A Canadian carbon management company, DevvStream Corp., and a United Arab Emirates (UAE) investment platform have joined forces to launch a new climate investment vehicle. The goal of the partnership is to build a US$100 million fund by the end of 2027 to invest in environmental assets. These include carbon solutions, decarbonization, and technologies that support the global energy transition.
The new vehicle, called the Fayafi x DevvStream Investment Platform, seeks to bring in capital. It will help scale impactful projects in various carbon and climate initiatives. DevvStream’s carbon asset know-how and Fayafi’s financial strength will team up. They will build a global investment engine for environmental infrastructure and carbon solutions.
Inside the Fayafi–DevvStream Investment Platform
DevvStream and Fayafi Investment Holding Limited, based in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), have signed an investment agreement. They will create a jointly governed special purpose vehicle (SPV).
The SPV’s main objective is to pursue scalable, high-impact decarbonization opportunities. It is targeted to reach $100 million in capital commitments by 2027, though this remains a non-binding target rather than a guarantee.
The vehicle will focus on several areas, including:
- Environmental infrastructure,
- Carbon credit solutions and monetization,
- Climate-related technologies
Fayafi is expected to hold 80% of the economic interest in the SPV, while DevvStream will hold 20%. Most profits from investments and carbon credit revenues are expected to go to Fayafi. The rest will be distributed to DevvStream.
An Investment Committee with representatives from both partners will review and approve funding decisions. A Fayafi representative will serve as Chair of this committee. DevvStream will charge a one-time setup fee once the platform is approved. It will also receive ongoing consulting fees based on a percentage of assets used in the fund.
Why This Deal Matters for Carbon Markets
The launch of the Fayafi x DevvStream Investment Platform comes at a time when carbon markets and environmental assets are gaining traction. More companies, governments, and investors want to fund climate solutions. They are looking for options beyond just cutting emissions. Projects related to carbon capture, carbon markets, clean energy, and decarbonization infrastructure are drawing interest from a wider set of financial players.
DevvStream itself specializes in handling, aggregating, and monetizing environmental assets such as carbon credits and renewable energy certificates. This lets the company handle and create climate investments within larger sustainability plans.
Carbon credits are units that represent a reduction or removal of greenhouse gas emissions. They can be bought and sold in voluntary and compliance markets.
Carbon credit demand is set to rise. Companies aim for net-zero targets, and regulators are tightening rules on climate reporting and carbon offsets.
The chart shows the projected global carbon credit market size from 2025 to 2050. The green range shows lower and upper bounds, reaching $50–$250 billion by 2050 (2024 prices). Growth depends on demand: high demand with loose supply drives the market to the upper bound, while low demand with loose supply results in the lower bound.
Another projection says it could reach up to $270 billion by 2050. This prediction of market growth reflects the rising corporate demand for nature-based and technology-based environmental asset solutions. DevvStream and Fayafi are building platforms to tap into this growing market. They focus on linking finance with clear climate results.
DevvStream’s Expanding Role in Climate Assets
DevvStream started in 2021. It focuses on carbon management and monetizing environmental assets. The company works across three strategic domains:
- Carbon offset portfolios: including nature-based, tech-based, and carbon sequestration credits for sale to corporations and governments.
- Project investment and acquisition: helping to extend its reach into broader environmental markets.
- Project development services: where it structures and manages eligible climate and sustainability activities in exchange for a percentage of generated credits.
This model allows DevvStream to provide full support, from project development to monetization. By teaming up with Fayafi to scale investments, the company can boost its opportunities and increase steady revenue from advisory and asset management roles.
DevvStream has also been active in other strategic moves. In late 2025, it teamed up with Southern Energy Renewables and agreed to merge into a Nasdaq-listed company. This new company will focus on producing low-cost, carbon-negative fuels like sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and green methanol.
The plan features a $402 million bond allocation for a biomass-to-fuel facility in Louisiana. This move will boost the company’s role in carbon-negative industries.
Market Forces Powering Climate Capital
Many market trends are shaping the launch of climate investment vehicles that DevvStream and Fayafi are creating.
Corporate net-zero commitments are a major driver. Many multinational companies now aim to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner. To meet these goals, they mix direct emissions cuts with clean energy buying. They also purchase environmental assets like carbon credits. This corporate demand boosts liquidity. It also supports investment platforms that create and manage climate-aligned assets.
Policy changes and ESG reporting standards are also pushing growth. Governments and regulators in developed and emerging markets are improving climate reporting rules. This trend increases the demand for verified environmental assets that help firms demonstrate progress toward emissions targets.
Another key trend is the rise of carbon markets themselves. Both compliance markets (such as the EU Emissions Trading System) and voluntary markets are expanding. Voluntary markets have challenges with pricing and standardization.
Still, they are vital for companies looking to offset and eliminate residual emissions. Research shows that the ecosystem for environmental asset investment is growing. This growth opens doors for financial products that blend climate impact with returns.
Climate Finance Market: Size, Trends, and Outlook
Global climate finance continues to expand, but it still falls short of what is needed. In 2024, global climate finance flows reached over $1.8 trillion in 2023 and will surpass $2 trillion in 2024, based on Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) data. Most of this funding goes to clean energy, transport, energy efficiency, and climate-resilient infrastructure. Private investors now provide more than half of total climate finance.
Despite this progress, the funding gap remains large. Analysts estimate that annual climate investment must rise to $5 trillion to $7 trillion by 2030 to meet global climate goals. This means current funding would need to increase several times within the next few years.
Carbon markets form a smaller but growing part of climate finance. Most future growth is expected in emerging markets, where mitigation costs are lower but access to capital is limited. This has increased interest in structured climate investment vehicles.
In this context, initiatives like DevvStream’s joint platform targeting $100 million by 2027 reflect a broader push to channel private capital into scalable carbon mitigation projects and close global climate finance gaps.
What This Deal Means for Climate Finance
The Fayafi x DevvStream Investment Platform will target:
- Environmental infrastructure
- Carbon solutions
- Technologies that support climate goals
This initiative fits with the growing trend in sustainable investing. Corporations, governments, and financial firms are putting more money into environmental assets. They aim to meet net-zero goals. Though achieving a $100 million target is still a forecast, this partnership is a big step in climate finance growth.
The post DevvStream and UAE Platform’s Alliance Targets $100M Carbon Investment by 2027 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.
The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.
Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.
Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.
You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.
Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings
The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.
Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.
Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.
What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.
The three commodity exposures that hit margin first
For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.
- Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
- Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
- Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.
TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes
The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.
For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.
The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.
What procurement and finance can do now
Three actions matter near-term.
Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.
Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.
Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.
Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.
If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.
More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits