TerraPower, the nuclear energy company founded by Bill Gates, has secured a major $650 million investment to advance its Natrium reactor. This funding round included support from Nvidia’s NVentures, Bill Gates, and HD Hyundai. It brings TerraPower’s private financing to over $1.4 billion.
With $2 billion in federal support from the U.S. Department of Energy, the company now has more than $3.4 billion to speed up the design and building of its first commercial Natrium reactor.
The plant is being built in Kemmerer, Wyoming, at the site of a retiring coal plant. The goal is to have it operational by 2030, with construction that started in 2024. TerraPower has submitted its formal permit application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
This is an important step in the U.S. nuclear approval process. This project is a top example of small modular reactor (SMR) use in the country. It may also serve as a model for future clean energy growth.
Tech Titans Join Nuclear Push for Low‑Carbon, 24/7 Power
Tech companies are turning to nuclear power as data centers and AI technologies using a lot of energy now. Nuclear power offers a clean and stable solution. Unlike solar and wind, which are intermittent, nuclear energy provides consistent electricity around the clock. This makes it ideal for powering servers, cooling systems, and other infrastructure that must run 24/7.
Nvidia’s investment in TerraPower signals a growing interest from the tech sector in long-term energy solutions. AI applications, such as language models and image generators, drive high demand for computing power. This power relies on a steady supply of electricity.
According to estimates, a single AI training run can consume as much power as 100 U.S. homes use in a year. That figure is expected to rise as AI becomes more advanced and widespread. The chart below shows the range of power estimated for U.S. data centers by 2030.

TerraPower has also partnered with Sabey Data Centers to explore integrating Natrium reactors directly with new data center builds. The goal is to place advanced nuclear reactors near digital infrastructure. This will provide secure, carbon-free power where it’s needed most. This could help stabilize grids while also reducing emissions from the rapidly growing tech sector.
Other major technology firms like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are also investigating nuclear energy options. Many companies have net-zero goals due in the next decade. They are starting to see that renewables alone might not be enough.
Advanced nuclear reactors, such as Natrium, provide a flexible option. They complement solar and wind energy, which helps balance the grid and meet peak energy demands.
Natrium’s Secret Sauce: Salt, Safety, and Smarts
The Natrium design features a 345-megawatt sodium-cooled fast reactor. Unlike traditional reactors that use water as a coolant, Natrium uses liquid sodium, which allows the reactor to operate at lower pressures and higher temperatures. This improves efficiency and simplifies construction while enhancing safety.
What makes Natrium especially innovative is its 1-gigawatt-hour thermal energy storage system. This system stores excess heat in molten salt, which can then be released on demand to generate up to 500 megawatts of electricity for several hours. Such flexibility allows the plant to increase output during peak demand. It can also reduce production when renewable sources generate enough power.
Apart from being safer and more adaptable, Natrium is also cleaner than older reactors. It produces less long-lived radioactive waste and is designed to be easier to build and replicate. TerraPower expects future reactors to be constructed in about 36 months, significantly faster than traditional nuclear projects.
Supply‑Chain Partnerships and Global Scale‑Up
To bring Natrium to market quickly and at scale, TerraPower is forming global partnerships. The company is working with HD Hyundai Heavy Industries to manufacture reactor components and vessel systems. It has also teamed up with Spain’s ENSA and South Korea’s Doosan for parts fabrication and engineering services.
TerraPower is also eyeing international markets. It has submitted its Natrium design to the UK’s Generic Design Assessment and is in early discussions with regulators in Japan and South Korea.
As more countries set net-zero goals and look to retire fossil fuel plants, interest in advanced nuclear is growing. TerraPower’s flexible, scalable model could meet that demand in both developed and emerging economies.
A New Nuclear Renaissance for Energy‑Hungry AI and the Grid
We are entering a new phase of global energy transition, one in which AI and data services will become as central to society as manufacturing and agriculture. With that shift comes a steep rise in electricity demand.
Data centers, AI training clusters, and cloud platforms are projected to consume up to 8% of global electricity by 2030—double what they consume today.
EPRI U.S. Data Center Load Projections

In response, private investors and governments are turning to small modular reactors as a solution. These reactors can be placed near industrial centers or in remote spots. They produce steady electricity while using little land and also fit well with the current infrastructure.
SMRs also complement wind and solar by filling in gaps when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing. Learn more about this reactor technology in this comprehensive guide.
TerraPower’s Natrium is one of several SMR designs moving forward globally, but it is currently among the best-funded. Including the recent Nvidia-led round, SMR developers worldwide have raised over $3.5 billion in private capital since 2023.

That wave of investment shows a change in how industries and countries see nuclear energy. It’s not just a backup option anymore. Instead, it’s a key solution for decarbonizing power systems. Experts believe that advanced reactors could help meet dual challenges: providing zero-emission baseload energy and supporting the digital economy’s rising demand.
If TerraPower’s Wyoming project succeeds, it may lead to a new generation of nuclear plants that are smaller, safer, and easier to build than their predecessors. This trend is strengthened by the recent nuclear energy deal signed by Oklo with the U.S. Air Force. The DoD picked Oklo to provide clean power to its Eielson Base in Alaska.
Nuclear 2.0: Why TerraPower Could Lead the Charge
TerraPower’s Natrium reactor represents a bold and practical approach to clean energy. Backed by private tech investors like Nvidia and federal agencies, the company is creating a new nuclear power model. This model is safe, adaptable, and meets today’s energy needs.
If the company can deliver on its promise, Natrium may become a blueprint for the future of nuclear power: compact, clean, and ready for the 21st century.
The post Nvidia Invests in Bill Gates’ TerraPower, Which Closes $650M for Its Natrium Reactor appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

