Connect with us

Published

on

plastic pollution

Plastic pollution is one of the greatest environmental challenges facing the world today. As per Verra, every year, more than 430 million tons of plastic are produced, and nearly two-thirds of this ends up as waste—dumped, burned, or abandoned in open spaces, rivers, and oceans.

Without significant intervention, global plastic waste is projected to triple by 2060, threatening ecosystems, economies, and communities alike. Thus, plastic credits are becoming essential tools in sustainable development strategies, particularly in emerging markets.

Let’s start with a quick look at what plastic credits are and how they help tackle the global plastic crisis.

What Are Plastic Credits and How Do They Work?

Plastic credits are a way to tackle plastic pollution through the market. Individuals and organisations can buy these credits to balance out the amount of plastic they use. The money from these purchases helps fund projects that collect, recycle, or reuse plastic waste—keeping it out of oceans, landfills, and the environment.

This system encourages people and businesses to cut back on plastic use while supporting waste recovery efforts both locally and globally.

This video further explains plastic credits:

How Are Plastic Credits Created?

Plastic credits are only given for plastic waste that would have harmed the environment if it hadn’t been collected. Projects working with credit organizations gather plastic waste and recycle or process it using methods like:

  • Mechanical recycling

  • Advanced recycling

  • Reprocessing

  • Co-processing

For every extra kilogram of plastic that is recycled or recovered, a certified plastic credit is issued. These credits are checked through records and audits to make sure the plastic waste would have otherwise ended up in the environment without the project’s help.

Moving on to Verra, its globally recognized standards-setting organization ensures credibility, transparency, and impact of plastic credit programs.

This article explores how Verra’s Plastic Waste Reduction Program is transforming waste management, strengthening Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) systems, and helping countries and businesses alike combat plastic pollution through verified, high-integrity plastic credits.

plastic pollution

Why Verra’s Work Is Key to Ending the Global Plastic Problem

Plastic pollution has long been a global concern, but its impact is particularly acute in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs). These regions face critical gaps in waste management infrastructure, financing, and regulation, which hinder their ability to collect and effectively recycle plastic waste.

Some key challenges include:

  • Lack of collection and recycling infrastructure

  • Funding shortages and limited private investment

  • Weak legal and regulatory frameworks

  • Underrepresentation of informal waste workers

  • Reliance on open dumping and burning of waste

These challenges make it difficult to reduce plastic pollution without external support, technological innovation, and robust governance frameworks.

And in the plastic sector, Verra is leading by creating a global framework for plastic credits that drives waste reduction, community support, and sustainable growth. Its results-based financing channels investments into projects with proven impact, building a cycle of trust and long-term environmental solutions.

Unlocking Verra’s Plastic Waste Reduction Standard

Verra’s EPR Discussion Paper states that its Plastic Waste Reduction Standard is the key to its plastic credit program. It offers a transparent, science-based methodology for tracking and certifying plastic waste recovery, ensuring that projects create real, measurable impact.

The standard is built on four foundational pillars:

1. Measurability and Transparency

Verra’s methodology makes projects document every step of waste collection and recycling. Projects track waste sources, volumes, and weights. They record management practices and verify the chain of custody from collection to recycling.

All data is accessible and traceable. This helps governments, funders, and consumers confidently assess project performance.

2. Impact Verification

Verra requires third-party auditors to validate the waste collection and recycling claims made by projects. These audits confirm that plastic waste would otherwise have been lost to the environment and that the recovery efforts are additional, meaning they would not have occurred without the project’s intervention.

The verification process safeguards against inflated reporting and helps maintain trust in the plastic credit system.

3. Social and Environmental Safeguards

Plastic waste projects often involve communities that rely on informal waste collection for their livelihoods. Verra integrates safeguards to ensure that projects:

  • Uphold human rights and provide fair compensation

  • Offer safe working conditions

  • Respect local environmental and social concerns

By aligning sustainability goals with community development, Verra ensures that projects generate benefits beyond just waste reduction.

4. Market Access and Financing

Verra’s certification enables projects to access both voluntary and regulatory markets. This creates investment opportunities for businesses aiming to offset their plastic footprint while supporting high-impact waste management efforts globally.

How Verra Supports Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Systems

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a policy tool that shifts the financial and environmental responsibility for plastic waste from governments to producers. Effective EPR frameworks incentivize companies to design recyclable products, invest in waste management infrastructure, and reduce their overall plastic consumption.

However, developing EPR systems is challenging, especially in countries with limited resources. Verra helps strengthen EPR systems across three phases:

Phase I – Initiation

During this phase, governments explore EPR as a policy tool and begin building legal frameworks. Verra’s methodologies help producers understand the measurable impacts of waste management, providing data that informs policymaking.

Phase II – Transition

This phase focuses on implementing enforceable regulations and aligning stakeholders. Verra’s third-party audits and reporting tools ensure that data collection is transparent, helping build trust in the early stages of regulation.

Phase III – Maturity

In mature systems, EPR frameworks are fully operational, with clearly defined regulations and robust monitoring mechanisms. Verra’s certifications support scaling waste management solutions by providing financing options and ensuring compliance with international standards.

By integrating plastic credits into EPR systems, Verra helps governments and companies build resilient waste management infrastructures while promoting accountability and innovation.

plastic credits Verra
Source: Verra

Making Every Ton Count: Financing Change with Plastic Credits

Plastic credits are only as effective as the financing structures behind them. Verra’s program helps mobilize investments from both public and private sectors, ensuring that projects receive the support they need to scale operations.

Key ways Verra enables financing include:

Bridging Funding Gaps

Plastic credit markets channel investments into waste collection and recycling projects that would otherwise lack access to funding. This is especially important in regions where waste management is underfunded and informal labor plays a significant role.

Results-Based Incentives

By issuing credits only after verified waste recovery, Verra ensures that funds are aligned with real-world impact. Investors and governments alike can be confident that their contributions lead to measurable improvements.

Promoting Innovation

Verra’s framework encourages the development of new recycling technologies, supply chain management tools, and data tracking solutions, helping to modernize waste management practices across sectors.

Encouraging Circular Economy Models

With verified credits, recycled plastic becomes a more valuable commodity, attracting demand and promoting the reuse of materials within production cycles. This supports long-term sustainability and reduces reliance on virgin plastics.

Verra’s Impact Across the Globe

Verra
Source: Data from Verra

Challenges and the Way Forward

While Verra’s plastic credit program offers promising solutions, challenges remain:

  • Data Quality: Accurate measurement and reporting remain difficult, especially in regions lacking infrastructure.

  • Risk of Misuse: Without strict regulation, companies might offset plastic usage without reducing consumption.

  • Funding Constraints: Infrastructure development requires significant capital, particularly in developing regions.

  • Inclusion of Informal Workers: Waste collection often depends on informal labor sectors, which require support and integration into formal systems.

However, Verra is actively working to address these challenges by promoting rigorous third-party audits, encouraging governments to adopt transparent frameworks, supporting inclusive policies that empower communities, and collaborating with global financial institutions to expand investment flows.

Global plastic waste generation: Management Vs Mismanagement

plastic waste generation report
Source: Plastic Overshoot 2025 Report

The Plastic Credit Market: Growing Demand and Opportunities

Industry report says, the global plastic credit market, valued at US$462 million in 2024, is projected to reach US$1790 million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 23.6%. This surge is driven by increasing environmental awareness, regulatory frameworks, and consumer expectations.

Other key players include PCX, rePurpose Global, Empower, Plastic Bank, Ecoex, TONTOTON, Waste4Change, Ampliphi, GemCorp, and OceanWorks.

plastic credit market size
Source: Valuates

As read and studied, Verra’s Plastic Waste Reduction Program plays a pivotal role in ensuring that these efforts are credible, verifiable, and impactful. Last but not least, as plastic pollution worsens, Verra leads with accountability and innovation, turning waste into opportunity and responsibility into lasting action.

The post The Power of Plastic Credits: How Verra’s Waste Reduction Program Can End Global Plastic Pollution appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Want a simpler way to buy carbon credits? Discover our carbon marketplace

Published

on

Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Climate-Linked Supply Chain Risk Is Already in Your P&L

Published

on

The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.

Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.

Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.

You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.

Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings

The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.

Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.

Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.

What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.

The three commodity exposures that hit margin first

For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.

  • Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
  • Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
  • Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.

TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes

The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.

For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.

The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.

What procurement and finance can do now

Three actions matter near-term.

Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.

Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.

Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.

Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.

If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Where should an SME start with a carbon action plan?

Published

on

More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com