While some climate change is normal, human actions have dramatically accelerated it. And this has led to increased severe weather events, rising sea levels, and global warming. With the Paris Agreement in place and many countries onboard with reducing their emissions, we have a clear pathway to slowing and even reversing climate change. Unfortunately, the world is still off-track for meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement, so we all need to do more.
To try to help get the U.S. on track and potentially spur the same action worldwide, the government has announced major funding to kick-start growth in the U.S. carbon removal industry. This technology remains relatively new and still needs more research to meet the levels needed to make a significant impact, but the hope is these funds will help get that in motion.
Learn all the details about the billions of dollars the U.S. government is injecting into the carbon-removal industry and how it can help the environment below.
How Much Did the U.S. Government Commit to Funding Carbon Removal?
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) recently announced it would commit $3.7 billion to finance projects to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. This is in an attempt to kickstart our commitment to emit net-zero greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions) by 2050 and slow climate change through the commercialization of carbon sequestration and storage.
In a second round of funding the DOE announced another $2.52 billion for two carbon capture initiatives. Of these funds, $820 million will go to 10 projects targeting the de-risking of carbon-capture technology. This will help organizations test new technology in the power and industrial sectors.
The remaining $1.7 billion will support six carbon-capture demonstration projects showing how the technology works and can be replicated and installed at power plants and in the cement, pulp and paper, iron, and steel industries.
This influx of cash will help fund the government’s previously announced plans to finance four direct air capture hubs (DAC hubs) that remove CO2 from the air and store it underground.
In addition to this funding and the four CO2 removal facilities, the DOE also announced programs that will bolster research on carbon removal technology and provide grants to state and local governments and utilities for carbon use. These programs are funded through the bipartisan infrastructure law.
What Else Is the Government Offering to Boost DAC Commercialization?
On top of offering grants to build these carbon-absorbing facilities, the government is also offering a tax credit for carbon sequestration. All carbon absorption is eligible for a tax credit of $85 per metric ton when it’s permanently stored or $60 when it’s used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or industry.
To be eligible for this tax credit, power plants must absorb at least 18,750 metric tons of CO2 annually, and other industries must absorb at least 12,500 tons.
On top of this, organizations that build carbon-absorption facilities will receive an even larger tax credit of $180 per metric ton of carbon removed and permanently stored and $130 per metric ton of carbon used for enhanced oil recovery or industry. To qualify for the tax credit, these facilities must absorb at least 1,000 tons of carbon annually.
So, if a facility can absorb the 1 million metric tons of CO2, as the U.S. government anticipates, it can get a hefty $130 million to $180 million tax credit.
For all the tax credits mentioned above, organizations have until 2033 to begin constructing their carbon absorption technology to qualify — a seven-year extension on the previous tax credits.
How Much CO2 Can These Facilities Remove?
There has been a lot of development in CO2 removal technology. Currently, 18 direct air capture plants operate worldwide, each capturing 0.01 megatons (Mt) — a megaton is 1 million tons — of CO2 annually. The first of the facilities funded through this initiative is already in advanced development, and it’s projected to remove 1 Mt of CO2 annually. That’s equal to removing over 200,000 fossil-fuel-burning vehicles off the road.
By 2030, experts anticipate the technology will be available to scale these facilities up to 60 Mt of CO2 removal annually.
What Will Happen with the Captured CO2?
You’re likely wondering what happens to all the CO2 these facilities capture. They can’t store it forever, right? The storage facilities are designed for permanent geological storage — storage deep within geological formations. One permanent solution in the works is a plant that pumps the CO2 underground so it can combine with basalt and turn into stone.
However, other options exist too, such as using the captured carbon in food processing or creating sustainable synthetic fuel. In these instances, the organizations operating these carbon capture facilities can sell the CO2 to other companies to help recoup some of their costs.
Some examples of how this CO2 can be used include:
- Enhanced oil recovery: When an oil well runs dry, a small amount of oil is often left in the bottom. Oil companies then rely on pressure — often from pressurized CO2 — to get the leftover oil out of the ground.
- Synthetic fuels: When combined with hydrogen, CO2 becomes a synthetic fuel that various industries can burn. Then, these industries can recapture the CO2 emissions to prevent releasing it into the atmosphere again. They then restart the process, making it almost like a renewable energy source.
- Crop growth: Plants and trees use CO2 for photosynthesis, and selling compressed CO2 to greenhouses can help spur crop yield. One company sells 900 metric tons (tonnes) of CO2 to a pickle company to aid in cucumber growth.
How Much Does It Cost to Capture and Store Carbon?
Capturing carbon and storing it is far from a free act. These companies will incur significant expenses in performing this important climate action. Depending on the facility, capturing a metric ton of CO2 costs between $100 and $1,000. However, experts in the field say these estimates are “unduly pessimistic” and believe this cost can get as low as $94 per tonne as technology advances.
As the technology continues to develop and lowers in cost, this price could fall even further, making it a reality for more industries to install them at their factories and power plants. And the U.S. government is helping push this along with all the funds it’s pouring into the environment-saving technology.
Who Bid for a $500 Million U.S. Climate Grant for Direct Air Carbon Capture?
Two corporations have partnered with a nonprofit organization to bid for a $500 million grant from the U.S. to build a commercial direct air capture facility. The two corporations are Switzerland’s Climeworks and California’s Heirloom, and the nonprofit joining the project is Battelle.
These three organizations are no strangers to climate technology. Battelle has worked with carbon capture tech in the past and even managed some of the government’s centers and labs. Heirloom operates a small-scale carbon-capture demonstration project in California, and Climeworks operates the largest DAC facility in the world, which removes 4,000 metric tons of CO2 annually.
Other companies are closing in on applying for federal funding for their DAC projects. Occidental Petroleum plans to build a $1.1 billion DAC facility in Texas, with a projected start in 2024. Another company in California plans to build a facility in Wyoming that could remove 5 million metric tons of CO2 annually by 2030.
Other organizations are likely putting together proposals to deliver to the U.S. Department of Energy for review, and we’ll learn more about those as they are approved and funded.
Who Is Funding Carbon Capture?
While the U.S. Department of Energy is heading up these initiatives, the funding will come from a different source. Both the $3.7 billion to fund the four decarbonization facilities and the $2.52 billion to fund de-risking of carbon-capture technology and developing carbon-capture demonstrations will come from President Biden’s $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law. This law earmarked funds for refurbishing roads, bridges, and airports as well as reducing carbon emissions.
What Carbon Removal Organizations Are on the Stock Market?
With a healthy influx of cash from the federal government, carbon removal companies on the stock market may be a sound investment for climate-focused investors. Some publicly traded companies to consider include:
- Global Thermostat
- Occidental Petroleum
- Equinor
- Aker Carbon Capture
- Delta CleanTech
These five companies are all traded publicly on the stock market, but a leader in this space, Climeworks, is not. You may still want to watch Climeworks, as it may choose to go public and offer shares on the open market.
DAC Facilities Will Help, But You Can Still Play a Role
The DOE’s major funding to kick-start U.S. carbon-removal industry will likely be a big boost to our goal of reaching net-zero emissions as a nation. The potential to remove millions of tons of CO2 is just one part of the equation. This will also help commercialize the technology, which can drive down the price to build DAC facilities and make them even more efficient, compounding our ability to suck CO2 from the atmosphere and store it or reuse it in various eco-friendly ways.
While these DAC facilities will help, you can still play a huge role by reducing your carbon footprint by purchasing carbon credits. These credits can offset a wide range of things, including commercial flights, vacations, and more.
Check out Terrrapass’ wide range of carbon credits, and find one that can help you offset your CO2 emissions and help slow the impacts of climate change and global warming.
Brought to you by terrapass.com
Featured image:
The post DOE to Deliver Major Funding to Kick-Start U.S. Carbon Removal Industry appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测





