Published

1 year ago

July 17, 2024

Alice Rush

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s Cropped.
We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.

Key developments

UK election impacts

LABOUR’S ENVIRONMENT PRIORITIES: The UK’s new Labour government has started to outline its priorities, with the new minister for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Steve Reed, setting out his five priorities in a video posted to Twitter. These were, he said: “Cleaning up British rivers, lakes and seas; creating a roadmap to move Britain to a zero-waste economy; supporting farmers to boost Britain’s food security; ensuring nature’s recovery; and protecting communities from flooding.” Edie reported that the UK “ranks in the bottom 10% of nations globally in terms of biodiversity intactness”, and that it is nowhere near its national goal of protecting 30% of its land and sea by 2030.

AGRICULTURE PLANS: However, a budget for farming was notably absent from the Labour manifesto. Nick von Westenholz, the National Farmers Union’s (NFU) director for strategy, told Euractiv last week that setting the budget for the environmental land management schemes (Elms), which will replace the EU’s multimillion farming subsidy programme by 2027, was “crucial”. Under Elms, farmers can receive subsidies for actions such as reducing pesticide use, planting wildflowers and preventing groundwater pollution. (See Carbon Brief’s 2023 explainer for more details.) Making the Elms subsidies financially attractive to farmers was a key issue, von Westenholz said: “There is a concern about the budget not being sufficient and that there won’t be enough of a business case for farmers to adopt the scheme”. Last week, Carbon Brief analysed the climate issues that the new Labour government will have to address, including those on land, agriculture and nature.

CONSERVATIONISTS REACT: Inkcap Journal summarised the positive, but cautious, reactions of conservation champions to Labour’s victory. Charities including the RSPB and CPRE urged the new prime minister to “act quickly on nature”, highlighting that upcoming decisions will “affect all UK wildlife immensely”. The Wildlife Trusts commended Labour’s “welcome commitments on nature and climate”, but published a list of priorities for the new government, including a review of the Environmental Improvement Plan and increasing the budget for wildlife-friendly farming. Experts also shared their views with Carbon Brief on what Labour’s priorities should be for climate action.

African farmers’ woes

DOUBLE THREAT: In the Conversation, University of Cape Town researcher Dr Vuyisile Moyo described the challenges facing farmers in Zimbabwe due to the “combination of heat, droughts and floods caused by climate change, and water contamination and damaged land caused by illegal, small-scale mining”. There are an estimated 400,000 illegal, small-scale miners in the country and their operations have resulted in “deforestation, land degradation, water pollution and loss of biodiversity”, Moyo wrote. One farmer told Moyo: “My farm was encroached by the artisanal miners who believed that there is a lot of gold there. My farmland was dug all over and now I no longer have land for crop production.”

MALNUTRITION AND DROUGHT: Al Jazeera carried a gallery of photos from drought-stricken Zimbabwe, with one farmer telling the outlet: “I did not harvest anything after all my effort and using all our savings to buy seeds.” Malnutrition is on the rise in the eastern Zimbabwean district of Mudzi, with cases jumping “by about 20%” over the past three months. The outlet added that “Zimbabwe and neighbouring Malawi and Zambia are among the countries in southern Africa most affected by malnutrition” amid the drought. In nearby Namibia, cattle sales have increased by nearly 50% as farmers facing the “biting effects of drought” have been forced to sell off their herds, the Namibian reported. As a result of the influx of cattle to the market, producers’ prices declined by nearly 4% since last year, the outlet added.

‘FOOD SECURITY CRISIS’: In South Africa’s Western Cape province, “informal settlements have been waterlogged for days” following heavy rains, Ground Up reported. Many of the people living in these settlements are “farm workers who have been evicted from farms they used to live at”, the South African outlet wrote. The Associated Press reported that “a food security crisis lies ahead” for Kenya following devastating floods that impacted the country beginning in mid-March. And local NGOs told Devex that flooding across east Africa has left children at risk of malnutrition “because of lack of food and medical services”.

Spotlight

Murky waters

In this spotlight, Carbon Brief unpacks the agenda ahead of the International Seabed Authority, as it resumes negotiations to frame rules for deep-sea mining.

The controversial possibility of mining the deep sea for critical minerals has been catapulted to the spotlight in the past few years, from investigations into the work of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) to late-night comedians in the US running dedicated segments.

Triggered by a move by Nauru in 2021, the ISA has been “under pressure” to finalise rules to regulate deep-sea mineral exploitation or risk the possibility of assessing mining applications without them.

That “what-if” scenario has become one of “what-now”, as the ISA’s 36-member council has already passed the July 2023 deadline to draw up this mining code. This atmosphere of uncertainty has since been met by a growing chorus of 27 governments that have called for some form of ban, moratorium or pause on deep-sea mining.

On Tuesday, the ISA resumed its 29th annual session in Kingston, Jamaica, with three crucial points on the agenda for its council and assembly: the debate over the mining code and a moratorium, the election of its secretary general and, for the first time ever, a discussion on the need for a general policy to protect and preserve the marine environment.

“All states have said that they don’t want [mineral] exploitation without regulation, but just how robust that regulation is, that’s the fault line,” Julian Jackson, project director of seabed mining at Pew Charitable Trusts, told Carbon Brief. According to Jackson, there are still “30 outstanding, big policy issues” to be resolved, from “permissible levels of environmental harm” – such as thresholds for toxicity – to issues of compensation and liability. He added:

“These are very technical negotiations, with yet more detailed standards and guidelines remaining to be addressed, all being done in an international, multilateral setting with very divergent views and not enough time.”

While the groundswell calling for a moratorium has grown, with banks and companies joining the fray, senior lecturer at the Borneo Marine Institute Dr Sharifah Nora Syed Ibrahim points to the fact that developed countries such as Norway have moved in the opposite direction. She told Carbon Brief:

“Norway wants to keep the option of deep-sea mining open, including within its national waters, because if oil is being phased out due to the climate movement, what other main natural resources does Norway have, other than fisheries?”

Who secures the ISA’s top post, which holds sway over the deep sea’s future, has been the subject of a huge scandal in recent weeks. Earlier this month, a New York Times investigation pointed to “allegations of possible payments to help secure votes” and attempts “to entice a candidate to withdraw from a race” amid complaints of misuse of agency funds by ISA chief Michael Lodge, who is currently eyeing a third term at the top.

While Lodge responded to the Times in a six-page statement describing the story as a “collation of vague, unsubstantiated, unfounded and anonymous rumours”, observers told Carbon Brief the allegations were being discussed on the first day of the talks.

“The science [on impacts] is way behind, the regulations are also way behind,” said Jackson:

“In the meanwhile, how do you have a multilateral organisation mired in allegations of conflicts of interest governing what is still so poorly understood?”

News and views

ARGENTINA BEEF: The consumption of beef in Argentina has fallen to a historical low, with demand forecasted to fall to the “lowest level in a century”, according to the Buenos Aires Times. A report from the Rosario Board of Trade found that annual beef consumption is now around 45kg per person, down from a peak of more than 100kg in the 1950s. Bloomberg attributed the decline to skyrocketing beef prices amidst a national recession. However, a shift to poultry, pork and plant-based diets due to greater nutritional awareness amongst consumers is also contributing, the newswire said. Argentina remains one of the biggest beef consumers globally, surpassing the UK and US (18 and 38kg per capita, respectively).

EU POLICY: The farmers’ organisation European Coordination Via Campesina has called on the EU to control agricultural prices and abandon free-trade agreements, including the long-stalled deal with the Mercosur South American trading bloc, Euractiv reported. “Farmers fear the Mercosur deal would result in markets being flooded with cheaper products”, it said. A separate Euractiv piece said that the European People’s Party is aiming to take the post of agriculture commissioner in the European Parliament in a move to solidify itself as “the farmers’ party”. Meanwhile, US paper producers have warned that new EU regulations requiring them to trace the sources of timber will cause price increases and shortages of diapers, sanitary pads and hygiene products, with Bloomberg reporting that “pulp supply chains are too diffuse to track all trees”.

‘CARBON LAUNDRY’: Brazil is “rac[ing]” to launch “one of the first major carbon emissions trading systems in the developing world”, Dialogue Earth reported. The emissions trading system aims to cover major polluting companies from sectors such as steel and cement, it added, but they would also be allowed to offset their emissions by buying credits from the voluntary market. This would need “careful regulation”, experts told the outlet, to ensure Brazil does not become “the carbon laundry of the world”. Dialogue Earth also covered controversies around “blue carbon” trading in China, where “most of the credits…involve the scientifically contentious matter of carbon sequestration by shellfish and seaweed”. Scroll.in, meanwhile, reported on “dubious” credits being generated by Himalayan hydropower projects.

WATER WARS: Amid ongoing drought in the south-western US, the country is “looking to parched northern Mexico to solve its water shortage”, Excelsior reported. The newspaper noted that the latest agreement between the two countries marks “the third consecutive year of water cuts from the Colorado River to Mexico”. In return for the reduction, Mexico will receive $65m “that will be used to improve water resources infrastructure”. Nearly two-thirds of northern cities and towns are already impacted by water shortages, including “a dozen municipalities living in a state of emergency”, Excelsior said. It added that 14 members of congress from Texas have requested the US “suspend aid to Mexico…until Mexico pays off its current water debt”.

DEFORESTATION DECREASE: Last year, Colombia “achieved its lowest deforestation rate ever recorded”, reporting a 36% decrease compared to the previous year, City Paper Bogota said. (Historical records in the country go back to 2000.) The figure represents a decrease of more than 50% over the last two years, “surpassing the initial target” set in the country’s national development plan, the outlet said. It quoted Colombian environment minister Susana Muhamad, who said: “It is a truly iconic year in this fight against deforestation.” However, Colombia Reports said that the reduction is “feared to be temporary” and that “the first quarter of this year indicated that deforestation had been going up again”.

DISPUTED MAPS: Indigenous communities in India’s western state of Gujarat have complained that district authorities rejected their forest rights claims based solely on satellite imagery collected by an autonomous state body, over other evidence such as testimonies and site inspections, IndiaSpend reported. Activists accused the GEER Foundation of “a lack of transparency”. Villagers asked to vacate their lands within 10 days told the outlet that the “notices came as a shock, as GPS and satellite imagery exercises conducted by local NGOs” support their claims. An official told IndiaSpend that the foundation “has now agreed to share their maps”, but said that “people give arbitrary estimates” of the size of their forest plots. Separately, the Financial Times reported that Australia has asked for a delay of the EU deforestation law regime citing “incorrect data”, with a spokesperson stating that “[t]he EU’s map is not a single source of truth”.

Watch, read, listen

BALANCING ACT: On her Feed the Planet podcast, Prof Sarah Bridle talked to researcher Barbara Bray about how to balance humans’ health with that of the planet.

COMEBACK KID: Mongabay carried a two-part series on the “re-introduction” of the Spix’s macaw that went extinct in the wild, but now faces an “uncertain future”.

STICKER SHOCK: In a new video, Al Jazeera explored how climate change has played a role in the global increases in food prices and inflation.

PORK OUT: Vox carried a long read that looked at how factory farming was “shoring up public support” by “funding favourable research” from US public university scientists.

New science

Climate change impact on Mediterranean viticultural regions and site-specific climate risk-reduction strategies

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Grape growers in parts of the Mediterranean should consider reducing their crop’s exposure to sun and optimising water usage to help vineyards adapt to climate change, according to new research. The researchers aimed to understand how climate change will impact wine-growing areas in Portugal, Italy, Turkey and Morocco. Using scenarios under moderate (RCP4.5) and very high emissions (RCP8.5), the researchers compared the main climate-related challenges these locations will face and assess the “best strategies to reduce the impacts of climate change at the national and regional levels”. The conclusions of the study “may support local growers” in optimising “sustainable production under changing climates”, the researchers wrote.

Severe droughts reduce river navigability and isolate communities in the Brazilian Amazon

Communications Earth & Environment

A new study found that severe droughts “routinely disrupt inland water transport and isolate local populations” in the Brazilian Amazon, resulting in restricted access to food, medicine, education and more. By combining historical records of river streamflow, maps of human settlements and news reports, researchers analysed the impacts of lowered river levels on communities near the Amazon River. They found that droughts over the past two decades “have not only caused exceptional low-water anomalies across the Amazon basin, but also dramatically increased the duration of the low-water period”, contributing to communities’ isolation. They concluded: “Given this new reality, Amazon countries must develop long-term strategies for mitigation, adaptation and disaster response.”

Four decades of data indicate that planted mangroves stored up to 75% of the carbon stocks found in intact mature stands

Science Advances

New research found that planted mangroves store nearly three-quarters of the amount of carbon stored by untouched mangroves over 20 to 40-year timescales. Analysing data from 684 planted mangrove stands around the world, researchers looked at the carbon storage both below and above ground and determined how carbon storage rates change over time. They found that planted stands that incorporate more than one mangrove species “would maximise [carbon] accumulation within the biomass compared to monospecific planting”. The authors concluded: “Our models also facilitate goal setting; performance measure development; and progress tracking in restoration, rehabilitation or afforestation projects.”

In the diary

15 July-2 August: Second part of the 29th Session of the International Seabed Authority Assembly and Council | Kingston, Jamaica
22-26 July: 27th Session of the FAO Committee on Forestry | Rome
27 July-2 August: 61st Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-61) | Sofia, Bulgaria

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org.

The post Cropped 17 July 2024: Climate change and wine; Seabed mining talks; Argentina’s beef habit appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Cropped 17 July 2024: Climate change and wine; Seabed mining talks; Argentina’s beef habit

Greenhouse Gases

Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025

Published

6 hours ago

December 5, 2025

Alice Rush

Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025

By Elissa Tennant

Healthy forests are a key part of the climate puzzle — and they’ve been a big part of our advocacy in 2025!

In January of this year, CCL volunteers sent 7,100 messages to Congress urging them to work together to reduce wildfire risk. Soon after, the Fix Our Forests Act was introduced in the House as H.R. 471 and passed the House by a bipartisan vote of 279–141.

At our Conservative Climate Conference and Lobby Day in March, we raised the Fix Our Forests Act as a secondary ask in 47 lobby meetings on Capitol Hill. The next month, an improved version of the bill was then introduced in the Senate as S. 1462 and referred to the Senate Agriculture Committee.

The bill was scheduled for a committee vote in October. CCLers placed more than 2,000 calls to senators on the committee and generated a flurry of local media in their states before the vote. In October, the bill passed the Senate Agriculture Committee with strong bipartisan support.

It’s clear that this legislation has momentum! As the Fix Our Forests Act now awaits a floor vote in the Senate, let’s take a look back at our 2025 advocacy efforts to advance this bill — and why it’s so important.

Protecting forests and improving climate outcomes

Wildfires are getting worse. In the U.S., the annual area burned by wildfires has more than doubled over the past 30 years. In California alone, the acreage burned by wildfires every year has more than tripled over the past 40 years.

American forests currently offset 12% of our annual climate pollution, with the potential to do even more. We need to take action to reduce wildfire, so forests can keep doing their important work pulling climate pollution out of the atmosphere.

The bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act:

Protects America’s forests by supporting time-tested tools, like prescribed fire and reforestation, that make our forests healthy and able to better withstand and recover from severe wildfire and other extreme weather.
Protects communities across the nation by reducing wildfire risks to people, homes, and water supplies and adopting new technologies.
Protects livelihoods by supporting rural jobs and recreation areas and sustaining the forests that house and feed us.

CCL supports this bill alongside many organizations including American Forests, The Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, National Audubon Society, The Western Fire Chiefs Association, The Federation of American Scientists and more.

A deeper dive into our efforts

All year long, CCL’s Government Relations staff has been in conversation with congressional offices to share CCL’s perspective on the legislation and understand the opportunities and challenges facing the bill. Our Government Relations team played a key role in helping us understand when and how to provide an extra grassroots push to keep the bill moving.

Starting Sept. 9 through the committee vote, CCLers represented by senators on the Senate Agriculture Committee made 2,022 calls to committee members in support of FOFA. CCL also signed a national coalition letter to Senate leadership in support of the bill, joining organizations like the American Conservation Coalition Action, Bipartisan Policy Center Action, the International Association of Fire Chiefs, and more.

In October, we launched a local media initiative in support of FOFA, focused on states with senators on the Agriculture Committee. Volunteers published letters to the editor and op-eds in California, Minnesota, Colorado, and more. In one state, the senator’s office saw a CCLer’s op-ed in the local newspaper, and reached out to schedule a meeting with those volunteers to discuss the bill! CCL’s Government Relations team joined in to make the most of the conversation.

As soon as the committee vote was scheduled for October 21, our Government Relations staff put out a call for volunteers to generate local endorsement letters from trusted messengers. CCL staff prepared short endorsement letter templates for each state that chapters could personalize and submit to their senator’s office. Each version included clear instructions, contact info, and space for volunteers to add their local context, like a short story or relevant example of how wildfires have impacted their area.

Then, CCL state coordinators worked with the CCL chapters in their states to make sure they prepared and sent the signed letters to the appropriate senate office, and to alert CCL’s Government Affairs staff so they could follow up and keep the conversation going on Capitol Hill.

Individually, our voices as climate advocates struggle to break through and make change. But it’s this kind of coordinated nationwide effort, with well-informed staff partnering with motivated local volunteers, that makes CCL effective at moving the needle in Congress.

On October 21, the Fix Our Forests Act officially passed the Senate Agriculture Committee with a vote of 18-5.

Building on the momentum

After committee passage, FOFA is now waiting to be taken up by the full Senate for a floor vote. It’s not clear yet if it will move as a standalone bill or included in a package of other legislation.

But to continue building support, we spent a large portion of our Fall Conference training our volunteers on the latest information about the bill, and we included FOFA as a primary ask in our Fall Lobby Week meetings.

Volunteers are now messaging all senators in support of FOFA. If you haven’t already, add your voice by sending messages to your senators about this legislation. With strategy, organization, and a group of dedicated people, we can help pass the Fix Our Forests Act, reducing wildfire risk and helping forests remove more climate pollution.

Help us keep the momentum going! Write to your Senator in support of the Fix Our Forests Act.

The post Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025 appeared first on Citizens' Climate Lobby.

Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025

Greenhouse Gases

DeBriefed 5 December: Deadly Asia floods; Adaptation finance target examined; Global south IPCC scientists speak out

Published

14 hours ago

December 5, 2025

Alice Rush

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s DeBriefed.
An essential guide to the week’s key developments relating to climate change.

This week

Deadly floods in Asia

MOUNTING DEVASTATION: The Associated Press reported that the death toll from catastrophic floods in south-east Asia had reached 1,500, with Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Thailand most affected and hundreds still missing. The newswire said “thousands” more face “severe” food and clean-water shortages. Heavy rains and thunderstorms are expected this weekend, it added, with “saturated soil and swollen rivers leaving communities on edge”. Earlier in the week, Bloomberg said the floods had caused “at least $20bn in losses”.

CLIMATE CHANGE LINKS: A number of outlets have investigated the links between the floods and human-caused climate change. Agence France-Presse explained that climate change was “producing more intense rain events because a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture and warmer oceans can turbocharge storms”. Meanwhile, environmental groups told the Associated Press the situation had been exacerbated by “decades of deforestation”, which had “stripped away natural defenses that once absorbed rainfall and stabilised soil”.

‘NEW NORMAL’: The Associated Press quoted Malaysian researcher Dr Jemilah Mahmood saying: “South-east Asia should brace for a likely continuation and potential worsening of extreme weather in 2026 and for many years.” Al Jazeera reported that the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies had called for “stronger legal and policy frameworks to protect people in disasters”. The organisation’s Asia-Pacific director said the floods were a “stark reminder that climate-driven disasters are becoming the new normal”, the outlet said.

Around the world

REVOKED: The UK and Netherlands withdrew $2.2bn of financial backing from a controversial liquified natural gas (LNG) project in Mozambique, Reuters reported. The Guardian noted that TotalEnergies’ “giant” project stood accused of “fuelling the climate crisis and deadly terror attacks”.
REVERSED: US president Donald Trump announced plans to “significantly weaken” Biden-era fuel efficiency requirements for cars, the New York Times said.
RESTRICTED: EU leaders agreed to ban the import of Russian gas from autumn 2027, the Financial Times reported. Meanwhile, Reuters said it is “likely” the European Commission will delay announcing a plan on auto sector climate targets next week, following pressure to “weaken” a 2035 cut-off for combustion engines.
RETRACTED: An influential Nature study that looked at the economic consequences of climate change has been withdrawn after “criticism from peers”, according to Bloomberg. [The research came second in Carbon Brief’s ranking of the climate papers most covered by the media in 2024.]
REBUKED: The federal government of Canada faced a backlash over an oil pipeline deal struck last week with the province of Alberta. CBC News noted that First Nations chiefs voted “unanimously” to demand the withdrawal of the deal and Canada’s National Observer quoted author Naomi Klein as saying that the prime minister was “completely trashing Canada’s climate commitments”.
RESCHEDULED: The Indonesian government has cancelled plans to close a coal plant seven years early, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, Bloomberg separately reported that India is mulling an “unprecedented increase” in coal-power capacity that could see plants built “until at least 2047”.

$518 billion a year

The projected coastal flood damages for the Asia-Pacific region by 2100 if current policies continue, according to a Scientific Reports study covered this week by Carbon Brief.

Latest climate research

More than 100 “climate-sensitive rivers” worldwide are experiencing “large and severe changes in streamflow volume and timing” | Environmental Research Letters
Africa’s forests have switched from a carbon sink into a source | Scientific Reports
Increasing urbanisation can “substantially intensify warming”, contributing up to 0.44C of additional temperature rise per year through 2060 | Communications Earth & Environment

(For more, see Carbon Brief’s in-depth daily summaries of the top climate news stories on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.)

Captured

A new target for developed nations to triple adaptation finance by 2035, agreed at the COP30 climate summit, would not cover more than a third of developing countries’ estimated needs, Carbon Brief analysis showed. The chart above compares a straight line to meeting the adaptation finance target (blue), alongside an estimate of countries’ adaptation needs (grey), which was calculated using figures from the latest UN Environmental Programme adaptation gap report, which were based on countries’ UN climate plans (called “nationally determined contributions” or NDCs) and national adaptation plans (NAPs).

Spotlight

Inclusivity at the IPCC

This week, Carbon Brief speaks to an IPCC lead author researching ways to improve the experience of global south scientists taking part in producing the UN climate body’s assessments.

Hundreds of climate scientists from around the world met in Paris this week to start work on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC’s) newest set of climate reports.

The IPCC is the UN body responsible for producing the world’s most authoritative climate science reports. Hundreds of scientists from across the globe contribute to each “assessment cycle”, which sees researchers aim to condense all published climate science over several years into three “working group” reports.

The reports inform the decisions of governments – including at UN climate talks – as well as the public understanding of climate change.

The experts gathering in Paris are the most diverse group ever convened by the IPCC.

Earlier this year, Carbon Brief analysis found that – for the first time in an IPCC cycle – citizens of the global south make up 50% of authors of the three working group reports. The IPCC has celebrated this milestone, with IPCC chair Prof Jim Skea touting the seventh assessment report’s (AR7’s) “increased diversity” in August.

But some IPCC scientists have cautioned that the growing involvement of global south scientists does not translate into an inclusive process.

“What happens behind closed doors in these meeting rooms doesn’t necessarily mirror what the diversity numbers say,” Dr Shobha Maharaj, a Trinidadian climate scientist who is a coordinating lead author for working group two (WG2) of AR7, told Carbon Brief.

Global south perspective

Motivated by conversations with colleagues and her own “uncomfortable” experience working on the small-islands chapter of the sixth assessment cycle (AR6) WG2 report, Maharaj – an adjunct professor at the University of Fiji – reached out to dozens of fellow contributors to understand their experience.

The exercise, she said, revealed a “dominance of thinking and opinions from global north scientists, whereas the global south scientists – the scientists who were people of colour – were generally suppressed”.

The perspectives of scientists who took part in the survey and future recommendations for the IPCC are set out in a peer-reviewed essay – co-authored by 20 researchers – slated for publication in the journal PLOS Climate. (Maharaj also presented the findings to the IPCC in September.)

The draft version of the essay notes that global south scientists working on WG2 in AR6 said they confronted a number of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) issues, including “skewed” author selection, “unequal” power dynamics and a “lack of respect and trust”. The researchers also pointed to logistical constraints faced by global south authors, such as visa issues and limited access to journals.

The anonymous quotations from more than 30 scientists included in the essay, Maharaj said, are “clear data points” that she believes can advance a discussion about how to make academia more inclusive.

“The literature is full of the problems that people of colour or global south authors have in academia, but what you don’t find very often is quotations – especially from climate scientists,” she said. “We tend to be quite a conservative bunch.”

Road to ‘improvement’

Among the recommendations set out in the essay are for DEI training, the appointment of a “diversity and inclusion ombudsman” and for updated codes of conduct.

Marharaj said that these “tactical measures” need to occur alongside “transformative approaches” that help “address value systems, dismantle power structures [and] change the rules of participation”.

With drafting of the AR7 reports now underway, Maharaj said she is “hopeful” the new cycle can be an improvement on the last, pointing to a number of “welcome” steps from the IPCC.

This includes holding the first-ever expert meeting on DEI this autumn, new mechanisms where authors can flag concerns and the recruitment of a “science and capacity officer” to support WG2 authors.

The hope, Maharaj explained, is to enhance – not undermine – climate science.

“The idea here was to move forward and to improve the IPCC, rather than attack it,” she said. “Because we all love the science – and we really value what the IPCC brings to the world.”

Watch, read, listen

BROKEN PROMISES: Climate Home News spoke to communities in Nigeria let down by the government’s failure to clean up oil spills by foreign companies.

‘WHEN A ROAD GOES WRONG’: Inside Climate News looked at how a new road from Brazil’s western Amazon to Peru has become a “conduit for rampant deforestation and illegal gold mining”.

SHADOWY COURTS: In the Guardian, George Monbiot lamented the rise of investor-state dispute settlements, which he described as “undemocratic offshore tribunals” that are already having a “chilling effect” on countries’ climate ambitions.

Coming up

1-12 December: UN Environment Assembly 7, Nairobi, Kenya
7 December: Hong Kong legislative elections
11 December: Falkland Islands legislative assembly elections

Pick of the jobs

Greenpeace International, engagement manager – climate and energy | Salary: Unknown. Location: Various
The Energy, newsletter editor | Salary: Unknown. Location: Australia (remote)
University of Groningen, PhD position in motivating people to contribute to societal transitions | Salary: €3,059-€3,881 per month. Location: Groningen, the Netherlands

DeBriefed is edited by Daisy Dunne. Please send any tips or feedback to debriefed@carbonbrief.org.

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s weekly DeBriefed email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

The post DeBriefed 5 December: Deadly Asia floods; Adaptation finance target examined; Global south IPCC scientists speak out appeared first on Carbon Brief.

DeBriefed 5 December: Deadly Asia floods; Adaptation finance target examined; Global south IPCC scientists speak out

Greenhouse Gases

Cropped 3 December 2025: Extreme weather in Africa; COP30 roundup; Saudi minister interview

Published

2 days ago

December 3, 2025

Alice Rush

We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

Key developments

COP30 roundup

FOOD OFF THE MENU: COP30 wrapped up in the Brazilian Amazon city of Belém, with several new announcements for forest protection, but with experts saying that food systems were seemingly “erased” from official negotiations, Carbon Brief reported. Other observers told the Independent that the lack of mention of food in some of the main negotiated outcomes was “surprising” and “deeply disappointing”. The outlet noted that smallholder farmers spend an “estimated 20 to 40% of their annual income on adaptive measures…despite having done next to nothing to contribute to the climate crisis”.

‘BITTERSWEET’: Meanwhile, Reuters said that the summit’s outcomes for trees and Indigenous peoples were “unprecedented”, but “bittersweet”. It noted that countries had “unlocked billions in new funds for forests” through the Tropical Forest Forever Facility. (For more on that fund, see Carbon Brief’s explainer.) However, the newswire added, “nations failed to agree on a plan to keep trees standing as they have repeatedly promised to do in recent summits”. Mongabay noted that pledges to the new forest fund totalled “less than a quarter of the $25bn initially required for a full-scale rollout”.

‘MIXED OUTCOMES’: A separate piece in Mongabay said that COP30 “delivered mixed outcomes” for Indigenous peoples. One positive outcome was a “historic pledge to recognise Indigenous land tenure rights over 160m hectares” of tropical forest land, the outlet said. This was accompanied by a monetary pledge of $1.8bn to support “Indigenous peoples, local and Afro-descendant communities in securing land rights over the next five years”, it added. However, Mongabay wrote, there were some “major disappointments” around the summit’s outcomes, particularly around the absence of mention of critical minerals and fossil-fuel phaseout in the final texts.

Africa on edge

SOMALIA DROUGHT: Somalia officially declared a drought emergency last month “after four consecutive failed rainy seasons left millions at risk of hunger and displacement”, allAfrica reported, with 130,000 people in “immediate life-threatening need”. According to Al Jazeera, more than 4.5 million people “face starvation”, as “failed rains and heat devastated” the country, with displaced communities also “escaping fighting” in their villages and aid cuts impacting relief. Down to Earth, meanwhile, covered an Amnesty International report that demonstrated that Somalia failed to “implement a functional social-security system for the marginalised, particularly those negatively affected by drought”.

COCOA CRASH: Ivory Coast’s main cocoa harvest is expected to “decline sharply for [the] third consecutive year” due to erratic rainfall, crop disease, ageing farms and poor investment, Reuters reported. Africa Sustainability Matters observed that the delayed implementation of the EU’s deforestation law – announced last week – could impact two million smallholder farmers, who may see “delays in certification processes ripple through payment cycles and export volumes”. Meanwhile, SwissInfo reported that the “disconnect between high global cocoa prices and the price paid to farmers” is leading to “unprecedented cocoa smuggling” in Ghana.

‘FERTILISER CRISIS’: Nyasa Times reported that, “for the first time”, Malawian president Peter Mutharika admitted that the country is “facing a planting season…for which his government is dangerously unprepared”. According to the paper, Mutharika acknowledged that the country is “heading into the rains without adequate fertiliser and with procurement dangerously behind schedule” at a meeting with the International Monetary Fund’s Africa director. “We are struggling with supplies… We are not yet ready in terms of fertiliser,” Mutharika is quoted as saying, with the paper adding that his administration is “overwhelmed” by a fertiliser crisis.

News and views

PLANT TALKS COLLAPSE: “Decade-long” talks aimed at negotiating new rules for seed-sharing “collapsed” after week-long negotiations in Lima, Euractiv reported. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture allows “any actor to access seed samples of 64 major food crops stored in public gene banks”, but “virtually no money flows back to countries that conserve and share seed diversity”, the outlet said. Observers “criticised the closed-door nature of the final talks”, which attempted to postpone a decision on payments until 2027, it added.

UNSUSTAINABLE: The UK food system is driving nature loss and deepening climate change, according to a new WWF report. The report analysed the impacts on nature, climate and people of 10 UK retailers representing 90% of the domestic grocery market. Most of the retailers committed in 2021 to halving the environmental impact of the UK grocery market by 2030. However, the report found that the retailers are “a long way off” on reducing their emissions and sourcing products from deforestation-free areas.

GREY CARBON: A “flurry” of carbon-credit deals “covering millions of hectares of landmass” across Africa struck by United Arab Emirates-based firm Blue Carbon on the sidelines of COP28 “have gone nowhere”, according to a joint investigation by Agence-France Presse and Code for Africa. In Zimbabwe – where the deal included “about 20% of the country’s landmass” – national climate change authorities said that the UAE company’s memorandum of understanding “lapsed without any action”. AFP attempted multiple ways to contact Blue Carbon, but received no reply. Meanwhile, research covered by New Scientist found that Africa’s forests “are now emitting more CO2 than they absorb”.

UK NATURE: The UK government released an updated “environmental improvement plan” to help England “meet numerous legally binding goals” for environmental restoration, BusinessGreen reported. The outlet added that it included measures such as creating “wildlife-rich habitats” and boosting tree-planting. Elsewhere, a study covered by the Times found that England and Wales lost “almost a third of their grasslands” in the past 90 years. The main causes of grassland decline were “increased mechanisation on farms, new agrochemicals and crop-growing”, the Times said.

IN DANGER: The Trump administration proposed changes to the US Endangered Species Act that “could clear the way for more oil drilling, logging and mining” in key species habitats, reported the New York Times. This act is the “bedrock environmental law intended to prevent animal and plant extinctions”, the newspaper said, adding that one of the proposals could make it harder to protect species from future threats, such as the effects of climate change. It added: “Environmental groups are expected to challenge the proposals in court once they are finalised.”

‘ALREADY OVERSTRETCHED’: Producing enough food to feed the world’s growing population by 2050 “will place additional pressure on the world’s already overstretched” resources, according to the latest “state of the world’s land and water resources” report from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization. The report said that degradation of agricultural lands is “creating unprecedented pressure on the world’s agrifood systems”. It also found that urban areas have “more than doubled in size in just two decades”, consuming 24m hectares “of some of the most fertile croplands” in the process.

Spotlight

Saudi minister interviewed

During the second week of COP30 in Belém, Carbon Brief’s Daisy Dunne conducted a rare interview with a Saudi Arabian minister.

Dr Osama Faqeeha is deputy environment minister for Saudi Arabia and chief adviser to the COP16 presidency on desertification.

Carbon Brief: Thank you very much for agreeing to this interview. You represent the Saudi Arabia COP16 presidency on desertification. What are your priorities for linking desertification, biodiversity and climate change at COP30?

Dr Osama Faqeeha: First of all, our priority is to really highlight the linkages – the natural linkage – between land, climate and biodiversity. These are all interconnected, natural pillars for Earth. We need to pursue actions on the three together. In this way, we can achieve multiple goals. We can achieve climate resilience, we can protect biodiversity and we can stop land degradation. And this will really give us multiple benefits – food security, water security, climate resilience, biodiversity and social goals.

CB: Observers have accused Saudi Arabia, acting on behalf of the Arab group, of blocking an ambitious outcome on a text on synergies between climate change and biodiversity loss, under the item on cooperation with international organisations. [See Carbon Brief’s full explanation.] What is your response?

OF: We support synergies in the action plans. We support synergies in the financial flows. We support synergies in the political [outcome]. What we don’t support is trying to reduce all of the conventions. We don’t support dissolving the conventions. We need a climate convention, we need a biodiversity convention and we need a desertification convention. There was this incident, but the discussion continued after that and has been clarified. We support synergies. We oppose dissolution. This way we dilute the issues. No. This is a challenge. But we don’t have to address them separately. We need to address them in a comprehensive way so that we can really have a win-win situation.

CB: But as the president of the COP16 talks on desertification, surely more close work on the three Rio conventions would be a priority for you?

OF: First of all, we have to realise the convention is about land. Preventing land degradation and combating drought. These are the two major challenges.

CB: We’re at COP30 now and we’re at a crucial point in the negotiations where a lot of countries have been calling for a roadmap away from fossil fuels. What is Saudi Arabia’s position on agreeing to a roadmap away from fossil fuels?

OF: I think the issue is the emissions, it’s not the fuel. And our position is that we have to cut emissions regardless. In Saudi Arabia, in our nationally determined contribution [NDC], we doubled [the 2030 emissions reductions target] – from 130MtCO2 to 278MtCO2 – on a voluntary basis. So we are very serious about cutting emissions.

CB: The presidency said that some countries see the fossil-fuel roadmap as a red line. Is Saudi Arabia seeing a fossil-fuel roadmap as a red line for agreement in the negotiations?

OF: I think people try to put pressure on the negotiation to go in one way or another. And I think we should avoid that because, trying to demonise a country, that’s not good. Saudi Arabia is a signatory to the Paris Agreement. Saudi Arabia made the Paris Agreement possible. We are committed to the Paris Agreement.

[Carbon Brief obtained the “informal list” of countries that opposed a fossil-fuel roadmap at COP30, which included Saudi Arabia.]

CB: You mention that you feel sometimes the media demonises Saudi Arabia. So could you clarify, what do you hope to be Saudi Arabia’s role in guiding the negotiations to conclusion here at this COP?

OF: I think we have to realise that there is common but differentiated responsibilities. We have developed countries and developing countries. We have to realise that this is very well established in the convention. We can reach the same end point, but with different pathways. And this is what the negotiation is all about. It’s not one size fits all. What works with a certain country may not work with another country. So, I think people misread the negotiations. We, as Saudi Arabia, officially announced that we will reach carbon neutrality by 2060 – and we are putting billions and billions of dollars to reach this goal. But it doesn’t mean that we agree on everything. On every idea. We agree to so many things, you never hear that. Saudi Arabia agrees on one thousand points and we disagree on one point, then suddenly it becomes the news. Now, why does the media do that? Maybe that gives them more attention. I don’t know. But all I can tell you is that Saudi Arabia is part of the process. Saudi Arabia is making the process work.

This interview has been edited for length.

Watch, read, listen

NEW CHALLENGE: CNN discussed the environmental impacts of AI usage and how scientists are using it to conserve biodiversity.

AMAZON COP: In the Conversation, researchers argued that hosting COP30 in the Amazon made the “realities of climate and land-use change jarringly obvious” and Indigenous voices “impossible to ignore”.

DUBIOUS CLAIMS: DeSmog investigated an EU-funded “campaign blitz” that “overstated the environmental benefits of eating meat and dairy, while featuring bizarre and misleading claims”.

WASP’S NEST: In a talk for the Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery, Prof Seirian Sumner explained the “natural capital” of wasps and why it is important to “love the unlovable parts of nature”.

New science

Climate change can “exacerbate” the abundance and impacts of plastic pollution on terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems | Frontiers in Science
The North Sea region accounts for more than 20% of peatland-related emissions within the EU, UK, Norway and Iceland, despite accounting for just 4% of the region’s peatland area | Nature Communications
Economic damages from climate-related disasters in the Brazilian Amazon rose 370% over 2000-22, with farming experiencing more than 60% of total losses | Nature Communications