Connect with us

Published

on

The European Green Deal is a pact that looks to improve the well-being and health of citizens and future generations by providing a range of basic necessities, such as fresh air, clean water, healthy soil, healthy and affordable food, cleaner energy, future-proof jobs, and much more.  

It bases much of this on the European Union (EU) becoming greener. Recently, the European Commission released a series of new rules focused on corporate responsibility that aims to strengthen the path toward its carbon-neutral goal. 

How will these changes affect life in the EU? We review the upcoming EU rules on green claims and greenwashing and what they mean. 

What Is the European Green Deal policy?

The European Union (EU) and European Parliament recognize that climate change and environmental degradation threaten all life in Europe and worldwide. To help get past these challenges and improve the chances of a clean, safe world for future generations, all 27 EU Member States agreed to the European Green Deal 

This environmental agreement will help convert the EU into a modern, resource-efficient, and competitive economy by ensuring: 

  • A reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions by 55% of 1990 levels by 2030 
  • Zero greenhouse gas emissions (GHG emissions) by 2050 
  • Economic growth becomes decoupled from resource use 
  • No person or place is left behind economically or ecologically 
  • EU’s energy independence 
  • Job creation and growth 
  • An improvement in the overall health and well-being of EU citizens 

Financing for the European Green Deal will come from dipping into one-third of the 1.8 trillion euro ($2.022 trillion) investments from the NextGenerationEU Recovery Plan and the EU’s seven-year budget. 

What Is the New EU Environmental Legislation?

Newly proposed legislation for the European Green Deal focuses heavily on green claims. Green claims are any claim an organization makes that it’s taking action to combat GHG emissions and to help slow climate change 

Currently, EU laws don’t regulate environmental claims, which leads to inconsistencies with regard to the handling of these claims among Member States. 

The changes would also better define green claims. They would be defined as: “any message or representation, which is not mandatory under Union law or national law, including text, pictorial, graphic or symbolic representation, in any form, including labels, brand names, company names or product names, in the context of a commercial communication, which states or implies that a product or trader has a positive or no impact on the environment or is less damaging to the environment than other products or traders, respectively, or has improved their impact over time.” 

This is all in an attempt to prevent greenwashing — when an organization focuses more on marketing itself as environmentally friendly than minimizing its environmental impact. 

Let’s review the main proposed changes. 

Rules for Methodology

To help ensure all green claims are valid and harmonious across the EU, EU Member States must validate environmental claims through science-based methodologies 

Accepted methodologies are expected to have to follow these basic guidelines: 

  • They must be based on widely recognized scientific evidence and state-of-the-art technical knowledge and account for relevant international standards. Claims are not allowed if no recognized scientific method exists or there’s insufficient evidence to assess environmental impacts and aspects. 
  • They must assess environmental impact throughout the product’s life cycle. 
  • They must account for the composition of products, the materials they use when producing products, the amount of emissions created during production, the use of the product, and the product’s durability, reparability, and end-of-life aspects. 
  • They must assess if achieving positive environmental impacts, aspects, or performance significantly increases any other negative environmental impact. 
  • They must be third-party accessible with a reasonable access fee, if applicable. 
  • They require regular review from a third party that can account for technical and scientific progress and the development of relevant international standards. 

Rules on Green Claims

Green Energy Claims Image of Smoking Factory Plantsource

So, what will be considered valid green claims under these proposed rules? While nothing is official yet, the green claims directives will be as follows: 

  • They can only make environmental claims substantiated through an approved methodology that meets specific criteria, which we’ll cover later.  
  • They cannot make positive environmental claims if a product has a positive and negative environmental impact. They may publicize the positive claim, but they must also communicate the negative impact clearly and understandably. 
  • They must make the information on the assessment on which the environmental claim is based available 

With regard to the final bullet point, the information on the assessment that should be made available includes: 

  • Information about the product or activities of the trader subject to the claim; Environmental aspects, environmental impacts, or environmental performance the claim covers 
  • Methodology used 
  • Underlying studies or calculations they used to analyze, measure, and monitor the claim’s environmental impact 
  • A brief explanation of how they improved environmental performance via a weblink, QR code, or equivalent 

There also needs to be a review of the accuracy of their environmental claims every five years at minimum. 

Rules on Comparative Environmental Claims

Organizations can make comparative environmental claims as a part of marketing efforts, but experts anticipate the new rules to crack down on such claims. Some of the proposals include: 

  • Organizations must utilize the identical methodology as the products or traders they compare themselves to. 
  • Organizations must generate or source the data to substantiate comparative claims equivalently to ensure comparability. 
  • Organizations must account for the most significant stages along the value chain for all products and traders compared. 

Rules on Forward-Looking Claims

Organizations may also claim anticipated environmental benefits under the newly proposed green claims directive. However, authorities would require these future-looking claims to follow specific guidelines, including: 

  • They must include commitments and milestones that they need to achieve within clearly specified time frames. 
  • They must indicate a baseline year for all targets, the desired result compared to the baseline year, and the target year to achieve the claim. For example, they might say something like, “We commit to making a 50% reduction in emissions by 2035 compared to our 1990 levels.” 
  • They cannot include previously achieved targets. 

Rules on Enforcement

source

The proposed rules will also include how they will expose non-compliant organizations. In the proposed rules, public authorities would require Member States to perform compliance monitoring: 

  • As part of their regular checks 
  • In cases where they have sufficient reason to believe an environmental claim may infringe upon the rules 
  • If complaints arise 

If an organization makes non-compliant environmental claims, the proposed rule changes would require it to fix the issues quickly. Once the organization receives a non-compliance notification, it would have 10 business days to respond with substantiation.   

If the organization doesn’t provide a timely or satisfactory answer, regulatory officials will require it to modify the offending claim or cease all communication of it immediately as consumer protection. The trader will have 30 business days to implement corrective actions. 

This enforcement aims to ensure all environmental labels and claims are credible and trustworthy, allowing consumers to make more educated purchasing decisions. 

What Are the Current EU Environmental Policies?

The current European Green Deal may not be as extensive as the proposed regulation changes. However, it still looks to take on climate change and help prevent the potential global existential crisis it causes.  

To help with this, the European Commission has adopted many climate-focused initiatives and policies, such as: 

  • Reducing car emissions by 55% by 2030 
  • Reducing van emissions by 50% by 2030 
  • Reducing all new-car emissions to 0% by 2035 
  • Performing energy-efficiency-improving renovations on 35 million buildings by 2030 
  • Reaching 40% renewable energy by 2030 
  • Reaching 36% to 39% energy efficiency by 2030 
  • Restoring Europe’s forests, soils, wetlands, and peatlands to increase carbon absorption to 310 megatonnes (Mt) 

What Is the New EU Sustainability Directive?

The EU requires large companies and all listed companies — listed micro-enterprises are excluded — to disclose what they view as risks and opportunities associated with social and environmental issues. They must also disclose their activities’ impact on people and the environment. 

This disclosure helps investors, civil society organizations, consumers, and other stakeholders evaluate companies’ sustainability performance as part of the European Green Deal. 

In January 2023, the new Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) was enacted. This new directive modernizes and strengthens the social and environmental information companies must report. A broader set of large companies and listed SMEs — approximately 50,000 companies — must now report on sustainability 

To be affected by this new reporting directive, a company must meet at least two of the three following criteria: employ 250-plus people, have assets totaling at least 20 million euros, and have turnover totaling at least 40 million euros.  

Companies will begin applying the new reporting rules in the 2024 financial year for reports published in 2025. Until then, the current Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) national law will remain in force, requiring affected organizations to report on environmental protection (Scope 3 emissions included), social responsibility, the treatment of employees, human rights, anti-bribery and anti-corruption, and company board diversity. 

Once the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) begins in 2024, corporations will have to report on all information in the current NFRD plus: 

  • Double materiality, including the company’s sustainability and climate risk, and the impact the company has on society and the environment 
  • Material-topic-selection process for stakeholders 
  • More forward-looking information, including organizational climate targets and its progress toward the targets 
  • Information regarding intangible items, including social, human, and intellectual matters 
  • Reports aligning with the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and European Union’s Taxonomy Regulation 

Upcoming EU Rules on Green Claims Seek to Elevate Corporate Responsibility

Front of Building EU Climate Policiessource

To accelerate the battle against climate change and global warming, the EU continues updating policies and proposals to the existing European Green Deal. The latest proposals focus on empowering European organizations to improve their climate-neutral reporting and to make this a common practice among more European companies. 

These upcoming EU rules on green claims and greenwashing may help Europe get on track and remain on a path to help reverse climate change. You can also do your part to help this process by offsetting your carbon footprint by purchasing voluntary carbon credit from Terrapass. We offer a wide range of options for businesses and individuals 

Choose the right option for you, and start offsetting your carbon footprint today. 

Brought to you by terrapass.com
Featured image:

The post Upcoming EU Rules on Green Claims and What They Mean appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Nuclear’s Next Chapter: newcleo Raises $88M to Scale SMR Powered by Nuclear Waste

Published

on

Nuclear’s Next Chapter: newcleo Raises $88M to Scale SMR Powered by Nuclear Waste

newcleo, a European nuclear technology company, announced that it has raised €75 million (about USD $88 million) in a new funding round. The cash will help the company build and develop advanced small nuclear reactors powered by recycled nuclear waste. The financing is a sign of growing investor interest in clean and low-carbon energy solutions.

Newcleo also said that it has now raised more than $124 million in total for 2025. The company was founded in September 2021 and is based in Paris, France. The nuclear energy developer also operates in Italy, the UK, Belgium, and Slovakia, with roughly 1,000 employees.

What newcleo’s Technology Does: Turning Nuclear Waste into Usable Fuel

newcleo develops a type of advanced nuclear technology known as lead-cooled fast reactors (LFRs). These reactors are a form of small modular reactor (SMR).

Unlike traditional nuclear reactors that use fresh uranium fuel, newcleo’s design aims to use reprocessed nuclear waste as fuel. This means existing waste from older reactors could become a power source.

Using nuclear waste as fuel is intended to have two benefits:

  • It could reduce long-term waste storage needs.
  • It may help lower the carbon footprint of nuclear power.

Lead-cooled fast reactors also use liquid lead to transfer heat out of the core. The liquid lead acts as a coolant and enables the reactor to operate at high temperatures without high pressure.

This reactor type is still under development and not yet in wide commercial operation. But companies like newcleo believe it could play a role in future clean energy systems.

Heavy Industry and Investors Double Down

The €75 million funding round brought in both new and existing investors. New industrial backers included heavy industry groups such as:

  • Danieli & C, a steel mill manufacturer
  • Cementir Holding, a cement and concrete producer
  • Orion Valves, an industrial valve maker
  • NextChem, an energy engineering firm

Existing financial backers also participated. These included Kairos, Indaco Ventures, Azimut Investments, the CERN pension fund, and Walter Tosto (industrial engineering).

The mix of industrial and financial investors shows that newcleo’s technology draws interest from companies looking for reliable, low-carbon power and firms focused on clean energy investments.

Scaling from Design to Deployment

newcleo said the fresh funding will support several key parts of its business. The company highlighted progress in:

  • Licensing and regulatory approval processes
  • Research and development (R&D) of reactors and fuel systems
  • Vertical integration of technology and manufacturing
  • Geographic expansion in key markets like Europe and the United States

This means newcleo is working not just on reactor design, but on building the skills and facilities needed to support production, testing, and commercial deployment. The company also has partnerships and projects in multiple countries, including France, Italy, Slovakia, and the U.S. These collaborations relate to licensing and siting work, research facilities, and future commercial reactor projects.

Closing the Nuclear Fuel Loop

Nuclear power is often seen as a low-carbon energy source because it produces virtually no direct CO₂ emissions during operation. However, it leaves behind radioactive waste that can remain hazardous for thousands of years.

nuclear carbon emission
Carbon Footprint of Various Energy Sources

Traditional reactors use uranium fuel once and store the resulting waste. newcleo’s approach aims to reuse existing waste as reactor fuel. This could potentially reduce the volume and hazard of waste that needs long-term storage.

Lead-cooled fast reactors are one class of Generation IV nuclear technology. These designs are intended to be safer and more efficient than older reactors. They can run on fuels that traditional reactors cannot and may help make nuclear energy more sustainable in the long term.

Using recycled radioactive fuel helps close the nuclear fuel cycle. This means sourcing more energy from mined uranium, which leaves less waste behind.

Building a Cross-Border Nuclear Footprint

newcleo has stated that it plans to roll out its technology in several countries with active regulatory frameworks for advanced nuclear projects. The company has started licensing and planning partnerships in Europe and the U.S. These moves aim to make it a major supplier of advanced nuclear power systems.

In France, newcleo is preparing regulatory filings for both fuel and reactor projects. In Italy, it is building R&D infrastructure and test systems, while in Slovakia, it has formed a joint venture to deploy multiple reactors at a nuclear site. And in the U.S., it is engaging in collaborations to build fuel manufacturing and fabrication capabilities.

The company’s CEO, Stefano Buono, said investors view newcleo’s progress in licensing, R&D, and global expansion as a key advantage. He further added,

“Our ability to deliver impactful low-carbon energy solutions for energy-intensive firms is proving an attractive investment rationale for both industrial and financial investors. Our tangible progress in licensing, R&D, vertical integration, and geographic expansion is seen by investors as a key differentiator in the race to deliver clean, safe, and affordable nuclear energy.”

Small Modular Reactors Gain Global Traction

Interest in small modular reactors is rising as countries look for reliable, low-carbon power. Governments and industry groups also track SMRs more closely than before.

One sign is the growing number of designs in development. The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) reported that its latest SMR Dashboard found 98 SMR technologies globally. It detailed 56 of these SMRs in its dashboard set.

A separate NEA summary shows a larger count of designs tracked over editions. This highlights how quickly the pipeline is expanding.

  • Forecasts also show wider deployment in the coming decades. The International Energy Agency (IEA) publishes scenario data on global SMR capacity from 2025 to 2050.

In its analysis, SMR capacity rises from near-zero today to tens of gigawatts by 2050 in its main scenarios (39 GW), and it grows even higher in its “high SMR” case (190 GW). This suggests that SMRs could move from pilot projects to meaningful scale if costs fall and licensing speeds up.

SMR Global Installed Capacity by Scenario and Case, 2025-2050 IEA data
Data from the IEA; STEPS = Stated Policies Scenario; APS = Announced Pledges Scenario; NZE = Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario.

International institutions also expect nuclear growth overall, with SMRs playing a bigger role. In September 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said it raised its long-term nuclear outlook again.

In its best-case scenario, the IAEA predicts that global nuclear capacity could grow to 2.6 times the 2024 level by 2050. It also noted that SMRs will be key to this growth.

Policy signals further support this direction. The NEA reports that over 20 countries at COP28 pledged to triple global nuclear energy capacity by 2050.

These forecasts do not guarantee fast deployment. SMRs still face key hurdles such as licensing timelines, supply chains, fuel availability, and first-of-a-kind costs. 

SMRs are increasingly central to global nuclear talks. The NEA tracks more designs, and the IEA outlines new deployment pathways. And interest from investors and policymakers has grown as countries look for reliable low-carbon baseload power.

The €75 million funding round adds to newcleo’s growing capital base. It boosts the company’s ability to advance its technology and work toward deployment. As of early 2026, newcleo has raised more than $124 million over the past year, with total funding since 2021 likely exceeding €645 million.

Private Capital Signals a Nuclear Comeback

The investment in newcleo highlights a broader trend: private capital is moving into advanced nuclear technologies.

Investors in heavy industry and finance are now seeing nuclear power as key to global decarbonization efforts. Some countries have recently updated their policies. This supports nuclear research and licensing. It shows a focus on energy security and climate goals.

Lead-cooled fast reactors and similar designs remain in early stages of testing and regulatory review. Newcleo and similar companies think their technologies can provide clean, reliable power. They also believe these systems create less waste over their life cycles compared to older reactors.

If successful, this approach could expand the role of nuclear power in the energy transition. But much work remains in testing, licensing, manufacturing, and cost reduction before commercial deployment at scale.

The post Nuclear’s Next Chapter: newcleo Raises $88M to Scale SMR Powered by Nuclear Waste appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

TotalEnergies and Google’s 1 GW Solar Deal Signals a New Phase in the Data Center Energy Race

Published

on

TotalEnergies has signed two long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) with Google to deliver 1 gigawatt (GW) of solar capacity in Texas. Over 15 years, the projects are expected to generate around 28 terawatt-hours (TWh) of renewable electricity.

The deal reflects a deeper shift in how the tech sector secures power for artificial intelligence, cloud services, and digital infrastructure. As AI workloads surge, electricity has become a strategic resource, and companies like Google are moving early to lock in supply.

The projects will be developed at two TotalEnergies-owned sites—Wichita and Mustang Creek—with construction scheduled to begin in the second quarter of 2026. Once operational, they will directly support Google’s growing data center footprint in Texas.

Texas: A Crucial Hub for Big Tech Power Demand

Texas has emerged as one of the world’s most important regions for data center expansion. Its abundant land, strong solar resources, and deregulated power market make it attractive for hyperscale data centers. However, demand is rising rapidly, and the grid is under pressure from AI-driven electricity loads, industrial expansion, and extreme weather events.

texas data centres
Source: AXIOS

The Wichita solar farm, with a capacity of 805 megawatts (MW), and the Mustang Creek project, with 195 MW, together form one of TotalEnergies’ largest U.S. renewable commitments to a single corporate buyer. These projects will add new generation capacity rather than simply reallocating existing renewable energy credits, which is critical for grid stability.

By building new supply, TotalEnergies and Google are addressing a major challenge facing the power sector: ensuring that clean electricity growth keeps pace with surging demand.

Corporate PPAs Are Now Shaping America’s Power Grid

Power purchase agreements were once seen as a financial tool for companies to claim renewable energy use. Today, they are becoming a core driver of grid expansion. Large corporate buyers are effectively acting as anchor investors for new energy infrastructure.

In this case, the 1 GW of solar PPAs complement another 1.2 GW of agreements recently secured by Clearway, a renewables developer half-owned by TotalEnergies. These deals span multiple U.S. grid regions, including ERCOT in Texas, PJM in the Northeast, and SPP in the Central U.S.

Together, these agreements illustrate how tech firms are diversifying their energy supply across regions to manage risk, hedge against price volatility, and ensure reliability.

Local Economic Impact and Community Benefits

Beyond climate goals, large-scale solar projects bring tangible economic benefits to local communities. The Wichita and Mustang Creek developments are expected to create several hundred construction jobs and generate significant tax revenues over their operating lifetimes.

For rural counties, utility-scale solar projects often become a long-term source of public funding for schools, infrastructure, and emergency services. As data centers expand into smaller communities, energy projects linked to them can transform local economies.

TotalEnergies’ Strategy: Tailored Power for High-Load Customers

TotalEnergies is positioning itself as a key energy partner for industries with massive and growing electricity needs. Its customer portfolio already includes major industrial and technology players such as Amazon, Microsoft, Airbus, Air Liquide, STMicroelectronics, Saint-Gobain, and Sasol.

The company’s approach goes beyond simple renewable supply. It combines solar, wind, battery storage, and flexible gas generation to deliver what it calls “clean firm power.” This hybrid model is increasingly important for data centers, which require 24/7 electricity with minimal interruptions.

Marc-Antoine Pignon, TotalEnergies’ Vice President for Renewables in the U.S., highlighted that the Google deal is the company’s largest renewable PPA volume ever signed in the country. He also pointed to the challenges of land availability and power supply for data centers, noting that large-scale colocation opportunities are becoming essential as AI infrastructure expands.

A Growing U.S. and Global Renewable Portfolio

TotalEnergies has been steadily expanding its renewable footprint. In the United States, it holds around 10 GW of onshore solar, wind, and storage capacity, with roughly 5 GW located in Texas. Globally, the company had more than 32 GW of installed renewable capacity by late 2025 and aims to produce over 100 TWh of net electricity by 2030.

total energies renewable portfolio
Source: TotalEnergies

This growth reflects a broader strategy to transition from a traditional oil and gas company into a diversified energy producer. By investing heavily in renewables and flexible assets, TotalEnergies is positioning itself for a future where electricity plays a central role in the global energy mix.

EARLIER: 

Google’s Aggressive Clean Energy Procurement Drive

Google is one of the world’s largest corporate buyers of renewable energy, and its procurement strategy has accelerated dramatically in recent years. Since 2010, the company has signed more than 170 clean energy agreements totaling over 22 GW of capacity. These deals span North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

google data centre electricity consumption
Source: Google

In 2024 alone, Google contracted more than 8 GW of additional clean energy—twice the volume of the previous year and the largest annual total in its history. These agreements are designed to stay ahead of the company’s rapid load growth, particularly from AI and cloud services.

google data center emissions
Source: Google

Despite a 27% year-on-year increase in data center electricity consumption in 2024, Google reported a 12% reduction in data center energy emissions.

  • It estimates that its clean energy purchases avoided more than 8.2 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent in 2024 and over 44 million tonnes cumulatively since 2011.

This shows that large-scale procurement can decouple emissions growth from electricity demand, at least in the near term.

Data Centers Are Reshaping Electricity Demand

The International Energy Agency (IEA )’s latest electricity report has highlighted data centers as a major driver of electricity demand growth in the United States. Electricity consumption rose by 2.8% in 2024 and 2.1% in 2025, with data centers expected to account for nearly half of future growth.

Industrial sectors such as semiconductor manufacturing and battery production will also contribute significantly, but digital infrastructure is among the fastest-growing loads.

AI workloads are particularly energy-intensive. Training large models requires massive, continuously running computing clusters, while inference workloads scale with user demand. This creates a constant, high-load electricity profile that challenges traditional grid planning.

2026 US Renewable Outlook and Policy Headwinds

The IEA also forecasts that nearly 250 GW of renewable energy capacity will be deployed in the U.S. between 2026 and 2030, with utility-scale solar accounting for around 70% of additions. Wind and distributed solar will make up the remainder.

However, recent policy changes and the phase-out of certain tax incentives have led to a downward revision of deployment forecasts. This underscores the growing importance of corporate buyers in sustaining renewable development.

When government support weakens, long-term PPAs from companies like Google provide the financial certainty developers need to build projects. In this sense, tech firms are becoming critical enablers of the energy transition.

iea 2026 us electricty demand

A New Power Paradigm for the Digital Age

The TotalEnergies and Google solar agreement states that electricity is no longer just an operating expense. It is a strategic asset that determines the scalability and sustainability of digital infrastructure.

For TotalEnergies, the deal reinforces its role as a key supplier of tailored renewable power to high-load customers. For Google, it ensures reliable, affordable, and low-carbon electricity for its expanding AI and cloud operations.

More broadly, the partnership reflects a new phase in the global energy transition, where private companies play a central role in financing and building clean power infrastructure. As AI, cloud computing, and digital services continue to expand, similar mega-scale PPAs are likely to become standard practice.

Lastly, but not least, Texas is becoming a global test case for high-growth, low-carbon grids. Its rapid demand growth, combined with large renewable deployment, will offer lessons for other regions facing similar challenges.

The post TotalEnergies and Google’s 1 GW Solar Deal Signals a New Phase in the Data Center Energy Race appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Nigeria Aims for 80 Million Clean Cookstoves and a $5 Billion Carbon Credit Revenue

Published

on

Nigeria Aims for 80 Million Clean Cookstoves and a $5 Billion Carbon Credit Revenue

Nigeria is planning a large clean cooking program that aims to distribute 80 million efficient cookstoves to households. Project backers say the rollout could help reduce smoke from cooking, cut pressure on forests, and create a new stream of carbon credits.

Recent reporting in Nigeria says the project is also tied to a revenue target. A senior finance executive at project developer GreenPlinth Africa said the Federal Government could earn up to $5 billion each year from “verified carbon credit revenues” when the program reaches full scale.

Lagos State has also described itself as an early “anchor” for the program. Lagos State Government announced it will lead the way in providing 6 million free cookstoves. Distribution in the state has started in June 2025, beginning in Makoko.

Mr. Tunde Lemo, former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, commented:

“This is not a pilot. It is not a promise. It is a nationally endorsed, structured, and scalable intervention…This is one of the most ambitious clean cooking and household energy transition programmes ever undertaken globally.”

An 80 Million Stove Rollout With National Ambitions

Lagos State’s climate office describes the initiative as a nationwide effort to deploy 80 million efficient cookstoves free of charge. It says the goal is to sharply reduce traditional firewood use for women and low-income households.

Large stove programs usually try to replace or improve traditional cooking methods that produce heavy smoke indoors. In many households, cooking uses wood, charcoal, or other solid fuels. These fuels can release fine particles and other pollutants, especially in kitchens with poor airflow.

The Clean Cooking Alliance’s Nigeria dashboard uses official sources like the World Bank. It estimates that over 167 million people, or 73.8%, in Nigeria did not have access to clean cooking in 2023.

That gap is wider outside cities. The same dashboard reports that 26.2% of Nigeria’s population had access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking in 2023. It also reports 48.7% access in urban areas versus 9.7% in rural areas in 2023.

Cooking Smoke as a Public Health Crisis

Global health agencies link household smoke from cooking to major health harms. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that household air pollution led to around 2.9 million deaths in 2021. This includes more than 309,000 children under age 5.

WHO also estimates that household air pollution caused about 95 million DALYs in 2021. This measure combines years lost to early death and disability. The organization notes that the health burden is tied to diseases such as heart disease, stroke, and lung disease.

Moreover, a WHO technical page shows how household air pollution causes deaths. Here’s the breakdown:

  • Ischaemic heart disease: 32%
  • Stroke: 23%
  • Lower respiratory infections: 21%
  • COPD: 19%
  • Lung cancer: 6%

Global energy data also shows the scale of the challenge. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates 2.3 billion people worldwide still cook using open fires or basic stoves that create harmful smoke.

In Nigeria, a large stove program could affect health most in communities that rely heavily on fuelwood or charcoal. It could also change how much time families spend collecting fuel. It could lower daily smoke exposure for cooks and nearby children when stoves are used correctly and consistently.

From Kitchen Emissions to Carbon Markets

The project narrative links emissions cuts from cleaner cooking to carbon markets. Carbon crediting usually relies on measuring and verifying how much a project cuts greenhouse gas emissions compared to a baseline.

International rules also matter if the project aims to generate credits for compliance uses under the Paris Agreement. Under Article 6, countries can cooperate to meet climate targets, including through carbon credits created from verified emission reductions.

Within Article 6, the Article 6.4 mechanism (also called the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism) has a UN-backed governance structure. UNFCCC explains that an Article 6.4 Supervisory Body develops and supervises requirements to run the mechanism. This includes approving methodologies, registering activities, accrediting verification bodies, and managing a registry.

This matters because cookstove projects often face scrutiny over real-world use. Carbon credit quality can depend on factors like whether households actually use the new stove, how long they keep using it, and whether old stoves stay in use at the same time. Credible monitoring and verification are central to project integrity under any crediting pathway.

IEA clean cooking projection 2030
Source: IEA

The IEA predicts that clean cooking access will hit around 85% by 2030. This means over 350 million people, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa, will still lack safe cooking options. They will continue to rely on polluting open fires and basic stoves.

To achieve universal access by 2030, there’s a need to connect 160 million people each year. However, funding shortages and infrastructure issues make this unlikely. That requires about $2 billion a year just for Africa to make it happen.

The IEA believes full access by 2040 is more realistic. This will come from increased use of LPG, which will cover about 60% of new connections. It will also involve electric cooking, advanced biomass stoves, and various financing options such as carbon credits. And Nigeria is heading in that direction.

What a $5 Billion Carbon Claim Would Require

Nigeria already has experience with cookstove carbon projects on a smaller scale. The Clean Cooking Alliance’s Nigeria dashboard says the country has 18 registered cookstove projects that have generated 3.4 million carbon credits to date.

The credits from 9 developers are verified by Verra’s VCS and Gold Standard, as seen:

Nigeria cookstove project carbon credit summary
Source: Clean Cooking Alliance

The proposed 80 million-stove rollout is far larger than typical programs. Supporters argue that scale could also mean large volumes of credited emission reductions, especially if adoption remains high over many years.

The $5 billion per year figure has drawn attention because it implies both a large credit volume and a strong credit price. The figure cited in Nigerian reporting was presented as a projection tied to “verified” carbon credit revenues once the project is fully deployed.

Still, projected revenue is not the same as guaranteed income. Real outcomes depend on several conditions, including:

  • The number of stoves actually delivered and used,
  • The verified emissions reductions per household,
  • Approval under the chosen crediting pathway,
  • Market demand, and
  • The price and transaction costs for credits.

Lagos State’s official post highlights a key milestone: 6 million stoves in Lagos. However, it does not confirm future credit volumes or prices.

Delivery, Use, and Verification Will Decide the Outcome

Several signals will help observers judge the program’s progress and credibility.

First is delivery at scale. A plan for 80 million stoves requires large manufacturing or import capacity, distribution logistics, and after-sales support. Maintenance matters because stoves can fail or be abandoned if they do not meet cooking needs.

Second is sustained use. Clean cooking benefits and emissions cuts depend on households consistently using the new stove. Programs often track usage through surveys, sensors, or fuel consumption checks. Strong monitoring also supports more credible carbon claims.

Third is alignment with recognized rules. If the project aims to issue credits under Paris Agreement pathways, it must follow the requirements of Article 6.4 Supervisory Body. This includes using accepted methodologies and verification practices.

Finally, there is the public data baseline. Nigeria’s clean cooking access is still low overall. The Clean Cooking Alliance dashboard, using World Bank data, reported 26.2% access in 2023, with much lower access in rural areas. A well-run program could shift those numbers over time, but it will require steady funding and coordination across states.

For now, the story combines a large public health goal with a climate finance goal, and the scale is ambitious. The key question is whether implementation, monitoring, and market demand can match the size of the revenue promise.

The post Nigeria Aims for 80 Million Clean Cookstoves and a $5 Billion Carbon Credit Revenue appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com