Disseminated on behalf of PowerBank Corporation.
New York State is moving quickly to increase its use of clean energy. The state has set strong new goals to add up to 7 gigawatts (GW) of solar, wind, and battery storage capacity by 2030. This is part of New York’s plan to have 70% of its electricity come from renewable sources by 2030 and to reach 100% zero-emission electricity by 2040.
These targets come from the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), a law that guides the state’s climate strategy.
A key part of the strategy is community solar. This type of solar project lets many people and businesses enjoy the benefits without installing panels on their own property. New York is a leader in community solar, with over 2 GW of capacity already online and many more projects in progress statewide.
How Community Solar Supports New York’s Clean Energy Plans
Community solar projects are designed to include groups that might struggle to install solar panels themselves. People who rent their homes, families with low incomes, and households without usable roofs can all join these projects.
Members get credits on their electricity bills based on the amount of solar power their share produces. This helps lower monthly energy costs and makes clean energy more affordable.
New York aims to increase community solar projects owned by public entities, like local governments. This will provide clean power that goes directly into the grid. These projects also provide bill credits to subscribers, allowing more people to benefit from renewable energy without incurring upfront costs.
The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) reports that New York accounted for one-third of all new community solar installations in the U.S. in 2023.
There are now more than 500 community solar projects either operating or being developed in the state. This rapid growth shows how community solar is already a key part of the state’s clean energy future.

Moreover, the U.S. community solar market is set to double. By 2029, Wood Mackenzie expects 7.3 GWdc of new installations in state programs. This will raise total capacity above 14 GWdc.
Growth is expected to average 5% each year until 2026. After that, it may drop to 11% annually until 2029 as mature markets become saturated.

Turning Landfills into Clean Energy: PowerBank’s Geddes Project
PowerBank Corporation, a company focused on clean energy, plays an active role in New York’s solar development. Recently, PowerBank completed a 3.79-megawatt (MW) community solar project on a capped landfill in the Town of Geddes. This solar farm now supplies clean electricity to the grid and produces enough energy to power roughly 450 homes each year.
The project benefits from the NY-Sun program, which is run by the NYSERDA. Since 2011, NY-Sun has delivered over $1.8 billion in solar incentives across the state. These incentives lower the cost of solar projects. This makes it easier for developers to build them and for communities to access.
Using closed landfills for solar energy is smart because these sites can be difficult to develop for other purposes. They are often large and no longer in use, making them good places for solar panels without taking away farmland or natural areas.
PowerBank’s Geddes project proves that solar systems can be built even on complex sites that need extra permits and engineering work. This solar farm is the largest PowerBank project in the U.S. so far.
The Company has plans to expand its portfolio in New York. This includes a 14.4-MW project in Skaneateles and a 5.4-MW project at Boyle Road that are under development.
PowerBank has developed more than 100 MW of renewable energy projects and has roughly 1 GW of projects in its development pipeline.

- SEE MORE (SolarBank is the former PowerBank):
The Importance of Public-Private Partnerships
Achieving New York’s clean energy goals requires teamwork between public agencies and private companies. The state will own some solar projects. Meanwhile, private developers like PowerBank bring the skills, experience with permits, and funds needed to plan, build, and run solar farms.
Local governments and utilities help find great spots for solar power. This includes sites like landfills, brownfields, and other unused lands. Focusing on these spaces lets communities create clean energy. This approach avoids harming farmland or protected nature areas.
PowerBank’s success with landfill solar puts the company in a good position to take advantage of this approach as New York expands its clean energy programs. In addition to providing electricity, such projects can also support community benefits.
These may include offering solar subscriptions specifically to low-income households, working with local schools on clean energy education, and creating job training programs to prepare workers for employment in solar installation and maintenance.
Growth Opportunities and Broader Impact
New York’s climate law has sparked big investments in renewable energy. It also improves the electric grid to manage more clean power. The state now wants to increase the number of local solar projects. These allow communities and residents to directly benefit from clean energy and lower bills.
Solar projects on landfills were once rare, but they might soon become common. Many states are seeing the value of using such underutilized land for clean energy.
A 2024 report from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found that over 10,000 landfills in the United States could host solar panels. Altogether, these landfills could produce up to 60 GW of electricity — enough to power 10 million homes.
PowerBank’s 3.79-MW Geddes project is just a small piece of this nationwide potential, but it shows how landfill solar can work in practice. The company is well-positioned to partner with public agencies and communities on similar projects in the future.
PowerBank can support clean energy in other ways, too. It can help connect clean energy with education, community engagement, and workforce development while building solar farms.
Overall, New York is advancing rapidly toward its ambitious clean energy goals. Community solar and the smart use of unused land, like landfills, will continue to play a vital role. Private developers like PowerBank bring the experience and capital needed to transform policies into real projects.
These efforts will help New York cut greenhouse gas emissions. They will also lower energy costs for residents and boost local economies. As the state redefines what public clean energy can look like, Powerbank will play a key role in turning policy into real-world results.
- READ MORE: PowerBank Embraces Bitcoin and Tokenized Energy in Bold Treasury Shift to Digital Finance
Please refer to “Forward-Looking Statements” in the press release entitled “Bitcoin Purchases to be made by SolarBank Using Net Cash from Geddes Solar Power Project” for additional discussion of the assumptions and risk factors associated with the statements in this report.
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.
Carboncredits.com receives compensation for this publication and has a business relationship with any company whose stock(s) is/are mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post PowerBank Powers Ahead as New York Doubles Down on Community Solar appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

