Sustainable bond issuance in the Middle East is expected to remain strong in 2026. S&P Global Ratings projects regional issuance will reach between $20 billion and $25 billion next year. This outlook comes after a year marked by trade volatility and global uncertainty. Despite those pressures, investor appetite in the region remained resilient.
In 2025, conventional bond issuance by corporates and financial institutions in the Middle East grew by 10%–15%, reaching $81.2 billion. At the same time, sustainable bond issuance in the region increased by about 3%.
This contrasts sharply with global trends. Worldwide sustainable bond issuance declined by 21% in 2025. The Middle East, therefore, outperformed the broader global market.
Growth in 2025 was largely supported by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were especially important. Their strong activity offset a slowdown in Turkiye.

Issuance Concentrated in Three Countries
Sustainable bond activity in the Middle East remains highly concentrated. Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE captured more than 90% of the sustainable bond market in the region.
The bond market itself is mainly driven by Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Together, they accounted for a combined 80% of sustainable bond issuance by value in 2025.

Turkiye plays a different role. Sustainable loans dominate the market in that country rather than bonds. In fact, sustainable loan issuance in Turkiye represented about 60%–65% of the regional market by value, and 70%–75% by volume.
In 2025, labeled bond issuance slowed sharply in Turkiye. Banks reduced their activity in the bond market. However, renewable energy projects increased in both bond and loan markets. Wind and solar capacity growth could support issuance again in 2026.
In Saudi Arabia and the UAE, issuance remained resilient across markets. Volume stayed strong even during periods of volatility.
Sustainable Sukuk Breaks Records
One of the most notable trends is the rapid growth of sustainable sukuk. Sustainable sukuk are designed to fund projects that have environmental or social benefits, while complying with Shariah principles.

Total sustainable sukuk issuance in the Middle East reached a new record of $11.4 billion in 2025, compared with $7.9 billion in 2024. This type of financing now accounts for more than 45% of regional sustainable bond issuance by value and more than 40% by number of issuances in 2025.
This represents a major increase from the end of 2024, when sustainable sukuk made up 33% of value and 24% by number. Saudi Arabia and the UAE continue to lead sukuk issuance.
Guidance published by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) in April 2024 on green, social, and sustainability sukuk has helped improve transparency. Regulatory and government initiatives may further support growth in 2026.
Sukuk structures are particularly important in the GCC, where Islamic finance plays a central role in capital markets.
Renewable Energy Drives Issuance

Renewable energy remains the main use of proceeds in the region’s sustainable bond market. Solar energy is especially popular in GCC countries because of high solar irradiance. Large-scale renewable projects require significant capital. And green bonds and sukuk help finance these investments.
Energy companies such as Masdar in the UAE are expected to continue issuing green bonds to expand renewable portfolios.
Saudi Arabia is preparing to commission the world’s largest utility-scale green hydrogen project in Neom in 2026. The project will use solar, wind, and energy storage systems. It forms part of Saudi Vision initiatives aimed at diversifying the economy and reducing reliance on hydrocarbons.
Other common project categories include:
- Energy efficiency
- Green buildings
- Sustainable water management
- Clean transportation

Climate adaptation projects are still limited but growing. In Saudi Arabia, the sovereign has included climate adaptation in its green bond framework. Banks in the UAE and Saudi Arabia have also started financing adaptation projects.
New Bond Types Emerging
The Middle East sustainable finance market is evolving beyond traditional green bonds.
Transition finance is expected to grow in 2026. This is particularly relevant for hydrocarbon-linked economies. Issuers with credible transition strategies may use transition bonds or transition loans. These can finance emissions reductions and methane abatement projects.
Guidelines for sustainability-linked loan financing bonds (SLLBs) were introduced in June 2024. These instruments allow issuers to finance portfolios of sustainability-linked loans aligned with international principles.
In 2025, Emirates Islamic issued the first SLLB sukuk in the region. This may encourage more banks to follow.
Blue bonds are also gaining attention. The UAE has positioned itself as a leader in this segment, in line with its UAE Water Agenda 2036.
In August 2025, First Abu Dhabi Bank issued the region’s first blue bond by a financial institution. In January 2026, Emirates NBD raised $1 billion through a dual-tranche issuance, including $300 million in blue bonds and $700 million in green bonds.
Eligible blue projects include:
- Offshore wind
- Wetland and coral reef conservation
- Flood and drought-resilient infrastructure
- Sustainable water and wastewater management
Digital bonds may also emerge. In January 2026, Emirates NBD issued the largest UAE dirham-denominated digital bond listed on Nasdaq Dubai. Although not labeled sustainable, digital issuance could improve liquidity and attract foreign investors.
Stronger Rules Lay the Foundation for Growth
Finally, regulation is gradually strengthening across the region. In April 2025, Saudi Arabia’s Capital Markets Authority published guidelines for issuing labeled debt instruments. These align closely with ICMA standards.
In the UAE, Federal Decree Law No. 11 (2024) requires all entities to measure, report, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by May 2026. The law supports the country’s Net Zero 2050 strategy. Also, Turkiye is developing its own Green Taxonomy, largely based on the European Union framework.
Although there are currently no fully implemented local taxonomies in the region, policymakers are considering classification systems similar to Singapore’s “traffic light” approach. This system classifies activities as Green, Amber (transition), or Red (ineligible).
Such frameworks may help clarify which activities qualify for sustainable financing and could boost investor confidence.
What Will Power the $25B Forecast?
S&P Global expects issuance between $20 billion and $25 billion in 2026. The key drivers include:
- Continued renewable energy expansion
- Growing sustainable sukuk issuance
- Increased transition finance activity
- Regulatory developments and disclosure requirements
- Rising attention to climate adaptation and water resilience
However, sustainable finance volumes remain below what is needed to meet the region’s environmental challenges. Climate adaptation and water scarcity are still underfinanced. Private and blended finance may play a larger role in closing this funding gap.
Despite global volatility, the Middle East sustainable bond market has shown resilience. Strong issuance from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, combined with innovation in sukuk and new bond types, positions the region for continued growth in 2026.
If projections hold, the region could surpass $25 billion in sustainable bond issuance next year, reinforcing its expanding role in global sustainable finance.
The post Middle East Sustainable Bonds Set to Hit $25B in 2026 as Sukuk Surge appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

