On September 9, 2025, the gold price set a new all-time high with an intraday peak of $3,671.38 per ounce. The rally shows strong investor demand. It also reflects rising geopolitical tensions and record central bank purchases.
At the same time, the gold industry is undergoing a transformation. Mining companies are committing to renewable energy, carbon reduction, and net-zero targets. Together, record prices and sustainability strategies are reshaping how gold is valued by both investors and communities.
Why Gold Price Today Reaches Historic Levels
Gold’s role as a safe-haven asset has been reinforced by global economic uncertainty. Inflation, supply chain issues, and conflicts have led investors to seek safety in gold. At $3,671/oz, prices are up more than 20% since the start of 2025.

Central banks have played a major role. In 2024, they bought more than 1,050 metric tons of gold, the second-largest annual increase ever recorded.
China, India, and Turkey led the purchases as part of their strategy to diversify away from the U.S. dollar. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) also recorded a rebound, with inflows of $6.8 billion in the first half of 2025.
Retail demand is strong, even with high prices. This is especially true in India and China, where jewelry makes up a big part of what people buy.
The gold price surge reflects more than short-term speculation. At a glance, here are the structural trends that support gold’s long-term appeal:
-
Currency diversification: Central banks are reducing reliance on the U.S. dollar, boosting demand for gold reserves.
-
Inflation hedge: With global inflation averaging 4.7% in 2024, gold continues to act as a store of value.
-
Geopolitical risk: From conflicts in Eastern Europe to supply chain disruptions, gold offers security in times of instability.
Analysts suggest that if these conditions continue, gold could rise toward $3,800 per ounce by the end of the year. While prices climb, the gold mining industry faces a major sustainability challenge.
The Carbon Footprint of Gold Mining
Gold production is energy-intensive, often relying on fossil fuels for power and processing. According to the World Gold Council (WGC), here are some facts about gold emissions:
-
The average emissions intensity of gold mining is ~0.9 metric tons of CO₂ per ounce of gold produced.
-
Gold mining accounts for roughly 0.3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a significant share for one sector.
-
Electricity and diesel fuel make up more than 80% of mining-related emissions.

These numbers highlight the importance of industry-wide decarbonization efforts. Without action, rising production could undermine global climate goals. Let’s get to know the top gold companies promoting sustainable mining.
Gold Miners Expanding ESG and Net-Zero Efforts
Several leading gold companies have committed to aggressive climate goals. Below is a closer look at how the biggest players are progressing.
Newmont Corporation
As the world’s largest gold miner, Newmont has pledged to reach net zero by 2050. The company reduced Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 6% in 2024, thanks to a mix of renewable power agreements and efficiency upgrades. Boddington mine in Australia and Peñasquito mine in Mexico are switching to solar and wind energy.
Newmont has also invested in battery-electric haul trucks to replace diesel fleets. By 2030, Newmont aims to cut absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 32% and Scope 3 emissions by 30% compared to 2018 levels.
IAMGOLD
The Canadian miner has also made significant strides. Its Côté Gold mine in Ontario is powered primarily by hydropower, giving it net-zero Scope 2 emissions.
IAMGOLD aims to cut emissions intensity by 30% by 2030. They are also testing electric equipment in North America. Beyond emissions, IAMGOLD has invested in water conservation and biodiversity projects, positioning itself as a leader in responsible mining.
B2Gold
B2Gold has been recognized for its bold renewable energy strategy in Africa. The company built a 7 MW solar power plant at the Fekola mine in Mali, which reduces diesel use by 13 million liters annually. This saves about 39,000 tons of CO₂ emissions every year.
B2Gold is evaluating hydrogen pilot projects. They are also expanding solar infrastructure at other sites. Their goal is to cut emissions intensity by 30% across all operations in the next decade.
Nova Minerals
Based in Australia, Nova Minerals is exploring some of the most advanced decarbonization technologies in the sector. It is testing green hydrogen systems to power off-grid mining operations. It is also looking into carbon capture options in mine waste.
These steps aim not only to reduce emissions but also to position the company as an innovator in low-carbon mining solutions. Nova has announced plans to achieve carbon neutrality by 2035, earlier than most of its peers.
Gold Fields
Gold Fields, headquartered in South Africa, has set a net-zero by 2050 goal with interim targets to reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 30% by 2030. The company is already producing tangible results.
At its South Deep mine in South Africa, it installed 40 MW of solar capacity, supplying about 25% of the site’s power needs. Across its global operations, Gold Fields’ renewable projects prevent an estimated 250,000 tons of CO₂ annually.
Together, these initiatives show how miners are transforming their business models to meet climate goals. Importantly, they also lower operating costs by reducing dependence on volatile fossil fuel prices.
The Gold Industry’s Green Makeover
Beyond individual companies, the entire gold sector is moving toward sustainability. The World Gold Council’s “Net Zero by 2050” framework guides miners. It emphasizes using renewable energy, electrification, and engaging the supply chain.

By 2024, about 35% of electricity used by the gold industry came from renewables, up from 15% in 2019. Carbon credits are also becoming part of the transition. Many miners buy top-notch forestry and renewable energy offsets. They do this to balance emissions they can’t eliminate yet.
If current trends continue, the WGC projects that the sector could reduce total emissions by 30–40% by 2035, with deeper cuts possible through new technologies.
Soaring gold price is boosting revenues, but investors are increasingly focused on ESG credentials. A 2025 MSCI survey found that 72% of institutional investors consider ESG performance when evaluating mining companies. This is especially relevant as ESG-focused funds are projected to manage over $50 trillion globally by 2030.
For miners, this means profitability is no longer enough. Companies that show strong sustainability progress are more likely to secure financing and attract long-term investors. This dual focus—financial strength and ESG performance—will shape the industry’s outlook in the coming decade.
Gold’s Future: Shining Brighter, Greener, and Pricier
The future of gold is being shaped by two powerful forces: market momentum and sustainability. On one hand, record demand and central bank purchases are pushing gold prices higher, with forecasts pointing to $3,800/oz by the end of 2025.
On the other hand, the industry is undergoing a deep transformation. From Newmont’s electrified fleets to B2Gold’s solar-powered mines, gold companies are proving that it is possible to align profitability with climate responsibility. These moves not only reduce emissions but also make operations more resilient and cost-efficient.
The gold price today at $3,671 per ounce is a milestone for the industry, but the bigger story lies in how miners are responding to climate pressures. With carbon-intensive operations under scrutiny, leading companies are committing to ambitious net-zero goals and rolling out renewable energy projects across the globe.
For investors and policymakers alike, gold’s future will be measured not just in ounces and dollars, but in how sustainably those ounces are produced. In this sense, the industry is writing a new chapter—one where gold shines both as a financial safe haven and as a driver of responsible growth.
The post Gold Price Today Surges to All-Time High at $3,671 as Miners Push ESG and Carbon Reduction Goals appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business
Key takeaways
- SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
- Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
- The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
- Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
- Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.
Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.
However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.
In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.
How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?
SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.
Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.
What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.
| Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings | Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation |
|---|---|
| Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises | Focus on short-term climate progress |
| Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules | Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning |
| We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check | Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits |
What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?
Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.
The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.
Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.
| Old Net Zero Standard | New Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|
| Grounded in net-zero by 2050 | Grounded in net-zero by 2050 |
| Climate leadership is reducing emissions | Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions |
| Make a long-term commitment to net-zero | Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles |
| Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal |
|
| Businesses who fall behind targets lose status |
|
| Ignores voluntary carbon projects |
|
When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?
Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).
Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.
What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?
The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.
Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.
Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.
How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.
- Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
- Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
- Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.
How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:
- Reducing electricity consumption,
- Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
- Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.
V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.
The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.
The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.
How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?
Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.
Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.
Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:
- An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
- An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
- A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.
What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?
This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.
The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.
- Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
- Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
- Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.
Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.
Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.
How must companies neutralize residual emissions?
At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.
What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?
Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.
- Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
- Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
- Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.
How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard
As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.
We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.
FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision
What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?
It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.
What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?
The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.
When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?
If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.
Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?
They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.
What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?
Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.
What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?
Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.
Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.
The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD
For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable
A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?
![]()
-
Climate Change11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy9 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

