Connect with us

Published

on

Colombia’s ambitious green plans have hit headwinds, as tricky politics hampers renewable growth and plans to stop oil and gas exploration spark economic fears.

Last June, left-winger Gustavo Petro was elected president, vowing to make Colombia a “world power of life” in his four-year term.

He promised to scale up renewables, end fossil fuel exploration and ensure that workers are protected from the transition.

Climate campaigner Andres Gomez from CENSAT said it was an ambitious strategy that “no other country in the world is trying to do”.

Forests, methane, finance: Where are the Cop26 pledges now?

Over half of Colombia’s export revenue is from fossil fuels and richer nations like the US, UK and Canada have yet to commit to stopping fossil fuel exploration.

But Petro’s ambitious strategies are experiencing turbulence. Foreign energy firms have pulled out of renewable projects and plans to restrict fossil fuel exploration have sparked a backlash from some economists.

Beyond oil and gas?

At the start of the year, the then Colombian energy minister Irene Velez told the World Economic Forum in Switzerland that no new oil and gas exploration licenses would be granted.


Since then, none have been. The Colombian Senate passed a motion in April banning fracking for gas and no new coal exploration licenses have been granted either.

But this end to exploration has not been put into law, meaning the next government could issue licenses when it comes into power in 2026. Colombia restricts presidents to one four-year term.

It could happen sooner. In August, Velez was replaced as energy minister by Omar Camacho. He and finance minister Ricardo Bonilla have made overtures towards the oil and gas sector.

In August, Bonilla told a congressional commission that he was not ruling out future licensing but would first look at how much could be produced within areas already licensed for exploration.

Economic fears

Pressure to issue licenses was increased when Colombia’s Hydrocarbons Agency found that existing reserves are slightly smaller than previously estimated – enough for just over seven years.

Milton Montoya, a professor at Universidad Externado, warned that lower production could be economically damaging to Colombia.

“If we don’t invest in exploring right now, we’re going to have to import gas and oil. For our economy that would be a disaster,” he said.

Fuel prices are already a sensitive political subject: In August, taxi drivers in Colombia’s capital city Bogota stopped traffic in a protest against high fuel prices.

Jobs are at risk too. A government analysis this year found that halving the production of coal and oil could risk 362,000 jobs if there are no measures in place to help.

To deal with this upheaval, the energy ministry is consulting on a just transition plan for workers. But Juan Carlos Solano, the environmental lead at Colombia’s coal workers’ union said that the process is “too slow”.

Renewables roll-out

Wind and solar still provide just over 2% of Colombia’s power. The government wants to multiply installed capacity by 20 by 2030.

Its having some success. Last month, the energy regulator announced a record number of renewables developers were requesting to be connected to the electric grid.

But some projects are stalling. French energy giant EDF cancelled a solar project south of Bogota in October.

In a statement, it primarily blamed local government for delays in environmental permits. But also criticised national government’s tax reforms which made the project less profitable.

Argentine rewilding debate descends into legal threats

The rising cost of borrowing and a volatile exchange rate also dampened their enthusiasm, the company said.

In May, Italian firm Enel indefinitely suspended a wind farm near the Venezuelan border because indigenous Wayuu communities regularly blockaded construction.

But a 200-mile electricity transmission cable through the same region has been agreed, along with an agreement on energy transition.

Romain Ioualalen is the policy manager of Oil Change International. He said “‘it was always going to be the case that a very ambitious, visionary policy was going to be difficult”.

“No one said the transition was going to be easy and perfection doesn’t exist in the policy world,” he added, “but the political capital and energy they’re putting in to make this work is impressive”.

The post Colombia’s big green plans run into headwinds appeared first on Climate Home News.

Colombia’s big green plans run into headwinds

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Fish Threatened By Farms and Mining Set to Be First Species Listed As Endangered in Second Trump Term

Published

on

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed an Endangered Species Act listing for a rare chub whose habitat has been dried up by over-pumping of groundwater that would be further stressed by proposed lithium mines.

DYER, Nev.—A century ago, Fish Lake Valley looked much more like its name than it does today.

Fish Threatened By Farms and Mining Set to Be First Species Listed As Endangered in Second Trump Term

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Global wheat yields would be ‘10%’ higher without climate change

Published

on

Global yields of wheat are around 10% lower now than they would have been without the influence of climate change, according to a new study.

The research, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, looks at data on climate change and growing conditions for wheat and other major crops around the world over the past 50 years.

It comes as heat and drought have this year been putting wheat supplies at risk in key grain-producing regions, including parts of Europe, China and Russia.

The study finds that increasingly hot and dry conditions negatively impacted yields of three of the five key crops examined.

Overall, global grain yields soared during the study period due to technological advancements, improved seeds and access to synthetic fertilisers.

But these yield setbacks have “important ramifications for prices and food security”, the study authors write.

Grain impacts

Most parts of the world have experienced “significant” yield increases in staple crops since the mid-20th century.

The new study notes that, in the past 50 years, yields increased by 69-123% for the five staple crops included in the research – wheat, maize, barley, soya beans and rice.

But crop production is increasingly threatened by climate change and extreme weather. A 2021 study projected “major shifts” in global crop productivity due to climate change within the next two decades.

Earlier this year, Carbon Brief mapped out news stories of crops being destroyed around the world by heat, drought, floods and other weather extremes in 2023-24. Maize and wheat were the crops that appeared most frequently in these reports.

The crops that appeared most frequently in media reports of extreme weather impacts analysed by Carbon Brief, ranked in order of most to least frequent: maize, wheat, rice, potatoes, soya beans, olives, bananas, grapes, sunflowers and coffee. Credit: Carbon Brief.
The crops that appeared most frequently in media reports of extreme weather impacts analysed by Carbon Brief, ranked in order of most to least frequent: maize, wheat, rice, potatoes, soya beans, olives, bananas, grapes, sunflowers and coffee. Credit: Carbon Brief.

Hot and dry weather is currently threatening wheat crops in parts of China, the world’s largest wheat producer, Reuters reported this month.

In the UK, wheat crops are struggling amid the “driest start to spring in England for almost 70 years”, the Times recently reported. Farm groups say some crops are already failing, the Guardian said.

As a result, global wheat supplies are “tight”, according to Bloomberg, with price rises possible depending on weather conditions in parts of Europe, China and Russia.

Food security and prices

The study uses climate datasets, modelling and national crop statistics from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization to assess crop production and climate trends in key grain-producing countries over 1974-2023, including Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, the EU, Russia and the US.

The researchers assess climate observations and then use crop models to calculate what yields would have been with and without these climate changes.

For example, “if it has warmed 1C over 50 years and the model says that 1C leads to 5% yield loss, we’d calculate that the warming trend caused a loss of 5%”, Prof David Lobell, the lead study author and a professor at Stanford University, tells Carbon Brief.

The study looks at two reanalysis climate datasets that include information on temperature and rainfall over the past 50 years: TerraClimate (TC) and ERA5-Land. (Reanalysis data combines observations with a modern forecasting model.)

The researchers find that yields of three of the five crops are lower than they would have been without warmer temperatures and other climate impacts in the past 50 years.

Yields were lower than they otherwise would have been by 12-14% for barley, 8-12% for wheat and 4% for maize.

The impacts on soya beans were less clear as there were “significant differences” between data sources. But both datasets show a negative impact on yields, ranging from 2% to 8%.

The effects on rice yields were inconclusive, with one dataset showing a positive effect of around 1% while the other showed a negative effect of about 3%.

The chart below shows the estimated yield impacts for each crop based on the calculations from the two climate datasets.

The estimated percentage impact of climate factors on yields of wheat (brown), maize (yellow), rice (blue), soya bean (green) and barley (purple) from 1974-2023, using two different historical climate datasets. Source: Lobell et al. (2025).
The estimated percentage impact of climate factors on yields of wheat (brown), maize (yellow), rice (blue), soya bean (green) and barley (purple) from 1974-2023, using two different historical climate datasets. Source: Lobell et al. (2025).

Given soaring overall crop yields during this time, impacts of 4-13% “may seem trivial”, the researchers write. But, they say, it can have “important ramifications for prices and food security” given growing food demand, noting:

“The overall picture of the past half-century is that climate trends have led to a deterioration of growing conditions for many of the main grain-producing regions of the world.”

Water stress and heat

The study also assesses the impacts that warming and vapour pressure deficit – a key driver of plant water stress – have on crop yields.

Vapour pressure deficit is the difference between the amount of water vapour in the air and the point at which water vapour in the air becomes saturated. As air becomes warmer, it can hold more water vapour.

A high deficit can reduce plant growth and increase water stress. The models show that these effects may be the main driver of losses in grain yield, with heat having a more “indirect effect”, as higher temperatures drive water stress.

Agricultural irrigation system watering dry soil on a crop field in the US. Credit: Andrii Biletskyi / Alamy Stock Photo. Image ID: 3AKGHEX.
Agricultural irrigation system watering dry soil on a crop field in the US. Credit: Andrii Biletskyi / Alamy Stock Photo.

The study finds that vapour pressure deficit increased in most temperate regions in the past 50 years.

The researchers compare their data to climate modelling simulations covering the past 50 years. They find largely similar results, but notice a “significant underestimation” of vapour pressure deficit increases in temperate regions in most climate models.

Many maize-growing areas in the EU, China, Argentina and much of Africa have vapour deficit trends that “exceed even the highest trend in models”, they write.

The researchers also find that most regions experienced “rapid warming” during the study period, with the average crop-growing season now warmer than more than 80% of growing seasons 50 years ago.

The findings indicate that, in some areas, “even the coolest growing season in the present day is warmer than the warmest season that would have occurred 50 years ago”.

Wheat growing in a field. Credit: Jon Freeman / Alamy Stock Photo. Image ID: EXYNXR.
Wheat growing in a field. Credit: Jon Freeman / Alamy Stock Photo.

An exception to this is in the US and Canada, they find, with most maize and soya bean crop areas in the US experiencing lower levels of warming than other parts of the world and a “slight cooling” in wheat-growing areas of the northern Great Plains and central Canada.

(The central US has experienced a cooling trend in summer daytime temperatures since the middle of the 20th century, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. There are many theories behind this “warming hole”, which has continued despite climate change.)

CO2 greening

Dr Corey Lesk, a postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College who studies the impacts of climate on crops, says these findings are in line with other recent estimates. He tells Carbon Brief:

“There are some uncertainties and sensitivity to model specification here – but it’s somewhat likely climate change has already reduced crop yields in the global mean.”

The study’s “main limitation” is that it is “behind” on including certain advances in understanding how soil moisture impacts crops, Lesk adds:

“Moisture changes and CO2 [carbon dioxide] effects are the largest present uncertainties in past and future crop impacts of climate change. This paper is somewhat limited in advancing understanding on those aspects, but it’s illuminating to pause and take stock.”

The research looks at whether the benefits of CO2 increases during the past 50 years exceed the negative effects of higher levels of the greenhouse gas.

Rising CO2 levels can boost plant growth in some areas in a process called “CO2 fertilisation”. However, a 2019 study found that this “global greening” could be stalled by growing water stress.

Yield losses for wheat, maize and barley “likely exceeded” any benefits of CO2 increases in the past 50 years, the study finds.

The opposite is true for soya beans and rice, they find, with a net-positive impact of more than 4% on yields.

Soya beans growing in a field. Credit: Volodymyr Shtun / Alamy Stock Photo. Image ID: 3B84F7G.
Soya beans growing in a field. Credit: Volodymyr Shtun / Alamy Stock Photo.

Climate science has “done a remarkable job of anticipating global impacts on the main grains and we should continue to rely on this science to guide policy decisions”, Lobell, the lead study author, says in a press release.

He adds that there may be “blind spots” on specialised crops, such as coffee, cocoa, oranges and olives, which “don’t have as much modelling” as key commodity crops, noting:

“All these have been seeing supply challenges and price increases. These matter less for food security, but may be more eye-catching for consumers who might not otherwise care about climate change.”

The post Global wheat yields would be ‘10%’ higher without climate change appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Global wheat yields would be ‘10%’ higher without climate change

Continue Reading

Climate Change

The Chairman of Texas’ Public Utility Commission Has a To-Do List

Published

on

The electricity regulator is looking to regain the public’s trust after Winter Storm Uri and build out infrastructure to support the boom in electricity demand for data centers.

Ahead of Thomas Gleeson’s unanimous full confirmation Monday as the chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, Sen. Angela Paxton asked the energy regulator what three things top his to-do list.

The Chairman of Texas’ Public Utility Commission Has a To-Do List

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com