For more than two decades, Nestlé through its “Sustainable Agriculture Initiative” (SAIN) has empowered farmers to adopt sustainable practices in coffee production. This time, the company is enhancing its Arabica variety supply chain to mitigate the carbon footprint of coffee production. So, what’s brewing in here? Let’s find out.
Introducing Arabica Star 4: Nestlé’s Sustainable and High-Yielding Coffee Variety
Nestlé has developed a new high-yielding Arabica coffee variety called Star 4 to strengthen its coffee supply chain. As global coffee demand is growing significantly, irrespective of climate changes, Nestlé has innovated its coffee variety with a reduced carbon footprint. The news release highlighted that the company was very concerned about the shrinking of Arabica cultivation areas due to climate change. Thus, this prompted Nestlé to leverage its agricultural expertise to overcome environmental concerns while ensuring a steady supply chain.
Nestlé’s team of scientists, technologists, and agronomists hail that the Star 4 is a “novel high-yielding Arabica variety” selected in Brazil. It is highly resilient and has a unique Brazilian coffee flavor.
Jeroen Dijkman, Head of Nestlé’s Institute of Agricultural Sciences remarked,
“Ensuring resilient coffee supply chains is crucial for future generations to enjoy exceptional coffee. Star 4, with its larger bean size and resistance to coffee leaf rust, demonstrates significantly higher yields compared to Brazil’s predominant local varieties, thereby reducing its environmental footprint.”
Notably, Marcelo Burity, Nestlé’s Head of Green Coffee Development has emphasized the importance of optimizing farming practices to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with coffee cultivation. He added,
“Optimizing cultivation practices remains vital as they are the primary factor contributing to the environmental impact of a cup of coffee.”
Other Sustainable Coffee Varieties of Nestlé
In addition to Star 4, Nestlé has introduced Roubi 1 and 2, Robusta varieties in Mexico, showcasing its ongoing commitment to innovative solutions in coffee cultivation. In the year 2021, the company added a new generation of carbon coffee using non-GMO breeding techniques. These two Robusta coffee varieties increase yields to 50% per tree compared to standard varieties. They cause a 30% reduction in the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) footprint of green coffee beans.
The basic idea of sustainable coffee production is to produce more coffee per unit of land, fertilizer, and energy input. Reducing the carbon footprint of green coffee beans is crucial, as they contribute significantly to the total CO2e emissions of a cup of coffee, ranging from 40% to 80%. Nestlé’s new Robusta varieties achieve up to a 30% reduction in CO2e, marking a substantial environmental breakthrough in coffee production.
Planting More Shade Trees
Various initiatives focus on integrating shade trees within farming systems. This approach particularly benefits crops like cocoa and coffee, which thrive under shaded conditions. By encouraging farmers to plant more shade trees, the initiative aims to shield these crops from heat stress and other environmental threats such as heavy rainfall. Moreover, shade trees play a pivotal role in improving water management, enhancing biodiversity, and sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, thus contributing significantly to emission reduction efforts.
Boosting Soil Health
A critical component of sustainable agriculture involves improving soil health to maximize land productivity. Nestlé has adopted many eco-friendly practices such as no-tillage, cover cropping, crop rotation, and organic fertilizers. Additionally, composting agricultural waste essentially fosters a robust carbon cycle for sustainable farming practices.
Agroforestry in Border Areas
Another important criterion is optimizing the surrounding areas of the main farmland. Some such practices involve restoring forests and peatlands and implementing strategic projects like windbreaks. These efforts mitigate carbon emissions and protect the biodiversity of that agricultural land.
Some other significant technological advancements to enhance cocoa and coffee supply chains and restore carbon sinks involve:
- farm-level assessments
- sustainability certifications
- satellite monitoring systems
- 100% renewable energy
Nestlé’s Emission Reduction Strategies
According to its current sustainability report, Nestlé achieved a 13.58% GHG emissions reduction in 2023 as compared to its 2018 baseline.

source: Nestlé
Nestlé has pledged to curb their emissions by 20% by 2025. By 2050, the organization aims to achieve net zero emissions by implementing regenerative agricultural practices. Furthermore, it is transitioning its logistics and operations to zero emissions. This ensures all facets of the organization contribute to environmental sustainability.
It will use high-quality natural climate solutions, benefiting communities and ecosystems to offset residual emissions. This approach balances environmental impact with societal well-being, supporting a sustainable future for all.

source: Nestlé
DID YOU KNOW?
Here’s a cool fact! Nestlé clinched the top spot for “coffee sustainability” in the 2023 Coffee Brew Index, as highlighted in the latest Coffee Barometer report. The accolade reflects Nestlé’s robust coffee sourcing strategy, which integrates social, environmental, and economic dimensions.
David Rennie, Head of Coffee Brands at Nestlé, emphasized,
“This recognition underscores our ongoing dedication to responsible coffee sourcing. Through initiatives like the Nescafé Plan and Nespresso AAA Sustainable Quality
Program, we collaborate closely with coffee farmers to promote sustainable and inclusive farming practices. Our commitment remains steadfast in innovating and advancing coffee farming for the better.”
With these science-backed coffee varieties and a strategic focus on sustainability, Nestlé is sure to achieve its net zero goals. Until then, let’s wait for the moment to savor a fresh cuppa as it hits the stores.
The post Brew Green: Nestlé Boosts Arabica Supply Chain to Lower Carbon Footprint appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

