Microsoft has teamed up with Vaulted Deep to eliminate millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO₂), one of the largest deals made in the sector. They will use a special carbon removal technology that injects organic waste deep underground. This infrastructure approach seeks to store carbon permanently while also addressing waste management issues throughout the United States.
Let’s examine in depth how this technology offers a promising solution in tackling carbon emissions and what the details are involved in the partnership.
Beneath the Surface: Vaulted Deep’s Carbon Capture Tech
Vaulted Deep captures CO₂ by redirecting organic waste away from disposal methods. This includes landfilling, incineration, or land application. The waste is injected deep underground into basalt rock formations, where it breaks down slowly.
Carbon minerals form during this process and trap carbon for thousands of years. This effectively removes it from the atmosphere permanently.
To date, Vaulted has removed nearly 18,000 tonnes of CO₂ and diverted more than 69,000 tonnes of organic waste from surface disposal. Their carbon removal methodology is certified by the carbon registry Isometric.
The certification promises over 1,000 years of carbon storage durability. It ensures that every carbon credit issued stands for a scientifically validated tonne of permanent CO₂ removal.
For every tonne of CO₂ the company sequesters, it releases just 0.05 tonnes of CO₂. This efficiency rate, verified by Isometric, is among the best in the industry.
The company’s technology has been operating safely since 2008 and is approved and permitted in multiple U.S. states. For example, in Los Angeles, Vaulted has processed about 20% of the city’s biosolids for over 15 years. In Kansas, Vaulted oversees 75% of biosolids for Derby.
The company also works with local farmers to handle extra manure. This manure often causes nutrient runoff and odor. Plus, it helps sequester carbon underground.
Economic and Environmental Impact of Vaulted’s Technology
Vaulted’s Great Plains site in Kansas illustrates the combined environmental and economic benefits of this approach. Within its first 18 months, the facility created 18 full-time local jobs and generated more than $5 million in economic investment.
Vaulted’s technology turns tough organic waste into a resource for carbon capture. This process cuts down greenhouse gas emissions from regular waste management. At the same time, it helps solve environmental issues such as nutrient pollution and unpleasant odors associated with organic waste.
According to industry estimates, the U.S. produces about 200 million tons of organic waste every year. This includes food scraps, yard clippings, and paper products. Sadly, most of this waste ends up in landfills. Only around one-third is turned into useful compost or energy.
Reducing organic waste is important to protect the environment. This is a big opportunity to help fight climate change, and where Vaulted Deep technology comes in. Vaulted is looking for new waste partners in different sectors to expand its reach and boost carbon removal efforts.
Power Partnership: Microsoft’s Drive to Scale Impact
Microsoft’s recent investment supports Vaulted Deep in scaling operations with an ambitious goal to remove approximately 4.9 million tonnes of CO₂ over the next 12 years. The partnership will aim to expand site capabilities. It will also build new relationships with waste suppliers from agriculture, municipalities, and manufacturing.
Brian Marrs, Senior Director of Energy and Carbon Removal at Microsoft, noted:
“Vaulted Deep provides a differentiated, scalable approach to permanent carbon removal with low technology risk. Its work delivers immediate climate benefits while stimulating local economies and addresses long-standing environmental challenges that communities face every day. We support this solution as part of our broader effort to accelerate durable, high-integrity carbon removal.”
Microsoft’s Growing Commitment to Carbon Removal
Microsoft is working hard to grow its carbon dioxide removal options. The ech giant aims to be carbon negative by 2030. In 2024, the company secured long-term deals for almost 22 million metric tons of carbon removal credits. This amount surpasses the total from all prior years combined.
Their CDR contracts include various technologies. These include biochar, direct air capture, soil carbon sequestration, and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS).
One of the biggest CDR deals Microsoft made is made Exomad Green. This agreement is the largest biochar carbon removal deal ever. It will last for over a decade. The plan aims to sequester at least 1.24 million tons of CO₂. They will do this by turning crop waste and woody debris into stable charcoal-like carbon.
Moreover, Microsoft signed a record contract with Fidelis’ company AtmosClear. They will remove 6.75 million metric tons of CO₂ over 15 years. This will use BECCS technology.
Microsoft also works with Carbon Direct, a science-based carbon management group. Together, they set strict quality standards for carbon removals. They released the 2025 Criteria for High-Quality Carbon Dioxide Removal. This sets clear standards for various removal methods. The focus is on durability, social and environmental benefits, and transparency.
Microsoft follows a “do our best and remove the rest” approach. This means they aim for strong emissions cuts while also backing new, trustworthy carbon removal methods. The company is tackling rising energy demands from AI. It is investing a lot in carbon offset and removal to meet its net-zero goals.
Carbon Credits and Market Boom: The CDR Opportunity
The market for carbon dioxide removal is growing fast. Governments and businesses are pushing for net-zero emissions targets. Durable carbon removal methods are gaining interest, and Vaulted Deep’s underground storage is one example. These methods have a lasting impact.
Analysts say the durable CDR credit market will grow at a rate of 38% each year from 2025 to 2035. By 2035, it could reach around $14 billion. Other research forecasts the broader CDR industry could generate between $650 million and $3 billion by 2034.
This growth shows that more people want verified carbon credits. These credits promise permanent removal and follow strict environmental standards.
Microsoft and other big companies are investing in carbon removal technologies. These include direct air capture and reforestation, but solutions that use natural waste streams are seen as very promising.
Challenges in Scaling and the Road Ahead for CDR
Although promising, carbon removal at scale comes with challenges. Infrastructure investments are significant. Monitoring carbon permanence for centuries needs advanced technology and clear reporting. Moreover, collecting organic waste from different sources is tricky. It also involves transporting it to sequestration sites.
However, Vaulted Deep’s proven track record and ongoing expansion provide a positive blueprint for growth. Partnering with big companies like Microsoft gives them the cash and market access to speed up deployment.
In response to the CarbonCredits team queries, Bryan Epps, Head of Commercialization at Vaulted, shared the following:
Q: Given that Vaulted Deep’s process involves injecting organic waste deep underground for carbon sequestration, how do you ensure the long-term monitoring and verification of carbon permanence over the 1,000+ year timescale you mention, and how might this scalability model differ as you expand to new U.S. sites under the Microsoft agreement?
A: “Vaulted Deep’s permanence is independently verified by Isometric, our third-party carbon registry and MRV partner. Isometric’s Biomass Geological Storage protocol is purpose-built to evaluate geologic storage durability, and it requires rigorous site-specific modeling and lifecycle emissions accounting for every tonne of removal.
All of Vaulted’s sites are engineered for long-term containment based on each area’s unique geology, drawing on decades of best practices from industrial underground injection.
As we scale under the Microsoft agreement, these protocols carry forward. Each new site undergoes its own geologic validation, regulatory review, and third-party audit to ensure durable, verifiable sequestration.
Across all site types, Vaulted mitigates key risks to permanence (e.g., wellbore failure, migration through confining layers, methane re-emissions) through conservative injection design, site-specific modeling, and continuous subsurface monitoring.”
Q: Microsoft’s investment supports the removal of nearly 4.9 million tonnes of CO2 over 12 years—what are the key challenges Vaulted Deep anticipates in integrating your carbon removal solution across diverse waste streams from municipalities, industry, and agriculture, and how do you see this infrastructure-based approach complementing emerging technologies like direct air capture in the broader carbon removal ecosystem?
A: “Vaulted’s model is built around flexible waste management infrastructure. Our patented slurry injection technology can accept a wide range of organic wastes—from biosolids and manure to paper sludge and ag residues—many of which are too wet, contaminated, or variable for most other BiCRS or BECCS systems to handle.
The core challenge is ensuring each stream meets our standards for safety, flowability, and carbon density. To manage that, we’ve developed a rigorous waste qualification protocol, informed by real-world R&D at our Kansas site. Every waste stream is tested and optimized for injection performance, emissions profile, and net carbon value. This allows us to expand across industries and geographies while keeping MRV and environmental safety fully intact.
Our infrastructure-based approach doesn’t compete with direct air capture; it complements it. Vaulted addresses a different part of the problem: capturing and permanently storing biogenic carbon that’s already circulating in the economy, while eliminating pollutants in the process.
As the CDR ecosystem matures, we’ll need a portfolio of solutions: some pulling carbon from the atmosphere, others preventing it from ever reaching it. Our work focuses on the latter, with the added benefit of solving urgent waste and contaminant challenges for communities today.”
By combining climate impact with economic benefits for local communities, Vaulted Deep is positioned to be a key player in building an effective, durable carbon removal infrastructure in the United States.
FURTHER READING: Carbon Removal in 2025: Are You Investing in the Right Climate Credits?
The post Microsoft (MSFT Stock) and Vaulted Deep Team Up to Unlock Almost 5M Ton of Carbon Removal from Organic Waste appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
State of the climate: Rapidly developing El Niño raises chance of record-warm 2026
Great Barrier Reef still in hot water, nature law critical for reef’s future
Earth911 Inspiration: Nature Is Not a Place To Visit. It Is Home.
-
Greenhouse Gases12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change12 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测