Humans are deeply responsible for the current climate crisis, and a significant root cause is the nationstate fiction that land and morethanhuman relations can be reduced to “property” to be owned, controlled, and exhausted for profit. This ownership paradigm is inseparable from the Doctrine of Discovery and Terra Nullius, by Church and Crown, which gave moral and legal cover to seize Indigenous lands and suppress Indigenous laws of responsibility and reciprocity with the web of life.
The modern idea that a Crown or state holds “underlying title” to Indigenous lands in Canada flows directly from these doctrines, which treated alreadyinhabited territories as “empty” and available to Christian European empires. In practice, this has allowed Canada to assert ultimate authority over unceded territories, reduce Indigenous Nations to “claimants” on their own lands, and legitimize largescale extraction and dispossession.
This way of thinking has fractured the integrity of land and the broader web of life. When land is seen as property rather than as a living relation, decisions are framed around shortterm economic gain instead of the continuity of waters, soils, plants, animals, and communities. From clearcut logging and fossil fuel expansion to exclusionary conservation, the same logic of unilateral control has fragmented habitats, undermined biodiversity, and disrupted longstanding Indigenous stewardship practices.
For Indigenous Nations, climate change intensifies these harms. Shifting seasons, altered animal migrations, and degraded waters are eroding the conditions for hunting, fishing, trapping, and gathering, and with them, language, ceremony, and landbased teachings. This is not just environmental damage; it is an attack on living Indigenous legal orders that were designed to keep human behaviour accountable to the land.
Politically, the ownership myth entrenches a hierarchy in which the state imagines itself as the final decisionmaker over territories it claims. Indigenous Nations are pushed into endless “consultation,” while absolute authority and benefitsharing rarely shift. Economically, this worldview feeds a growthdriven model in which “wealth” is measured by what can be extracted, privatized, and traded, rather than by the health of ecosystems and communities. Socially and spiritually, it normalizes disconnection from place, where many people experience land as a commodity rather than as a living network to which they belong and are accountable.
Human arrogance thrives in this disconnection. The belief that humans stand above other beings, entitled to engineer, commodify, or sacrifice them for convenience and profit, has opened a climate change Pandora’s box: land turned into property, relations turned into resources, and the garden of life left to rot around us while humanity chooses profits over peace. Our current geopolitical and geoeconomic crises are symptoms of the same disorder, power and control elevated above responsibility and reciprocity.
There is no doubt that human activities, shaped by colonialism, fossil capitalism, and the property mindset, are driving the climate crisis. Yet Indigenous knowledge holders and communities across Turtle Island insist that genuine solutions must be rooted in decolonization, land back, and the restoration of landbased responsibilities and Indigenous selfdetermination. Indigenousled renewable energy projects, landback agreements, and the revitalization of traditional land use practices show it is possible to align livelihoods with the wellbeing of ecosystems instead of their destruction.
This moment demands more than new policies; it calls for a profound shift in worldview. Humans are not owners, but relatives, not masters, but participants in a living treaty with the rest of creation. Moving from ownership to relationship feeling as well as thinking our way back into reciprocity offers one path out of the current crisis.
Householdlevel conversations are an essential place to begin reconciling with Mother Earth. These conversations can ask different questions: Who rather than What is this land to us? What are our responsibilities here? How do our everyday choices, food, energy, transport, investments, and political action support or undermine Indigenousled visions of climate justice? When families and communities begin to live as if land is a relative rather than a possession, the foundations of a different future begin to take root.
Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock
Image Credit: Davey Gravy, Unsplash
The post From Ownership to Relationship: Reclaiming Our Responsibilities to Land appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.
From Ownership to Relationship: Reclaiming Our Responsibilities to Land
Electrification of transportation and the power grid all but require lithium to make batteries—but mining it takes a toll on delicate ecosystems. Still, there are reasons for hope.
From our collaborating partner Living on Earth, public radio’s environmental news magazine, an interview by Paloma Beltran with Thea Riofrancos, the author of “Extraction: The Frontiers of Green Capitalism.”
A new panel of experts, bringing together some of the world’s top climate scientists, has called on governments to develop roadmaps for phasing out fossil fuels “anchored in science and justice”.
Launched on Friday in Santa Marta, Colombia, along with a set of 12 initial policy recommendations, the panel’s appeal came ahead of a key ministerial meeting on equitable ways to reduce dependence on coal, oil and gas during next week’s “First Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels”.
Sixty countries head to Santa Marta to cement coalition for fossil fuel transition
Presenting the panel’s recommendations in a packed Santa Marta Theatre, Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), said the push for a global transition away from fossil fuels offers “a light in the tunnel” during a “very dark moment” of geopolitical conflict and climate extremes.
“Science is here to serve,” Rockström said. “We’re today launching the Science Panel for the Global Energy Transition (SPGET) as a service, as a global common good for all countries, all sectors, all regions to connect to the best science enabling a transition away from fossil fuels.”
The panel is urging countries to create “whole-of-government” plans to “dismantle legal, financial and political barriers” to the energy transition. Its insights are intended to inform top officials from 57 governments who will gather in Santa Marta for high-level discussions on Tuesday and Wednesday.
Draft roadmap for Colombia
Colombian Environment Minister Irene Vélez Torres said the panel “addresses a longstanding shortcoming” in international climate science, by creating a scientific body dedicated solely to overcoming the world’s reliance on fossil fuels.
“It’s a first-of-its-kind, designed to organise in the next five years the scientific evidence that allows cities, regions, countries and coalitions to take the big leap,” Vélez told the event in Santa Marta.
As an example of how countries can move forward – even when their economies are closely tied to the production and use of dirty energy – a group of European scientists presented a draft roadmap to phase out fossil fuels in Colombia, with inputs from the Colombian government. It will be used as a basis for further consultation in the Latin American nation to define the way forward.
To phase out fossil fuels, developing countries need exit route from “debt trap”
Piers Forster, director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at the University of Leeds and co‑author of the roadmap, said it shows “a clear pathway to economic and societal benefit”, with average annual investment of $10.6 billion producing net economic benefits of $23 billion per year by 2050.
The document says fossil fuels in Colombia can be phased out through energy efficiency measures, coupling renewable generation with energy storage, and switching to electrified transport. But, it adds, the government will need to plan for reduced revenue from fossil fuel exports, which roughly half by the mid-2030s.
“What matters now is moving beyond headline targets to create credible, policy-relevant roadmaps, enabling a just and effective transition,” Forster said in a statement. Brazil is also working on a national roadmap for its own economy, as well as leading a voluntary process to produce a global roadmap.
IPCC hobbled by politics
Currently, the world’s top climate science body – the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – requires countries to sign off on each “summary for policymakers” of its flagship science reports. This has led to a politically fraught process that has increasingly seen some oil-producing governments making efforts to weaken its recommendations.
In a bid to focus scientific debates on the phase-out of fossil fuels, the new SPGET was created based on a mandate from last year’s COP30. It is also meant to come up with scientific recommendations at a faster pace than the IPCC’s seven-year cycle.
Natalie Jones, senior policy advisor at the International Institute of Sustainable Development (IISD), called the new scientific panel “historic”, as it will be “more specific, more targeted and potentially more agile” with its advice on phasing out coal, oil and gas than the IPCC’s exhaustive scientific synthesis reports.
Why the transition beyond fossil fuels depends on cities and collective action
One of the SPGET members, Peter Newell of the UK’s University of Sussex, said “there are many different challenges along the way – and not all of them have to do with lack of evidence”, but the phasing out of fossil fuels “is one part of the story and it’s important to address it”.
The panel will be co-chaired by Cameroonian economist Vera Songwe, PIK’s chief economist Ottmar Edenhofer and Gilberto M. Jannuzzi, professor of energy systems at Brazil’s Universidade Estadual de Campinas. It will be composed of between 50 and 100 scientists divided into four working groups: transition pathways, technological solutions, policies and finance.
Under the 12 insights for the Santa Marta process, the panel recommended banning new fossil fuel infrastructure, mandating “deep cuts” in methane emissions, implementing carbon levies on imports, and de-risking clean energy investments via interventions from central banks, among others.
The post New panel of climate scientists calls for fossil fuel transition roadmaps appeared first on Climate Home News.
New panel of climate scientists calls for fossil fuel transition roadmaps
Despite not yet paying out any money, a UN-backed fund meant to address the loss and damage caused to developing countries by climate change could face “liquidity issues” by the end of next year, its head warned today.
With ten projects already requesting $166 million in total, the fund’s Executive Director Ibrahima Cheikh Diong warned a board meeting in Zambia that the fund was likely to be “oversubscribed” and should anticipate cashflow problems.
A framing paper prepared by the fund’s secretariat similarly warns that “given the current status of the capitalization of the Fund, there is a risk of the Fund exhausting its capital by the end of 2027, which could result in a loss of operational momentum and expose the FRLD to reputational risk”.
Since governments agreed to set up the fund at UN climate talks in Egypt in 2022, wealthy nations have promised $822 million, but delivered just $449 million.
The fund is expected to approve its first projects at its next board meeting in July. Early proposals submitted include strengthening responses to floods in Bangladesh and the Nigerian city of Lagos, and improving water infrastructure in Jamaica following Hurricane Melissa last year.
Millions not billions
ActionAid Zambia climate justice coordinator Michael Mwansa told the board meeting that he was concerned about “the failure of the Global North governments to deliver on their climate finance obligations, making it largely impossible to scale up [the fund’s initial stage] significantly, if at all”.
“Pledges remain nowhere near the billions and even the trillions needed to address loss and damage to the Global South”, Mwansa added, highlighting reports which found that financing loss and damage could cost developing countries up to $400 billion a year.
The fund’s board discussed its strategy for raising more money at its meeting this week while climate campaigners called, in an open letter, for it to aim to secure $50 billion a year from developed countries starting next year, rising to $100 billion a year by 2031 and $400 billion by 2035.
The World Bank-hosted fund aims to have revenue-raising rounds known as replenishments every four years, with the first in 2027.
Governments have agreed to “urge” developed countries to contribute but only to “encourage” other nations to do so and the fund’s secretariat wants to appoint a “high-level champion” to lead the replenishment team.
The fundraising strategy will be discussed further at the next board meeting in the Philipines in June.
Campaigners’ open letter calls for developed countries to contribute more and for them to introduce taxes on fossil fuel companies, financial transactions, luxury air travel and wealth to raise money for the fund.
“Rich countries must be held strictly accountable for the devastation they have caused,” said Climate Action Network International head Tasneem Essop. “Their failure to fulfil their responsibility to the Loss and Damage Fund is not just an oversight; it is a shameful betrayal of humanity.”
The post New loss and damage fund could run out of money next year appeared first on Climate Home News.
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits