Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Business Development in Wind with Joel Saxum

Weather Guard Lightning Tech’s Chief Commercial Officer, Joel Saxum, gives his view of the state of the wind energy business from the perspective of a business development executive. The IRA bill is changing the way businesses are planning, working, and being acquired in the United States. Will that trend continue? And with the current lack of technicians, how do wind energy companies grow their businesses? This is an enlightening discussion sure to sparks conversations at the water cooler (or wind turbine).

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com

Joel Saxum Interview

Allen Hall: I’m Allen Hall, and I’m here with my good friend, JoelSaxum, and on this special edition of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast, we’re here to talk with Joel, who has recently joined Weather Guard Lightning Tech as our Chief Commercial Officer. And Joel has tremendous knowledge in the wind industry and what has happened over the last couple of years.

And today we get to pick Joel’s brain. And get a sense of where we have gone, where we are at, and where we are likely headed in the next year or two. So Joel, welcome to the program.

Joel Saxum: Welcome, I suppose, for the, I don’t know, the hundredth time or so, maybe? It’s, it’s close to that at this point. Yeah, so Allen and I were talking in the background off air, talking about, you know, what, what is actually happening out there right now.

It’d be nice to kind of drop a little bit of knowledge of. Of what, of course, I’m hearing in the, in the BD circles everybody seems to be connected somehow in this industry. And then also the general trends, all right? And we will touch on a couple of things here.

Allen Hall: So if we go back two years ago to ACP in San Antonio, which is really kind of the first real kickoff.

I know we had O& M previous to that. I think, I think that’s right, right? So we had O& M in San Diego. And, and at that point in the industry, everybody was just coming out of COVID. Those were really some of the first events, right? We had, if we all remember in San Antonio, we had COVID tests before we could walk into the building.

And what fun that was. And at that point in the, in the industry, it was like, everybody was just trying to come awake again. There was a little bit of discontinuity between organizations. You could feel that everybody’s just trying to feel the way around. And technician wise, it seemed, it did seem like there was a huge competition for technicians, like, like we have seen now.

And then as we progressed over the last year or two, it’s really, I think, changed dramatically in terms of the number of players in the marketplace. Even if you look at the number of drone companies that we saw a couple of years ago versus today, dramatically different. In, in terms of just sort of the knowledge base is still see the same key people around in terms of like the, the business development side, it has been a little bit of a rough road, right?

Even with the IRA bill has been a little bit of a rough road.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. So, I mean, the IRA bill was designed to spur on projects, right? They say that we’ll, we’re going to get PTC back funds back the case, basically credits back basically back the same way they were. Before the IRA bill was passed, so, you know, every 10 years put X amount of dollars into your wind farms, get them up and running again, and you’ll re qualify for these credits, which I think are like 2.

8 cents per kilowatt hour or something right now. And then on the heels of that was also the ITC which is investment tax credits, which was a 30 percent tax break on things that qualify for it that are in the renewables industry, but built here in the U. S. So it was designed to spur these things on.

Now, to get the economic machine moving, it doesn’t happen overnight. That bill was passed last August, I think, Allen, if I’m correct. So we’re 14 months past it now. And if you look at some of the charts and graphs that the DOE’s put out, you’ll see a lot of little dots and pins put in maps all over the place in the U. S. based on who is taking advantage of it, right? Like who’s, who’s making products and, and starting manufacturing facilities. So we’ve even seen, I guess, like here up in my, my, my home state of Wisconsin the ship builder now, so that even that in it, it’s an offshore As fact, in Crowley building a vessel up here for offshore east coast us.

So that ITC idea in the bill, there has spurred on some, some movement. We’ve talked about some others on the podcast about, you know, a tower factory down in I think it was New Mexico. And some others taking advantage of it as well. You’re finally in the BD world, you’re finally starting to see that happen.

You’re starting to see things where people are going, Oh, well, this person’s now doing a repower because they weren’t quite sure before. I know of one operator where they have Ooh, I think eight or ten repowers that they plan on doing in the next three to four years that weren’t on the docket before the PTC.

Or before the IRA bill and the PTC, new PTC funds were there and these fund farms aren’t the 10 year old ones. They’re 17, 18, 19 year old wind farms that they may even put all new technology on, right? Take the whole nacelle off and put a new nacelle on. So with that will come a ton of work, right? So from cranes to.

It go all the way down to the people that support on the ground getting mats and cribbing and bearings major corrective exchange smart people that do that new gearboxes you know, unfortunately, some of those components will have to come from overseas. But we’ll be all, you know, U. S.

labor installing all of those here and, and hopefully as the ITC credits kick off and we build more things here in country more and more of those components get built here as well.

Allen Hall: Does that, shift in the industry in terms of hardware translate this year, next year? I, I, cause I, I feel like we’re still three, four, five years out.

On the effects of it, just because of the time it takes to build a factory, to build a ship, to… Make a tower factory it it’s slow.

Joel Saxum: I think full swing to feel the real economic impact of it Will be we will be so far removed from the bill passing that you’ll just feel like it’s normal again, right? Like you say like two three years down the road It could be things kicking off and that were really actually tied to the the IRA bill But at that point in time you won’t even really feel it because it’ll just be this is how we do business now because that’s The IRA bills in place for it’ll be in place for a long time So the, the smaller components, the lighter things are happening now, but it’ll take it, but it’ll take a little bit for the major components stuff.

Yeah.

Allen Hall: Right. Even though there’s a lot of talk about offshore wind, because that’s where a lot of the, the auction money obviously is big numbers, make headlines and some of the contracts and the PPAs that are bouncing around there make the news. But the vast majority of, of wind in America is, is onshore and that’s where the action is at the moment.

Right?

Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. That’s actually when I was taking notes for, to, to chat with you today, that was one of the things I put on there. It’s like my second bullet point and focus. The focus in news is offshore wind in the U S it’s this pretty shiny new glittery thing that’s in everybody’s face, but don’t forget onshore, right?

We’ve got 70, 000 plus turbines in the U S. And that is where 99. 99 percent of the action is happening commercially in the, in the United States. That’s where all the, all the companies are working, all the service companies, all the ISPs most all of the parts. Like I said, there is, there is some stuff happening offshore, but the bulk of the economic wind engines here in the States is still securely in the onshore world.

Allen Hall: And that drives all the way down to companies that do crane work and the heavy lift, replacing generators and all those companies you don’t really hear about. I know we put out a recent post asking the industry, Hey, identify these key players in the U. S. industry, U. S. wind industry that are actually based in the United States.

And that list got really short, right? The number of feed, the feedback on that was extremely limited and I know better. I know there’s a lot more players in it, but they don’t. Interact like sort of we do, and they don’t say, Hey, we’re doing this project in Colorado. You just don’t hear anything about it, which is.

Very odd, I think, especially in light of the IRA bill, that you would want to make a little more noise.

Joel Saxum: I think the existing, the existing people in the market, right? Your, you know, your, your Barnharts, your IEAs, DWT, Blattner, all these big companies, the Pearce and, and, and TAKKION. They’re so flush with work right now that they really don’t have to be out chasing stuff, right?

While I don’t want to take this away from this, the, from other people as well, it seems to me that We almost have a little bit of a problem in this industry, and it’s not specific to the wind industry. It is specific to any… industry. If you watch innovation cycles, say in the in the late nineties, early two thousands, it seemed like everybody was starting up a, if you were out in California, right?

Everybody’s starting up this dot com boom. Everybody’s got a little company doing something on the internet. Well, there’s a few of them that rose to the top and a lot of them that got either acquired or just passed by because either their product was not good, didn’t have customer support or whatever.

Innovation cycle happens in all industries. Right, that innovation cycle happened in the auto industry in 1920, 30, 40. How many auto manufacturers were there that just aren’t around anymore and they’ve all either consolidated or, you know, the products went off and that happens in, in, in almost every industry that grows right now, we’re in that in the U S where you see a lot of places you see, you know, every Tom, Nick and Harry starting up a company that, Oh, we do this.

Oh, we do that. On the, at the same time, if you start a company and you don’t have the, you know, the HSE stuff in place and the quality things in place, like you’re going to run into a lot of teething pains, you’re going to hurt, you’re going to feel a lot of pain for a long time. And you can start to see some of these people doing that at the same time of this wicked shortage of labor and even greater shortage of good and trained educated labor that knows what they’re doing, where you don’t have to go and teach everybody everything all the time.

So you have companies that are starting up that might have one or two good smart people in them, and then they brought along a bunch of friends to try to start this thing, and they’re either… And getting in, getting contracts, screwing them up. Other people have to come in and kind of rescue them or there’s quality issues or HSE issues.

And, and so the, the large companies, the OEMs, the big asset owners that are, you know, need all these, these services are getting, Quite bent out of shape about the quality that they’re getting. So while we’re sitting here going, there’s so much work, so much work, so much work, which is true. And everybody’s like, well, I’m sorry to company I’ll do this.

I’ll do that. But then you go to the, the, the people that are using the services and they’re not happy with the results. So you have a kind of a. A weird thing going on there where now, even though there’s all kinds of work to be had, these smaller companies are going like, where is it at? Whereas the big companies are just flush with it.

They’re soaking it in and they’re looking at high need people. So you’re starting to see, I think you’ll see more consolidation of companies. I think you’ll see Tachyon and Pierce and these big guys buying up some of the smaller ones or some of the smaller ones joining together. Just simply because the people that are hiring them are looking for…

strategic suppliers, because they don’t want to deal with this rash of massive issues in the field. They want to deal with one person that can take care of all their problems. So they want to deal with one person, whether it’s, Hey, I got a blade issue, or I need an inspection done, or I have a main bearing that’s, you know, gone, or I have an oil leak or whatever.

They don’t want to have to, I got to call this contractor, got to call this one. I got to call that one and figure this out. It’s that, that’s getting dialed back. You’re starting to see it in RFQs too. I just looked at one the other day that was like, Yeah. You can have sub suppliers, but we don’t want to manage them and we’d rather you not like there was points for not using sub suppliers in it.

And, and, and to me that makes, it makes sense. But that will drive some consolidation because people need resources. If you’re. A, I don’t know, Allen Energy, and you need all of a sudden your biggest client comes you says, Hey, I need someone to change out pitch rams. Well, you don’t have that capability.

Well, I don’t know. Let’s go look for a company that does and scoop them up.

Allen Hall: Yeah. It does seem like that in the United States at the moment, there is a lot of moving and shaking that is below the radar. That you hear about it at conferences, you run into people and say, Hey, did you know that this company is going to maybe acquired by that company that they’re looking to, to, to join up in Europe.

It seems like most of those transactions have already happened that unless you bring something really unique to the marketplace that has not been seen before, that it just doesn’t seem to, to move anybody. And maybe that’s just a different sort of business environment. U. S. versus Europe, but it does seem like the Europeans have shaken this whole system down a little bit and have found the companies are going to be around a while and then focused.

And I agree with you. In the United States, we’re still in that shakedown period. We’re trying to figure out who’s here for the long term and who’s just testing the water a little bit. And does that then force like the operators to be a little more leery of what’s happening? Of, do they, do they do a lot more vetting of these companies?

Are they looking for insurance products to come along with it? Are they monitoring the sites closely when repair work is going on? What are they doing?

Joel Saxum: Well, I think you’re a hundred percent correct on this, the, the acquisition portion, Europe versus America. American, right, America right now is… Grow, grow, grow as fast as you can.

We’re grabbing companies because you need resources. Well, whereas in Europe, it’s more We’ll grab a, we’ll grab a country, company strategically. Strategically being like maybe we’re looking to sell our group and we need to add in some capabilities or something like that. Whereas in the U S it’s just a revenue chase, right?

Everybody like this work is going to be here. I have a shot at it. If I don’t go grab people, I’m not going to get it. So we’re, we’re just not as we’re not as mature. The industry isn’t as mature here as it is there. But back to your, your question about what are the asset owners, the OEMs doing from what I’ve seen, the tender processes are getting more difficult.

They’re asking for again, more references, more, more track record. Like if you don’t have a track record, you might as well not even, I mean, it’s tough to get in on some of these because you’re competing against some good competition, right? If you’re looking for a major OEM or a major asset owner, and you’re a drone company, like XYZ Drone Company isn’t going to get it.

It’s going to be a Zeitview, a SkySpecs, a Thread, like someone, someone that’s there and, and is established now because that industry is there. If you’re a a blade repair company but you’ve only been around a year, unless you know someone in high places, good luck because they, these large companies have been burned so bad so many times that people just aren’t willing to stick their neck out.

Because what ends up happening there, and I’ll go, let me, let me shift gears a little bit, what ends up happening within that, that large company, that asset owner, that OEM, is when they bring on a subcontractor that doesn’t fulfill their needs. It creates strain within their own organization, let alone not getting their product done.

So the blade repairs may not get done, may not get done to quality, but you’re also putting a lot of stress on your internal people. So if you’ve got a site manager that has to manage one person on site or one or two subcontractors, that’s not too bad. But when that one guy on site has to, or guy or gal on site has to manage five different subcontractors and he’s got to be in their operations because they’re not that good at what they’re doing.

And. helping them rig up their platforms or whatever. And he’s just like, why am I paying for you guys to be out here when I have to tell you how to do your job? That happens way more than it should in the wind industry. So what happens is, is these site managers and site supervisors and things, they start getting overloaded.

They start quitting. They start looking because they’re, they’re, then they’re yelling up the chain. Hey, I don’t have enough resources here to manage all these people. And then the people up there, the upper guys that are given the contracts like, Oh, well, you shouldn’t be any problem. You got 30 guys out there that are doing your blade repairs.

Yeah. And I got to manage all of them, you know, so you’re, you’re starting to see, like, I, I, I’ve talked with people, I’ve seen resumes come across from, from OEMs. Hey, like I’m, I’ve just had enough, like I’m done here, you know, like look at what GE just did not too long ago, taking it from all site people to go into hubs.

The, how their job, how all of those people’s jobs changed immediately. And they may have said, well, you were in charge of this wind farm or you were on this one. Now you’re on these four. Man, it’s overloaded. A lot of a lot of people in the field talking about how the managers are struggling a bit with having to deal with just too much.

Allen Hall: Yeah. And that, I guess sort of gets into the next question, which is about technicians, right? So everybody’s getting strained. There seems to be a real lack of technicians, particularly technicians with experience, and we know how tough the industry can be. It’s sort of a young person’s game at the minute, because if you’re fixing blades or out in the middle of West Texas working on stuff, it’s not particularly easy to do, and the industry, I think because it has Doesn’t have a lot of exposure.

That’s a hard time recruiting new talent. And from a business development standpoint, that that’s a real limiting factor on your rate of growth.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you’re, you’re, you, you, you run businesses two ways usually, right? Demand. On the business side drives demand on the operation side or demand on the operation side drives demand on the business side and you can go either way, right?

You, you pick your poison, however, signing contracts where you don’t have people in them is or don’t have people for them at that point in time. is almost always going to have quality issues, whether it’s quality, whether it’s HSE in the field, whether it’s quality of the work, the repair, the whatever, the communication, like so many times I’ve heard of, Oh yeah, well we got, I just, I need 20 people and you’re just grabbing them.

Here’s a truck head to Saskatchewan. You’re a commissioner now on a, on this project and they’re like, okay. They don’t know how to communicate within the organization, or even have their fuel card work while they’re traveling. That happens all the time. And it’s a black eye on the industry. So, again, this is a conversation I had with Chris this morning, Chris Gagnon.

You know, we’ve talked about on the podcast before about how do we get more people trained? How do we get, you know, there’s, and there’s people opening training facilities. You had Rob Renewables open up their facility in Chicago and, and a bunch of, you know, I know blade repair companies opening GWO training sites and stuff.

And that stuff is great. However, that gets the safety check boxes that doesn’t give people the technical skills they need. Technical skills they need, need to be taught at community colleges or in, you know, internal programs of that sort. And they’re having a hard time getting people just into those programs.

Those schools are. So when we’re sitting there going like we have a shortage of labor an even greater shortage of good trained labor that knows what they’re doing, retaining the techs is even harder once you have them in your company. So once we have a good tech in your company. This is from, from, from us or from me to the industry, treat them well, pay them on time.

Don’t make them hunt money. We see that stuff on LinkedIn. Oh, such and such. We’re hunting money from them. They won’t pay my invoices, you know? So get, that would be to me, if you’re going to scale and grow a company in the wind industry, specifically in the U. S., figure out the HR portion of your company as, and have a plan and have stuff in place before you start trying to scale up.

Because. You, you’ll, you’ll, you’ll be paying or stealing from Peter to pay Paul the whole time going why do we have this attrition rate? Why are these people leaving? Well, if you don’t have a good setup for them and you’re not treating them right it’s just not going to happen for you.

Allen Hall: Explain to me a little bit of valuations while we’re sort of talking topic of people and people turn it to valuations of companies.

And I do think there’s going to be a lot of mergers and acquisitions over the next 12 months based upon the noise we’re hearing. How does, how does that work? Because it does seem like the number of technicians you have in your stable is a part of the valuation process. So I take a technician times, you know, I have a hundred technicians are each valued at X.

I have a 10 engineers are each valued at Y that sort of, plus all the equipment I own, I guess, that in turns into a valuation, but there’s just, that doesn’t always align with what I’m seeing in some of these numbers on acquisitions.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, the tough thing here is, okay, so diving back and this is the base of the technician problem.

Every company operates, not technician problem, the technician conundrum, I’ll call it. Every company operates differently, right? So since wind is, especially, especially blade, blade repair. is such a seasonal market. Unless you’re a big company and you can send people to Brazil or Australia or whatever in the wintertime, you’re up here, you have a shoulder season.

You go up, you get busy as hell and then you kind of slack off. So what ends up happening is, instead of hiring employees, a lot of these companies hire contractors. Well, no intelligent contractor is going to sign an exclusive contract as a contractor unless they’re getting paid the whole year. And no company really wants to do that.

So the majority of these people are free agents month after month after month. So if I’m a blade technician, I might be working for, you know, company Y this week and company A next week. And I might have jumped because a dollar, I may have jumped because I didn’t like the guy I was working with. But either way, you can’t really count on that valuation wise, right?

Unless it was a stable of employees. What I’ve seen valuation wise in the wind industry. Is because there’s so many moving parts like that in different companies and to, to levelize it, to equalize it, you’re of course taking in the standard stuff or your debt, your, your your, your debt ratios, the team you have, those things don’t really turn into, or the team doesn’t really turn into dollars until you get to the end, but I’m seeing a Test.

Depending on who you are, a nine to 14 or a 10 to 15 times EBITDA as a valuation and good faith valuations or good faith additions in the wind industry, I’m starting to see go away when I talk to people. And the reason being is because the market is so volatile. You never know who’s going to get these contracts.

People are jumping around here, jumping around there. That your good faith, good faith being like, Oh, we did 5 million EBITDA this year. Next year we plan on doing seven. So we want to be valued at seven. That’s starting to raise people’s eyebrows a little bit. Still getting good multipliers for EBITDA.

You know, some industries it’s can be two and three ebitda, two ti two or three times ebitda. Tech industries I’ve seen 20 times ebitda, but the renewables and wind is still trading really well. So those that, that, you know, 10 to 15, 12 probably average multiplier for EBITDA is what people are shooting at ebitda, being earnings before income tax and depreciation and amortization.

So basically what’s your revenue minus your operating expenses?

Allen Hall: No. Does that then drive those EBITDA multipliers having looked at that at other industries anything above 10 is sort of a sweet number if you’re selling. If you’re, if you’re getting a multiple of 10 plus on your EBITDA, does that change the way you do business today?

Or should it change the way you do business today? To have that possible merger or acquisition occur so that you can make the magic happen.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. If you’re, if you’re above 10, you’re looking at a company that has on staff engineers. You’re looking at a company that has a good, good support all around, right?

So if you’re. Two guys running a company and you got six blade techs out there. Like you’re not at 10 multiple even a company, but if you are a company that has a dedicated back office person for travel, a dedicated fleet manager an actual engineering group, engineering staff that can support you through operations, if you have processes in place, if you’re ISO approved, if you have, you know, you’re, you’re in an HSE system, that’s been, if you’ve been vetted by, if you have an MSA with Siemens and Vestas, like those kinds of companies are in that 10 to 12.

EBITDA range, but that’s a company that can, that someone looks at and goes, well, they did 10 million in revenue or 20 million in revenue this year, and we believe we can get more and more and more. Well, then that’s someone that’s going to get a high EBITDA. But if someone’s just grabbing you to grab people, it’s not going to be that high.

Allen Hall: Do service agreements. Influence that eat about the service agreements, increase the multiplier. So if you have an agreement with G. E. or Siemens to do work for the next two years, does that really then help propel you into a more stable bracket than maybe a company that’s sort of looking for work month to month?

Joel Saxum: Absolutely. 100%. And, and. It’s not something that you can put a metric to. It’s not like, Oh, you have an at one MSA, you get one time X multiplier extra it. That’s a valuation thing. That’s where you have these big companies, these, you know, Boston consulting group and stuff like that, that you’ll hire. If you’re trying to sell, come on and say, and do a valuation.

And they’ll be able to tell the market, this is why we’re at a 12 or this is why we’re at an 11. And we have. And MSA good through 2026 with GE to do all of their, I don’t know, foundations or whatever your company does. Those, those MS, those master service agreements or ongoing agreements definitely play into the EBITDA multiplier sale.

Allen Hall: So looking at the existing landscape in terms of the business development side, what are real three key areas over the next six to 12 months that companies should be focused on?

Joel Saxum: I think your big one right now, okay, it’s fall. We know that tenders are coming out soon. It’s the beginning of October. So tenders will be out in the next two months for people who are on the ball.

If you’re a company that once worked on this spring, please don’t wait until January or February to put your tender out. But you’ll see tenders for everything, right? For whether it’s major correctives, whether it’s blade work, whatnot. Everybody’s getting their ducks in a row to start off next spring. And the spring season in the U. S., depending on where you are, Texas to… Montana starts in either end of February or May, somewhere in there, right? So everybody’s getting their ducks in a row right now to do tenders. So everybody that’s in the BD world is sharpening pencils, getting a proposal, templates ready, ready to rock to, to receive all these things.

And there’ll be anything from inspections to full blade repairs and, and whatnot. BD people busy with tenders in the next few months. So that’s the big one right now on the docket. You will also. Everybody else that’s chasing work is going, is going to be chasing people doing repowers because no matter what sector you fit into in the wind industry in the US, somehow your product or service more than likely is impacted by repowers.

Whether it’s bolt tensioning or cable sales or our buddies at 3S Lift selling lifts or, or ourselves. The selling strike tape, you know, I mean, it’s, it’s the, the, when those things are coming down, it’s some of the best opportunity to, to upgrade retrofit, get everything ready to, to go for the next 10 years for that wind farm.

So, you know, the, you’re starting to also see, here’s another one that’s kind of popping up, general contractor rep representatives for repowers. That’s the person to, to talk to if you know who those people are at, at these companies and you’re trying to speak with someone doing a repower, that’s a good one to chase.

So tender season is upon us. Also people that are chasing things are chasing getting ready for repower season and repowers can start earlier, right? Because if you’re, you can do crane work, you can start plucking stuff as long as, as long as things are ready to go. You’re not, usually not waiting for resins and epoxies to dry in certain temperatures or anything like that, so.

They’ll, they’re cycling all the time, but again the wind industry is kind of used to a slow winter fuel operation wise. So repowers tend to follow that same path.

Allen Hall: Okay. That’s really interesting. If I was going to choose number three, it’s getting yourself some technicians. Right now.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, yeah, absolutely the tough thing with that is okay, so I’m gonna give you here’s a theory for you Allen This is one of the theories I like or it’s not theory an idea. So when I was an oil and gas we used to operate this way.

I hired Allen Hall as a technician I would pay Allen Hall. I don’t know 70, 000 a year You would get, you’d get, you’d get, so you’d get 70, 000 a year. Okay. And you get that salary year round. So every two weeks you’d get your paycheck deposited. However, for that 70, 000, you owe me 200 days. So 200 days, because because we work in the field remote, it’s, you know, six, seven days a week on site, 200 days during the busy season or 180 days, or however you want to structure the contract.

You may, you may eat, you may eat through real, real fast in the summer, like between April and, and September, man, you might be at 180 days already. Well, that’s good for you. You made your salary. Now, every day that you work extra after that, then I give you, or every hour you work extra after that, then I give you what your hourly rate would be.

So there’s a possibility of a technician that’s working into Christmas. Or November making a really good year. But what that also does is that gives the, that maintains that employee. So you’re, you’re keeping him or her and you’re keeping them happy. They’ve got to, they’re not having to struggle to go, where am I going to go next?

Where am I going to go next? Cause you’re getting a paycheck every two weeks. So they work for you. They’re going to be more loyal to you. They have the possibility of making a bunch of money. And then the other side, the backside. Upside to the company is if you have a group of good people that you do this for and say you are slow, well, then you guys got to come into the office and you got to do training and or, and, or you’ve got to get kit ready.

You’ve got to test PPE. You’ve got to training is the big one. I always, I always like to do. But that’s how we used to do things in the oil and gas world because you’d have people because the jobs were cyclical and you might be out for three months at a crack and then home for a month. Well, you didn’t lose that person.

All the efforts you put into training them and, and getting them up to speed on your processes and how your company works. You didn’t lose that person. They’re there for you when, when you’re ready to go back out to the field. So it keeps them happy and it keeps you able to grow. So that’s, that’s a theory.

That’s how I, that’s, that’s how I used to pay people.

Allen Hall: That’s innovative for wind right now. I think a lot of it is just the hours you work, we’ll pay you and what you’re not working, we don’t pay you and we’ll see you next season, maybe. And I think that really hurts the industry more than you think.

Joel Saxum: Yeah.

Absolutely. So if it was me and I had a company and say, I say, I’m going to go blade repair company. If I had 10 blade teams, that means I’ve got 30 people, 25 people, the 10 leads on the teams. I would set this up. I’d say, Hey, the last three years you made an ad, you made 70 grand, 80 grand, 90 grand, whatever.

So I’m going to give you an average of this much, and that’s going to be your salary. And if you can do that for those key people, keep them around. Then it tends to actually trickle down to because the next guy in line likes working with this guy and he’s like, Hey man, if I do good, I can get that as well.

I can get a steady salary in the wind industry. That’s the kind of stuff we need because right now, like you said, You shouldn’t be going and finding technicians. That’s a BD job as well. Like everybody is a, everybody’s a recruiter in the wind industry, whether you’re client facing or not. So like, so you, you’ve got to be out there pounding the ground and what, and what it is is it’s, it’s attrition.

Like right now there’s no, you know, everybody’s left or getting close to, right, it’s October. So you, you don’t know, you may think you’ve got, you know, Joe and Jessica and Sarah and John for next spring, but you don’t know. Unless you secure them somehow.

Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s the industry. It’s such a fluctuation. I know we like to think of ourselves as being fully established and running full steam.

There are some weak spots and there’s some really good really good growth spots that I’ve seen over the last couple of months where I’m really have been impressed by the companies and the people. That they have assembled, and it’s, it’s sort of an inflection point, I think, in the U. S. industry, and it, Joel, it’s been really good to pick your brain on this, because we don’t get to talk a lot about business development and actually what’s actually happening on the street like this, and I think there’s a lot of, of interested listeners to this, and I’m really glad we had the time to spend together, so everybody this is gonna conclude this episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

Check us out on all the major platforms, and If you like what Joel had to say today, leave him a comment or leave a five star rating for us on your podcast platform.

Business Development in Wind with Joel Saxum

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

What Operators Want to Hear at WOMA 2027

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

What Operators Want to Hear at WOMA 2027

Two days of operator meetings in Melbourne shape the WOMA 2027 agenda, from performance upgrades and cable faults to foundations and bolts.

The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast is brought to you by Weather Guard Lightning Tech, creators of the StrikeTape Ultra LPS retrofit. Subscribe to Uptime’s Substack newsletter. And check out Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” Youtube channel. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall. I’m here with Matthew Stead and Rosemary Barnes. And Rosemary, where are we?

Rosemary Barnes: We’re in Melbourne, and we have been visiting future attendees and sponsors and people interested in, in the event to see what topics that we should be talking about.

What are the hot topics of the moment?

Allen Hall: Which is a very interesting two days, Matthew, in that, uh, we h- did meet with a number of operators based in Australia, but, uh, they’re also very worldly. They have talked to companies all over about operations and, and maintenance, and there are some really eye-opening topics- Mm

that will be- Mm … at WOMA 2027 this year.

Matthew Stead: Yeah. The thing that was interesting for me was [00:01:00]that actually the topics have changed each year. So, um, they’re evolving and the industry’s continuing to, to do better, and so that, that was really interesting. Performance upgrades was probably one of the big areas of, of new interest, I think.

I think we heard with the pressure on pricing, uh, the market and so forth, you know, that, that 1% or 2% now is becoming more important. Um, so I think, uh, upgrades will definitely feature quite a lot. Um, balance of plant was also a big topic. Um, you just can’t ig- ignore the, um, transmission, you can’t ignore the transformers, you can’t ignore, uh, condensers and all these sorts of things, so yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Cables.

Matthew Stead: Cables.

Rosemary Barnes: Terminations. Terminations of cables. Specifically raised several times.

Allen Hall: Yep. Yeah. It’s all about being more efficient, uh, getting more production, and then with the PPA prices, uh, that are changing-

Matthew Stead: Mm …

Allen Hall: rapidly, uh, everybody is paying more attention to the bottom line.

Matthew Stead: Mm, mm.

Allen Hall: Absolutely. There, there’s less cash running around, uh, chasing new development.

It’s [00:02:00] more of a focus on making sure your, at least your existing assets are performing as, as well as they can be- Mm … which then opens up the, uh, Pandora’s box of opportunity. Mm. Because there are 1%’s all around a wind turbine. More specifically, uh, all the drive train issues, the blade issues, the generator issues, and even going into the substation.

Mm. I, I was really shocked on BOP e- the, the one topic that came up, uh, yesterday and today was buried cables. Mm. Like-

Matthew Stead: Faults …

Allen Hall: faults.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Junctions. Finding- Yeah … finding faults and what to do about them. Yeah. Yeah. But I think in addition to just wanting more revenue, I think people have, are getting more sophisticated about what actually matters and then the finances.

You know, everyone’s focused so much on availability, and now people- Mm … are like, okay, yeah, like once you’re at a certain level of availability, gets harder and harder to get more. And actually, you know, not all availability is equal. Is good. It, it [00:03:00] depends. Yeah. Yeah, like you wanna, um, you wanna focus on how much you’re generating at the times when electricity prices are high specifically, which usually means during lower wind speed periods.

Yeah. Which is actually good because that matches really well with what is actually possible. It’s, it’s hard to get more power out of the turbine if it’s at, you know, its rated power, then you’re not g- More efficiency is not gonna get you any more, um, power output, whereas lower in the power curve- Mm … um, when wind speeds are lower, there’s less electricity in the grid and so prices are higher.

And so- Mm … yeah, I mean, that’s, that’s why people are really asking to know more about what efficiency upgrades are possible, better ways to operate, scheduled maintenance, um, all those sorts of things. Mm. So that will be really interesting.

Matthew Stead: Raising the bar on sophistication. Um, but also life extension

Allen Hall: Yes, a lot of discussion about life extension

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, end of life and life extension End of life Yeah, um-

Matthew Stead: Foundations, structures Which is

Allen Hall: tied to PPA.

Mm. A lot of that [00:04:00] discussion I, at least I looked at it as, uh, if I had a PPA and I can continue with that PPA with an existing turbine, I want to do that. Mm,

Matthew Stead: mm,

Allen Hall: mm. But how do I do that and how do I know that that existing turbine can last another five years? It seemed to go in five-year blocks, like can we get to another five years and then another and then, then another.

Wow.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Once you get to 20, 20, 25 years, I think people like, uh, they, you know- It’s getting a little- Their original agreement might have been for 20, then they kind of just assume that there will be another five, and then after that they’re- Yeah … kind of reassessing cyclically and yeah, I know that people make plans for, you know, what components are replaceable, what would they have to get in, and I think that sometimes, uh, people doing those plans aren’t as familiar with the, you know, actual technical issues that are being faced.

Like, is a blade a replaceable component? It may be early on in the life it sort of is, not easily, but you know, like a 25-year-old wind turbine, you know, good luck trying to order 10 new blades because you’ve got a, you know, an issue that’s-

Allen Hall: Oh, well you, you need to read the news. Did you [00:05:00] see the news today about, uh, the, the wooden wind turbine blades as a replacement for aged blades?

That, that’s happening- … in real time, Rosa.

Rosemary Barnes: Okay. I know they- Yeah. Yep, yep. Okay. Okay. So that, that’s, that’s good. Making carbon new blade. E- even so, I don’t think that they’re- Okay. … gonna be, like, super-duper cheap, so you’re still gonna wanna be, um, doing a trade-off between y- you know, like, what kind of repairs.

You might be able to change the way you’re operating to reduce loads. Um, you might be able to monitor to make sure that your blades are safe. You know, if you know that there’s an issue, um, you just wanna get some advanced warning before blades start falling off your, your tower. Mm. You know, and then you can push it further.

Yeah. Whereas if you’ve got no information, then you have to be conservative and shut it down. Yeah. So yeah, I think there’s a whole lot that can be g- can be done there in that area.

Matthew Stead: There was a point that came up today, which I think was close to your heart, on, you know, if you’re going to be going for 1% or 2% or 0.5% AEP improvement, how do you actually measure that and how do you set up a proper experiment?

So-

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah …

Matthew Stead: I, I, I love that topic. [00:06:00]

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. No, it’s one that I, um, yeah, I deal with m- my clients I, I’m often… It’s one of the things that Pablo really loves to do, is to organize trials of that nature of new technologies and see if they work. But, um, yeah, asset managers are usually very, uh, focused on fast results.

You know, they’ve got a, a big problem and they want a solution now, so they wanna just roll out the new technology over an entire wind farm. But if you do that, then it’s almost impossible. Unless you get, like, a huge benefit, like, uh, 10% gains or, you know, like reduce your failures by 50% or more, it’s really hard to actually- Mm

pick that out if you just replace everything. Mm. Whereas if you do a really, really good, um, trial plan- Systematic. Yeah … and you match pairs very well so that you have, you know, a control for each turbine and there’s- so many variables in a wind farm. It’s not, it’s not as easy as just, like, randomly choosing 50% to do and not do.

Mm. Mm. Mm. Like, you have to, you know, put some work into the trial design, and then, you know, like, do your statistical calculations ahead of time to know how long it’s gonna take you to get s- statistical [00:07:00]significance. So then you don’t just have a gut feeling about- Yep … how something went. You’ve actually got numbers, and then you can take those numbers to, you know, other wind farms that you’ve got- Yeah

and, and know what’s going on much better.

Matthew Stead: Worst study is an inconclusive study.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Yeah, that’s true. Definitely.

Allen Hall: Well, that comes back to the data analysis- Mm … which a lot of operators mentioned, and how much data there is and what to do with it, and it did seem like a couple of operators have chosen some AI tools, varying degrees, all the way down from Microsoft Copilot to something much more complicated.

Uh, but I think there’s, uh, getting that d- to the last 1, 2, 3%, you’re going to need those tools- Absolutely … because what do you choose? Do you choose a blade? Do you choose a gearbox? Do you choose a generator? Do you go to the substation to get that percentage point or two Without having some really powerful tools- Mm.

you may be wasting your time [00:08:00] and money.

Matthew Stead: Mm.

Allen Hall: Which is a, a, a very interesting, uh, aspect to wind energy because it’s such an industrial business that, uh, we haven’t used heavy computational tools, uh, un- until really now.

Matthew Stead: Mm.

Allen Hall: And maybe Australia’s at the forefront because of the PPA and negative pricing is that that will, uh, actually lead an industry.

Because I haven’t seen a lot of that being used globally. Mm. So this is the first time an operator- Mm … that I’ve talked to has said, “We’re using it.”

Matthew Stead: Yeah. It’s quite a different discussion, um, I think, you know, this year compared to previous years in that I think in the past it was getting to know what’s possible, but now it’s like real case studies are coming through.

And a few of the people had some really good examples that we can talk about at the conference as to how they’ve actually been helped and how they did this and what the outcome was. I think, yeah, that would be really great content on that.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I think it’s gonna be a good mix of people who have used third party tools and have experience with it, people that are doing it in-house and can share- Mm

some of the kinds of results- Mm … that, that you can get just from analyzing your own- Mm … [00:09:00] SCADA data. Um, people talking about how they get the data that they want. Mm. ‘Cause it’s not always so easy. You would think that, you know, you own a wind turbine, you have a right to have all of the data that comes through it, but it’s not.

Um, even if you do technically have a right, it’s, uh, it, it’s harder to actually get it than you might think. Mm. So yeah, sharing all, all those kinds of things. But I think also, like just as important as talking about the successes is talking about the, the gaps that– people still feel lots of gaps. Like, okay, we’ve got all the data, we’re collecting it.

We know that there’s so much potential here- Mm … but we don’t really- Mm … know what we can do, or it’s hard for us to, you know- Mm … make headway in this particular pain point. And that is really useful for companies that are developing tools to know what are the, the problems. Mm. Because then they can e- you know, they’re well placed to fix them.

Allen Hall: Mm. Which leads to the discussion we had with the operators and, uh, some of the suppliers for WOMA 2027. There’s a lot of interest. And as we’re sitting in the conference rooms, I’m thinking, we may not have enough room to [00:10:00] seat everybody. Uh, the WOMA 2027 website is up and running, and you can register now.

So just go to woma2027.com and get started there. At the same point, we’ve had a lot of contact with, uh, pretty much everybody that wants to sponsor the event, and there’s only a limited number of ways to sponsor. So if you’re interested in doing that, you, you need to go to woma2027.com and look at those, uh, part- particular packages and see what- Mm

fits your, your business. Uh- Going back to some of the, the comments we were just discussing downstairs about what we heard at 2026, like, which is only a couple of months ago, right? It’s back in February this year. Uh, there’s, they’re still discussing what happened at WOMA 2026- Mm. Which was very fascinating- Mm

because I think Rosemary, you and I have been to conferences that I have not thought an iota … about what happened at those conferences. Just nothing interesting does occur. There’s no new, new information, there’s [00:11:00] no new science, there’s no new operator approaches.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Allen Hall: But we’re gonna see a number of those- Yeah.

Mm … come next March.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Well, I think it’s partly because I don’t know what other conference organizers do, but, you know, we’ve had a exhausting few days here. You’ve come all the way from America, obviously, and, and Claire as well, also come over, our producer. Um, so, y- you know, like, we’re working really hard to make sure that the topics…

Like, it’s not an accident that the topics are ones that people are talking about later, because we come here to make sure that we get the right topics. And it’s not just these meetings as well. People get in touch, and- Mm … anybody watching, listening, who has, you know, something that they wanna talk about, then definitely, you know, send us a message, and yeah, we’re working on the agenda.

We’ll, we’ll have a draft agenda in the next couple of weeks based on what we’ve learned here, but then we’ve got the hard job of it’s not just that you have a really interesting topic, you need to have a really great speaker- Yeah … or several really great speakers, usually covering several different aspects of the problem.

You know, maybe it’s, uh, yeah, an asset [00:12:00] owner, an OEM, and some, some technology provider, you know, all together giving different, um, yeah, perspectives. That’s, I think, what makes a really great session. Mm. So yeah, we need the ideas for the sessions, and we also need the ideas for great speakers.

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Right.

Matthew Stead: Yeah. I think we’ve, we’ve already matched a few of those dots, so- Yeah … I, we’ve heard people asking for certain topics they wanna hear about, and then we’ve heard other operators saying, “Well, this is what we could talk about.” So I think we’ve already-

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, yeah … got some great

Matthew Stead: progress.

Rosemary Barnes: It was, it was interesting ’cause we, we built up a list of, you know-

Matthew Stead: Yeah

Rosemary Barnes: frequently raised topics, and then you’d say it to the next person that you went to- Mm … and they’re like, “Oh, that’s not a problem for us because we’ve done X, Y, Z.” And you’re like, “Okay. Well, excellent. You can, you can present the solutions that we know that other people- Yeah. Yes … are, are looking for.” Yeah.

So it has been… Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it’s definitely worthwhile coming, as, as tiring as it is. Yeah. Um, definitely worthwhile, and we’ll get a much better agenda for the- Yeah … for the effort.

Matthew Stead: And I think, I mean, it has been tiring. Um, but what, what made it for me was one of the operators said that [00:13:00] this is the only conference they will go to So I think, I think we’re doing the right thing.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Yeah. I, I think so. I understand too, like, you know, all of us, we kind of are forced to go to events because that’s where our, our clients and customers are, and so you need to see them. And yeah, like I’ve even gone to the extent of some events where I don’t particularly like the event, but I know everyone’s going.

Mm. I just go and sit near the event for a couple of days and meet people at a cafe. So yeah, like we can’t get away from it. But if you’re an asset manager or, um, yeah, somebody in that kind of type of work, like you’ve got better things to do than listen to sales pitches aggressively thrown at you that aren’t relevant- Yeah

to what you’re doing. So, um, yeah. Like I, I definitely love to hear that kind of feedback- Yeah … and wanna make sure that we get it every, every year. Like that’s- It’s, it’s

Matthew Stead: encouraging.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah … yeah, that’s, that’s the point of the conference, so.

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah.

Matthew Stead: The other big topic was we would really love more OEM involvement.

Um-

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Everybody wants more- … a lot of the operators- … OEM involvement- Yeah … all of the asset owners.

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Like we want to [00:14:00] hear from OEMs more, have them there. Um, so yeah, we’re, we’ll be trying to To get those sorted

Allen Hall: Well, WOMA is a global conference, although it’s Australia-based and there’s a, a number of Australian operators.

There are Danish, Americans, uh, plenty of Europeans. Uh, we’re gonna see some from Southeast Asia, I think, this year. Mm-hmm. And, and Japan hopefully will come. Uh, because it’s a, it’s a global conference, there’s global knowledge- Mm … and wind is such a big industry. You may not have the solution in the United States, it may be sitting in Australia, and we need to exchange those ideas.

Mm. And that, that’s the point. So w- we are continuing to look for those world experts as we have received all the inputs of these are all the topics we wanna go hear about. Great. Now it’s on us three to go find some of those world experts and, and try to get them to Melbourne. Yeah. And I, I think that’s a great opportunity.

So if we do call you and ask you to participate in WOMA [00:15:00] 2027, please take it seriously because- Mm … you will be bombarded with great questions- Mm … and contacts and information. Uh, it’s an event you won’t wanna miss. Yeah. And- But I would- … there’s opportunity there.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I’d say we’re, we’re prioritizing OEMs, um, to, to get more participation, ideally to speak, but at least to be there.

And we have heard from multiple asset owners in Australia that they want, they, they want to know what are some of the upgrades that they can do- Yeah … that you’re offering. They wanna know what’s coming next in terms of technology. They wanna know what are some of the non-Western options. So, you know, like it would be great to get some Chinese wind turbine, um, manufacturers as well.

Like, they want all this information. They don’t want a slick sales brochure pitch that doesn’t give them any technical information. So we’re hopeful that we’ll be able to get, you know, some technical people to speak on, yeah, what are the upgrades you offer and how does it work- Mm-hmm … and show us a case study that demonstrates the improvements.

Um, ’cause that [00:16:00] sometimes is really hard to get out of- Mm … out of OEMs. You know, that, “We’ve got this thing, it’s so amazing, you should get it.” Okay, well, what’s the business case for it? “Oh, well, we don’t have any numbers. Just trust us.”

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Um, it’s so common to get a pitch like that. So yeah, any, any OEM that has any- anything like that, either for the next generation of wind turbines or for upgrading the current fleet, yeah, if you’re willing to bring the data, then people, they are desperate to hear this information.

Allen Hall: Mm.

Matthew Stead: Yeah. That came up so many times.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Allen Hall: So what were the other, uh, topics that we’re… I’m just not thinking off the top of my head. I know foundations came up quite a bit- Foundations, yeah … which was an odd one, I think, because we haven’t seen that a lot in Australia. Yeah. But this year, foundations, foundations, foundations.

Basically, the health of foundations. Yeah.

Matthew Stead: Yeah. I think really there was a lifting of the maturity. Um, I think the topics were sort of showing that, you know, Maslow’s hierarchy and moving into the more of optimization rather than making do, and I think life extension around the foundations was a, a really good example of that.

Allen Hall: And bolts.

Matthew Stead: Bolts? Yeah, bolts.

Allen Hall: [00:17:00] Everybody said bolts. Bolts.

Matthew Stead: Bolts.

Allen Hall: You think the world’s simplest device, we’ve been making bolts for nearly 1,000 years or at least a couple hundred. But it does- And, you know- … come up quite often … cable, cable

Matthew Stead: terminations, again, some really

Rosemary Barnes: basic- Yeah, that, really specific ones that were raised multiple times.

Yeah. Um, yeah, which, which is great- Yeah … ’cause it gives us a good direction to go. But I do love how it changes so much every year- Yeah … ’cause it makes me feel like, okay, yeah, like we’re actually, you know, it’s worthwhile, um, putting on another event. Mm. Um, not just recording one event and then just, you know, like replaying that every year or something.

Re-educating.

Allen Hall: Yeah. Well, I, I think there’s a learning exercise that has happened over the past two years where people now are knowledgeable about those things we talked about- Mm … two years ago. Uh, was it, was it even two years ago? It was a year and a half ago when we first started this, so we’re, we’re not that deep into it.

Although our third conference will be next March, uh, you just see more energy, more industry knowledge in some of the references that I heard, uh, in terms of other companies and the approaches they’re taking clearly came from WOMA.

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Matthew Stead: Yeah,

Allen Hall: yeah. Which is, which is [00:18:00] fascinating. Yeah. That’s

Rosemary Barnes: good. I mean, we want- It, it is

Allen Hall: sticking

Rosemary Barnes: we want tech conferences to get better, right? That was the- No … the reason why we, uh, we started this conference was ’cause we didn’t think that it was sufficient, what we had available. So, you know, it’s not a bad thing if other conferences, um, get better. Yeah. Yeah. We should also mention that blades were, were raised a fair bit.

We talked so much about blades in the previous years, and we will be talking about blades a lot again, including we’ve got a master class on the Friday. Uh, it’s… Yeah, we’ll go back to some of the basics about how the composite materials work and how a blade is designed and certified and manufactured, and, um- Lightning.

Y- yeah, yeah, a little, a little bit about lightning. Um, I don’t wanna cover it too much because we did the master class on lightning- Right … last year. Mm. Um, yeah. And yeah, some of the common damage methods anyway. And of course- Mm … yeah, lightning is probably the most- … common, or I guess leading edge erosion is the most, and then lightning would be the most expensive.

Um, yeah, so we’ll be, we’ll be covering all that and just try and raise the knowledge level a little bit, um, for [00:19:00] everybody to… It’s a very complicated kind of, uh, yeah, component.

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah.

Matthew Stead: And workshops. So each year we’ve run sort of workshops or roundtables or whatever, so we’re still thinking about the format for them, but, um, thinking about how we’ll reintroduce them again this year.

You know, specific topics, specific questions, specific answers.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Allen Hall: And the three of us will be in Hamburg in a couple of weeks at Wind Energy Hamburg, so if you see us and you’re interested in coming to Australia, that’s the place to grab us and- Yep … and shake us and say, “I wanna go to Australia. How do I do it?”

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Allen Hall: Uh, yeah. Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Especially if you’ve got a, a t- technology that addresses some of those specific issues that we’ve mentioned- Mm … then, um, yeah, just know ahead of time that Australia needs, needs more information and more, um, solutions available to them. So, yeah. And

Matthew Stead: that reminds me, we had a really discussion a- around safety and, you know, reasonable and [00:20:00] practicable, and discussion around all the lessons learned about how…

or what is best practice on a site, what is best practice about how to manage risks and-

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Matthew Stead: Yeah. Yeah. I know you, you, you enjoyed that one.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, yeah, definitely. And we’re not talking about, like, safety the- Ear muffs or hats. The, um, rou- Yeah, the routine safety that if you- The goggles, yeah … yeah, trip over and graze your knee, then you need to let the site supervisor know.

You, you know, it’s not that stuff, ’cause sites have that under control. That’s a given, yeah. Or at least the ability to get that under control. We’re talking about the bigger- Yeah … bigger things, you know. Like, uh, is there a issue that is causing blades to fall off turbines every now and then? Is there an issue that, uh, can lead to, you know, a fire?

I, I think everyone, like- Yeah … a big fear of everybody’s. There’s never been, um, in Australia at least, there’s never been a wind turbine fire that has caused a bush fire, but it is a possibility, and it would be so bad for the industry. So, you know, it’s those things- Mm … that could be just terrible, preventing those before they happen.

Mm. So that’s the kind of safety that we’re gonna mainly focus on. Mm. Although, you know, we’re not gonna [00:21:00] turn down questions on, um, some of the smaller stuff as well.

Matthew Stead: Yeah.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Matthew Stead: And we even thought about getting some lawyers-

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah …

Matthew Stead: you missed out on this discussion, Rosie. Okay.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah.

Matthew Stead: So

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Lawyers, this is news to me.

Well, I mean, are we talking contracts or, um-

Matthew Stead: No, no … no … it’s really operations. I mean- Right … the environmental, um, issues- Oh yeah … the operational issues. Mm. You know, there’s, there’s a few things in there that the lawyers can add.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. I mean- … I’ve, I constantly find myself having to interpret, you know, legal, um, legal text and also anticipate, you know, it’s one thing about what’s the right engineering, but then there is also the legal interpretation of it- Yeah

uh, as well, you know, in terms of contract law, but then also in, in terms of safety. Yeah. Um, yeah. Was this certification done correctly? You know- Yeah … that’s got some legal aspect to it. So yeah, that- Yeah … makes sense to me. Insurance is another one where I would say- Yeah, actually that came up … you know, like some, some people might think that that doesn’t sound interesting, but yeah, in- insurance is the other-

Matthew Stead: Mm

Rosemary Barnes: aspect that you [00:22:00] just can’t, um, you can’t get away from it. Like, you can’t just think that you’re, you’re doing your engineering without bothering about Mm … yeah, like finance and law and, um, and insurance. Those are things that- Mm … you spend a lot of time thinking about.

Matthew Stead: Yeah. Mm. And I guess we would also love to hear, you know, about potential speakers, but we’d also love to hear any other topics that people are attending and want to know about as well.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm-hmm.

Allen Hall: Absolutely. And if you haven’t registered for WOMA 2027, which will be March 3rd through 5th at the Pullman in East Melbourne, right? East Melbourne, yeah. They just redefined it. It’s Pullman in East Melbourne. Uh, go ahead and go to woma2027.com and register now. Uh, Matthew and Rosemary, it’s great to see you in person again, and we’ll see you in a couple of weeks, uh, hopefully in, in Germany.

Rosemary Barnes: Mm.

Allen Hall: Very [00:23:00] exciting.

What Operators Want to Hear at WOMA 2027

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Forcing Our Teachers to Toe the Line on Communism

Published

on

The substance of the meme here is correct; Florida public schools require comprehensive K-12 instruction on the history and dangers of communism, following a series of legislative moves and curriculum standards. The updated “History of Communism” curriculum is rolling out for the 2026–2027 school year, mandating that students learn about the “brutal realities” and (the catastrophic) global impact of communist regimes.

When I was a schoolboy in the 1960s and early 1970s, we came to learn that all efforts to establish a viable communist nation had failed, but our teachers were not shackled as to what they could teach and how they could teach it.  As a result, we came to a variety of helpful viewpoints, and these are what I offered my own kids as they were growing up, e.g.,

  • “Men are not angels,” as my sixth-grade social studies teacher explained.  Those who do not need to work in order to survive can simply goof off.
  • Yet idleness is averse to most people’s psychological needs to be an active and productive person, and member of society.
  • Power corrupts, and absolutely power corrupts absolutely.  Democracy prevents the accumulation of a pathological amount of power on the part of any one leader.  (This was assumed to be true until Donald Trump’s second term.)
  • If Lenin (a butcher) hadn’t had Trotsky (a compassionate intellectual) assassinated, the entirety of the USSR would have turned out completely differently.
  • If the U.S. hadn’t, through its embargoes, made it impossible for Cuba to offer its people a decent quality of life, their revolution may have succeeded and brought forth a new way of thinking.
  • There are examples of smaller scale societies in which the ideals of communism work out very nicely, e.g., the Israeli kibbutz.
  • We read and discussed at length a book called “Social Ideals and Ideal Societies” in which these concepts were analyzed fairly and in great depth.

Now, will the typical American schoolchild turn out better if he’s cut off from thinking critically about all this and forced to accept the mantra that “communism = evil?” The typical Florida Republican would say the answer is an obvious yes, but most intelligent people would dispute that.

Producing educated people who can think for themselves is an idea quite opposed to the ongoing control of a population.

Forcing Our Teachers to Toe the Line on Communism

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Trump Supporters Stupid?

Published

on

To the author of the meme here, I say: It’s safe to say that most folks in Trump’s MAGA base are stupid, though one needs more than a low IQ to fit into this segment.

In particular, we mustn’t omit mean-spiritedness.  People who are kind, compassionate, decent and tolerant of others are grossly unqualified to be rank-and-file Trumpers.

Trump Supporters Stupid?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com