Carbon offsets have made headlines in recent years – often for the wrong reasons.
From investigations into “phantom credits” and “crypto” offset schemes through to late-night comedians running lengthy segments, journalists and researchers have revealed a range of issues that can arise through attempts to “cancel out” emissions.
But the chequered history of carbon offsets – and the ideas, experiments and policies that informed them – is much longer, spanning more than six decades.
Emissions-offsetting took root in US environmental law in the 1970s, particularly amendments to the Clean Air Act. Early experiments with trading offsets of lead, sulphur dioxide and nitrous oxide in the US laid the groundwork for market-based environmental regulation worldwide.
Such mechanisms found support from a chorus of voices, including fossil-fuel companies and conservative politicians from the UK to Australia, who favoured “efficiency” and markets over “command-and-control” environmental regulation.
Many large NGOs, such as the Environmental Defense Fund and Nature Conservancy, also argued for emissions trading over a carbon tax, even partnering with corporations to reduce their emissions.
Below, Carbon Brief’s timeline of carbon-offsetting traces the origins, ideas, arguments, milestones and controversies, from the 1960s through to today.
Read the full article on the Carbon Brief website
The post Timeline: The 60-year history of carbon offsets appeared first on Carbon Brief.
https://www.carbonbrief.org/timeline-the-60-year-history-of-carbon-offsets/
A new paper suggests that 15 percent of global warming comes from overlooked pollutants.
Record-high global temperatures aren’t driven only by well-known greenhouse gas culprits.
The decision voided the EPA guidance to terminate the $2.8 billion grant program. But it stopped short of requiring the agency to resume administering it.
A federal judge in South Carolina ruled this week that the Trump administration’s termination of environmental justice grants was “illegal.” The decision dealt a setback to efforts to dismantle a Biden-era program that funded projects addressing environmental and public health challenges in underserved communities across the country.
Trump’s EPA Unlawfully Cancelled Environmental Justice Grants, Judge Rules
The surge in satellites brings pollution and risks of repeating destructive colonial practices, experts warn.
The starry night sky has always anchored humanity’s sense of place in a vast universe. It’s a map guiding travelers, a calendar for migrations and harvests, a wellspring of stories. But a surge of commercial satellite launches into the upper fringes of Earth’s atmosphere threatens the relationship between people and the celestial commons by crowding the night sky and polluting the atmosphere, scientists warn.
A Commercial Space Race Prompts a Thorny Question: Who Owns the Sky?
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测