Dr. Mirianna Budimir is senior climate and resilience expert at Practical Action, and early warning systems lead for the Zurich Climate Resilience Alliance (ZCRA). Francisco Ianni is senior officer for climate resilience initiatives at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, and heat hazards lead for the ZCRA. Carolina Pereira Marghidan is a technical advisor at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre.
Across the world, instances of extreme heat are occurring more frequently than ever. News of temperature records being shattered – all too often accompanied by reports detailing tragic loss of life – appear with frightening regularity. The threats posed by heatwaves are considerable, and due to the climate crisis are expected only to get worse.
It’s hard to think of any aspect of daily life unaffected by an extreme heat event. Health services quickly become overstretched; power systems buckle; and economic productivity grinds to a halt.
A new study by Mercy Corps in the rural region of Madesh in Nepal reveals the impact heatwaves are having on children’s education. “The classrooms feel like furnaces,” said one student. “The air is thick with hot air and foul smell of sweat, the walls trap the heat, and all I can think about is when I can escape.”
Scientists predict global warming of more than 1.5C for 2025-2029 period
Today is Heat Action Day, a global moment for raising awareness of heat risks. While we welcome and encourage the sharing of practical advice for staying safe, there’s so much more that needs to be done.
Knowing when and where these extreme heat events will occur is key to tackling the problem, and early warning systems hold enormous potential to reduce losses, suffering and death across the world. So why do they often fall short?
The fragmented landscape of heat warnings
Given the risks presented by heatwaves, and the relative ease of predicting temperature well in advance, over a hundred meteorological services – more than half of the global total – do provide warnings for instances of extreme heat.
However, many of these are informed solely by maximum temperature, and don’t capture prolonged, intense periods of heat. When the mercury refuses to drop for consecutive days and nights, the dangers are far greater.
This points to a bigger problem with heatwave warning systems: the lack of standardization. Analysis led by the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre has revealed stark inconsistencies in approaches to the monitoring, research and forecasting of heat across the world. This is in no small part due to the differing levels of capacity from region to region; but even the terminology varies wildly, with literally hundreds of definitions of extreme heat in use right now.
Then there’s an even greater concern, which is that many countries – particularly lower-income nations in Africa, Latin America, and parts of Southeast Asia – have no such warning system at all. As is too often the case, those most vulnerable to the risks are the ones with the least protection, with potentially lethal consequences.
Climate change-driven heatwaves hit Delhi’s Red Fort market traders
Break the silos to enhance resilience to heat
Closing these gaps requires the urgent scaling up of effective early warning systems for heatwaves. While national governments and donors have their part to play (particularly in the development and financing of low-cost solutions), improved coordination and cooperation at the global level would give these efforts a much-needed boost.
More standardization will certainly improve matters, and it is promising to see progress being made on this front. The World Meteorological Organization recently published a new definition for heatwaves, one that crucially captures their prolonged nature. In partnership with the World Health Organization, the WMO is also updating its decade-old guidance on heatwave warning system development. And a new handbook of extreme heat indicators, indices and metrics is expected later this year.
To continue this momentum, far greater transparency is required of all governments, institutions and organizations engaged in addressing heat-related risks. This should include the proactive sharing of knowledge, data and best practices, and collaborating wherever possible.
Low-income countries currently without protection from extreme heat events can use this information to rapidly build their capacity to assess their existing vulnerabilities, as well as develop and implement appropriate warning systems. Meanwhile, those already using such systems can make the necessary improvements to increase their effectiveness.
No one-size-fits-all solution for communities
A more coherent, coordinated approach to heatwave warning systems will be a massive step in the right direction. However, as with any such intervention, steps must be taken to avoid an overly top-down approach. If invaluable community insights go unheard, and potentially life-saving messages don’t reach the people they’re designed to help, we won’t see anything close to the levels of progress needed.
Only by taking a people-centred approach can the true potential of early warning systems be realized. Alerts need to be accessible and comprehensible to even the most remote and marginalized populations, and contain practical guidance informed by detailed, locally led risk assessments and response plans. The best way to do that is to ensure communities are active participants at every step of the process.
Women bear brunt of South Sudan’s heatwave made worse by climate change
One major flaw with the top-down model is that it rarely acknowledges how heat affects different people in different ways. Rather than issuing a blanket alert, early warning systems must target their messaging to those most at risk – be it pregnant women, elderly people, or outdoor labourers.
Where communities lack access to air-conditioned spaces and other opportunities for respite, that must also be taken into account. In every case, information on the likely impact of the heat, combined with guidance on how to mitigate it, is essential.
After over a decade enhancing resilience to floods around the world (including via warning systems), the Zurich Climate Resilience Alliance is applying the same community-centred approach to tackling heatwaves. In Pakistan, Senegal, the Philippines and more, we’re partnering with communities and national actors to conduct in-depth assessments and provide country-specific recommendations to enhance Heat Early Warning Systems.
No time to lose
By necessity, the world is beginning to act with more urgency to address the risks presented by heatwaves; but as life-threatening heat events increase in both frequency and intensity, we can’t afford to wait for the next heat-related tragedy before taking action.
This year, Heat Action Day falls on the opening day of the Global Platform For Disaster Risk Reduction in Geneva, at which Early Warning Systems will take centre stage. This is an unmissable opportunity to collaborate across continents and sectors, as part of a renewed commitment to a world in which all are protected from heatwaves and other climate hazards by effective and equitable early warning systems.
As temperatures rise, so too must our ambitions.
The post Early warnings for heatwaves can save lives – and we need them now appeared first on Climate Home News.
Early warnings for heatwaves can save lives – and we need them now
Climate Change
‘This is a fossil fuel crisis’, Greenpeace tells Senate gas tax Inquiry, citing homegrown renewables as path to energy security
CANBERRA, Tuesday 21 April 2026 — Greenpeace Australia Pacific has slammed gas corporation war profiteering and environmental damage in a scathing Senate hearing today as part of the Select Committee on the Taxation of Gas Resources, urging fair taxation of gas corporations and the transition to secure, homegrown renewable energy to protect Australian households and the economy from future energy shocks.
Speaking at the hearing, Greenpeace said the US and Israel’s illegal war on Iran has laid bare the fundamental flaws of an energy system built on fossil fuel extraction, geopolitical power plays and corporate greed, and will be a defining moment for how the world thinks about energy security.
Greenpeace’s submission and full opening remarks can be found here.
Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
“This is not an energy crisis, it’s a fossil fuel crisis. The crisis we’re all facing lays bare the dangers of fossil fuel dependence, for our energy security, our communities, and for global peace and stability.
“Gas corporations like Woodside, Santos, Shell and Chevron — the same companies whose CEOs refused to front this Inquiry — are making obscene war profits, using the illegal war on Iran to price gouge, profiteer and push for more gas we don’t need — while people and our environment pay the price.
“Australians are getting smashed by soaring bills and the impacts of climate disasters — gas corporations should be paying their fair share to help this country, instead of sending billions offshore, tax-free.
“But we’re at a turning point — while gas corporations cynically push to open up more of our oceans and land to drilling for fossil fuels, our allies like the UK are doubling down on renewables in response to the fossil fuel crisis. Our trading partners in Asia are making the same reassessment of fossil fuels.
“Which is why the hearing today is crucial: an effective and well-designed tax on the gas industry’s obscene war time profits is a chance to channel funds to people and communities, fast-track the rollout of clean, secure homegrown wind and solar energy, while holding polluters accountable.
“Our dependence on fossil fuels leave us overexposed to the whims of tyrants like Trump — it’s in Australia’s national interest to end the fossil fuel chokehold for good and usher in the era of clean energy security.”
-ENDS-
Media contact
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
HOW WOODSIDE’S BROWSE GAS PROPOSAL THREATENS SCOTT REEF’S GREEN TURTLES AND PYGMY BLUE WHALES
Woodside’s Browse to NWS gas project is under assessment by the WA and Federal Governments right now. This is a project that involved drilling up to 50 gas wells around Scott Reef off the coast of WA. Gas would be extracted directly underneath Scott Reef and Sandy Islet and pumped through a 900-kilometre subsea pipeline to the NWS gas processing facility.
Woodside’s Browse gas project’s impact on Scott Reef’s marine habitats?
Scott Reef is one of Australia’s most ecologically significant marine environments, where green turtles breed, pygmy blue whales feed, and an array of at-risk species, including sharks, dolphins, whale sharks, rays, sawfish and sea snakes thrive. It is home to many threatened species, including some found nowhere else on Earth or in genetically isolated groups, magnifying its importance from a conservation perspective.
This delicate reef’s ecosystem faces multiple threats if Woodside’s Proposed Project goes ahead, including seismic blasting, gas flaring, noise pollution, artificial lighting, pipe laying and fast-moving vessels. The reef also faces the risk of a gas well blowout, which could have catastrophic and irreversible consequences for the region’s reefs and marine parks.
Woodside’s woeful marine impacts management plan
To secure their approvals, Woodside had to develop a plan for how they would manage the significant risks to threatened green turtles and endangered pygmy blue whales if the project proceeds. We’ve had two independent scientists provide a technical assessment of Woodsides management plan for whales and turtles and their findings are gobsmacking.
Their assessment found that Woodsides management plans for these species misrepresents or does not assess the risks the Browse project poses to Scott Reef’s pygmy blue whales and green turtles. They’ve also surmised that if the project goes ahead the impacts contradict the Australian government’s own recovery plan for turtles and Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for Blue Whales.
The State and Federal Governments now have the opportunity to define their legacies on nature protection and save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan
Prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific by Dr Ben Fitzpatrick of Oceanwise Australia with Dr Olaf Meynecke of Griffith University.
The full technical assessment is available HERE
Scott Reef is a vital feeding, foraging and resting habitat for pygmy blue whales.
Pygmy blue whales feed, forage and rest in the Scott Reef region every year. Scott Reef is recognised as a Biologically Important Area for the pygmy blue whale and is an important stop-over on their annual migration.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
- Woodside’s management plan claims of “no credible threat of significant impacts” are not supported by scientific evidence.
- The management plan relies on outdated whale population information.
- Woodside has claimed it is unclear whether Scott Reef is a foraging habitat for pygmy blue whales, despite the presence of pygmy blue whales and significant concentrations of krill being documented in the area.
- The PBWMP ignores the impacts of industrial noise on whale-to-whale communication. This is especially concerning as mother-calf pairs migrate through the Scott Reef Biologically Important Area shortly after calves are born. Mother-calf pairs rely on continuous, uninterrupted communications to maintain their connection.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Turtle Management Plan
Prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific by Dr Ben Fitzpatrick of Oceanwise Australia.
The full technical assessment is available HERE
Scott Reef is a vital nesting ground for unique green turtles.
The green turtles that nest at Scott Reef’s low-lying Sandy Islet sand cay and nearby Browse Island are genetically unique and are classified as ‘Extremely Vulnerable’ in Australia’s Recovery Plan for Marine Turtles.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could make Scott Reef’s unique green turtles extinct.
- The Browse project would operate within 20 kilometres of nesting habitat that’s critical to the survival of Scott Reef’s genetically unique and vulnerable green turtle population.
- Woodside’s Browse Turtle Management Plan (TMP) misrepresents the risks the Browse project poses to Scott Reef’s green turtles.
- Claims in Woodside’s TMP about Scott Reef’s green turtle population size, nesting success and hatchling numbers are not backed by scientific evidence.
- The TMP proposes gathering updated data after the Browse project is approved.
- Woodside’s TMP proposes adding sand sourced elsewhere to Sandy Islet to counter subsidence and erosion, but fails to properly assess the associated risks.
To save Scott Reef and protect our oceans and animals, the State and Federal Governments must reject Browse.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan
To secure their approvals, Woodside had to develop a plan for how they would manage the significant risks to threatened green turtles if the project proceeds. We’ve had two independent scientists provide a technical assessment of Woodside’s management plan for whales and turtles and their findings are gobsmacking.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could make Scott Reef’s unique green turtles extinct.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits