Connect with us

Published

on

battery lithium

In this era of sustainability, the battery metals market plays a key role in the energy transition. Lithium, nickel, and cobalt drive demand for electric vehicles (EVs), renewable energy storage, and electronics. Now confining to lithium, its compounds namely lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide power the battery cathodes for highly efficient storage.

Beyond batteries, lithium has diverse uses in glass, lubricants, ceramics, and pharmaceuticals. In 2025, the top battery-grade lithium producers are focusing on sustainability and making efforts to stabilize the supply chains to meet growing demand.

Lithium’s Contribution to Reduced Automotive Life Cycle Emissions

Albemarle lithium
Source: Albemarle

The industry is further transforming through mergers and partnerships, enhancing resource access and supply chains to meet global needs. However, challenges remain. Rising demand risks supply chain strain, stricter environmental rules push for greener practices, and most significantly the fluctuating prices affect profits.

To thrive in this turbulent market, these top producers are constantly innovating and collaborating, ensuring they overcome obstacles while driving the global energy shift. So who are the top lithium producers fueling the battery market in 2025? Find out…

1. Albemarle Corporation: The Lithium Powerhouse

Albemarle Corporation, with a market cap of $11.08 billion in January 2025, leads the lithium industry. Based in Charlotte, North Carolina, it plays a key role in the clean energy transition.

The company supplies lithium to major EV manufacturers worldwide. Its operations in Chile, Australia, and the U.S. make it a global leader. In Kings Mountain, North Carolina, Albemarle runs one of the world’s most advanced lithium facilities. This site focuses on cutting-edge technology and development, reinforcing its industry leadership.

Albemarle
Source: Yahoo Finance

Innovating for a Sustainable Future

Albemarle leads in innovation with technologies like lithium sulfide and ultra-thin lithium anodes. These advancements increase energy density, reduce battery weight, and extend EV range. The company has invested heavily in new facilities to boost lithium hydroxide production, essential for EV batteries.

Collaborations with Tesla and General Motors highlight Albemarle’s role in the EV ecosystem. The company is committed to sustainability, and reducing carbon emissions during lithium production. These efforts align with global green energy goals and reinforce Albemarle’s industry leadership.

Albemarle’s focus on innovation and sustainability keeps it ahead in the growing lithium market. As the world shifts to cleaner energy, Albemarle ensures it remains a key player in powering the future.

2. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM): A Lithium Giant with a Sustainable Focus

As of January 2025, Sociedad Química y Minera (SQM) boasts a market cap of $11.04 billion, solidifying its position as one of the largest lithium producers globally. The Chilean company leverages the country’s vast lithium reserves in the Atacama Desert. SQM plays a pivotal role in the global lithium supply chain with its vertically integrated operations and cost-efficient production methods,

The company sources raw materials like brine and caliche from its operations in Chile’s Salar de Atacama. This brine is used to produce key battery materials such as lithium carbonate, potassium chloride, and potassium sulfate.

S&P Global reported SQM is ramping up production to meet surging demand, with plans to reach 230,000 metric tons of lithium in 2025.

Expansion efforts in Australia, Chile, and China, including a new conversion plant in China, underpin this growth. Despite declining lithium prices, SQM remains optimistic, driven by a projected 20% increase in global lithium demand, especially from electric vehicle (EV) markets in China.

SQM lithium
Source: SQM

Sustainability and Strategic Partnerships

SQM is committed to sustainable practices to lower brine extraction rates and integrate renewable energy into its operations. The company also engages local communities, promoting social well-being while minimizing its environmental impact.

Strategic partnerships further bolster SQM’s market position. Agreements with LG Energy Solution and SK On enhance its role in the EV supply chain and ensure steady demand for its lithium. Additionally, lithium and its derivatives now contribute 79% of SQM’s gross margin, highlighting their significance in the company’s portfolio.

SQM aligns with global sustainability goals and meets the growing need for battery metals by focusing on “Green Lithium” production and investing in innovative technologies.

3. Ganfeng Lithium: China’s Lithium Leader

As of January 2025, Ganfeng Lithium, headquartered in Jiangxi, China, has a market cap of HKD 64.83 billion. As one of the world’s largest lithium producers, Ganfeng has a robust supply chain that supports competitive pricing and high production volumes.

The company supplies premium lithium hydroxide products to leading lithium battery and EV manufacturers, earning its reputation for technological excellence and reliable quality.

Sustainably Sourcing Lithium

Ganfeng lithium
Source: Ganfeng

Notably, EVs using Ganfeng’s lithium salt products traveled over 129 billion kilometers between 2015 and 2022. This achievement reduced CO2 emissions by 32.26 million tons which aligned with the environmental benefits of EV adoption.

Furthermore, Ganfeng’s lithium batteries play a crucial role in energy storage. They store solar and wind energy, ensuring renewable energy is reliable and accessible. By reducing the reliance on fossil fuels, these batteries help lower carbon emissions and support global clean energy goals.

The company’s sustainability goals revolve around battery recycling which is a critical part of the EV supply chain. The company’s recycling projects recover valuable materials like lithium, nickel, cobalt, and manganese from retired batteries.

These efforts reduce resource waste and support the transition to renewable energy. Ganfeng’s lithium batteries are also used in energy storage systems, helping store solar and wind energy while cutting fossil fuel usage and lowering carbon emissions.

Ganfeng Lithium Group

Lithium Capacity Boost by 2025

However, the company faces challenges as its production capacity has outpaced project development. To address this, Ganfeng plans to boost its annual lithium compounds capacity to 300,000 tonnes LCE by 2025, aiming for 70% self-sufficiency.

Ganfeng also announced last year a joint feasibility study with Pilbara Minerals Limited highlights to expand its lithium production. Its innovation in recycling and its dominance in China’s lithium market make it a key player in the global clean energy transition.

4. Tianqi Lithium: An Expanding Global Player

With a market cap of 49.33 billion CNY, Tianqi Lithium stands out as a major force in the lithium industry. The company has a strong presence in China and Australia, thanks to its joint venture with Albemarle at the Greenbushes lithium mine. This mine, located in Western Australia, is one of the largest and highest-grade lithium resources globally.

High-Quality Resources

Tianqi relies on top-tier lithium resources to drive its business. The Greenbushes mine and the Cuola mine in Sichuan ensure a stable, cost-effective supply of high-quality lithium raw materials. This stability enhances efficiency, flexibility, and reliability in Tianqi’s downstream chemical production.

Notably, the Greenbushes mine, managed through Talison Lithium, has been in operation for over 30 years. Recent expansions have boosted its annual production capacity to 1.62 million tonnes of lithium concentrate, cementing its critical role in the global market.

Strategic Investments for Growth

Tianqi is investing heavily in downstream processing, including lithium hydroxide facilities. These efforts aim to add value to the battery supply chain and meet surging demand for premium lithium products. With its strategic partnerships and focus on innovation, Tianqi is well-positioned for growth in the competitive battery metals market.

Tianqi lithium
Source: Tianqi lithium

5. Mineral Resources: Australia’s Rising Star

With a market cap of A$7.28 billion, Mineral Resources Limited (MinRes) is a top diversified resources company headquartered in Perth, Australia. Its operations span lithium, iron ore, energy, and mining services across Western Australia, making it a major player in the mining industry.

World-Class Lithium Assets

MinRes manages some of the world’s most prominent lithium projects, including the Wodgina and Mount Marion mines. The Wodgina mine, one of the largest known hard rock lithium deposits, is a joint venture with Albemarle Corporation, with MinRes overseeing all mining activities. It includes a spodumene concentrate processing plant with an annual capacity of 900,000 tonnes (SC5.5).

Mount Marion, another key operation, produces up to 600,000 tonnes (SC6 equivalent) of spodumene concentrate annually. This project is co-owned with Jiangxi Ganfeng Lithium. The spodumene is transported to the Port of Esperance for export, serving global markets.

Expanding Operations and Sustainability

MinRes acquired the Bald Hill mine in 2023, boosting production by adding 150,000 tonnes (SC6 equivalent) of spodumene annually. Located near Mount Marion, this site leverages shared infrastructure.

Mineral Resources Australia lithium
Source: Mineral Resources

Apart from supporting decarbonization, MinRes Australian operations add strategic value to global supply chains.

Recent cuts in lithium investments and project expansions may lead to supply shortages. Albemarle predicts that these constraints could disrupt the market in the mid-term, emphasizing the need for increased production and sustainable sourcing.

However, as the energy transition accelerates, the role of these battery-grade lithium producers will become even more critical to stabilize the lithium market.

________________________________________________________________________

Li-FT Power: Exploring & Developing Hard Rock Lithium Deposits in Canada

Li-FT Power Ltd. (TSXV: LIFT) recently announced its first-ever National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) compliant mineral resource estimate (MRE) for the Yellowknife Lithium Project (YLP), located in the Northwest Territories, Canada.

An Initial Mineral Resource of 50.4 Million Tonnes at Yellowknife.

This maiden estimate is a major milestone for the company and marks a significant step forward in the project’s development. Li-FT Power’s upcoming mineral resource is expected to further solidify Yellowknife as one of North America’s largest hardrock lithium resources.

Click to Learn More about Lithium and Li-FT Power Ltd. >>

The post Top 5 Lithium Producers Powering the Battery Market in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares

Published

on

Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain

Published

on

“…Protecting nature makes our business more resilient…”

For companies with land, water, food, fiber, or commodity exposure, the supply chain may be the most practical place to turn nature from a risk into an operating asset.

Your supply chain already has a nature strategy. It may be undocumented. It may live in procurement files, supplier contracts, commodity maps, and one spreadsheet nobody opens without coffee. But it exists.

If your business depends on farms, forests, water, soil, packaging, rubber, timber, fibers, minerals, or food ingredients, nature is part of your operating system. The question is whether you manage that system with intent, or discover it during a disruption, audit, or difficult board question.

That is why more companies are asking how to find Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain. Do not begin by shopping for offsets. Begin by asking where nature already affects cost, continuity, emissions, regulatory exposure, and supplier resilience.

What Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain Means

The European Commission defines nature-based solutions as approaches inspired and supported by nature that are cost-effective, deliver environmental, social, and economic benefits, and help build resilience. They should also benefit biodiversity and support ecosystem services.

In supply-chain terms, that becomes practical. Nature-based solutions in your supply chain can include agroforestry in cocoa, coffee, rubber, or palm supply chains. They can include soil health programs for food ingredients, watershed restoration near water-intensive operations, mangrove restoration linked to coastal sourcing regions, and avoided deforestation in forest-linked commodities.

The key test is business relevance. If your procurement team relies on a landscape, watershed, crop, or supplier base, that is where opportunity may sit. The best projects do not hover outside the business like a framed certificate. They plug into the system that already produces your revenue.

Why the Boardroom Should Care

For many companies, the largest climate and nature exposure sits outside direct operations. The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard gives companies a method to account for and report value-chain emissions across sectors. Purchased goods, land use, transport, supplier energy, and product use can make direct emissions look like the visible tip of a very large iceberg.

The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures notes that many nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities arise upstream and downstream. That is why nature-based supply chain investments matter to boards. You are managing supply security, audit readiness, investor confidence, and regulatory preparedness.

For companies exposed to EU markets, this also connects to rules and expectations such as CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, and SBTi FLAG.

Step One: Map Where You Touch Land, Water, and Living Systems

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain starts with mapping, not marketing.

Begin with procurement and Scope 3 data. Which categories carry high spend, high emissions, or high sourcing risk? Which suppliers depend on agriculture, forestry, mining, water-intensive processing, or land conversion? Which regions face water stress, heat, flood risk, soil degradation, deforestation, or biodiversity pressure?

The Science Based Targets Network uses a clear process for companies: assess, prioritize, set targets, act, and track. That sequence keeps companies from treating nature as a mood board. You identify where the business has exposure, then decide where intervention can create measurable value.

Step Two: Look for Operational Value Before Carbon Value

This is the center of CCC’s Dual-Value Model. A nature-based supply chain investment should do useful work for the business before anyone counts the carbon.

Agroforestry may improve farmer resilience, shade crops, protect soil, and reduce pressure on forests. Watershed restoration may reduce water risk for beverage, textile, or manufacturing sites. Soil health programs may improve the stability of agricultural inputs.

Carbon and sustainability value can still be created. In some cases, the project may support Scope 3 insetting. In others, it may generate verified carbon credits. Sometimes the main value may be resilience, readiness, and better supplier data.

The IPCC has found that ecosystem-based adaptation can reduce climate risks to people, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, with multiple co-benefits, while also warning that effectiveness declines as warming increases. That is a sober argument for acting early.

Step Three: Separate Insetting, Offsetting, and Resilience

Nature-based solutions in your supply chain are not automatically carbon credits. They are not automatically Scope 3 reductions either.

An insetting opportunity usually sits inside or close to your value chain. It may support Scope 3 reporting if the accounting rules, project boundaries, supplier connection, and data quality are strong enough.

An offsetting opportunity usually involves verified credits outside your value chain. High-quality credits can still play a role for residual emissions, but they should not distract from direct reductions or credible value-chain work.

A resilience opportunity may deliver business value even if you cannot claim a Scope 3 reduction immediately. That may include water security, supplier capacity, land restoration, biodiversity protection, or regulatory readiness.

Gold Standard’s Scope 3 value-chain guidance focuses on reporting emissions reductions from interventions in purchased goods and services. Verra’s Scope 3 Standard Program is being developed to certify value-chain interventions and issue units for companies’ emissions accounting. The direction is clear: stronger evidence, tighter boundaries, and more disciplined claims.

Step Four: Design for Audit-Readiness From the Beginning

Weak data is where promising nature projects go to become expensive anecdotes.

Before public claims are made, you need to know the baseline. What would have happened without the project? Who owns or manages the land? Which suppliers are involved? How will outcomes be measured? How will leakage, permanence, and double counting be addressed?

The GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard gives companies methods to quantify, report, and track land emissions, CO2 removals, and related metrics. This matters because land projects are rarely neat. Farms change practices. Suppliers shift volumes. Weather changes outcomes.

What Recent Corporate Examples Show

Recent case studies show that supply-chain nature work is becoming more serious, and more scrutinized.

Reuters has reported on insetting to reduce emissions within supply chains, including examples linked to Reckitt, Danone, Nestlé, Earthworm Foundation, and Nature-based Insights. The same article highlights familiar problems: measurement, double counting, supplier incentives, and credibility.

Reuters has also reported on companies using the Science Based Targets Network process to examine nature impacts. GSK, Holcim, and Kering were among the first companies with validated science-based targets for nature.

The Financial Times has covered the promise and difficulty of soil carbon in corporate supply chains, including a PepsiCo example in India where yields reportedly increased while greenhouse gas emissions fell. The lesson is that carbon, soil, biodiversity, farmer economics, and measurement need to be handled together.

A Practical Screening Checklist

A supply-chain nature-based solution deserves deeper review when you can answer yes to most of these questions:

  • Does it sit in or near a material supply-chain hotspot?
  • Does it address a real business risk?
  • Can you connect it to supplier behavior, land management, or sourcing practices?
  • Can the outcomes be measured?
  • Are the claim boundaries clear?
  • Does it support Scope 3 strategy, SBTi FLAG, CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, or investor reporting needs?
  • Are permanence, leakage, land rights, and community issues addressed?

Build the Asset, Then Make the Claim

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain is about identifying where your business already depends on living systems, then designing interventions that make those systems more resilient, measurable, and commercially useful.

For companies with material Scope 3 exposure, the right project can support supplier resilience, emissions strategy, regulatory readiness, and credible climate communication. The wrong project can become a glossy story with a weak audit trail.

Carbon Credit Capital helps companies design nature-based carbon and sustainability assets that embed directly into corporate supply chains. Through CCC’s Dual-Value Model, you can assess where sustainability investment may support operational resilience, Scope 3 insetting eligibility, regulatory readiness, and high-quality carbon or sustainability value.

Schedule your consultation with the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital to explore how nature-based supply chain investments can support your next stage of climate strategy.

Sources

  1. European Commission: Nature-based solutions
  2. GHG Protocol: Corporate Value Chain Scope 3 Standard
  3. TNFD: Guidance on value chains
  4. European Commission: Corporate Sustainability Reporting
  5. European Commission: Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence
  6. European Commission: Regulation on Deforestation-free Products
  7. SBTi: Forest, Land and Agriculture FLAG
  8. Science Based Targets Network: Take Action
  9. IPCC AR6 WGII Summary for Policymakers
  10. Gold Standard: Scope 3 Value Chain Interventions Guidance
  11. Verra: Scope 3 Standard Program
  12. GHG Protocol: Land Sector and Removals Standard
  13. Reuters: Can insetting stack the cards towards more sustainable supply chains?
  14. Reuters: Three companies put their impacts on nature under a microscope
  15. Financial Times: The dubious climate gains of turning soil into a carbon sink

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living

Published

on

Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.

For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.

Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.

The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.

More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)

Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.

Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.

Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:

  • Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
  • Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
  • Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
  • Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs

The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?

How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs

There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.

Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)

According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)

In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)

The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)

After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)

For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.

How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

A light bulb, a pen, a calculator and some copper euro cent coins lie on top of an electricity bill

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.

Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.

Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)

As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)

These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)

Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)

For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.

How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates

On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.

Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.

As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)

While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.

How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes

Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.

The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.

These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.

Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action

While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.

While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.

For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:

  1. Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
  2. Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
  3. Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.

Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.

Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.

The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com