Connect with us

Published

on

Chinese EV Maker BYD Banks 6.2M Carbon Credits Under Australia’s EV Efficiency Scheme

Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD has accumulated around 6.2 million carbon credits under Australia’s New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) scheme. This comes from its strong performance in low-emission vehicle production and sales in the country.

The credits reward manufacturers that make and import vehicles with low greenhouse gas emissions. BYD’s haul reflects the company’s large supply of electric vehicles (EVs) that meet or exceed strict emissions benchmarks.

These credits can be sold to other manufacturers that fall short of efficiency targets. They help other car makers comply with regulatory requirements, which can be costly to miss.

BYD’s strong carbon credit position highlights its quick growth in EV markets. This shows the importance of leading in clean vehicles, especially with carbon pricing and regulations.

How Australia’s NVES Turns Emissions Into Tradable Credits

Australia’s New Vehicle Efficiency Standard aims to cut vehicle emissions over time. It sets yearly targets for average CO₂ emissions of new light vehicle fleets sold in the country.

Australia NVES targets
Source: NVES website

Manufacturers that sell more low-emission vehicles than required earn credits. Those that sell fewer low-emission vehicles can buy credits to balance their performance.

BYD benefited because its vehicles, especially EVs, have very low tailpipe emissions. Each EV imported or sold that performs better than the standard adds credits to BYD’s account. On the other hand, makers of heavier or higher-emission vehicles might face penalties. They may also need to buy carbon credits to comply.

carbon credit earners under Australia NVES scheme
Chart from Financial Review

This system creates a market for credits linked to carbon intensity. It rewards companies that adopt clean tech quickly and penalises those that lag. The 6.2 million-credit total shows BYD’s scale in clean vehicle supply under this compliance scheme.

Why BYD Leads in Carbon Credit Generation

BYD’s strong position in carbon credits reflects its dominance in EV production and global sales trends. Per the NVES data, the Chinese EV maker tops the list of companies earning carbon credits under the scheme.

BYD is now the biggest EV maker globally, beating Tesla in 2025. It has been selling millions of electric cars each year since 2023. The company is also growing in markets like Europe, Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Australia.

BYD vs TESLA ev sales 2025

This scale makes BYD well-placed to earn credits when regulations reward low-emission vehicles. Other carmakers that depend on internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles might find it hard to earn similar credits for efficiency or emissions programs.

In some regions — including Europe — BYD is even in talks to supply surplus carbon credits to traditional automakers. The aim is to help those automakers avoid fines under strict EU emissions rules by 2025.

These talks could expand BYD’s reach in carbon credit markets. They might go beyond Australia and into global regulatory frameworks.

From Regulation to Revenue: Carbon Credits as Strategic Assets

Carbon credits have become more important in the auto industry as regulators tighten emissions limits.

Under schemes like Australia’s NVES and the European Union’s emissions regulations, credits act as compliance instruments. They can reduce the cost of meeting regulatory targets for manufacturers.

For example, European automakers can form carbon credit pools. Carbon credit pooling, where companies share or trade surplus credits, is emerging as a compliance method. These pools allow companies that fall short of targets to buy credits from low-emission peers such as BYD or Tesla.

Tesla has also earned significant revenue from selling regulatory or carbon credits to other automakers. In 2025, the company generated almost $2 billion in total carbon credits from these sales, even as volumes shifted during the year. They are an important, though changing, revenue source for Tesla.

Tesla carbon credit revenue 2025

The pooling helps firms avoid large fines for missing emissions caps. In 2025, EU penalties for vehicles that exceed CO₂ limits could run into billions of dollars if automakers do not comply.

Under Australia’s NVES, credits are generated when a manufacturer’s fleet emissions fall below annual targets. While there is no fixed public trading price yet, industry modelling links the credit value closely to the penalty rate of A$100 per g CO₂/km per vehicle, per the NVES Act 2024.

Analysts estimate real trading values may range around A$50–A$60 per unit, or roughly US$32–US$38 at current exchange rates. Using a mid-range estimate of US$35 per credit, BYD’s 6.2 million credits could represent around US$217 million in potential compliance value.

BYD_NVES_credit_value_table
Sources: NVES Act 2024, AADA estimates

For BYD, credit generation becomes an asset as well as a compliance indicator. It can potentially sell surplus credits to others and strengthen relationships across global auto markets.

This shift reflects a broader trend. More countries are now tying vehicle emissions to tradable credits. This helps boost EV adoption and cut transport emissions.

Policy Pressure Accelerates the EV Shift

Transport is a major source of global greenhouse gas emissions. Light-duty vehicles alone account for a large share of road transport emissions worldwide. Thus, many governments are tightening emissions standards. These include late-decade targets for EV sales and fleet emissions averages.

The European Union wants carmakers to cut average CO₂ emissions a lot by 2025. They aim for zero-emission sales by 2035.

EU emissions standard for vehicles
Source: ICCT

In Asia, BYD is also pushing EV adoption hard, often outpacing legacy brands in unit sales. Its production volume helps it to be a major source of low-emission vehicles.

Australia’s NVES scheme reflects similar intentions. It seeks to shift the vehicle fleet toward cleaner technology by rewarding low emissions and penalizing high emissions. The 6.2 million credits that BYD amassed show the scale of emissions improvement achievable when a market leader focuses on EV supply.

Legacy Automakers Face a Compliance Squeeze

Traditional or legacy automakers face increasing pressure from efficiency and emissions regulations. Automakers that still sell many ICE vehicles often fall short of targets. This forces them to purchase carbon credits or pay penalties.

Both options can incur high costs. For example, if automakers don’t meet the 2025 emissions targets set by the EU, they could face fines up to $15.6 billion.

BYD’s possible participation in carbon credit pools could be significant for global emissions markets. These structures help companies with low EV production get credits from top EV sellers. The business and compliance value of credits thus goes beyond one scheme or country.

Beyond Sales: BYD’s Long-Term Climate Commitments

BYD’s strong carbon credit position supports its broader sustainability strategy. The company aims to reduce its carbon footprint and align with global climate goals.

The EV maker has committed to achieving carbon neutrality across its value chain by 2045, guided by China’s national dual-carbon goals. It also aims to cut the carbon intensity of its own operations by 50% by 2030 compared with a 2023 base year.

BYD GHG emission intensity
Source: BYD

BYD’s sustainability work spans beyond EV sales. It invests in battery technology, solar power solutions, and recycling efforts that support circular energy systems.

Each EV model is designed to support long life and high safety. These models, including those using BYD’s proprietary Blade Battery technology, also enable recycling and reuse.

These efforts reinforce BYD’s positioning not just as an EV maker but as a broader participant in low-carbon technology markets.

A Glimpse of the Auto Industry’s Carbon-Driven Future

BYD’s 6.2 million carbon credits show how regulatory incentives can amplify low-emission technology adoption. They provide a compliance advantage for BYD and a potential revenue stream if credits are sold or pooled.

Credit generation also signals strong EV market performance tied to emissions rules. BYD shows that as carbon pricing and efficiency standards grow, top EV makers can gain both environmentally and financially.

For traditional carmakers, the rise of tradable carbon credits tied to vehicle efficiency will likely remain a key part of emissions compliance strategies.

As global climate policies tighten, carbon credits may increasingly bridge technology gaps and help accelerate the transition to zero-emission mobility.

The post BYD Banks 6.2M Carbon Credits Potentially Worth US$217M Under Australia’s EV Efficiency Scheme appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business

Published

on

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) just rolled out a major revision to its Net-Zero Standard, Version 2.0. It changes how companies set climate targets, how much room they actually have to hit those targets, and how carbon credits fit into a credible net-zero strategy. Below, we break down what’s changing, when it takes effect, and why it matters even if your business isn’t formally an SBTi participant.

Key takeaways

  • SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
  • Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
  • The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
  • Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
  • Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.

Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.

However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.

In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.

How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?

SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.

Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.

What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.

Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation
Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises Focus on short-term climate progress
Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning
We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits

What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?

Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.

The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.

Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.

Old Net Zero Standard New Net Zero Standard
Grounded in net-zero by 2050 Grounded in net-zero by 2050
Climate leadership is reducing emissions Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions
Make a long-term commitment to net-zero Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles
Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal
  • Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal and asset decarbonization plan
  • Adds SBTi’s Asset Transition Method
  • Decarbonization targets are set through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps
  • Ambitious but achievable path based on starting point, financial resources, technology
  • Multiple pathways for unique opportunities and constraints of industries and companies
Businesses who fall behind targets lose status
  • “Best efforts” basis creates flexibility on progress to targets
  • Businesses that miss targets can keep status if they used “every lever” in their control
  • Minimum progress rules will be provided in the SBTi Assurance Manual
Ignores voluntary carbon projects
  • Uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions
  • 2027–2034: Mitigation is recognized. Carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted.
  • 2035 forward: Mitigation with carbon removal credits is required, with durability matching.

When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?

Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).

Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.

What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?

The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.

Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.

Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.

How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.

  1. Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
  2. Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
  3. Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.

How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:

  1. Reducing electricity consumption,
  2. Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
  3. Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.

V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.

The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.

The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.

How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.

Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.

Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:

  1. An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
  2. An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
  3. A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.

What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?

This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.

The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.

  1. Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
  2. Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
  3. Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.

Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.

Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.

How must companies neutralize residual emissions?

At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.

What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?

Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.

  1. Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
  2. Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
  3. Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.

How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard

As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.

We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.

FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?

It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.

What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.

When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?

If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.

Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?

They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.

What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?

Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.

What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?

Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.

The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD

Published

on

For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable

Published

on

A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com