With this blog post, we would like to introduce and launch our new cooperation with FYORD! FYORD is a joint network by CAU and GEOMAR initiated to connect and support Early Career Researchers of the marine sciences from Master’s to PostDoc level. After occasional exchanges in the past (see our blog here), we are very happy to establish a closer, long-term cooperation with FYORD.
One example of the support provided by FYORD is the Travel Grant. Any FYORD member can apply for funding to travel to conferences, workshops, and summer schools, or visit project partners or institutes. After returning from a funded trip, the FYORD members provide a short report about the event they participated in, to inspire and motivate others and share their experiences. As part of the newly established cooperation, OceanVoices will publish these reports on behalf of FYORD. Below you can find the first two reports, where Helene, Sayoni, and Xiaoqi share their experiences at the largest European geoscientific conference. Enjoy!
My experience of participating in the EGU assembly for the first time
I am Xiaoqi Xu, an exchange PhD student in GEOMAR, from the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. My major is meteorology, and my research is about the atmosphere-ocean-sea ice interaction over the Southern Ocean as well as the development of an ocean-sea ice coupled model.
Since starting my PhD studies, I have believed that academic communication is a crucial part of scientific research. With the scholarship supported by the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, I had an opportunity to go to GEOMAR for a one-year exchange program. Under the guidance of Torge Martin, a scientist in the Ocean Dynamics group in GEOMAR, I am studying the mechanism of the atmospheric response to freshwater input around Antarctica based on FOCI (the fully coupled climate model developed by GEOMAR).
I am delighted to have received funding from FYORD and was pleasantly surprised that guest students like me are eligible for the same benefits. I applied for funding to participate in the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU). EGU General Assembly is a fantastic event in the geoscience community, held annually in Vienna. This year, the conference featured 18,896 presentations, with early-career scientists accounting for 57%, making it an excellent platform for young researchers. Six months before the conference, I decided to organize my research with Torge and present it at this international event to promote our work. Since we didn’t have project funding related to this topic at the time, I learned about FYORD and applied for funding with the help and advice of colleagues, receiving a positive response quickly, which was a pleasant surprise.
-

Xiaoqi Xu giving her talk -

A crowded meeting room -

The exhibition hall
A month before the conference, I spent a lot of time and effort perfecting my presentation. The EGU venue is vast, with a lot of sessions and a tight schedule, so to attend the talks of interest, it’s essential to plan and bookmark them in advance. I gave an 8-minute oral presentation (plus 2 minutes for discussion), requiring careful management of my content due to the time constraints. Oral presentations provide an opportunity to systematically convey my research and enhance my presentation skills. For researchers, it’s crucial not only to conduct research but also to articulate it logically.
In addition to oral presentations, the poster sessions were a pleasant surprise for me because they allowed for more extended discussions (1-2 hours) with other scientists in similar fields. If given the chance, I would consider presenting a poster in the future.
During the conference, my days were filled with attending talks and visiting the poster sessions, where I could chat over coffee. This intense exchange of ideas, both giving and receiving, is a highlight. Although we cannot remember every detail of each talk, the main goal of such conferences is to know about what scientists worldwide are working on and what improvements are needed. Additionally, it’s a large social platform where you can meet your old friends, make new ones, and learn about various institutions, which can help in future career decisions.
The overall experience of the conference was very positive, and the venue was modern and well-organized. I highly recommend attending EGU. Of course, one small gripe is that lunchtime can be extremely crowded, with lines for food stalls exceeding 40 minutes, so bringing your own lunch might be a good idea to avoid missing out on sessions.
Xiaoqi Xu
Sayoni’s experience at EGU 2024
Hello, I am Sayoni Bhattacharya and I am currently working as a Ph.D. student in GEOMAR, Kiel. My topic of research is to develop an autonomous sensor for measuring Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) in seawater.
I applied for a travel grant from FYORD to attend the EGU 2024 conference. The conference was held in Vienna, Austria from 14-19th April 2024. EGU is considered one of the biggest conferences in Europe in the field of Earth Science. According to this year’s survey, almost 20,000 people attended from all over the world. EGU is a successful concoction of ocean, land, and space science, where curious scientists can develop a network with peers from similar expertise, or they can expose themselves to other genres of science to get a new flavour. There were parallel sessions of talks and posters for consecutive days. With the help of the EGU24 app, a curious person can navigate through all the sessions and choose to attend specific sessions. Moreover, several companies, and publishing houses e.g., Pyroscience, ThermoScientific, and Elsevier showcased their products in company booths. I was particularly interested in sensors which were commercially available to measure gases or liquids using different working principles.
-

Sayoni at EGU 2024 -

Discussion research during the poster session
In EGU 2024, I applied for a short talk but in the end, my abstract was selected for a poster presentation and I presented my Ph.D.-related work. I communicated with many scientists, from early career scientists like myself to well-known professors. In each interaction, I felt that I explored a new way of thinking about my own work and I can translate that idea to my next discussion. I felt that the poster sessions were more active and dynamic than talks.
My overall feeling about EGU 2024 is bittersweet. I like the idea of connecting scientists of different backgrounds from any corner of the world and making it a successful event without any visible problems. On the other hand, it felt robotic, as from getting the ID badge to hovering around a session is all done without any human interaction. Finally, from my very personal feeling, I would like to say that the cost to attend EGU is very expensive and no food was served (except for drinks at a few specific times).
Sayoni Bhattacharya
A short report on visiting Europe’s largest geoscience conference
My name is Helene-Sophie Hilbert and I am a doctoral researcher at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. My research belongs to the field of marine geophysics, a discipline which studies the physical processes and the physical properties of the Earth within the marine environment. My main work focuses on the back-arc basin and active volcanic island arc in the Mariana Subduction zone in the north-western Pacific. I am fascinated by these geologic settings because they are regarded as highly dynamic regions encompassing oceanic and continental domains. While island arcs are considered prime locations for the growth of continental crust, back-arc basins play a major role in the opening and closure of ocean gateways. To gain information about the structures in the crust and upper mantle in the Marianas, I use ocean bottom seismometers that record seismic signals on the seafloor and analyse these signals by generating a seismic tomography (a bit more abstract version of computer tomography, you may know from your doctor).
-

Some FYORD travel grand recipients -

Helene presenting her Poster
From 14-19 April 2024, I now had the opportunity to present my research about the youngest back-arc basin, the Mariana Trough, at the European Geoscience Union (EGU) General Assembly in Vienna. The EGU General Assembly is Europe’s largest and most prominent geoscience event with more than 20,000 participants this year from all over the world. I presented my research results in the form of a scientific poster in a session focusing on the geological processes inside subduction zones during their initiation and later evolution. This presentation format gave me the chance to have in-depth discussions with other experts on the individual aspects of my interpretation. Due to the nearly 19,000 presentations during the EGU General Assembly, it was possible to get a wide overview of the current hot topics in the geoscience community and to meet scientists from all kinds of disciplines and institutes. Although the programme was very tightly scheduled, there was still plenty of time for networking. For me personally, it was quite extraordinary and sometimes overwhelming due to the sheer flood of information. But I would still recommend to every geoscientist to have this experience and benefit from the direct exchange with the community. I am therefore grateful that I was given this opportunity thanks to the support in the form of the FYORD Travel Grant.
Helene
FYORD Travel Grant Reports: Impressions from the largest European geoscientific conference
Ocean Acidification
Between Storms and Science: Easter in the Labrador Sea (04.04.26–13.04.26)
Between all the scientific work, we celebrated Easter on board, although the weather had other plans for us. Due to rough conditions, we weren’t able to carry out any CTD casts.

Easter itself was spent in a mix of rest and small celebrations. Some of us enjoyed a long Easter breakfast with traditional Easter bread, while others took the opportunity to sleep in. In the evening, we gathered with both crew and scientists for a small celebration. The ship’s cook even organized a quiz, and those who answered correctly were rewarded with Easter chocolate.
The next day, the weather improved, and we began early with the recovery of K1, a 3,495-meter-long mooring in the middle of the Labrador Sea.
We joined the nautical officers on the bridge before sunrise to search for it. Fortunately, K1 has a floating buoy with a light, so we were able to spot it even in the dark. The actual recovery started at first light, and it began to snow while we were working.


Amid all the CTDs and mooring operations, there was also a personal highlight: my (Sarah’s) birthday. Although I’ve spent birthdays away from home before, this one felt especially unique, being so far out at sea, with only limited internet contact.
Normally, I work the 4-8 shift, but my incredibly kind shift team gave me the morning off. That meant I could sleep in and even find time to call family and friends back home. In the afternoon, I was surprised with my favourite cake, baked by Julia.
Our work continued with the mooring array at 53°N, which consists of seven moorings. So far, we have recovered five (K7, K8, K9, DSOW1 and DSOW2), and three of them have already been redeployed (K7, K8 and DSOW1,).
Deploying K7 turned out to be particularly tricky. On our first attempt, sea ice drifted toward us faster than expected, forcing us to recover nearly half of the mooring again. While the ship itself can handle drifting ice, deploying a mooring is much more delicate: a long cable with instruments and floats is released behind the ship before the anchor is dropped, allowing the system to sink into place.
Two days later, we tried again and this time, the deployment was successful.

Afterwards, we moved closer to the sea ice, which was a highlight for many of us. Seeing the ice up close and even spotting a seal swimming nearby, made the experience unforgettable.


Due to the continuing harsh weather, the decision was made to return to K1 and make use of an upcoming weather window for deployment the following day.
German:
Zwischen Stürmen und Wissenschaft: Ostern in der Labradorsee (04.04.26 – 13.04.26)
Zwischen all der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit haben wir Ostern an Bord gefeiert, auch wenn das Wetter andere Pläne für uns hatte. Aufgrund der rauen Bedingungen konnten wir keine CTD-Messungen durchführen (Messungen von Leitfähigkeit, Temperatur und Tiefe im Ozean).

Ostern selbst war eine Mischung aus Erholung und kleinen Feierlichkeiten. Einige von uns genossen ein ausgedehntes Osterfrühstück mit traditionellem Osterbrot, während andere die Gelegenheit nutzten, etwas länger zu schlafen. Am Abend kamen Crew und Wissenschaftler*innen zu einer kleinen Feier zusammen. Der Koch organisierte sogar ein Quiz, und wer die Fragen richtig beantwortete, wurde mit Oster-Schokolade belohnt.
Am nächsten Tag besserte sich das Wetter, und wir begannen früh mit der Bergung von K1, einer 3.495 Meter langen Verankerung mitten in der Labradorsee. (Eine Verankerung ist eine lange, am Meeresboden befestigter Draht, der mit Instrumenten ausgestattet ist, um über längere Zeit Ozeandaten zu messen.)
Noch vor Sonnenaufgang gingen wir mit den nautischen Offizieren auf die Brücke, um nach ihr Ausschau zu halten. Glücklicherweise verfügt K1 über eine schwimmende Boje mit Licht, sodass wir sie bereits im Dunkeln entdecken konnten. Die eigentliche Bergung begann bei Tagesanbruch und es begann sogar zu schneien.


Zwischen all den CTD-Einsätzen und Verankerungsarbeiten gab es auch ein persönliches Highlight: meinen (Sarahs) Geburtstag. Obwohl ich schon öfter Geburtstage fernab von zu Hause verbracht habe, war dieser besonders, so weit draußen auf dem Meer und mit nur eingeschränktem Internetkontakt.
Normalerweise arbeite ich in der 4-8 Uhr Schicht, aber mein unglaublich nettes Schichtteam hat mir den Morgendienst freigegeben. So konnte ich etwas länger schlafen und hatte sogar Zeit, mit Familie und Freunden zu Hause zu telefonieren. Am Nachmittag wurde ich dann noch mit meinem Lieblingskuchen überrascht, den Julia für mich gebacken hat.
Unsere Arbeit ging weiter mit dem Verankerungs-Array bei 53°, das aus sieben Verankerungen besteht. Bisher haben wir fünf geborgen (DSOW1, DSOW2, K7, K8 und K9), von denen drei bereits wieder ausgebracht wurden (DSOW1, K7 und K8).
Das Ausbringen von K7 erwies sich als besonders schwierig. Beim ersten Versuch trieb das Meereis schneller auf uns zu als erwartet, sodass wir fast die Hälfte der Verankerung wieder einholen mussten. Obwohl das Schiff selbst gut durch treibendes Eis navigieren kann, ist das Ausbringen einer Verankerung deutlich anspruchsvoller: Dabei wird ein langer Draht mit Messinstrumenten und Auftriebskörpern hinter dem Schiff ausgesetzt, bevor am Ende der Anker gelöst wird und das gesamte System absinkt.
Zwei Tage später versuchten wir es erneut, diesmal mit Erfolg.

Anschließend fuhren wir näher an das Meereis heran, was für viele von uns ein besonderes Highlight war. Das Eis aus nächster Nähe zu sehen und sogar eine Robbe in der Nähe schwimmen zu beobachten, machte das Erlebnis unvergesslich.


Aufgrund der weiterhin rauen Wetterbedingungen wurde schließlich entschieden, zu K1 zurückzukehren, um ein bevorstehendes Wetterfenster für die Ausbringung am nächsten Tag zu nutzen.
Between Storms and Science: Easter in the Labrador Sea (04.04.26–13.04.26)
Ocean Acidification
Humans Just Flew Around the Moon This Week. But Would Babies Born There Ever Truly Feel Gravity? Ask Jellyfish Babies.
This week, NASA’s Artemis II crew made history by flying around the Moon and returning safely to Earth, the first human journey to the Moon’s vicinity in more than 50 years. It was a stunning reminder that humanity is no longer just dreaming about living beyond Earth. We are actively rehearsing for it.
And that leads to a much stranger, deeper question: even if one day we build skyscrapers on the Moon, raise families there, and turn space into a place to live, will babies born away from Earth develop a normal sense of gravity? Or will their bodies learn the universe differently?
To explore that question, NASA once turned to an unexpected stand-in for human babies: jellyfish babies. On the STS-40 mission, scientists sent thousands of tiny jellyfish polyps into space because jellyfish, like humans, rely on gravity-sensing structures to orient themselves. The experiment asked a simple but profound question: if a living body develops in microgravity, will it still know how to handle gravity later?
The answer was both fascinating and unsettling. The jellyfish developed in space in large numbers, but once back under Earth’s gravity, the ones that had developed in microgravity showed far more pulsing abnormalities than the Earth-grown controls. In other words, their bodies formed, but their sense of balance did not seem to work quite the same way.
That is why this old jellyfish experiment still matters today. Before we imagine lunar cities, schools, nurseries, and generations born off-world, we need to ask not only whether humans can survive in space, but whether developing there changes how the body understands something as basic as up, down, and movement. Jellyfish babies cannot tell us everything about human children, but they may have given us one of the first clues that life born beyond Earth might not come home unchanged.

Reference: https://nlsp.nasa.gov/view/lsdapub/lsda_experiment/0c10d660-6b12-573d-8c3b-e20e071aed3b
Image: GEOMAR, Sarah Uphoff
Ocean Acidification
First Week of Cruise MSM142 – Into the Labrador Sea
After a slight delay of the Maria S. Merian caused by late-arriving containers our research cruise MSM142 finally got underway. By last Tuesday (24.03.2026), the full scientific team had arrived in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, and the ship reached port on Wednesday (25.03.2026) morning. That same day, scientists and technicians moved on board and immediately began preparations, assembling and testing our instruments. Although the mornings on Wednesday and Thursday were grey and overcast, the afternoons cleared up beautifully. This gave us valuable time to organize equipment on deck and store empty boxes back into the containers before departure.


Given the forecast of harsh conditions outside the fjord, we carried out the mandatory safety drill while still in harbour. This included practicing emergency procedures and boarding the lifeboat. After completing border control, we were finally ready to leave Nuuk. We set sail on March 27th, heading into the Labrador Sea to begin our mission. Even before starting scientific operations, we tested the setup for deploying our gliders without releasing them during the transit out of the fjord. Once we reached open waters, we were met by high waves the following morning. For some on board, this was their first experience under such rough sea conditions. Seasickness quickly became a challenge for a few, while scientific work had to be temporarily postponed due to the strong winds and sea conditions. Together with the crew, we discussed how best to adapt our measurement plans to the given weather conditions. On March 29th, we were finally able to begin our scientific program with the first CTD deployment. A CTD is an instrument used to measure conductivity, temperature, and depth, which are key parameters for understanding ocean structure.


During the following night, we continued with additional CTD stations and successfully recovered two moorings: DSOW 3 and DSOW 4, located south of Greenland. These moorings carry instruments at various depths that measure velocity, temperature, and salinity. DSOW 4 was redeployed on the same day, while DSOW 3 followed the next day. In addition, the bottles attached to the CTD’s rosette can be used to collect water samples from any desired depth. These samples can be used, for example, to determine the oxygen content, nutrient levels, and organic matter.


Both are part of the OSNAP array, a network of moorings spanning the subpolar North Atlantic. On these moorings are a few instruments, for example microcats which measure temperature, pressure and salinity.
We then conducted around 25 CTD stations spaced approximately 3 nautical miles apart across an Irminger ring identified from satellite data. This high-resolution sampling was necessary to capture the structure of an Irminger Ring, which had a radius of about 12 km wide.

The days leading up to April 2nd were marked by very rough weather conditions. Life on board became both challenging and, at times, unintentionally entertaining sliding chairs were not uncommon. During the night from April 1st to April 2nd, winds reached 11 Beaufort with gusts up to 65 knots, forcing us to pause our measurements. Fortunately, conditions improved by morning, allowing us to resume our work. As well as with the help of the crew we had to adapt to the harsh weather conditions to continue our scientific work. On the 3rd of April, we were able to deploy a few gliders and one float. An ocean glider is an autonomous underwater Vehicle, which you can steer remotely and send to different locations, while it is measuring oceanographic key parameters.


This research cruise focuses on understanding small-scale processes in the ocean and their connection to the spring bloom, an essential phase in marine ecosystem in subpolar regions. Despite the challenging start, we have already gathered valuable data and look forward to the weeks ahead in the Labrador Sea.
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
