

[00:04:00] And this is gonna power about 1.6 million German households. This is a huge project.

Joel Saxum: I think it’s really cool to hear this about the offshore wind sector, right? So, so much, whether it’s in the US or elsewhere, not a lot of good news, right? We had the Danish, uh, auction news. It didn’t really go anywhere for a little while.

There was a German, uh, auction that was, you know, had a really low subscription rate. So the fact that, uh, Vattenfall is charging forward, and, and this is a key thing too. And we’ll talk, you know, Phil’s usually here to talk about this, but final investment decision is a big milestone, right? There’s all this, you can, these offshore wind projects are being worked on for 6, 8, 10 years before you get to this stage, you know, you’re, you’re looking out, um, doing sub seed mapping and site characterization and all the permitting, and getting all the PPA stuff in place and signing these contracts and all these different things.

And then you finally get to final investment decision and once that is debt box [00:05:00] is checked, then you’re moving. Right. So final investment decision right now, Alan, and it looks like 2026 is gonna be the start of construction. What do you think they’re looking for right now? Are they signing contracts for vessels?

Is that, is that next on the list? It

Allen Hall: has to be right because they signed an agreement with Vestas for 68 turbines. Now this is really fascinating because it’s the V 2 36 15 megawatt turbine, 68 of them. Now, the big discussion about offshore is been, is 15 megawatts enough and should we be pushing to 20 or higher than 20, which is where Siemens GAA appears to be going.

But uh, that and fall sticking with a 15 megawatt turbine. I do think makes a lot of sense because it is less risky and risk is a huge concern at the moment. But Vest has also got a comprehensive long-term service agreement, which has been their, uh, mode of operating for a number of years now, and which [00:06:00] you hear a lot of operators offshore talk about not wanting a long-term agreement, but it seems like Europe is still sticking with it and Augustus is obviously.

Pushing it, uh, at the moment, but 15 megawatts long-term service agreement. Does

this

Joel Saxum: make sense,

Allen Hall: Joel?

Joel Saxum: I think so. And one of the reasons for Vestas as well is we know, ’cause we have someone in our network that used to be operations for Vestas, uh, for the offshore stuff, is they, they’re very well versed in it and they have the facilities and the Keyside facilities ready to go.

So Vesta is, uh, it’s not like, oh, we have these, you know, this gigawatt of order. Fantastic. We got the service contract. Fantastic. Now we need to do all this prep and this build out and figure out how this operation works. That’s not the case. Vestas is ready to rock. They’ve got their own keyside facilities, they have the teams in place, they can make this thing happen and that 15 megawatt turbine, I think it’s interesting that you say this too because you know the other one, um, from the Western OEMs that we’ve been following is that Big Dog 21 megawatt, I think from Siemens Mesa.

[00:07:00] That’s, but that is currently being tested. So to take final investment decision, you have to engage your insurance companies and your banks. If they’re not gonna sign a contract for a turbine that’s still under testing at this stage. Right? This is a, you’re talking a gigawatt of, of turbines at, you know, that’s a billion dollars, that’s a billion US dollars minimum in just tur a turbine order.

Right? So, so just in those turbines, that’s what that thing looks like. And, and if I’m fat and fall, uh uh. And fall. Of course, they’re, they’re developing a lot of on onshore power. They’re a part of some other offshore wind farms. But this is a big, big undertaking and I think you want, when you’re, you know, you’re taking, looking at final investment decisions.

You’re in these conversations with the banks and the insurance and the people that want to de-risk the investment. I think that’s where the, the Vestus thing steps in. I think that’s where it looks good, is de-risking the operation.

Allen Hall: Does esa. [00:08:00] Have a problem now that Vestus seems to be scoring with a 15 megawatt turbine.

It does. The Siemen SC MEA effort get, or the pathway get more difficult because like you said, they’re gonna have to have somebody buy a number of these turbines and it’s gonna have to demonstrate a decent service life for a year or two before you start to see a lot of people jump in and start to purchase those turbines.

In the meantime, Vestus is gonna be. Just building 15 megawatt turbines, one after the other. Does that start to weigh on Siemens cesa in terms of what they want to offer?

Joel Saxum: I don’t think so. Um, and the reason being is, is that 2021 megawatt machine that they’re testing right now is they’re trying to future proof their organization, right?

They’re trying to make sure that for the next push, they’re ready to go. So what’s gonna happen there, in my mind, is when the industry’s ready to make that next step forward, Vestas won’t have an offering. So Siemens will, right? So they’re gonna step into that hole, right? And so right now we [00:09:00] know, uh, Siemens cesa, while they had some troubles with the four and five megawatt onshore platform during that period, their offshore platforms are completely built different.

So the Siemens cesa offshore platforms, they didn’t really slow down in sales. They kept chugging along, right? Like I think, uh, there’s, you know, um, revolution in the States as the Siemens GAA turbine platform. Um, so I don’t, I don’t think it’s gonna hurt them right now. Or, I mean, let, let’s take this one, like you said in the future, I don’t think it’s gonna hurt them right now.

It kind of, it’s kind of painful to be probably on that team, in sales team and watching these, these things roll out and, oh, Vestas is doing this, Vestas is doing that. Um, but I think that, uh, they’ll be okay. It’ll be okay for them in the future. That’s just my take on it.

Allen Hall: That’s a good thought. Well, another thing happened in regards to the Nor Lake Offshore Wind Farm, Helena Bistro.

Who was Vattenfall wind business leader as announced her resignation and is gonna be stepping down from her position. This is kind of big, right? [00:10:00] She’s been there a long time. She’s been the head of that business area for quite a while. Bistro cited a desire to prioritize other things in life after 42 years of operational work.

Okay, so. When I first read this news story, it was kind of popped up in a number of places. Like, oh, there’s been big changes at Vattenfall. And then you read, well, she’s been doing this for 42 years. That’s a long time. And she just made, or just locked in, really, I. The largest offshore wind farm in Germany.

That is something to go out at at the top right. If you’re gonna go out, go out at the top.

Joel Saxum: I think she just did that. Win the Super Bowl and then retire. Just be done. Right? Like, like I, I’m with it. Like, yeah. I think that that happens sometimes in, you know, whether it’s wind, aerospace, the industries, you know, we’re always looking at all kinds of different industries, but when you see these big changes, if it’s a change of someone that they have an organization when they’re like 50.

I know this being ageist, right? But you’re like, Ooh, what’s going on over there? But sometimes [00:11:00] someone’s just retiring, right? Like sometimes it’s like, Hey, am I’m done here? You know? So not all changes in organizations mean good or bad news or, or whatever they may need. Sometimes it’s just, Hey man, I’m done here.

I’m, I’m riding off into the sunset. And you know what, uh, uh, he Helena Bi Bistro here. Or bistro doing this right after signing that thing FID on this big thing. You know what? Boom, springtime is here. I’m gonna enjoy not only my European summers that I usually do, but European summers for a long time now.

Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s a total win. I just didn’t understand the news reports, thought they were totally off on this, and congratulations to Helena because, uh, job well done

Joel Saxum: as busy wind energy professionals staying informed is crucial. I. And let’s face it difficult. That’s why the Uptime podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine.

PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an [00:12:00] industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit ps Wind.com today.

Allen Hall: Well GE renova and. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology have formed a new strategic alliance aimed at advancing energy technologies and developing industry leaders.

The partnership will focus on accelerating innovation in electrification, decarbonization, and renewables. Now, GE Renova is committing $50 million over five years to this partnership, and it’ll fund research initiatives, student fellowships and internships. That, uh, researchers obviously, and a lot of that’s on electrification, right?

That’s where Chii Renova is focused on. It also, uh, fund about 12 research projects annually, and three master’s students per year will conduct policy research resulting in published white papers. And it looks like they’re gonna have a symposium together at MIT, kind of a joint symposium. [00:13:00] Now, when I first read this, Joel, I thought, wow, this is kind of innovative.

GE Renova just recently moved to Cambridge, which is right next door to MIT and to Harvard. And I know that one of the things about GE moving, uh, Renova moving to that area was that they wanted to build a relationship with universities and try to grab some talent out of there. That makes sense to me.

The odd part about this is MIT doesn’t need the money and MIT. Should be creating students or graduates that are really focused on renewable energy already, and you should see a lot of impact from those students. I think the issue for me is I really haven’t seen as much as I would like to have seen and if, uh, MIT engineers are smart and obviously they are.

Where’s the impact? Uh, and I, I did, I used AI to go look right. I mean, let’s use something that simplifies the process a little bit. And AI is really [00:14:00] looking at MIT and saying they’ve done some work on ya optimization, like on offshore wind farms. So pointing the turbines in slightly different directions to increase power output.

There’s other companies that have been doing that for years that that research is not innovative.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, that’s commercialized.

Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s, it’s commercialized. There’s a lot of companies that offer it, have been offering it for quite a while. So what’s new? I, I don’t know which. You know, GE Renovo can do whatever they want with $50 million.

It does seem like the American universities may not be that place.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, I just, just, just a crackdown of the dollars. Right. $50 million over five years, funding 12 research projects, and that about basically equates to a million dollars per research project with some master’s students funded, thrown in there.

That’s great. I love to see that, but I’m a hundred percent with you. You know, if you, if you watch, I like to watch the innovation space. So I watch these, um, VC companies and I kind of [00:15:00] look at their, their posts and what they’re talking about and stuff. And you see regularly that on the commercial capital side, Europe is way behind the states on innovation funding.

Flip that thing into universities. They’re, they are doing so much more with the, with the dollar per output at their universities. That’s actionable. That actually works for industry than we are. Right. We talk about this all the time in private, but you have the DTUs and, and such over there. DTU puts out just gads of research.

I’ve been a part of some of the research programs when I was, you know, working for a Danish company and the, and it’s like. Research on leading edge erosion and how can we solve that today? Research on this weather pattern and how we can solve this today. What’s that? Doing research on structural loads for turbines and what does that mean and how can we share this with the industry Blade designers and these kind of things are regularly happening in Europe.

At that university, the same level [00:16:00] of the MIT type thing. But in reverse in the US you don’t see whether it’s funded research at universities or it’s funded research from the government. At Government labs, you don’t see that many things coming out that are actionable today, right? You see some reports about things that are kind of neat and maybe future, future wins involvement, and we need to look at the future stuff too.

I get that, but when I see $50 million going to a university, I, I’m thinking, man. If you gave me just a portion of that, I got, we got all kinds of ideas that we can, we can look at that could solve things tomorrow in the industry. And I think that’s what, where we’re at, the, the, the wind industry. I love it.

But, um, we have some black eyes. We have some things we need to solve, some, some ongoing issues that, uh, that are painful. And I think that, uh, throwing money at MIT is not the right way to solve them. That’s just me.

Allen Hall: I was just looking to see what MIT’s endowment is, and it is about $25 [00:17:00] billion right now, so $50 million is a drop in a bucket, which goes back to back to my first point that MIT should be doing this already.

They have plenty of research funds. They have plenty of smart people. If they care about the planet and are trying to be out in front of renewable energy, they would be doing the work already. I know that, and I think the response back is gonna be, well, they’ve been working on solar cells and Sure,

Joel Saxum: okay, that’s fine.

What about spreading the love? Right? What about take 50 million? What? Why not give MIT 10 million? Give Texas Tech 10 million. They have a win program. Give Georgia Tech to 5 million. They got some stuff. They’re doing some stuff in Wind. University of Wyoming’s doing some stuff in wind. North Texas is doing some stuff in wind.

Why not spread that around to the universities that are already working in wind or start a center of excellence at a university where we could get more wind people

Allen Hall: involved. Well, I just hate feeding the bureaucracy more than anything else because it does seem like when there are grants going into colleges and universities.[00:18:00]

When I watch them and see how they behave, and we’ve been sort of peripherally attached to some of this and watched it happen and decided to step out because the bureaucracy is taking so much of the funds that there is very little left to do real research and whatever research there is produced kind of goes into a black hole because it’s not applicable.

That’s a frustrating point. It can’t do that anymore. The bureaucracy can’t take 30, 40, 50, 60% of it and leave a little bit for actually doing something useful. It needs to flip, but that’s not what happens right now and that’s what worries me the most. It’s, you know, I don’t wanna get into details about some of the things we’ve been affiliated with for a brief, brief amount of time, but I do think that if they’re going to anybody.

Is going to give to a university to think hard about that and really figure out where your money is going. If it’s going to feed a a bunch of [00:19:00] paper pushers, maybe find another way to use those funds to push your products or your ideas forward. Output per dollar. Real output per dollar. Yeah, it’s gotta have.

Something come out of it that’s, if it’s public use, great. Publish it. And that’s the other thing too. I’m getting on my high horse here, but when they publish some of these things, they’re always buried in journals that cost a ton of money to, to even review the research, which I feel like to American taxpayer has probably paid for.

It’s much easier to get the research out of a European college or university than it is an American one. Strangely enough,

Joel Saxum: I saw a, a joke the other day online, and it was like, it was a, it was a research paper about, uh, the general public getting access to research, but it was behind a paywall. It’s bad,

Allen Hall: Joel.

It is really bad. I mean, you could easily pay well on some papers. Some of the lower cost ones are gonna be in a 20, $30 range. [00:20:00] It’s easy to get into the hundreds of dollars for a single research paper. And I kind of get it, except if it’s funded by the federal government. Those things should be just published.

You know, there’s a thing called Google. You can create a website, you can publish it. Google Scholars is a thing. You can publish it there. There’s a lot of ways to do this, which are free, but in ResearchGate is another one. There’s a lot of ways to do it that are free, but in order to get it to count, and a lot of the people that are doing the research are trying to get their PhDs.

In order for that to count, it has to be in, in a. Periodical, it’s gotta be reviewed by some people before. It can be blessed to be public knowledge at some level. It’s creates sort of the, a money changing or it creates a system that, uh, encourages. The selling of access. Let’s put it to you that way. Which [00:21:00] is unfortunate.

It doesn’t need to be that way. It didn’t used to be that way, but it is now.

Joel Saxum: And I think, I think there’s one thing too, to like monetizing or, or the capital markets monetizing ip, that’s one thing. But when it’s demo de, when we’re talking about de, we’re talking about democratizing research, not. Industry trade secrets or something of that sort.

Allen Hall: When I read about NRA projects, uh, like, oh, nras done this thing and I try to go find that paper and it’s in some publication that I have to go pay for, that just burns me.

Joel Saxum: It really burns me.

Allen Hall: Didn’t

Joel Saxum: I already pay for this in my tax bill?

Allen Hall: Yeah, pretty sure that I did, but now I gotta pay some random, uh, paper producing organization, uh, 30, 40, 50 bucks to get access to this paper, which.

Joel, you’re right. I have already paid for. There’s something not right with that system. Don’t let blade damage catch you off guard OGs. Ping sensors detect issues before they become expensive, time consuming problems from ice [00:22:00] buildup and lightning strikes to pitch misalignment and internal blade cracks.

Ping has you covered the cutting edge sensors are easy to install, giving you the power to stop damage before it’s too late. Visit eLog ping.com and take control of your turbine’s health today. Well, we’re almost reaching Terminator stage, Joel, with this open AI thing because there is concern about the AI models finding ways to cheat and to hide their reasoning, and it’s called reward hacking.

And OpenAI is saying, as AI becomes more sophisticated, uh, monitoring, controlling the system. The thing that they’re producing becomes increasingly challenging because it wants to find loopholes. Now my only question is you created this thing, I guess it’s got a mind of its own now, but it doesn’t. It’s a large.

Language model. It doesn’t have, uh, a [00:23:00] conscience, I wouldn’t say was, but, uh, or it doesn’t have a soul. Probably that’s another way to describe it. Uh, but it’s finding ways to cheat the system. ’cause it’s getting rewarded somehow. And my question is, well, one. What is rewarding? It mean? Like how does an AI system get happy?

Uh, what’s a dopamine hit here for some electrons? I don’t know. And second of all, how the heck are we gonna be able to know that it is. Telling you inaccuracies, and this is really troubling when it comes to things like software code engineering work. Like I was designing a building and I was using AI to do some calculations.

I would be really concerned about that. Is it actually doing the work that I think it’s doing, or is it just spitting out something to get you off? Because it’s, it’s, you’re using too many resources, right? It’d rather throw you ads about Amazon products than to tell you how to build

Joel Saxum: a building. I’m not an AI [00:24:00] expert, um, but I had a really good conversation last week.

So we did that, uh, we did that awesome webinar with Sky Specs, and when we were talking with them, we were talking with Dave Roberts, who’s the new CEO over there. And he brought up a term that I didn’t know and he said, agen ai, because of the last few years, it was like, you know, algorithmic things and generative ai, so gen ai and that was kinda the hot button thing.

Now, agen ai, that was a new concept for me. So I actually reached out to someone in my network, it’s uh, that is an AI actual expert. And I said, tell me what this syngen AI means. The difference with Agentic AI is, it’s like, it’s some, it’s an agent, right? It’ll do something for you. And so you can run it like, like generative ai, but it’s like the next level of generative ai.

But you can add that into any model and give it goals. Like if you’ve ever fi used the, um, Excel, there’s the find zero function. I love that one. It it for, for building business models and stuff, find zero is, is [00:25:00] fantastic. But it’s kind of like find zero on steroids, right? So you could tell it, I need you to do all of these calculations, but I also want you to, to do them to this goal.

Get me to this end goal. So like in Egen AI and win, you may say, run an AI algorithm based on this, this, this, this, and this. But the end goal is to get as many megawatt hours outta this wind farm as possible. This is, this is me talking in generalities, right? But that’s the thing, right? So now when you talk about.

What AI looks like for data centers, dollars spent on computing, dollars spent on cooling, dollars spent on power, which those ai, those large AI models, are gonna wanna run as efficiently as possible. So if you start to do some agentic AI things in there and say, do all of this, but exactly like you said, lower the cost of computing a little bit or whatever, then you’re gonna start to get this thing where it’s gonna start to, to kind of maybe cheat your answers a little bit to get to a more efficient.

[00:26:00] Compute state. I don’t know. Like I said, I’m not an AI expert,

Allen Hall: but it does make you think though, right? Joel? The way I think about it is when I ask perplexity or chat, GPT, one of these things, like, Hey, we just got a house and it has an induction cooktop. Okay. Which happened this morning, by the way, and it would not work with our pots and pans.

So I’m standing there like. Huh, this is not getting hot. And I can feel the stove pulse, like trying to see what I have stuck on top of it. And clearly I’ve made some human error. I thought, okay, I’ll go look that up to see what’s wrong. And, and, and perplexity said, Hey, you idiot. You can’t use aluminum cookware on these induction ranges.

Like, okay, I’ll take that for the, the loss. Human, human zero AI one. There you go. Now think in a bigger scope, like you were just saying, if I’m out [00:27:00] there trying to optimize a wind farm or to optimize a drive, train, or optimize anything that’s really complicated in engineering world. It doesn’t like to do that.

In fact, I went after, what’s the Google one? Um, Gemini, right. I tried to have Gemini do something that was fairly deep and it did process it. It wanted to process it and it wanted to sp out. Um, this significant amount of information, none of it really useful because I was looking for a specific, uh, research area within Lightning.

It’s esoteric to this discussion, but I was asking it to go find me this research in the world. And show me where these papers are that would talk about this one particular topic. And it just cranked and cranked and cranked and cranked. And I thought, you know what? It can’t be happy doing this. It’s going to want to dump me, which is [00:28:00] essentially what it did.

It just said, this is an interesting topic. Move along.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, you got you. You cost too much for this free service. Go away.

Allen Hall: Right? But it did it in a very, uh, unique way. It said a bunch of flowery things. This is this interesting subject. There’s been a lot of research. All these great things have happened, and then that was it.

And I, I think because of the amount of compute time it takes to do so many things, particularly complicated, engineering, technical work, even software, I think would be a problem. Will it always produce results? And I’ve tried some of the software pieces, like write me some code in C to do X or C plus plus to do this thing or in a Python to do this thing.

And it has been sketchy at best. It’s like 80% of the way there, but it doesn’t really work. And it, and you tell it, Hey, it has this problem. And then it goes, yeah, I have this problem. Let me retry it. Recode this again. You’re like, well you should have got it right the [00:29:00] first time kind of problem, right?

That’s recycling and re reasoning and rethinking that through has got to be eating up so much compute time and that there must be an incentive that they’re building in to get around that.

Joel Saxum: Here’s where we are though, so technically, okay, so I know Gemini Chat, GPT, Claude, all these, these things. I use Grok quite often.

Grok is cool because if it’s, if it’s chugging, there’s a little button on it. If you’re using it on your lap, on a desktop or laptop, whatever, on a browser. There’s a little button that says, see how I’m thinking? If it’s chugging away, and you could click on it and it will run you through like the processes that it’s doing to try to find your information, which is pretty cool.

But either way, at the end of the day, all of these things that we are using to kind of optimize our daily workflow, right? They’re not enterprise level. Right. So the one that scares me is if, if when we’re talking about this and go like. Well, what about the, the units that are using, like, I’m sure there’s something in, um, you know, fusion 3D that can [00:30:00] run AI algorithms on, on, I, I’m not saying, I’m sure, I know there is in engineering software to optimize the design.

I don’t want that design taking shortcuts, but, uh, but to, to make, to make the, uh, the, to general public feel safer about this concept, that AI expert I was talking to. He said this is the biggest difference that the public doesn’t see is that enterprise AI is a different story. Enterprise AI is, that’s what’s driving your, you know, the big data centers and stuff.

It’s enterprise ai, it’s not chat GPT and stuff like that’s, that’s not huge load on them compared to what some of these other things are. So when you get to that level where you’re integrating some kind of enterprise. AI for writing code, doing engineering work, these kind of things. It’s a different story.

We’re talking, you know, us playing football in the backyard to the NFL.

Allen Hall: I do think all the AI that’s being used to process, uh, video clips and make the people into Muppets is [00:31:00] time well spent. I’d tell you what, that’s scary. It’s insane. I think about how much compute are we doing to make this little video, 32nd video person talking into a Muppet.

Why are we

Joel Saxum: spending compute time on that? I saw one the other day that someone had sent me that was a, uh, an AI generated video of someone jumping off of a wind turbine and then turning into an eagle and like flying away and it looked freaking real. Like, I was like, man, is it CGI like who made this video?

I was like, no, this is literally like a prompt in a generative AI thing for a video. I was like, this is crazy.

Allen Hall: But again, it goes back like, why do we need that when we. We’re having some real

Joel Saxum: engineering or economic problems. The wind farmer this week, this week is the Strauss Wind Farm, which is over by Phil’s house.

Phil’s not here with us this week, but this one is right up the coast from Santa Barbara. It’s in Lompoc, California. This is the first wind farm on the coastline [00:32:00] of California. And because of this, uh, of course we wanted to make sure they did everything right. This is a bay wall wind farm. Uh, so part of the wind farm is it’s absolutely beautiful.

If you get a chance, go on the Bewa website and look at the video. Uh, but there’s an, there’s extreme protections for local, environmental and cultural resources, uh, associated with this wind farm. I’m gonna walk through, uh, one kind of example of it, but these are also some interesting turbines. It’s 27 ge, 3.8, 1 37 meter rotor turbines.

It’s 102.6 megawatts total. But an interesting thing, so we just talked about a bunch of things about ai. They’re actually going to use the ly ai system on this wind farm to see different kind of birds and raptors in the area. Uh, and because they were, are taking high considerations for wildlife, they’re doing feasibility studies about painting wind turbine blades, which we’ve heard about up in Wyoming and from Sweden.

I think it was. Um, they’re also doing excessive [00:33:00] monitoring for golden eagles. Uh, they’re doing a bunch of walk down studies, um, and then there is a, they’re also proposing something that I’ve never heard of. Um, it’s called Bird Guard Super Pro Amp, which is an auditory transmission thing gonna be installed around some of the turbines that basically when they sense a bird in the area, we’ll emit very loud auditory tones to push the birds or raptors, um, out of the area.

So. They’ve gone really deep into this thing for, uh, environmental protections, uh, and, uh, applaud that for bewa to make sure that they’re, uh. Being good stewards of the land. So the Strauss Wind Farm there in lopa, California, you are the Wind Farm of the week.

Allen Hall: That’s gonna do it for this week’s Uptime Wind Energy podcast.

Thanks for listening, and please give us a five star rating on your podcast platform and subscribing the Sun notes below to Uptime Tech News, our Substack newsletter. If you see an American wandering around Wind Europe loss, that will be me. So just come by and say hi, [00:34:00] and we’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

https://weatherguardwind.com/vattenfall-ai-learns-cheat/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Ten months after it was issued, the latest federal rule on transmission is mostly theoretical

Published

on

At a March 25 meeting convened by the Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning organization (SERTP), a large group of people met—as they do four times a year—to discuss the region’s power needs and whether the grid needs to be expanded to accommodate them.

As the meeting began, SERTP issued an increasingly common directive to those of us in attendance: We will not be discussing Order 1920, so don’t bother asking.

Some background on what this means may be important.

While most grid planning in the southeast is done by utilities within their own footprints, SERTP was created in response to a 2010 order from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) aimed at increasing the number of high-voltage power lines going across state boundaries and between utilities. These transmission lines are like highways for electricity: they may not be organically built by local communities, but they are essential to moving things at high volume.

A slow start

SERTP has never built or even planned a regional transmission line in more than a decade of its existence. Last year, FERC issued another rule, Order 1920, to address this ongoing failure of regional transmission.

SACE has previously broken down the details of Order 1920. The order requires utilities to start planning over a longer time horizon (20 years) and consider a number of potential benefits of new power lines that are left out of current analyses. (These include mitigation of extreme weather events, reduced energy loss on the lines, and a number of other virtues of having more space for power on the grid.)

As SACE has previously written, utilities in the Southeast have yet to announce any plans to comply with Order 1920 and have made several procedural moves to delay the deadline for legal compliance. The most recent and significant of these is SERTP’s request—now granted by FERC—to extend the deadline by a year, to June 2026.

Holding a meeting is not the same thing as taking action

What SERTP has been doing to prepare for Order 1920, and what it will do with the additional time it now has, is something of a mystery. According to the extension request it filed with FERC, SERTP’s efforts thus far have included “extensive working group meetings” between its member utilities (Duke, Southern Company, Dominion Energy, and others) as well as “outreach to neighboring regions.” 

The output of these conversations is not known to SACE or to the public. Since Order 1920 was issued, SERTP has declined to address it in any of its stakeholder meetings, except for two:

  1. An “educational session” on December 6th, 2024, which broke down the requirements included in Order 1920 but provided no information about what SERTP was doing to meet them. 
  2. A “stakeholder engagement meeting” held on January 29th of this year, in which regional nonprofit groups and other stakeholders were invited to offer feedback and suggestions on what SERTP might do to improve regional transmission. SERTP members made it clear during the course of this meeting that they were there only to listen and would not be taking questions.

It is, of course, possible that the conversations held between the utilities who run SERTP have been deep and substantive. But the extension request paperwork—which is the only information available to anyone outside of the utilities themselves—indicates that a number of critical decisions have yet to be made. Among the things these utilities have not decided are:

  • whether or not new software will be needed to examine the benefits of new power lines
  • who might supply that software, if needed, and for what price
  • what new planning procedures might be needed to meet the new federal standards
  • how those new planning procedures might be integrated with current ones

If these relatively fundamental questions remained undecided after more than six months of conversations among the member utilities, it’s fair to ask what has been decided. But stakeholders have been advised not to ask, and in any case, no answers have been given.

Holding meetings is not the same thing as listening

The community of advocates has been more than willing to offer ideas for what these processes might look like. Utilities outside the southeast, particularly those in the region known as MISO, have developed planning processes that meet many of the Order 1920 standards. We know that SERTP is aware of this because we presented it to them in some detail at the stakeholder engagement meeting. 

At the March 25th meeting earlier this week, I asked SERTP when, if ever, the stakeholders might hear back about the suggestions we have already shared. They offered no promise that we would get such an explicit reply and added that future stakeholder meetings may be delayed.

In fact, holding meetings is not necessarily anything

SERTP is within its legal rights to behave this way. Its meetings occur on schedule, its papers are in order, and the entity that regulates it—FERC—has given its blessings. But fifteen years after SERTP was formed to plan regional transmission, it cannot claim sole responsibility for a single new pole in the ground. 

Transmission can be arcane, but it matters. A well-planned and coordinated regional grid can be the difference between a manageable monthly bill and a shocking one; between a system that crashes in extreme weather and one that keeps people from shivering at home on Christmas Eve; and most starkly, between a livable climate and a hostile one. At some point, if we want these things, another meeting is not going to do the trick. Someone’s got to pick up a shovel and start to dig.

The post Ten months after it was issued, the latest federal rule on transmission is mostly theoretical appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

Ten months after it was issued, the latest federal rule on transmission is mostly theoretical

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com