Sustainable Aviation Fuel
Introduction for Exploring New Feedstocks of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
The aviation industry plays a significant role in global transportation, connecting people and goods across the world. However, the environmental impact of aviation, particularly its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, has become a growing concern.
In recent years, there has been a concerted effort to find sustainable alternatives to traditional jet fuels, leading to the emergence of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF).
SAF offers a promising solution to mitigate the environmental impact of aviation by reducing carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. While SAF production initially relied on conventional feedstocks such as vegetable oils and animal fats, there is a growing interest in exploring new feedstocks that can further enhance the sustainability and scalability of SAF production.
By examining innovative and diverse sources, we aim to shed light on the latest developments in SAF production and their potential to revolutionize the aviation industry. From algae-based feedstocks to municipal solid waste, carbon capture and utilization to waste vegetable oil, and lignocellulosic biomass, we will delve into each feedstock’s characteristics, advantages, and potential environmental benefits.
By venturing beyond traditional feedstocks, researchers and industry experts are unlocking new pathways to produce SAF sustainably and efficiently. These alternative feedstocks offer the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, minimize land use conflicts, promote waste management practices, and contribute to a more circular and sustainable aviation sector.
As we delve into the exploration of these new feedstocks, we aim to provide valuable insights into their feasibility, scalability, and environmental impact. By understanding the potential of these emerging feedstocks, we can pave the way for a greener and more sustainable future for aviation while addressing the urgent need to combat climate change.
Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Feedstock
Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is gaining significant attention as a viable solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the aviation industry. As the demand for air travel continues to rise, it becomes crucial to explore new feedstocks for the production of SAF. In this article, we will discuss some of the emerging feedstocks that show promising potential for the future of sustainable aviation.
Algae-Based Feedstocks
Algae are microscopic plants that can convert sunlight and carbon dioxide into energy through photosynthesis. They have high lipid content, making them a suitable feedstock for SAF production. Algae can be cultivated in various environments, including saltwater ponds, which minimizes the need for arable land and freshwater resources. Algae-based SAF offers the advantage of scalability, reduced land use, and potentially higher oil yields compared to traditional crops.
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
Converting municipal solid waste, such as food scraps and yard waste, into SAF is an innovative solution to address waste management and reduce carbon emissions simultaneously. Through various processes like gasification and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, MSW can be converted into a synthetic gas, which can then be transformed into a sustainable aviation fuel. This approach not only reduces landfill waste but also promotes the circular economy by utilizing waste as a valuable resource.
Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU)
CCU involves capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from industrial sources and utilizing them as a feedstock for SAF production. By using CO2 as a raw material, this process helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change. Several technologies, including direct air capture and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, are being explored to capture and utilize CO2 in the production of SAF.
Waste Vegetable Oil (WVO):
Waste vegetable oil, derived from cooking oils used in restaurants and food processing facilities, can be processed and converted into sustainable aviation fuel. By repurposing waste oils that would otherwise end up in landfills or cause environmental issues, WVO-based SAF reduces the reliance on fossil fuels and provides a more environmentally friendly alternative. This feedstock has the advantage of being readily available and offers a closed-loop solution for waste management.
Lignocellulosic Biomass
Lignocellulosic biomass, such as agricultural residues, forest residues, and dedicated energy crops, holds promise as a feedstock for SAF production. These feedstocks are rich in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, which can be converted into biofuels through biochemical or thermochemical processes. Utilizing lignocellulosic biomass reduces competition with food crops and can be grown on marginal lands, thereby avoiding land-use conflicts.
Fact and data for New Feedstocks of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
Here are some facts and data regarding new feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF):
Algae-Based Feedstocks:
Algae can produce up to 15 times more oil per acre compared to traditional oilseed crops like soybeans.
Algae-based SAF has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by up to 80% compared to conventional jet fuel.
The global production capacity of algae-based biofuels is projected to reach 6 billion gallons per year by 2030, according to a report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW):
According to the World Bank, over 2 billion metric tons of solid waste are generated annually worldwide.
Converting MSW into SAF can help reduce landfill waste and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) estimates that SAF produced from MSW could potentially supply up to 175 billion liters (46 billion gallons) of jet fuel per year by 2050.
Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU):
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggests that CCU technologies could contribute to reducing CO2 emissions by up to 20% by 2050.
The Global CCS Institute reports that there are over 65 CCU projects around the world, with potential applications in SAF production.
CCU technologies can capture CO2 emissions from industrial sources, preventing them from being released into the atmosphere, and utilize them as a feedstock for SAF.
Waste Vegetable Oil (WVO):
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), approximately 3 billion gallons of waste cooking oil are generated in the U.S. each year.
Conversion of WVO into SAF can help reduce carbon emissions and decrease dependence on fossil fuels.
A study published in the journal Energy Policy estimates that WVO-based SAF could reduce lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80% compared to conventional jet fuel.
Lignocellulosic Biomass:
The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that the potential annual supply of lignocellulosic biomass in the U.S. is approximately 1.3 billion tons.
The use of lignocellulosic biomass for SAF production can help reduce deforestation and promote sustainable land use practices.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), lignocellulosic biofuels have the potential to supply up to 26% of total transportation fuel by 2050.
These facts and data highlight the potential of these new feedstocks to contribute to the production of Sustainable Aviation Fuel, reducing carbon emissions and promoting a more sustainable aviation industry.
Conclusion for New Feedstocks of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
The development of new feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel is crucial to mitigate the environmental impact of the aviation industry.
Algae-based feedstocks, municipal solid waste, carbon capture and utilization, waste vegetable oil, and lignocellulosic biomass are just a few examples of the innovative solutions being explored. By diversifying feedstock sources, we can ensure a sustainable and low-carbon future for aviation. Continued research and investment in these emerging feedstocks will play a pivotal role in achieving a greener aviation sector and combating climate change.
The exploration of new feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) holds immense promise for revolutionizing the aviation industry’s environmental impact. As we have delved into the realm of alternative feedstocks, it becomes evident that innovation and diversification are key to achieving a sustainable and low-carbon future for aviation.
The emergence of feedstocks such as algae-based sources, municipal solid waste, carbon capture and utilization, waste vegetable oil, and lignocellulosic biomass showcases the vast potential for SAF production beyond conventional feedstocks. Each of these feedstocks brings unique advantages, whether it’s the scalability and high oil yields of algae, the circular economy benefits of utilizing municipal solid waste, or the reduction of carbon emissions through carbon capture and utilization.
By exploring these new feedstocks, we can address multiple challenges simultaneously. We can reduce reliance on fossil fuels, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, promote sustainable land use practices, and contribute to waste management and circular economy initiatives.
However, the journey towards widespread adoption of these new feedstocks is not without its challenges. Technical feasibility, economic viability, regulatory frameworks, and infrastructure development are all critical factors that need to be addressed for successful integration of these feedstocks into SAF production.
Continued research, innovation, and collaboration among industry stakeholders, governments, and research institutions are essential in furthering the development of these feedstocks. Investment in research and development, pilot projects, and scaling up production facilities will be pivotal in realizing the full potential of these alternative feedstocks.
As we conclude our exploration of new feedstocks for SAF, it is clear that they offer a path towards a more sustainable and environmentally friendly aviation industry. By embracing these innovative feedstocks, we can reduce the carbon footprint of aviation, mitigate climate change, and pave the way for a cleaner, greener, and more sustainable future for air travel.
The journey towards sustainable aviation is ongoing, and the discovery and utilization of new feedstocks will continue to play a vital role in achieving this vision. With a collective effort and commitment, we can transform the aviation industry into a global leader in sustainability, making air travel a catalyst for positive change while ensuring a healthier planet for future generations.
https://www.exaputra.com/2023/05/exploring-new-feedstocks-of-sustainable.html
Renewable Energy
Wind Turbine Cost: How Much? Are They Worth It in 2025?
Weather Guard Lightning Tech
Wind Turbine Cost: How Much? Are They Worth It in 2025?
by Dan Blewett
How much does a wind turbine cost in 2025? While renewable energy is no longer a “new” idea and large, green energy wind farms are more common – and more efficient – the combination of technology, construction, and operating expenses mean that a wind turbine’s initial cost is very expensive.
And calculating the “simple” cost of a wind turbine isn’t simple at all. Current projections for the cost of an offshore turbines cost is about $1.5M per Megawatt of power produced – meaning a 10MW wind turbine would come to about $15,000,000. But myriad factors go into the actual calculations.
For regular updates on wind turbine costs and the technology , people and policies driving the industry, follow the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast and subscribe to Uptime Tech News. It’s free! Subscribe now: https://substack.com/@uptimetechnews

Header image credit: GE Vernova
This article provides the numbers you need to understand how much does a wind turbine cost, do they actually pay for themselves over time, and is the upfront investment worth it?
As development for offshore wind farms has accelerated, over the past 20 years, the Biden Administration created some additional opportunities in the industry in the United States. As wind anticipated a second Trump administration, the economics of wind energy in the US were initially called into question. But both wind and the larger renewables market are bigger than shifting political policies. Since the renewable energy transition is well underway all over the world, the US is almost certain to remain a significant player. The mix of onshore and offshore wind energy is one of many unknowns that will affect the market, and specifically, the initial cost of a wind turbine.
When considering the cost of a wind turbine, it seems reasonable to pick one model of turbine to compare costs “apples to apples.” That alone is a daunting task, with cost estimates for off-shore wind more difficult to pin down than onshore wind, and costs of turbines designed for even modest-sized onshore wind farms vary based on the conditions of various wind farm locations.
Calculating even an “average” cost of a wind turbine in 2025 is a complicated math problem – actually, it involved numerous math problems and multiple conditions. We’ll explore several “solutions” to this problem.
In 2024, there were hints that manufacturers may reduce the number of models that they offer, for two basic reasons: profitability, and engineering reliability. If you’re not familiar with the wind energy market, it helps to start with a bit of an industry overview to understand how wind turbine costs are determined.
Are Wind Energy costs REally going down? Is Wind Energy Getting Too Cheap?
In recent years, wind turbine manufacturers like Siemens have expressed concerns that the cost of wind energy is getting too low to maintain the development and growth of the market. Rising costs, and government pricing structures present constant challenges to manufacturers.
In 2022, Nordex raised its turbine prices (approximately 12%) due to cost increases and rising interest rates; other turbine manufacturers increased prices as well. In 2023, wind turbine prices were more steady. Midway through the year, Nordex, based in Germany, recorded an average selling price of €890,000/MW or about $965,000/MW USD. [1]
In May 2023, Siemens’ Tim Dawidowsky famously commented, “it’s all about cash.” Obviously, Dawidowsky wanted to see European turbine makers get more money – and he’s not alone. When we reported on Dawidowsky’ s comment in an Uptime Podcast episode, we explained it in context with other concerns about energy pricing strategies. Nothing happens in a vacuum, and wind energy costs – including almost every piece of hardware in a wind turbine – are affected by myriad global factors more than most industrial products .
Of those factors, energy costs are the most difficult to pin down. Because different countries finance energy in vastly different ways, the industry absolutely does not enjoy a level playing field. While many European countries control energy developments outright – and other countries, like the US, has a long history of incentives and subsidy programs – it is difficult to determine actual costs, true profits and losses, and almost impossible to compare energy costs between nations. Even ‘simple’, hard costs – like blade and nacelle structures – fluctuate due to political policies and how they are expected to influence future prices.
The Biden administration’s IRA (Inflation Reduction Act) committed billions to green energy incentives from 2021-2024, and the effects of some of those programs continue. For weekly discussions on wind industry business and technology, listen to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast here.
How Much Does a Wind Turbine Cost Initially?
For commercial wind turbines, the answer is millions of dollars per turbine.

Wind turbines cost a lot, and as such the investment is to be recouped over a long period of time.
Turbines produce significant electricity and sell it back to local power utilities where it flows to the power grid, to be used by homes and businesses.
The Breakdown of Initial Wind Turbine Costs
- $2.6 – $4 million per average-sized commercial wind turbine
- Typical cost is $1.3 million per megawatt (MW) of electricity-producing capacity
- Most commercial wind turbines have a capacity of 2-3 MW, but offshore turbines can be as large as 16-18 MW
- Cost increases as turbine size increases, though there are benefits to using fewer, larger turbines – complexity and construction of the overall farm site is greatly reduced with fewer and larger turbines.
Interested in Wind Energy? Check out Our Wind Energy Podcast: Uptime
Listen to Uptime on Any Podcast Platform
Costs vary widely around the world. Why? It’s complicated
From Australia to Brazil to Canada to the UK, energy project are developed (read: funded and subsidized) in vastly different ways, largely due to different forms of governments. But there are many other stickier issues that make determining the cost of a wind turbine more difficult than your average accounting problem.
Different countries “adjust” the cost of materials, labor and land though artificially (or actually) reducing wages, and adding tariffs and taxes. In the US, well-intentioned initiatives like the Jones Act can increase the initial cost of wind turbine manufacturing – but in the long term, they should increase the value of the country’s wind energy market. The US isn’t the only country that creates such political constraints. Since 2022, throughout 2023, 2024 and well into 2025, the Jones Act is significantly impacting offshore wind turbine costs. In one August 2024 podcast episode, we detailed some of Orsted’s financial troubles. (Orsted is based in Denmark.) For more information on the business side of wind turbine costs and overall industry growth, listen to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast every week. It’s eye-opening!
Wind Turbine Maintenance Costs
Once built, maintenance is an ongoing expense.
- 1-2 cents per kilowatt-hour produced, or
- $42,000 – $48,000 per year
Operation and maintenance costs can be significant, but all of these machines are long-term investments continue to (hopefully) pay for themselves over time.

A wind turbine study using German data showed that these costs can be 1-2 Eurocents per kilowatt hour (kWh) produced, on average.

This number climbs as the the turbine ages, which is not surprising considering the wear and tear and harsh environments these machines operate in.
How Operation & Maintenance Requirements Impact Wind Turbine Cost
Operation & maintenance (O&M) typically includes the following:
- Insurance
- Land costs, rent and taxes
- Service, repair and spare parts
- Administrative tasks
- Power (it does take some electricity to run)
- Miscellaneous
These recurring costs are not too significant, and the turbine will significantly outproduce the maintenance costs.
Repairs can be a significant capacity reducer (more on this later), and lightning strikes on wind turbines can be a real problem.
Though turbine blades leave the factor with a lightning protection system, often they are inadequate.
Especially for offshore wind turbines–where transporting workers for repair is costly and time-consuming–additional layers of lightning protection is important.
Products like segmented lightning diverters can provide additional protection from lightning strike damage to wind turbines.
How Much Electricity Does a Wind Turbine Produce?
We’ve covered costs, so now lets turn to the big question: how much electricity does a wind turbine generate?

Wind turbines are sized in megawatts (MW), which refers to their capacity to create electricity.
One megawatt = 1,000,000 watts of power. One megawatt can power about 1000 homes for a month but in reality, wind turbines don’t come close to producing their rated capacity because of changing wind speeds.
Size of the Wind Turbine Affects Electricity-Producing Capacity
Wind turbines cost more the bigger they get, but they produce more electricity with larger nacelles and turbine blades.

In its latest report on average rotor diameter size, Statistica said rotors for onshore wind turbines had risen to 129 meters (423 feet).
Common commercial wind turbine sizes in megawatts:
- 1.5 MW (onshore, or land-based)
- 2.5 MW (onshore)
- 4 MW (onshore)
- 6-8 MW (offshore)
- Up to 15 MW (GE Haliade-X produces 12 MW and the Siemens Gamesa SG 14-222DD is a 15MW Turbine)
Offshore wind farms choose larger wind turbines in part because of the high cost of installing them and transporting the electricity, as well as the increased efficiency they gain with consistent, faster wind speeds.
It’s preferable to build one turbine rather than many smaller ones because fewer towers and ground anchoring systems have to be constructed, making everything less complicated.
Wind Speed & Direction Affects “Capacity Factor” in Electric Production
At full wind speed, a turbine can produce at it’s full capacity. If a turbine is rated for 2.5 MW, then at peak wind speed it will crank out 2.5 MW of power.
Yet, we all know that wind is never constant.

Because the wind dies down, changes direction, etc., overall averages will be much lower, usually in the 30-40% range for onshore wind turbines and up to 65% (occasionally higher in rare circumstances) for offshore turbines.
Biggest Wind Turbine: GE Haliade-X 12-14.7 MW Turbine
The GE Haliade-X is…insane.
This enormous wind turbine was the first to offer 12 MW capacity, with blades 107m (351 feet) long and an overall footprint that reaches 260m (853 feet) into the sky. The Haliade-X offshore turbine features a range of power rating covering 12-14.7MW capacity. Want to buy one? It will run you $12M – $20Million. See how they’re installed:
<iframe width="1344" height="840" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XX2-DE0etcQ" title="Haliade-X offshore wind turbine - installation time lapse" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Turbines of this size are typically used offshore, where wind speeds are consistently much higher and delivering power is more complicated. Fewer, bigger turbines = easier power transport, fewer long-distance cables and a simpler overall system.
If you’re curious how these turbines stay upright in the crazy waves and wind out to sea, check out this article featuring some great illustrations.
How Much Money Does a Wind Turbine Produce From Electricity it Generates?
Remember that a wind turbine has a maximum rated capacity (such as 4 megawatts), but it will only produce electricity at a “capacity factor” or “load factor” that is a percentage of this maximum.
In the chart below, you’ll find some numbers based on the typical sale price (2019 data) of electrical power created by wind turbines. This power is sold back to the electrical grid of utility companies, and the price has been falling as turbine technology has improved.
This sale of electricity is how wind turbines pay for themselves and create renewable energy.
We want this power to be cheap, and it’s moving in the right direction.

The goal is for turbines to produce at a higher capacity factor, which means they’re creating more electricity for the time they’re in operation. A majority wind farms worldwide are heavily subsidized by government investment, however, wind farms in the US and elsewhere in North America operate in a more businesslike manner.
Many US wind farms not only pay private land owners for the use of their land, the energy producers also contribute mightily to the larger community through direct investment in addition to job creation and tax payments. To learn how some US wind farms contribute to their communities, see this brief overview of Wind Farms featured in the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast in 2024.
Need Lightning Protection For Your Wind Turbine?
Our StrikeTape wind turbine segmented lightning diverters are the most durable, highest-performing product in the world. Wind turbine maintenance costs skyrocket when constantly damaged by lightning strikes, so protect your turbines with the best.
Use StrikeTape lightning protection on your wind farm.
More Wind Turbine Questions & Answers
Check out our common wind turbine questions below, including many about wind turbine cost, specifications and more.
If you have a question, leave it below and we’ll update this article with our answer!
The towers on most commercial wind turbines are in the range of 200-260 feet tall. The blades, often well over 100 feet long, when counted in total height push the number well into the 300s. The Gamesa G87 model wind turbine’s blades reach a height of 399ft.
Wind turbine blade tip speeds regularly range from 120-180 miles per hour, though they vary due to wind conditions. Because of their enormous size (with blades well over 100ft), they look like they’re spinning slowly, when in reality blade tip speeds are very, very fast.
$1,300,000 USD per megawatt. The typical wind turbine is 2-3 MW in power, so most turbines cost in the $2-4 million dollar range. Operation and maintenance runs an additional $42,000-$48,000 per year according to research on wind turbine operational cost. See the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s website for the most recent (December 2022) Cost of Wind Energy Review.
Yes, and these smaller turbines can now cost less than $1000. Energy production will vary greatly to the size, specs and wind conditions of a person’s home, and some homes may not be suited well for a turbine at all. There’s a reason that wind farms are carefully placed in very wind, often harsh conditions–high winds occur in places people often don’t want to live. If your home doesn’t get consistent, strong wind, it may not make financial sense to install any type of wind turbine. New turbine designs are constantly being proposed and tested.
Unfortunately, they sometimes do, but it’s not the largest threat to the bird population. Cats, and cell phone towers, are far more deadly to the bird population. This article sheds light on the issue: https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/09/15/wind-turbines-kill-fewer-birds-than-cell-towers-cats/15683843/.
The number can vary greatly due to factors including size, wind conditions, blade length and of course, average home energy consumption. A typical wind turbine is generally capable of powering 1000-2000 homes in one year. One megawatt of energy production capacity will power about 1000 homes, and many onshore wind turbines have a 2-3 MW capacity.
The capacity factor–or load factor–is the actual power generation over time, rather than the theoretical maximum a turbine could produce. Because wind turbines can’t maintain peak production at all times (not even close) due to changing wind conditions, downtime for service, etc. – it’s important to consider capacity factor when calculating the expected power a turbine can produce over a year or more.
Most recent update May 30, 2024. Original article by Dan Blewett published December 20, 2021. Edited by Dan Blewett and Diane Stresing. The most recent and substantive changes since original publication date are noted below.
[1] (New citation, May 2024 update) https://www.windpowermonthly.com/article/1829900/nordex-sells-16gw-wind-turbines-pricing-holds-steady-q2#
- The largest offshore wind turbines were updated to 18 MW
- The National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s website was added to the frequently asked questions linking to the most recent (December 2022) Cost of Wind Energy Review.
- Statistica’s latest figures on the Global Wind Power Market Statistics and Facts were reviewed in 2023 and 2024 when the latest figures available for most stats were based on a report completed 2021, available here. In January 2025, additional information was referenced from the Global Wind Energy Council’s report based on 2023 data.
- References to recent podcasts and articles have been added.
- This article may be updated periodically and substantive changes will be noted here.
- This article was updated on January 5, 2025, to include some of the latest (2024) wind energy analyses and opinions from global data analytics and solution provider Wood Mackenzie
- This article was previously on September 30, 2024 to include additional complications of breaking down wind turbine costs in various countries due to tariffs, subsidies, and other financial/political differences around the world.
https://weatherguardwind.com/how-much-does-wind-turbine-cost-worth-it/
Renewable Energy
Pacifico in Vietnam, Offshore Leading Edge Spray
Weather Guard Lightning Tech
Pacifico in Vietnam, Offshore Leading Edge Spray
This week Allen highlights Pacifico Energy’s efforts in developing offshore wind power in Vietnam, including meetings with government officials to support the country’s clean energy goals. In Ireland, researchers introduce a potentially revolutionary cold spray technology for maintaining wind turbine blades. Lastly, Iberdrola seeks a partner for a 1 GW energy portfolio.
Fill out our Uptime listener survey and enter to win an Uptime mug!
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Welcome to Uptime Newsflash, industry News Lightning fast. Newsflash is brought to you by Intel Store. For market intelligence that generates revenue, visit www.intel store.com.
Starting off the week, US-based Pacifico Energy is ramping up efforts to develop offshore wind power projects in Vietnam. The company’s CEO met with Vietnam’s party general secretary in Hanoi recently, and the party leader highlighted Vietnam’s goal to become a high income nation by 2045 with net zero emissions by 2050, emphasizing the need for stable clean energy sources.
Pacifico affirmed Vietnam’s immense potential for offshore wind power and pledge continued investment to support the country’s growth objectives. Now, Vietnam’s renewable energy sector is attracting strong international interest with the government recently reactivating nuclear energy plans in its south central province.
Over in Ireland, Irish researchers at Southeast Technical University in partnership with Technology University Dublin, have developed what may be a revolutionary maintenance solution for offshore wind turbine blades. The Clear Blade Project focuses on cold spray, leading edge erosion repair technology.
Environmental factors often cause rapid wear on turbine blades, as we all know, with defects appearing within one to three years of installation, requiring expensive repairs. The project proposes a novel, portable polymer cold spray technology for quote unquote infield repair, potentially extending blade lifespans and reducing maintenance costs.
Wind energy contribute 32% of Ireland’s electricity generation in 2024 with the government planning to develop 14 gigawatts of wind capacity by 2030.
And over in Spain, Iberdrola the Spanish Energy Giant is seeking a partner willing to buy a minority stake in a roughly one gigawatt renewables portfolio according to news source. Reuters sources familiar with the matter described the project as Romeo 2.0 referencing a previous deal where Norway’s Sovereign Wealth Fund took a 49% stake in a 1.3 gigawatt portfolio, valued at approximately 1.2 billion Euros.
The deal aligns with Iberdrola’s strategy of selling minority stakes in advanced projects to fund new investments. Iberdrola’s Finance chief recently stated they were working on two or three such assets rotation projects to complete this year. And that’s this week’s top.
News stories. Stay tuned for the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast tomorrow.
https://weatherguardwind.com/pacifico-offshore-leading-edge/
Renewable Energy
Explaining Our Role in the Universe to Young People
At left, we have the words of American planetary scientist Dr. Carolyn Porco, who explores the outer Solar System, beginning with her imaging work on the Voyager missions to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune in the 1980s.
FWIW, I don’t take the same tack. As a guy who’s done his fair share of tutoring young people in science, and who has also raised two kids, I’ve had to deal with the issue a great many times.
When someone wants me to tell them what happens when we die, I ask, “Do you want to know what scientists have learned about the universe as it applies here, or what the believers in an all-powerful God think? I’m happy to explain the ideas of both of of them.”
Normally, at this point, the kid (understandably) wants to change the subject, which is just fine with me.
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change Videos1 year ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Carbon Footprint11 months ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Farmers turn to tech as bees struggle to pollinate
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Clouds now contains plastic, contaminating ‘everything we eat and drink’