Connect with us

Published

on

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s Cropped.
We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.

Key developments

Weather-related hunger

‘LARGE-SCALE HUNGER’: A new report from the Clingendael Institute, a Dutch thinktank, found that “around 2.5 million people in Sudan could die from hunger by September 2024”, Middle East Eye reported. The report said “that parts of the country have likely already reached the tipping point at which large-scale hunger transitions into large-scale death”, the outlet wrote. The civil war that broke out in Sudan in April 2023 has disrupted food supply chains and logistics, but the shortage “has been worsened by drought and flooding, likely exacerbated by climate change”, Truthout said. Al Jazeera reported that “more than 25 million people scattered across Sudan, South Sudan and Chad are ‘trapped in a spiral’ of food insecurity”, according to the World Food Programme.

Subscribe: Cropped
  • Sign up to Carbon Brief’s free “Cropped” email newsletter. A fortnightly digest of food, land and nature news and views. Sent to your inbox every other Wednesday.

PROLONGED DROUGHT: Zambia’s environment minister, Collins Nzovu, has warned that the drought that has gripped southern Africa in recent months is “a harbinger of what is in store for the region as the climate crisis worsens”, the Guardian reported. The newspaper continued: “People are reaching the end of their food stores, and importing from other countries in the region has become much harder as they too are feeling the impacts of the drought.” Hydropower capacity has also halved in the country, which receives about 95% of its electricity from dams. The Times of Zambia reported last month that the World Food Programme was giving Zambia $3.3m “to help the country respond to the drought”. 

MARGINAL IMPROVEMENT: The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), which monitors global hunger, “forecast that 28% of Afghanistan’s population, about 12.4 million people, will face acute food insecurity before October”, the Associated Press reported. This is a “slight improvement” over the previous IPC report, “but underline[s] the continuing need for assistance”, the newswire said. It added that “torrential rains and flash floods” in the northern part of the country last month killed more than 400 people, damaged or destroyed “thousands of homes” and turned farmland into mud. The Afghanistan Times reported that the floods have also “destroyed numerous water systems”, causing “difficulties in accessing sufficient clean water for drinking, cooking and bathing”.

END OF EL NIÑO: Meanwhile, despite the coming end to El Niño, “it is uncertain how soon a transition to a cooler La Niña will bring respite from the heat”, New Scientist wrote. The outlet explained: “El Niño is associated with hotter average temperatures and a distinctive pattern of weather conditions in much of the world.” It noted that background warming heightened the impacts of extreme weather events during this El Niño in many parts of the world, including flooding in Afghanistan and “intense” wildfire seasons in South America and Indonesia. But, it added: “Not all these effects were entirely negative. In the Horn of Africa, for instance, the rain helped ease a drought that has contributed to near-famine conditions in the region.”

Bird flu continues to spread

CASE BY CASE: The US reported a third human case of the H5N1 avian influenza and the first with the “respiratory symptoms that are more typical of human influenza infections”, CNN reported. All three cases so far have occurred in workers on dairy farms who had direct contact with infected cows. The outlet added that “the addition of respiratory symptoms doesn’t necessarily indicate that the virus has become more dangerous or that it may transmit more easily from person to person”. But in the New York Times, virologist Dr Rick Bright wrote that “the current bird flu situation is at a dangerous inflection point”.

SILENCE BEFORE THE STORM: Bright pointed out that the virus has now been found in 69 dairy herds in nine states. But the “agribusiness industry is eerily quiet about bird flu”, Gene Baur, an animal-rights activist, wrote in the Des Moines Register. He added that “lax responses from…industry indicate that there is no rush to spend the time and money needed to address this growing crisis”. Meanwhile, according to the Los Angeles Times, a “growing number” of states are moving to legalise the sale of raw milk, despite finding “high levels” of the virus in samples.

TWO FLUS: The first human case of H5N1 avian influenza in Australia was detected two weeks ago, in a child who had recently travelled to India, Reuters reported. The child has “made a full recovery” and there “was a very low chance of others becoming infected”, the newswire wrote. Meanwhile, a different strain of avian influenza has been detected near Melbourne, Reuters reported in a separate piece. The newswire wrote: “Hundreds of thousands of birds have already been destroyed after bird flu was found at two Australian egg farms last month.” According to the Victoria state government, “the outbreak poses no risk to consumers of eggs and poultry products”.

TREATY TALKS STALL: Meanwhile, the World Health Assembly ended without a finalised pandemic treaty, although member states agreed to extend the body’s mandate, with an aim to finalise the treaty by next year’s assembly, according to Down to Earth. The assembly did, however, “adop[t] crucial amendments to the International Health Regulations”. These included “pledging improved access to medical products and financing”, which will help protect the world against future pandemics, the outlet wrote. Al Jazeera explained that it appears that talks broke down over knowledge and technology sharing around new disease-causing pathogens. (For more on the importance of the pandemic agreement, see Carbon Brief’s DeBriefed from earlier this year.)

Offset push

MIXED MESSAGING: The US government announced new rules “to govern the use of voluntary carbon credits [while] seeking to boost confidence” in a market that has seen high-profile projects “failing to deliver” on emission cuts, Reuters reported. Meanwhile, a Financial Times story quoted US treasury secretary Janet Yellen calling for corporate buyers of carbon credits to “prioritise reducing their own emissions” and that participation in voluntary carbon markets should only “complement these efforts”. However, Yellen added that countries “need to use all the tools at our disposal”, including markets and private capital. The new federal guidelines attempt to define what “high-integrity” offsets are, the New York Times wrote, “meaning they can deliver real and quantifiable emissions reductions for projects that wouldn’t have happened otherwise”.

OFFSETS UNRAVELLING: Elsewhere, Bloomberg reported that one of the world’s biggest carbon-offsetting projects, based in Zimbabwe, is being withdrawn from Verra, a “key registry and standards body”. The Kariba forestry project, operated by Carbon Green Investments, “has emerged as one of the most controversial projects in the market for carbon offsets”, Bloomberg added. Kariba’s withdrawal from Verra “risks undermining one of the carbon market’s key insurance mechanisms”, which is a pool of surplus credits “set aside to cover events such as forest fires”, it said. Meanwhile, a SourceMaterial investigation with the Times questioned a claim from offset platform Carbon Done Right that it had “secured 57,000 hectares for offsetting” in Sierra Leone. The investigation found that no such leases had been registered with local authorities.

DWINDLING APPETITE: According to a new report by Ecosystems Marketplace, the market for carbon offsets “shrank dramatically” in 2023, falling from $1.9bn (£1.5bn) in 2022 to $723m (£551m) in 2023, the Guardian reported. The 61% contraction in market size was attributed to a “flurry of scientific studies and media reports that concluded millions of offsets were worthless”, the story adds. However, Prof Julia Jones of Bangor University, who co-authored one such study, told the Guardian – and wrote in Nature Ecology & Evolution – that she was “deeply concerned” that recent media coverage “gives the impression that the very idea of tackling climate change by slowing tropical deforestation is a scam”. She added: “This is not true and the idea could harm forests.”

News and views

‘BOILING NOT WARMING’: Thailand’s marine life is “suffering” due to record ocean temperatures, “worrying scientists and local communities”, the Bangkok Post reported. Mass coral bleaching is underway, with Lalita Putchim, a marine biologist with the country’s department of marine and coastal resources, telling the newspaper: “I couldn’t find a single healthy coral…Almost all of the species have bleached, there’s very little that’s not affected.” The temperatures – reaching close to 33C – are also impacting the livelihoods of local fishers, with potential knock-on effects for food prices and food security, the outlet noted. 

POLAND FARMER STRIKES: A DeSmog investigation revealed that Orka – a new Polish farmers’ movement that stormed the country’s parliament on 9 May – rose to prominence “after it was championed by populist politicians”, despite identifying itself as an “apolitical” group of “common farmers”. DeSmog uncovered “a number of far-right links to two of the group’s leading figures”. Rightwing Polish MPs gave Orka “access to the parliament building” and have “also been quick to join” Orka’s protest, which has said it wants to put the EU Green Deal “in the trash”, the outlet added. Politicians named in the piece had not yet responded to DeSmog.

SEABED SUIT: WWF-Norway has sued the Norwegian government “for its controversial decision to open up vast parts of its continental shelf to deep seabed mining”, the Maritime Executive reported. The suit claims that the government’s impact assessment “fails to satisfy minimum requirements of the country’s subsea minerals act”. The outlet added that the NGO had sent an initial notice to the government in April, while the government responded that the lawsuit is “lacking merit”. According to the Guardian, the Norwegian Environment Agency “has also said the impact assessment does not provide a sufficient scientific or legal basis for deep-sea mining”.

WOLVES RETURN: The Irish Times reported that wolf populations are “making a comeback” in Europe “thanks to wildlife protection measures” introduced by the EU. According to the newspaper, the number of wolves has grown 81% since 2012, to more than 20,000, and their range is up 25%. While Spain, host to “one of the largest populations in the EU”, has “tightened” its measures to protect the wolf, a “backlash” is stirring at the EU level, it adds. In December, Ursula Von Der Leyen’s conservative party backed a proposal to downgrade the protected status of wolves, Agriland reported. And, last week, the EU council of agricultural ministers “heard calls for more to be done to address the rise in wolf attacks on livestock”.

NZ’S ‘WAR ON NATURE’: New Zealand’s rightwing government was accused of “waging a war on nature” by environmentalists after it made “sweeping cuts” to climate projects in its 2024-25 budget, the Guardian reported. While the country’s climate minister pointed to flood defences and a waste levy when asked about the absence of new funding for environmental protection, critics described these as “the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff without future-facing climate mitigation plans”, the paper added.

OJ INFLATION: Orange juice makers are considering switching to mandarins as wholesale prices have “gone bananas” following fears of poor harvests in Brazil, the Guardian reported. It added that orange trees in Brazil have been hit by an “incurable disease” after “extreme heat stress and drought during their key flowering period…fuelled by the climate crisis”. Florida, another key growing region, has been “hit by a series of hurricanes and the greening disease, which is spread by sap-sucking insects”, it added.  The Financial Times quoted Kees Cools, the president of the International Fruit and Vegetable Juice Association, who said: “We’ve never seen anything like it, even during the big freezes and big hurricanes.”

MONKEY BUSINESS: More than 150 howler monkeys – “midsize primates known for their roaring vocal calls” – have died, apparently of heat stroke, amidst a major heatwave in Mexico, the Associated Press reported. In a northern Mexican animal park, “at least a hundred parrots, bats and other animals have died, apparently of dehydration”, the newswire added. Mexican newspaper La Prensa reported that volunteers were working to “establish drinking fountains for wildlife” in affected communities.

Watch, read, listen

FARMERS’ FURY: An Article 14 story explained why Punjab’s farmers “boycotted” Narendra Modi’s party in India’s general elections that concluded this week.

CHAT GPTREE?: This Guardian podcast looked at the literature to see if the “wood-wide web” – the idea that trees can talk to each other – holds water against new evidence.

FROG FUNGUS: In Sequencer, freelance journalist Max Levy explored the single deadliest pathogen for biodiversity loss: a deadly fungus imperilling amphibian populations. 

ISLAND DROUGHT: Euronews Green followed the plight of Sicilian farmers trying to cope with one of the island’s worst droughts on record – exacerbated by poor water management.

New science

Global groundwater warming due to climate change
Nature Geoscience

New research found that, on average, global groundwater is projected to warm by more than 2C over the 21st century under a medium-emissions pathway. By modelling the diffusion of heat from the surface through the ground and maps of water-table depth, researchers calculated monthly temperatures for groundwater around the world from 2000 to 2100. They found that groundwater temperatures increased by an average of 0.3C over 2000-20, although with significant variation from place to place. They concluded that climate change under a medium-emissions pathway could push groundwater resources for 77-188 million people above the “highest threshold for drinking water temperatures set by any country”.

African food system and biodiversity mainly affected by urbanisation via dietary shifts
Nature Sustainability

Increasing rice demand due to urbanisation will increase Africa’s methane emissions by 2.4% by 2050, according to new research. Using projections of urban expansion in Africa, researchers modelled land-use changes and the accompanying production changes for staple crops. They found that more than 3m hectares of land will be converted to urban land under a “middle-of-the-road” narrative – a relatively small proportional decrease, but with potential major impacts on local biodiversity. The authors argued that land-use planning and policymaking should take into account impacts on food production and biodiversity loss.

The human side of rewilding: Attitudes towards multi-species restoration at the public-private land nexus
Biological Conservation

A new study looking to understand US public opinion towards rewilding found more negative attitudes and behaviour when it came to reintroducing species that could harm livestock or humans or those that require more regulation. Conversely, interest groups favoured initiatives that involved conserving species migration as an ecological process. Researchers surveyed five stakeholder groups – “local ranchers, statewide ranchers, rural residents, urban residents and members of conservation organisations” – across the state of Montana. The results, they concluded, highlight “how achieving rewilding in working lands will require community engagement to increase public support and continued assessments of social processes that may limit multi-species restoration”.

In the diary

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org.

The post Cropped 5 June 2024: Sudan famine ‘imminent’; Pandemic treaty drags on; US backs offsets with ‘integrity’ appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Cropped 5 June 2024: Sudan famine ‘imminent’; Pandemic treaty drags on; US backs offsets with ‘integrity’

Continue Reading

Climate Change

The Language of the Land: Revitalizing Indigenous Languages for Ecological Understanding

Published

on

Indigenous languages are more than tools of communication—they are living repositories of ecological knowledge, shaped by millennia of close relationship with the land, waters, skies, and all living beings. Each word, verb, and inflection embed understandings of place, seasonality, climate cycles, and human responsibility to the natural world.
 As climate change accelerates, there is a growing recognition that language revitalization is climate action. Restoring Indigenous languages is about preserving culture and restoring knowledge systems that contain detailed and relational understandings of ecological processes. These languages offer insights urgently needed to adapt to and mitigate today’s environmental crises.

How Language Encodes Ecological Knowledge

Indigenous languages often describe the world relationally, not just descriptively. Many Indigenous terms describe relationships, behaviours, and responsibilities rather than naming things in isolation.
 For example:

  • In the Nuu-chah-nulth language on the west coast of Vancouver Island, there are multiple verbs for water movement—words that distinguish between rippling, trickling, flooding, or rushing. Each verb carries specific environmental cues: changes in rainfall patterns, seasonal flow, or flooding risk. 
  • In Anishinaabemowin, “Aki” refers to Earth as an animate being, reflecting a worldview where the land is not a passive backdrop but a living relative. This linguistic structure affirms that humans are in relationship with land, not dominion over it. 
  • In Gwich’in, different words for caribou describe their life stages, movements, and ecological roles. These linguistic distinctions hold knowledge about migration routes, mating cycles, and the health of the land.  

Such examples reveal how Indigenous languages encode local environmental indicators, climate memory, and survival strategies within everyday speech.  

Language and Climate Resilience: A New Frontier  

As climate change disrupts familiar patterns, Indigenous languages offer tools to interpret these changes through a culturally grounded lens. Revitalizing these languages strengthens identity and cultural continuity and equips communities with local and regional knowledge systems that can assess and respond to ecological disruption.

In many communities, land-based language camps teach youth the names of medicines, constellations, and animals, alongside the protocols and stories accompanying them. This strengthens climate resilience through:

  • Intergenerational knowledge  
  • Cultural pride and ecological responsibility 
  • Reinforced relationships with land, language, and community 

Colonialism, Language Loss, and Environmental Consequences

Colonial policies and practices—including residential schools, forced relocation, and assimilation—aimed to sever the ties between Indigenous Peoples and their languages. Today, many Indigenous languages in Canada are critically endangered, and with their loss comes the erosion of place-based ecological knowledge that is not documented in Western science. 

As communities work to reclaim their languages, they are also reclaiming their role as land stewards, drawing on ancestral teachings that define how to live in balance with all of creation. 

Revitalizing Indigenous languages is thus not only cultural preservation but also environmental justice. It challenges extractive paradigms and reasserts worldviews that prioritize reciprocity, care, and interdependence with Mother Earth.

Recommendations for Readers

  1. Support Language Revitalization Programs 
  2. Contribute to immersion schools, land-based learning camps, and Indigenous language organizations. These initiatives are vital for climate and cultural resilience. 
  3. Incorporate Indigenous Languages into Environmental Education 
  4. If you’re an educator, integrate local Indigenous terms into your climate, geography, and ecology lessons—always with appropriate consultation and permission. 
  5. Attend Workshops and Learn Locally 
  6. Participate in language classes or workshops offered by nearby Indigenous Nations. Learning a few words for local species, landforms, or weather phenomena can deepen your ecological awareness. 
  7. Explore the Language–Climate Connection

Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

(Image Credit: Getty images, Unsplash)

The post The Language of the Land: Revitalizing Indigenous Languages for Ecological Understanding appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

The Language of the Land: Revitalizing Indigenous Languages for Ecological Understanding

Continue Reading

Climate Change

嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

Published

on

火山喷发对科学家及其气候模型构成了根本性挑战。

众所周知,剧烈的火山喷发会导致地表气温突然下降,多次喷发则会在几十年乃至几个世纪的时间尺度上影响气候变率。

当火山喷发将二氧化硫注入平流层时,会形成气溶胶,从而阻挡阳光到达地球表面。

与人类对气候变化的影响不同,后者发生缓慢且可以在各种社会经济情景下被纳入气候模型进行考量。火山喷发具有突发性,这给气候预测带来了挑战。

目前科学家尚无法预测火山喷发的发生时间、地点以及二氧化硫的排放量。

那么,在进行未来气候预测时,如何考虑火山喷发对气候的影响呢?

上微信关注《碳简报》

在我们最近发表于《通讯-地球与环境》(Communications Earth & Environment)的研究中,我们表明火山喷发对全球气温预测的不确定性产生了重大影响。

我们的研究结果发现,如果将偶发的火山喷发纳入气候预测,突破《巴黎协定》所设定的1.5C升温上限的时间会略有延迟,但与此同时,未来几十年也将出现更多快速升温和降温的时期。

气候预测中的火山强迫

气候科学家将火山喷发对气候的影响——主要是通过释放出二氧化硫气体进入大气——称为“火山强迫”(volcanic forcing)。

当前的气候模型在进行未来预测时采用一个恒定的火山强迫值,该值是根据1850年至今的历史平均强迫值计算得出的。

国际耦合模式比较计划(CMIP)也是如此,这项全球模型工作为政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)发布的重要评估报告提供基础数据。

然而,这种方法存在显著局限。

首先,历史平均强迫值无法表示火山爆发的偶发性。

大规模火山喷发呈零星分布——有时好多事件集中发生在某几个十年内,有时两个事件之间则可能相隔上百年。

此外,与数千年尺度的记录相比,从1850年至今的参考时期中,发生过的大规模喷发事件 ——指排放超过3太克(Tg)二氧化硫的喷发事件——相对较少。

最后,早期国际耦合模式比较计划气候模型中所使用的火山强迫重建数据并未包含排放量少于3太克二氧化硫的中小规模喷发。

这是因为这些喷发在1980年卫星时代开始之前大多未被探测到。然而,这些体量较小但发生频率更高的喷发事件,在长期火山强迫中贡献了30%至50%。

采取新方法

传统上,气候科学家认为气候预测中主要存在三种不确定性来源:内部变率、模型不确定性和情景不确定性。

其中,“内部”变率是指气候系统内部自然产生的波动,如厄尔尼诺现象;模型不确定性是指不同气候模型之间结果的差异;情景不确定性则涉及未来几十年全球可能的发展路径。

我们的研究结果表明,火山喷发应被明确视为气候预测中第四个重要的不确定性来源。

为了探究在考虑火山强迫不确定性的情况下,气候预测会发生怎样的变化,我们的研究采用了一种概率方法,这一方法建立在Bethke等人于2017年提出的研究基础之上。

为此,我们构建了“随机强迫情景”,其本质是1000种延续至本世纪末的火山活动可能时间线预测。

这些情景基于冰芯中记录的过去1.15万年火山活动历史,以及卫星观测和地质证据。每个情景都呈现了不同的喷发强度、地点、时间和频率的组合。

(在数学中,“随机”系统是指结果包含随机性或不确定性的系统,因此不可预测;这与“确定性”系统相对,后者的结果可以通过初始条件和一套规则或方程完全预测。)

随后,我们利用2015至2100年期间的随机火上强迫和历史平均火山强迫模拟气候预测,研究共享社会经济路径(SSPs)中三种不同排放情景下的升温变化:低排放情景(SSP1-1.9)、与现行气候政策相符的中等排放情景(SSP2-4.5)、非常高排放情景(SSP5-8.5)。

在这一步中,我们使用了一种称为FaIR的简化气候模型,也称“模拟器”。

通过模拟1000种不同的火山未来情况,我们发现在21世纪未来时期火山喷发所引起的气候不确定性,可能超过同期气候系统本身的内部变率。

我们还发现,到2030年代,火山喷发可能占全球气温预测总不确定性的三分之一以上。

下图中能看到这些结果。图中展示了不同来源对总不确定性的影响。火山为橙色、内部变率为深蓝色、气候模型响应为黄色,未来人类排放情景为绿色。

Chart: Annual mean contribution of uncertainties

对1.5C临界值的意义

我们的模拟结果表明,在气候预测中纳入可能的火山活动时间线后,短期内突破《巴黎协定》设定的1.5C升温上限的概率略有下降。

根据不同的排放情景,相较于使用恒定火山强迫的预测,模拟发现超过1.5C升温上限的概率下降了4%至10%。

尽管这一结果听起来似乎令人鼓舞,但未来的火山活动并不能在长期缓和由人类引起的全球变暖。

1815年坦博拉火山的喷发事件就是一个强有力的例证。这次喷发使全球气温平均下降了约0.8C,带来了“无夏之年”,导致欧洲、北美和中国大范围的作物歉收和饥荒。

火山喷发带来的降温效应是短暂的,通常只持续几年,其并不会改变由人类排放所导致的长期变暖趋势。

我们的研究发现,即使考虑多种可能的未来火山活动,在除了最低排放路径以外的所有情景中,全球变暖仍将在几十年内超过1.5C。

即便21世纪火山活动频繁,其对全球变暖的抵消作用也仅占很小一部分——这意味着减排对于实现长期气候目标仍然至关重要。

下方图表展示了在三种排放情景下,使用随机火山强迫(实线)与恒定火山强迫(虚线)时超过1.5C的概率(上图),以及两种强迫方式之间的概率差异(下图)。

Charts: Probability of exceeding 1.5C

十年尺度的气温变率

我们的研究提供的另一个重要发现是:一旦将火山强迫的变率纳入考虑,将更有可能出现极端温暖和寒冷的十年期。

在中等排放情景下,我们发现出现负向十年期趋势——即全球表面温度在某个十年内平均下降——的概率增加了10%到18%。

与此同时,出现极端温暖十年期的概率也随之增加,这反映出火山强迫的变率会同时提高变暖和变冷极端事件发生的可能性。

这一结果凸显了火山喷发如何在十年时间尺度上对全球气温趋势带来显著的波动。

迈向更完善的气候预测

了解火山对气候的影响,对于全面评估农业、基础设施和能源系统在未来所面临的风险至关重要。

使用全面的地球系统模型运行数千种火山情景并不切实际,因为这需要极高的计算资源。但与此同时,当前的方法也存在上文提到的显著局限。

不过,在未来的气候模型工作中,仍有折中方案可行。

即将开展的下一阶段气候建模实验——即CMIP7情景模式比较计划——可以采用更具代表性的“平均”火山强迫基线,这一基线纳入了历史记录中常被遗漏的小型喷发事件的影响。这一偏差现已在用于下一代气候模型模拟的历史火山强迫数据集中得到纠正。

此外,建模团队还应额外运行包含高频和低频未来火山活动的情景,以全面捕捉火山不确定性对气候预测的影响范围。

虽然人类导致的温室气体排放仍是气候变化的主导因素,但若能妥善考虑火山活动的不确定性,将有助于我们获得更全面的未来气候图景及其对社会的潜在影响。

The post 嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测 appeared first on Carbon Brief.

嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

Continue Reading

Climate Change

There’s Resistance in Resilience

Published

on

My heart is heavy this week. The climate crisis is causing death and destruction across the globe — floods in Texas, North Carolina, China, Columbia, and Afghanistan; extreme heat in multiple continents; senseless wars and genocides — all continue in a somber and sad death march. Authoritarianism is more deeply entrenched across the USA and the contents of the legislation passed and signed by the President just before the 4th of July will cause great harm to people I love and consider family as well as set us back decades in the fight for environmental justice and climate mitigation and adaptation.

I feel like I have been writing about hope and resistance since I started at Climate Generation almost three years ago. And I have been finding it really hard to practice what I preach, what I know, these last few weeks.

And then last night, while doom scrolling on Instagram, I saw a post from @earthlyeducation. I was reminded that we need both to envision the world we actually want to live in, and then have practical strategies to fight for it. The post was a balm for my activated brain, body, and heart. So I share, directly quoting, from their post:

1. Speak truth with love
Start with your circles. Friends, family, workmates. Share the full reality of what’s happening without sugarcoating it. This system is violent and unsustainable. The goal is to wake people up, not with fear, but with clarity and care.

2. Use your gifts for resistance
Whatever you do, you have power. Whether you make music, build things, teach, or organize behind the scenes, your skills matter. Use them to support movements, challenge the status quo, or build alternatives rooted in justice and ecology.

3. Confront power directly
Power will not give up willingly. Join movements that are resisting fossil fuels, corporate greed, and settler-colonial violence. Disrupt the smooth flow of business as usual. Show up where it hurts them most, and don’t ask for permission.

4. Divest from destruction
Move your money out of institutions funding war, fossil fuels, factory farms, and deforestation. Ethical banks and credit unions exist. Every dollar you remove is one less fuelling collapse. Starve the beast wherever you can.

5. Join or build a collective
Collective power is our only hope. Join a climate, housing, indigenous, or justice group that aligns with your values. Or start one with others who are ready. You don’t need to be perfect, just present and willing to grow.

6. Live like capitalism is ending
Radically reduce consumption. Eat more plant-based. Grow and share food. Cut ties with fast fashion and hyper-consumerism. Build your life around regeneration, repair, care and mutual support. Be a living contradiction to this system.

7. Reclaim community and connection
The system wants us isolated and distracted. Fight that by building mutual aid, sharing skills, raising kids together, and restoring kinship with the more-than-human world.

Susan Phillips

Susan Phillips
Executive Director

Photo: Fabrice Florin

The post There’s Resistance in Resilience appeared first on Climate Generation.

There’s Resistance in Resilience

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com