Connect with us

Published

on

OPENING SUMMARY:

Upon the completion of writing my own climate story, I found a sudden interest in learning more about my father’s story. In an era where the effects of climate change are becoming increasingly evident, taking a step back to hear the experiences of others and reflect on the past becomes crucial. Made possible through my Talk Climate internship with Climate Generation, I was able to ask Ramil Villarama, whom I like to call “Dad,” a set of questions to understand his early years that were spent on a family farm. He shared his unique perspectives on how the environment he knew as a child has evolved, the lessons he learned from the land, and his thoughts on the urgent issue of climate change that affects us all today. As we delved into these cherished memories and insightful anecdotes, we uncovered not only the joys and challenges of growing up on a farm but also the stark contrasts between then and now in the context of climate change. Thank you for tuning in and enjoy the interview segment!

INTERVIEW:

Ramier: Hello Dad!

Dad: Hey, how are you son?

Ramier: Good! So we’re gonna start with the first part of the questions…so this one is kind of the section about your farm childhood, then we’ll move on to one more focused on climate change, then one more focused on the future and future goals.

Dad: That sounds good, I like that!

Farm childhood

Ramier: First question is, can you share your experiences of growing up on a family farm? How long did you grow up on the farm, what were some of your earliest memories of farming practices…What are some of the things you planted or did on the farm?

Dad: I’m really that you are having interests as far as my childhood…me growing up on a farm, it’s really a rewarding experience. I had so many wonderful memories and experiences growing up on a family farm. I used to help my dad plant various vegetables like eggplants, tomatoes, corn, bitter gourd or we call it ampalaya in Tagalog, and of course, rice. Apart from these vegetables, we would plant and grow melons and watermelons as well. It’s been an amazing and rewarding to say the least, given all those experiences that I had and seeing these plants grow and bear fruits. I grew up and lived in the farm for almost 22 years…in terms of the farming practices, I can remember that we would rely on rains apart from irrigation in making sure the plants, vegetables, fruits get enough water. Given the nature of the plants that we grow and the type of the soil/land, we will grow them alternately, which means some plants are best grown during wet or rainy season while others are in dry season. You know, I also helped my dad raise cattles and carabaos…I remembered that we will gather cow manure to be used as fertilizers and it actually helps improve the quality of the soil which is essential to growing healthy vegetables, plants, and fruits.

Ramier: Kind of to follow up on that question, how did you learn life in a different way by living on a farm…let’s say compared to someone I guess who grew up in a city…but also, how did it teach you responsibility at a young age?

Dad: That’s really a good question…living on a farm actually taught me to appreciate the simple things. It has taught me to be humble, the value of working hard, be respectful and persevere, and be patient cause I’ve really admired and respected my parents, particularly my day, as he’s been working really hard to provide our daily needs and that’s all coming from the farm. It actually taught me, you know, responsibility and compassion at a young age since I’ve always helped my parents, particularly my dad, with the planting and nourishing i.e., watering and applying fertilizers to the plants/vegetables we grow. I will always offer help and ensure that I, you know, make contributions with the daily tasks in growing our vegetables and fruits, feeding our cattles, etc.

Ramier: Cool, cool! So, I kinda took this question from something I read, from a book that also kinda talked about someone’s experiences growing up on a family and basically the question is, how did you have to work with and not against nature to make sure the farm succeeds?

Dad: Ya, that’s an awesome question! Again, you know, being a farmer or being a child or a kid of a farmer who grew up on a farm, we would rely heavily on nature to make sure that the farm or the farming succeeds right. Rain is very vital and a significant source of water for healthy soil and to grow the plants…so occasionally we would rely on heavy rains because that’s really good for the plants…and in the same manner, equally important is the heat of the sun, given that once you do the harvest, you need to dry the crops, especially rice, before it goes to milling. So nature plays an important role for the farm, for the planting to succeed. So we should take care of the nature, our nature, given that this provides, I would say, help, various help, regarding making sure the farming or the planting succeeds.

Ramier: That’s very interesting, especially in the book that I read, he talked about like…kind of all four seasons because he was from California, so kind of comparing that to the Philippines where it is only a lot of heat and rain, not really a spring or winter season is very interesting.

Dad: That’s very true! So in the Philippines, it’s either, it’s like there’s two seasons, right? When compared to the, to the States or the US, there’s like four seasons, but in the Philippines, sometimes I would joke around cause in terms of the weather or the temperature, it’s like hot or hotter, but during rainy season obviously there’s like rains and a lot of rains…you know, which as you can imagine, excessive rains don’t really help, cause it causes flooding.

Ramier: Ya so it’s kind of like both the positives and negatives of the seasons…so kind of to go off that, like as a child growing up on a family farm, did you have any experiences or realizations that made you more aware of the importance of addressing climate change? In other words, like how has your childhood shaped your understanding of the environment and climate…and I ask, I ask this because like I know back then people weren’t really thinking about climate change…it’s kind of more present knowledge and thought that people think more about now, but in the past, I feel like it is more something that just happened and people were kind of just farming to make a living and not really thinking about climate change.

Dad: Ya, I kinda find this question interesting, to say the least. Definitely! My response to that is definitely…growing up on a family farm, my experiences and realizations have really taught and made me more aware of the importance of addressing climate change. As a matter of fact and as I mentioned earlier, you know, rains, the heat of the sun are very important in terms of making sure that the plants grow healthy, right…but there are plants that are really suitable growing during the rainy season, while others are better during, or better suited, planting during dry season. As you can imagine, given the shifts and changes in weather patterns, this can really or tremendously impact the way we do farming or the growing of the plants.

Ramier: Kind of to follow up on that last part, like, can you explain more of the specific challenges you and your family faced due to the changing weather conditions?

Dad: Sure, ya there were specific challenges, you know we faced due to changing weather conditions that I can remember. As an example would be, when there’s drought and less rain, farmers or my dad will be heavily dependent on irrigation systems, which you would know becomes costly because you would have to buy fuel or gas to power the pumps…so obviously you know that’s an extra expense right, which kinda affects the profitable of farming. Then, the quality of soil diminishes, which means you can’t really expect good harvest. On the other hand, when you need to dry your crops right, like rice or corn, you’ll heavily rely on sufficient amount of sunlight to make sure the crops are totally dry and ready for milling.

Climate Change

Ramier: Cool! So we’re gonna move on to kind of this climate change and more specifics about climate change. So the question I have is how has climate change impacted your family farm over the years, and what are some specific changes you have observed? Then, to add on to that, how has the climate in the Philippines changed, if so, since your childhood?

Dad: Ya, again that is another good question…so I can say that climate change definitely impacted our family farm over the years. It’s been, as we go, harder to grow plants as you couldn’t really predict the weather due to climate change wherein, as I said, there’s change or shifts in weather patterns right…so, some specific changes that I’ve observed were obviously that we need to exercise crop rotation, the rotation of crops…wherein, let’s say this season, you’re just gonna grow rice, then the following season, you grow watermelon, so that’s what I’ve seen thus far. It actually became harder for other crops to grow due to shifts in weather patterns hence, you know, we would look into growing a different plant to really cope with the ever-changing weather patterns and given that the climate in the Philippines became, I would say, unpredictable given the climate change, however, for matter I’ve seen it’s getting worse nowadays, because of industrialization, pollution, and people not being cognisant right…they don’t really, I would say for a lack of a better word, take care of nature. Back in the day, when I was still living on our farm, we could still manage and cope up with the shift in weather patterns because before it’s not that worse, it’s manageable.

Ramier: Ya for sure! So I could tell that you guys as a family and as yourself, had to adjust farming practices in response to climate change and I think, of course, that’s really important…so, like you said, due to the changing weather you resorted to crop rotation, kind of to add to that, have you guys done any other adaptations or do you know what kind of is happening on that farm right now and what you’re family is doing to ensure the sustainability of the farm moving forward?

Dad: Ya, I mean like I said earlier, we had to make adjustments as far as farming practices in response to the ever-changing climate. Obviously, given the ever-changing weather, one of the things we’ve done was we resorted to crop rotation, that’s one…and the second, my dad actually built some irrigation well, given that, you know, you can’t really rely on rains, meaning that before you can actually predict when it’s raining and obviously crops would need to be watered and in order to do that, you would need another source and that’s the reason why, we would do or my dad would build irrigation wells just to cope up and be able to water the plants.

Future

Ramier: Wow that’s awesome! Now we are going to move on the future and future goals of the farm and yourself I gues. Kind of looking ahead, what do you envision for the future of farming, not only in your farm, but I guess your region, considering, like you said, the ongoing challenges of climate change? And another question is like, what role does the Philippine government play in supporting climate-resilient farming practices…are there any policy gaps that need to be addressed?

Dad: This is really a profound question…I would say looking ahead, what I envision for the future of farming in our region, considering the ongoing challenges of climate change are farmers should have access to better farm irrigation systems. Farmers should be able to explore and plant different rice seed variants or rice varieties to help breed improved crops with higher resilience to climate change. So you know, before, in the absence of good rice varients, you can’t really expect good harvest, given that the plants may not receive enough sunlight, may not receive enough water or sustenance…that’s the reason why I would think going forward, farmers should be more vigilant in thinking out of the box, like trying various or rice seed variants, which could really help improve or kind of cope up with the ever-changing climate change. The second question you asked about the Philippine government…obviously the Philippine government should play a vital role in supporting climate-resilient farming practices by building better irrigation systems. Another important thing is research and coming up with rice seed variants that are resilient to weather change. The Philippine government should also continue to educate its people regarding climate change as this truly impacts farming in the Philippines. As for the policy gaps that need to be addressed, the Philippine government should really enhance leadership and I would say accountability through monitoring, evaluation, and review of climate change policies and activities cause again this is very important right. As you would know, the Philippines is like a major source of you know, when it comes to rice, and there’s a lot of farmers there and it’s really important that the government should take part or do its role in making sure that farmers are able to cope up and navigate this ever-changing climate.

Ramier: Yes, I agree. The Philippines is very vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, so I think, obviously the government who has a lot of power should do more, in terms of helping the communities and people.

Dad: I couldn’t agree more. Again, coming from or growing up on a farm, it’s very important that the government should show the farmers that they’re doing, making sure that they provide support and in the same manner, educate the people…cause as you would know, farmers are from rural areas and they need to get this information and in the same manner, spread the news if there are new rice seed variants that they can utilize in making sure that those are resilient from climate change.

Ramier: Ya, so the next question is considering the challenges posed by climate change, do you have any advice or what message would you give to the younger generation growing up on family farms today?

Dad: I do, I sincerely do. As you would know…I mean, you, I can see that you are very particular with climate change and as you can imagine, climate change poses a real threat to farmers around the world and as you would know, farming is highly dependent on good weather and can really influence the harvest. In this regard, my pieces of advice that I’d give the younger generation growing up on a family farm today are they need to learn and they should learn how to adapt and think out of the box and also, be more cognizant and assertive in understanding what truly causes climate change. The younger generation growing up on family farms need to be more informed and I would think there are means right…they seminars or workshops and climate change has been an ongoing topic and younger generations should realize or I would say, be more keen in understanding the effects.

Ramier: What I got out of that was education is a big part, then like you mentioned like, the government can play a big part in educating it’s people, especially people who may not have these resources to learn about climate change. So kind of to end this, last question, is…so recently, I wrote my climate story and I wrote in it that I want to learn more about my identites, and one of them is my Filipino identity and I wanted to learn specifically your stories about growing up on the farm and that connection to climate change. So, what were some stories your father told you about the farm when you were younger?

Dad: I actually, specifically, gravitate to this particular question cause…you know…I can imagine like, I really like listening to my dad, my father and he’s always told me a lot of stories about our farm when I was younger and one of stories I can recall and I would say I will never forget is when Dad would tell me that, hey, you and I will go to our farm and he’ll bring me to the actual field and for me to actually see the size of the tomatoes and also the watermelons that we grow and then we observed and I’ll always tell my dad, hey can we pick up some tomatoes or watermelons…that’s how he’s told me the stories cause obviously I was a little young back then so I couldn’t really recall the full story, but my dad told me that we’ll pick the ripe ones and we will eat them and share them with the entire family and friends. He would always remind me that in life you actually need to persevere in order to be successful regardless whether I become a farmer or follow any other profession. He also kind of reminded me to respect nature and everyone around me cause again nature being vital to farmers and it was a lowkey life, but I can always feel happiness you know or like fully contented, meaning there’s food on the table right…my dad is always able to provide food for us and in the same manner, our farm, again, that’s main source of income for them…I kind of get teary when we’re talking about farm and particularly my experiences and the stories that my dad told me cause he’s been very passionate in regard to farming and he has a sense of, he’s very responsible to say the least. Imagine, my parents main source of income back then was farming and you know, they didn’t get higher education, but they were able to provide for their family and my dad was able to think outside of the box as well…he didn’t just rely on planting vegetables, he also took care of cattles. Up until now, we have cattles…he raised cattles, which was another source of income. It’s a cycle, like you plant rice and then the hay, the hay becomes the food of the cattle. Like you can imagine it’s like homestead, everything’s there. And I would say, climate, like weather, played a really important role, like rains, obviously the heat of the sun, so again, we should respect nature and take care of Mother Earth.

Ramier: Ya so one more thing is, now talking about your stories that your father told you, why do you think it’s important for you to share your own story and kind of, I guess right now like what we’re doing, talk about your life on the farm and be appreciative of that part of your life…and, why do you think it’s important for me and my other siblings to kind of, visit the farm and experience the farm whenever we travel to the Philippines?

Dad: You actually hit the nail on the head when you say the word appreciate. Me sharing these stories to you guys, for me, is very important to know your roots and in the same manner, you know, making sure that…cause there’s life out there right, I mean you probably think that its simple, but in essence, it’s kind of lowkey, but very rewarding for you guys to experience that, meaning it’s so simple, living is simple there and everything is provided by nature, and to me, I like you guys to, when we have the opportunity to visit the farm, to kind of experience what I’ve experienced cause I do cherish that. For me, I’m not the person I am today if I had, you know again those experiences taught me to be a better person and living on a farm man, I mean its been great and I would say you know, I’ll encourage you to, when we have the opportunity, to see and understand your roots as well.

Ramier: Ya, wow thank you dad!

Dad: I hope that answers all the questions, but if in anyway or any case you would like to have another conversation regarding me growing up on a farm, feel free and I love, I enjoy talking about my childhood and living on a farm obviously.

Ramier: Thank you!

Dad: You’re very welcome, anak!

Ramier Villarama (he/him) was born in the Philippines, but moved to New Jersey with his family at a young age. He is a current rising third-year student at Macalester College in St. Paul, MN. In addition to being a part of the Men’s Swimming and Diving team, he is a double major in Environmental Studies and Studio Art, with a minor in Asian Studies and a concentration in Food, Agriculture, and Society. He has been recently learning more about his Filipino culture and his relationship with nature, and has been connecting both with his art and the work that he creates.

The post Full Interview: Buhay Bukid, A Conversation with My Father on His Childhood Farm Adventures and Climate Change appeared first on Climate Generation.

Full Interview: Buhay Bukid, A Conversation with My Father on His Childhood Farm Adventures and Climate Change

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Indigenous groups warn Amazon oil expansion tests fossil fuel phase-out coalition

Published

on

Indigenous leaders from across the Amazon have warned that stopping the expansion of oil drilling into their territories will be a crucial test for a growing international coalition committed to transitioning away from fossil fuels.

As 60 countries discussed at a landmark conference in Santa Marta, Colombia, pathways to end the world’s reliance on fossil fuels, Indigenous groups said the process risks losing credibility if governments continue opening new oil frontiers in the Amazon.

Their central demand was the establishment of fossil fuel “exclusion zones” across Indigenous territories and biodiverse areas of the rainforest, permanently barring new oil and gas expansion in one of the world’s most critical ecosystems. Indigenous representatives proposed establishing protected “Life Zones”, which they said would provide legal safeguards against governments and companies seeking to expand extraction into their lands.

But Indigenous delegates left the conference frustrated as the final synthesis report drafted by co-chairs Colombia and the Netherlands failed to include the proposal.

In a statement at the end of the conference, Patricia Suárez, from the Organization of Indigenous Peoples of the Colombian Amazon (OPIAC), said formally declaring Indigenous territories – especially those inhabited by peoples in voluntary isolation – as exclusion zones for extractive industries was “an urgent measure”.

“If the heart of the conference does not begin there, it risks remaining a set of good intentions that fails to respond to either science or our Indigenous knowledge systems,” she added.

Pushing for a new oil frontier

Campaigners say the pressure on the Amazon is intensifying just as scientists warn the rainforest is nearing irreversible collapse. Around 20% of all newly identified global oil reserves between 2022 and 2024 were discovered in the Amazon basin, fuelling renewed interest from governments and companies seeking to develop the region as the world’s next major oil frontier.

Ecuador has moved ahead with the auction of new oil blocks in the rainforest, while the country’s right-wing president Daniel Noboa has promoted the region as a “new oil-producing horizon” and backed efforts to expand fracking with support from Chinese companies.

    In Santa Marta, a coalition of seven Indigenous nations from Ecuador issued a declaration condemning the government, which did not participate in the conference.

    “While the world talks about energy transition, our government is pushing for more oil in the Amazon,” said Marcelo Mayancha, president of the Shiwiar nation. “Throughout history, we have always defended our land. That is our home. We will forever defend our territory.”

    Indigenous groups also warned that Peru – another South American nation absent from the conference – plans to auction new oil blocks in the Yavarí-Tapiche Territorial Corridor, a highly sensitive region along the Brazilian border that contains the world’s largest known concentration of Indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation.

    COP30 host under scrutiny

    Indigenous leaders also criticised Brazil, arguing that despite its international climate leadership, the country is simultaneously advancing major new oil projects in the Amazon region.

    Luene Karipuna, delegate from Brazil’s coalition of Amazon peoples (COIAB), said the oil push threatens the stability of the rainforest. Not far from her home, in the northern state of Amapá, state-run oil giant Petrobras is currently exploring for new offshore oil reserves off the mouth of the Amazon river.

    Brazil participated in the Santa Marta conference and was among the countries that first pushed for discussions on transitioning away from fossil fuels at COP negotiations. Yet the country is also planning one of the largest expansions in oil production in the world, according to last year’s Production Gap report.

    Veteran Brazilian climate scientist Carlos Nobre told Climate Home that the country’s participation at the Santa Marta conference contrasted with its oil and gas production targets. “It does not make any sense for Brazil to continue with any new oil exploration,” he said, and noted that science is clear that no new fossil fuels should be developed to avoid crossing dangerous climate tipping points.

    He added that the Brazilian government faces pressures from economic sectors, since Petrobras is one of the countries top exporting companies. “They look only at the economic value of exporting fossil fuels. Brazil has to change.”

    The COP30 host also promised to draft a voluntary proposal for a global roadmap away from fossil fuels, which is expected to be published before this year’s COP31 summit.

    “In Brazil, that advance has caused so many problems because it overlaps with Indigenous territories. Companies tell us there won’t be an impact, but we see an impact,” Karipuna said. “We feel the Brazilian government has auctioned our land without dialogue.”

    For Karipuna and other Indigenous leaders, establishing exclusion zones across the Amazon is no longer just a regional demand, but a prerequisite to prevent the collapse of the rainforest.

    “That’s the first step for an energy transition that places Indigenous peoples at the centre,” she added.

    The post Indigenous groups warn Amazon oil expansion tests fossil fuel phase-out coalition appeared first on Climate Home News.

    https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/05/08/indigenous-amazon-oil-expansion-fossil-fuel-phase-out-coalition-santa-marta/

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Kenya seeks regional coordination to build African mineral value chains

    Published

    on

    African leaders have intensified calls for governments to stop exporting raw minerals and step up efforts to align their policies, share infrastructure and coordinate investment to add value to their resources and bring economic prosperity to the continent.

    In a speech to the inaugural Kenya Mining Investment Conference & Expo in Nairobi this week, Kenyan President William Ruto became the latest African leader to confirm the country will end exports of raw mineral ore. The East African nation has deposits of gold, iron ore and copper and recently launched a tender for global investors to develop a deposit of rare earths, which are used in EV motors and wind turbines, valued at $62 billion.

    Kenya is among more than a dozen African nations that have either banned or imposed export curbs on their mineral resources as they seek to process minerals domestically to boost revenues, create jobs and capture a slice of the industries that are producing high-value clean tech for the energy transition.

      “For too long we have extracted and exported raw materials at the bottom of the value chain, while others have processed, refined, manufactured and captured the greater share of economic value,” Ruto told African ministers and stakeholders gathered at the mining investment conference in Nairobi.

      As a result, Africa currently captures less than 1% of the value generated from global clean energy technologies, he said. To address this, Kenya, in collaboration with other African nations, “will process our minerals here in the continent, we will refine them here and we will manufacture them here”, he added.

      Mineral export restrictions on the rise

      Africa is a major supplier of minerals needed for the global energy transition. The continent holds an estimated 30% of the world’s critical mineral reserves, including lithium, cobalt and copper. The Democratic Republic of Congo produces roughly 70% of global cobalt, a key ingredient in lithium-ion batteries, while countries such as Guinea dominate bauxite production, and Mozambique and Tanzania hold significant graphite deposits.

      But African governments have struggled to attract the investment needed to turn their vast mineral wealth into a green industrial powerhouse. Recently Burundi, Malawi, Nigeria and Zimbabwe are among those that have resorted to banning the export of unrefined minerals to incentivise foreign companies to invest in value addition locally.

      Outdated geological data limits Africa’s push to benefit from its mineral wealth

      This week, Zimbabwe exported its first shipments of lithium sulphate, an intermediate form of processed lithium that can be further refined into battery-grade material, from a mine and processing plant operated by Chinese company Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt.

      After freezing all exports of lithium concentrate – the first stage of processing – earlier this year, the government introduced export quotas and will ban all exports from January 2027.

      Export restrictions on critical raw materials have grown more than five-fold since 2009, found a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published this week. In 2024, a more diverse group of countries, including many resource-rich developing economies in Africa and Asia, introduced restrictions, including Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Angola.

      This is “a structural shift in the wrong direction,” Mathias Cormann, the OECD’s secretary-general, told the organisations’ Critical Minerals Forum in Istanbul, Turkey, this week.

      “We understand the motivations: building local industries, managing environmental impacts, capturing greater value domestically. But our research is quite clear. Export restrictions distort investment, reduce volumes and undermine supply security often while delivering limited gains in value added,” he said.

      In-country barriers to success

      Thomas Scurfield, Africa senior economic analyst at the Natural Resource Governance Institute, told Climate Home News that export restrictions “can look like a promising route to local value addition” for cash-strapped African mineral producers but have “rarely worked” unless countries already have reliable energy, infrastructure and competitive costs for processing.

      “Without those conditions, bans may simply push companies to scale back mining rather than scale up processing,” he said.

      Alaka Lugonzo, partnerships lead for Africa at Global Witness, identified gaps in practical skills and infrastructure as other major barriers. “You need engineers, geologists, marketers,” Lugonzo said, warning that graduates are increasingly unable to match the pace of industry change.

      On infrastructure, she said that plentiful and stable energy supplies are vital and while Kenya has relatively robust road networks, they are insufficient for industrial-scale operations.

      “Meaningful value addition and real industrialisation requires heavy machinery… and you will need better infrastructure,” she said, highlighting persistent last-mile challenges in mining regions where “there’s no railway, there’s no electricity, there’s no water”.

      Export capacity is another concern, she said, particularly whether existing port systems could handle increased volumes of processed minerals.

      Regional approach recommended

      Scurfield said that through regional cooperation – including pooling supplies, specialising across different stages of refining and manufacturing, and building larger regional markets – “African countries could overcome many domestic constraints that make going alone difficult”.

      That’s what close to 20 African governments are working to deliver as part of the Africa Minerals Strategy Group, which was set up by African ministers and is dedicated to foster cooperation among African nations to build mineral value chains and better benefit from the energy transition.

      Africa urged to unite on minerals as US strikes bilateral deals

      Nigerian Minister of Solid Minerals Dele Alake, who chairs the group, said “true collaboration” between countries, including aligning mining policies, sharing infrastructure, coordinating investment strategies and promoting trade across the continent, will create the conditions for long-term investments that could turn Africa into “a formidable and competitive force within the global mineral supply chain”.

      “The time has come for Africa to redefine its place within the global mineral economy and that transformation must begin with regional integration and regional cooperation,” he told the mining investment conference in Nairobi.

      Lugonzo of Global Witness agreed, saying that value-addition would benefit from adopting a continental perspective. “Why should Kenya build another smelter when we can export our gold to Tanzania for smelting, and then we use the pipeline through Uganda to take it to the port and we export it?” she asked.

      To facilitate that, there is a need to operationalise the Africa Free Trade Continental Agreement (AFTCA), she added. “That agreement is the only way Africa is going to move from point A to point B.”

      The post Kenya seeks regional coordination to build African mineral value chains appeared first on Climate Home News.

      https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/04/30/kenya-seeks-regional-coordination-to-build-african-mineral-value-chains/

      Continue Reading

      Climate Change

      Key green shipping talks to be held in late 2026

      Published

      on

      The future of the global shipping industry – and its 3% share of global emissions – will be decided in three weeks of talks in the third quarter of this year, after a decision taken in London on Friday.

      At the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) headquarters this week, governments largely failed to substantively negotiate a controversial set of measures to penalise polluting ships and reward vessels running on clean fuels known as the Net-Zero Framework. The green shipping plan has been aggressively opposed by fossil fuel-producing nations, in particular by the US and Saudi Arabia.

      This week, countries delivered statements outlining their views on the measures in a session that ran from Wednesday into Thursday. Then, late on Friday afternoon, they discussed when to negotiate these measures and what proposals they should discuss.

      After a lengthy debate, which the talks’ chair Harry Conway joked was confusing, governments agreed to hold a week of behind-closed-door talks from 1 September to 4 September and from 23 November to 27 November.

      Following these meetings, which are intended to negotiate disagreements on the NZF and rival watered-down measures proposed by the US and its allies, there will be public talks from November 30 to December 4.

        Last October, talks intended to adopt the NZF provisionally agreed in April 2025 were derailed by the US and Saudi Arabia, who successfully persuaded a majority of countries to vote to postpone the talks by a year.

        Those talks, known as an extraordinary session, are now scheduled to resume on Friday December 4 unless governments decide otherwise in the preceding weeks. While this Friday session will be in the same building with the same participants as the rest of the week’s talks, calling it the extraordinary session is significant as it means the NZF can be voted on.

        Em Fenton, senior director of climate diplomacy at Opportunity Green said that the NZF “has survived but survival is not a victory” and called for it to be adopted later this year “in a way that maintains urgency and ambition, and delivers justice and equity for countries on the frontlines of climate impacts”.

        NZF’s supporters

        The NZF would penalise the owners of particularly polluting ships and use the revenues to fund cleaner fuels, support affected workers and help developing countries manage the transition.

        Many governments – particularly in Europe, the Pacific and some Latin American and African nations – spoke in favour of it this week.

        South Africa said the fund it would create is “the key enabler of a just transition” and its removal would take away predictable revenues from African countries. Vanuatu said that “we are not here to sink the ship but to man it”.

        Australia’s representative called it a “carefully balanced compromise”, as it was provisionally agreed by a large majority after years of negotiations, and warned that failing to adopt it would harm the shipping industry by failing to provide certainty.

        Santa Marta summit kick-starts work on key steps for fossil fuel transition

        Canada’s negotiator said that if it was weakened to appease its critics like the US and Saudi Arabia, this would disappoint those who think it is too weak already like the Pacific islands.

        A large group of mainly big developing countries like Nigeria and Indonesia did not rule out supporting the framework but called for adjustments to help developing countries deal with the changes. Nigeria called for developing countries to be given more time to implement the measures, a minimum share of the fund’s revenues and discounts for ships bringing them food and energy.

        According to analysis from the University of College London’s Energy Institute, the countries speaking in support of the NZF include five countries which voted with the US to postpone talks in October and a further ten countries which did not take a clear position at that time. Most governments support the NZF as the basis for further talks, the institute said.

        Opposition remains

        But a small group of mainly oil-producing nations said they are opposed to any financial penalties for particularly polluting ships.

        They support a proposal submitted by Liberia, Argentina and Panama which has proposed weakening emission targets and ditching any funding mechanism for the framework involving “direct revenue collection and disbursement”.

        Argentina argued that the NZF would harm countries which are far from their export markets and said concerns over that cannot be solved “by magic with guidelines”. They added that, as a result, the NZF itself needs to be fundamentally re-negotiated.

        The UCL Energy Institute said that just 24 countries – less than a quarter of those who spoke – said they supported Argentina’s proposal.

        While this week’s talks did not see the kind of US threats reported in October, their delegation did leave personalised flyers on every delegate’s desk which were described by academics, negotiators and climate campaigners as misleading.

        One witness told Climate Home News that junior US delegates arrived early on Wednesday and placed flyers behind governments’ name plates warning each country of the costs they would incur if the NZF is adopted.

        The figures on a selection of leaflets seen by Climate Home News ranged from $100 million for Panama to $3.5 billion for the Netherlands. “They are trying to scare countries away from supporting climate action with one-sided information”, one negotiator told Climate Home News.

        A flyer left on Pakistan’s desk, shared by a witness with Climate Home News

        They added that the calculations, by the US State Department’s Office of the Chief Economist, ignore the fact that the money raised would be shared to help poorer countries’ transition as well as ignoring the economic costs of failing to address climate change.

        Tristan Smith, an academic representing the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology, told the meeting that the calculations were “opaque” and flawed as they overstate the contribution of fuel cost to trade costs.

        A US State Department Spokesperson said in a statement that they “firmly stand behind our estimates” which were shared “in good faith” and to “provide an additional tool to policymakers as they contemplate the true economic burden over the NZF”.

        The post Key green shipping talks to be held in late 2026 appeared first on Climate Home News.

        https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/05/01/key-green-shipping-talks-to-be-held-in-late-2026/

        Continue Reading

        Trending

        Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com