Connect with us

Published

on

A new Greenpeace International report, Toxic Skies: How Agribusiness is Choking the Amazon, reveals how fires linked to industrial agriculture are turning the forest’s air toxic during the dry season. The findings are a stark warning that the Amazon’s crisis is not only about trees. It is about the air millions of people breathe, and the health of our shared planet.

Still from "World on Fire" Stories - Brazil's Episode #2 - Urban Haze in Porto Velho. © Fernanda Ligabue / Greenpeace
Porto Velho (Brazil), October 2024. © Fernanda Ligabue / Greenpeace

When the sun rises over Porto Velho, on the edge of the Brazilian Amazon, it does not pierce through the mist. It struggles through the smoke. For months each year, the air fills with the haze of fires deliberately set to clear forests for cattle or to renew pasturelands. What was once the world’s greenest ecosystem often breathes air contaminated with higher levels of toxic particles than Beijing, São Paulo or Santiago, according to the report.

What the study found

Researchers monitored air quality in two Amazonian cities, Porto Velho (Rondônia) and Lábrea (Amazonas), combining satellite and ground-based data. The results are alarming:

  • During the record-breaking fire season of 2024, levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exceeded WHO daily health guidelines by more than 20 times.
  • Even in 2025, a year with far fewer fires, the air still exceeded the guidelines by over six times.
  • Between 2019 and 2024, the annual average pollution in Porto Velho was higher than in major global megacities, largely driven by sharp increases in PM2.5 levels during the fire season.
  • Around 75% of burned areas around Porto Velho in 2024 are used as pasture for cattle production, showing that most fires are linked to grazing land use.
  • More than half of the total burned area in 2024 in the Amazon biome falls within a 360km radius around the facilities of Brazil’s largest meatpacker, JBS. Meatpackers such as JBS do not effectively prohibit and monitor the deliberate use of fire in their supply chains – leaving meatpackers exposed to the risk of indirect or direct supply chain links, including through maintaining business relations, with farms in burned areas. 

This is not a natural disaster. It is a business model that profits from destruction and public suffering.

Breathing in the crisis

Burning in Amazon for Agriculture. © Rodrigo Baleia / Greenpeace
Cattle ranching in a deforested area in Querência, Mato Grosso State. Cattle ranching is the primary driver of forest destruction in the Brazilian Amazon. Close to 80% of the total deforested areas in the Amazon are occupied by pastures. © Rodrigo Baleia / Greenpeace

The Amazon’s fires are not acts of nature. They are deliberately lit to clear forest or renew pastures for cattle. And, behind every statistic are human stories. Hilda Barabadá Karitiana, from the Karitiana Indigenous Territory near Porto Velho, describes how her community lives with the smoke:

During the dry season, the air becomes thick with smoke. Even when the fire is far away, we feel it. Sore throats, constant coughing, and irritated eyes. It affects everyone.– Hilda Barabadá Karitiana

For people like Hilda, the smoke is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a public health emergency. Exposure to high levels of PM2.5 causes respiratory infections, heart disease and asthma, especially among children and older adults. The air itself has become an agent of crisis.

Debunking Myths

✘ Fires in the Amazon region occur naturally and are beneficial for the ecosystem.

✔ Fires in the Amazon region are caused by human activity and are highly destructive to the rainforest ecosystem.

✘ Fires in the Amazon happen because of logging.

✔ Vast areas of the Amazon biome are set on fire to make way for cattle ranching.

A turning point before COP30

This year’s COP30, hosted in Belém, on the edge of the Amazon, will be the first UN Climate Summit held inside a tropical forest. It is an opportunity to put Amazonian voices and air quality at the centre of global climate negotiations and to demand that governments and corporations act.

Chief Zé Bajaga, from the Caititu Indigenous Territory, says:

Here in the Amazon, we face invasion, fires and pollution from companies that profit while our land burns. Those who destroy for money must be held accountable.– Chief Zé Bajaga

What needs to happen now

The 2nd Forest Defender Camp 2025 in Papua Day 4. © Jurnasyanto Sukarno / Greenpeace
Brasil Amazon Indigenous Nathalia Kycendekarun Apurina seen together with Papuan and Congo Basin Indigenous People under Merbau tree during the Forest Defender Camp 2025 in the Sira village forest, at Knasaimos customary area in South Sorong, Southwest Papua.  © Jurnasyanto Sukarno / Greenpeace

World leaders need to step up and:

  • COP30 should deliver an action plan to implement the UNFCCC’s 2030 target to halt and reverse deforestation and forest degradation of the world’s forests. It’s time to turn commitments into action.
  • Governments must urgently regulate the agricultural and financial sectors to ensure their alignment with the Paris Agreement, the Global Biodiversity Framework, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
  • Governments must ensure the transition to truly ecological and just food systems, an end to deforestation, and the reduction of emissions associated with agriculture, including methane.
  • World leaders must ensure funding for real solutions to protect and restore forests by providing finance directly accessible to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities.

The Amazon’s toxic skies are not inevitable. They are the product of political choices and economic greed. As world leaders prepare for COP30, this is the moment to act.

Lis Cunha is a campaigner with Greenpeace International’s Respect the Amazon campaign.

Toxic Skies: The Amazon is now breathing dirtier air than the world’s biggest cities

Climate Change

Unpacking Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Prop Up Coal

Published

on

A World War II-era policy is stopping old coal plants from closing, despite high costs and the wishes of their owners.

At one time, the U.S. electricity grid ran mostly on coal.

Unpacking Trump’s Use of Emergency Powers to Prop Up Coal

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Italy pushes coal exit back after gas prices rise

Published

on

Italy has delayed the permanent closure of its four coal-fired power plants to 2038, after the war in the Middle East caused the cost of producing electricity from gas to spike.

The government inserted the measure into a broader bill aimed at addressing the energy crisis. Parliament approved the legislation on Wednesday after the government tied it to a confidence vote, meaning that losing the vote would see the right-wing coalition government collapse.

The decision marks a climbdown from a pledge first made under centre-left Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni in 2017 to phase out coal by 2025 on the mainland and by 2028 on the island of Sardinia.

The Mediterranean island’s 1.5 million people remain heavily dependent on coal for electricity due to limited grid connections with the European mainland and a slow rollout of renewable energy.

Riccardo Molinari, a member of Parliament for the governing coalition Lega party, which championed the amendment, said the plants could be kept open as a “strategic reserve”, which can be turned on if needed.

“Unnecessary” decision

But analysts say the practical impact of the move is likely to be limited. Luca Bergamaschi, executive director of Italian climate think tank ECCO, described the extension as “largely symbolic”.

“Keeping them open will not materially affect electricity prices, which are driven by gas – for most hours of the day – and EU market rules,” he told Climate Home News. “The decision sends a negative signal but we don’t expect any meaningful impact on prices or emissions, which shows how unnecessary this is”.

    Coal has already been largely phased out of Italy’s power mix. Generation from coal has fallen over 90% since 2012 and accounted for less than 2% of electricity production last year, almost entirely in Sardinia.

    In 2024, Italy got about half of its electricity from gas and half from clean sources like hydropower, solar and wind.

    Coal plants on stand-by

    Italy has four coal-fired power plants left but only two, both in Sardinia, are still producing electricity.

    The other two are run by the country’s largest utility Enel, in Brindisi and Civitavecchia. They were shut down at the end of last year after they became uneconomic.

    The company had planned to begin decommissioning them, but the government intervened at the last minute, requiring them to remain on standby in case of an energy crisis.

    Gilberto Pichetto Fratin, Italy’s Minister of Environment and Energy Security, said at the end of March that these two power plants could be switched back on “right away, with a government decree”.

    “If the price of gas exceeds 70 euros per megawatt hour, producing with coal would be convenient,” he told Italian newspaper Il Corriere della Sera.

    European gas prices spiked to just below that level in mid-March as the Iran war escalated, but have since come down to around 50 euros per megawatt hour.

    Coal surge in Asia

    Italy’s move comes amid a broader, though limited, shift back towards coal in some parts of the world as countries respond to restricted gas supply. Germany slightly increased coal-fired generation in March and has considered reactivating idle plants as a precaution.

    Outside Europe, the trend has been more pronounced. Several Asian countries heavily exposed to disruptions in Gulf gas supplies have increased coal use.

    Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps

    Japan has allowed its coal power plants to operate at a higher rate to reduce the need for liquified natural gas (LNG). Bangladesh, Thailand and the Philippines have also increased electricity generation from coal since the start of the conflict in the Middle East.

    But analysis from Zero Carbon Analytics suggested that producing electricity from solar is cheaper than coal in most south-east Asian countries.

    “Energy security in Southeast Asia will not come from switching between fossil fuels,” Amy Kong added. “It will come from reducing dependence on them altogether.”

    The post Italy pushes coal exit back after gas prices rise appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Italy pushes coal exit back after gas prices rise

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Bills to Protect Ratepayers From Data Centers Fail in Georgia Legislature

    Published

    on

    Lawmakers adjourned without passing a single measure addressing data center expansion, tax breaks or consumer protections.

    When the final gavel fell on Georgia’s legislative session, Big Tech and Georgia Power had little reason to be disappointed.

    Bills to Protect Ratepayers From Data Centers Fail in Georgia Legislature

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com