In a landmark move, Anglo American (LON: AAL) and Teck Resources (TSX: TECK.A/TECK.B, NYSE: TECK) announced a $50 billion all-share merger that would reshape the global mining landscape. The combined company, to be named Anglo Teck, is set to become the world’s fifth-largest copper producer if regulators in Canada, the U.S., and China give their nod of approval.
This merger is about positioning both companies at the forefront of the global shift towards electrification and renewable energy, where copper plays a vital role. With global copper demand soaring, Anglo Teck is set to benefit from some of the highest-quality copper assets in the world.
Anglo American–Teck Deal: A Smart Move Balancing Value and Growth
For 2024, Anglo American reported $8.46 billion in underlying EBITDA, while Teck reported CAD$2.93 billion. The merger is expected to enhance margins, scale, and resilience through operational synergies and expanded assets.
The structure of the merger has raised eyebrows and interest alike. The press release highlights that Anglo American will exchange 1.3301 shares for each Teck share, calling it a “zero-premium” deal.
However, analysts have pointed out that this translates to a 17% premium on Teck’s recent share price. Anglo plans to offset this with a $4.5 billion special dividend to its shareholders, lowering the effective premium to just 1%.
Once completed, Anglo shareholders will control 62.4% of the new company, while Teck shareholders will hold 37.6%.
Leadership roles are well-defined: Anglo’s CEO Duncan Wanblad will lead Anglo Teck, with Teck’s Jonathan Price serving as deputy CEO. The global headquarters will be based in Vancouver, with streamlined offices in London, and listings planned in Toronto, Johannesburg, and New York.
At the Core: Copper Fuels Anglo Teck’s Strategy
Copper is the driving force behind the merger. Both Anglo and Teck have been refining their portfolios, moving away from coal and diamonds and focusing on minerals that are key to clean energy. Teck’s prized Quebrada Blanca (QB) mine in Chile is central to the strategy, despite its past challenges with cost overruns and operations.
Anglo’s access to QB’s assets will bolster its copper output at a time when demand from electric vehicles, solar farms, and grid expansion is accelerating.
Franck Bekaert, senior bond analyst at Gimme Credit, pointed out that Anglo Teck will emerge as a leading copper producer with a diversified portfolio that includes iron ore and zinc.”
Unlocking Synergies: QB and Collahuasi
One of the merger’s standout features is the operational synergy between two adjacent copper mines in Chile, Quebrada Blanca and Collahuasi. The latter is co-owned by Anglo and Glencore. Together, the mines are expected to deliver up to $1.4 billion in EBITDA gains through shared procurement and operational efficiencies. The companies estimate $800 million in annual pre-tax recurring synergies by combining resources, infrastructure, and expertise.
Though Glencore wasn’t consulted on the deal, the logic of combining operations has long been recognized as a path to reducing costs.
Building a Premier Critical Minerals Portfolio
Anglo Teck’s portfolio will include six world-class copper assets, along with premium iron ore and zinc businesses. The merger will also strengthen Anglo’s existing partnerships, such as a joint plan with Codelco in Chile and exploration opportunities across Canada, Latin America, the U.S., Europe, and Africa.
Here’s a glimpse of the production assets that will shape Anglo Teck’s future:
Additionally, Anglo Teck will remain a major player in iron ore and zinc markets, including Red Dog (Alaska) and Trail Operations (British Columbia).
Anglo Teck’s Vision to Make Canada a Critical Minerals Powerhouse
With the merger, Canada takes center stage. Anglo Teck’s global headquarters will be located in Vancouver.
The new company has committed to investing CAD$4.5 billion over five years across Canadian projects. It includes extending the life of Highland Valley Copper, expanding processing at Trail Operations, and exploring new copper resources in British Columbia.
The company also plans to work closely with Indigenous communities, labour unions, and local governments, ensuring that growth supports regional development and social inclusion.
As part of this commitment, Anglo Teck will partner with the Government of Canada to establish a Global Institute for Critical Minerals Research and Innovation. It aims to foster advanced exploration techniques, AI-driven geoscience, and sustainable mining practices.
The Canadian Government highlighted that,
- In 2023, Canadian mines produced 508,250 tonnes of copper in concentrate, with nearly half originating from British Columbia.
- Canada’s exports of copper and copper-based products were valued at $9.4 billion in 2023.
Furthermore, industry reports also say that the copper market in the USA and Canada is valued at approximately USD 23.09 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 37.88 billion by 2035, at an annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.1%.
With a planned TSX listing and a strong North American presence, Anglo Teck aims to make Canada a critical minerals hub, creating jobs, driving innovation, and supporting clean energy goals.
Duncan Wanblad, Chief Executive Officer of Anglo American, commented:
“We are unlocking outstanding value both in the near and longer term – forming a global critical minerals champion with the focus, agility, capabilities and culture that have characterised both companies for so long. Having made such significant progress with Anglo American’s portfolio transformation, which has already added substantial value for our shareholders over the past year, now is the optimal time to take this next strategic step to accelerate our growth. We have a unique opportunity to bring together two highly regarded mining companies whose portfolios and capabilities are deeply complementary, while also sharing a common set of values. We are all committed to preserving and building on the proud heritage of both companies, both in Canada, as Anglo Teck’s natural headquarters, and in South Africa where our commitment to investment and national priorities endure. Together, we are propelling Anglo Teck to the forefront of our industry in terms of value accretive growth in responsibly produced critical minerals.”
Growth Beyond Copper: Innovation and Exploration
The merger isn’t limited to copper alone. Anglo Teck is poised to grow in other critical minerals, such as germanium, crop nutrients, and premium iron ore. It also plans to invest across Latin America, the U.S., Europe, and Africa, in addition to its exploration projects in Canada.
By backing Galore Creek, Schaft Creek, and Zafranal, the company expands its portfolio and strengthens the supply of critical minerals essential to the global energy transition.
Jonathan Price, Chief Executive Officer of Teck, commented:
“This merger of two highly complementary portfolios will create a leading global critical minerals champion headquartered in Canada – a top five global copper producer with exceptional mining and processing assets located across Canada, the United States, Latin America, and Southern Africa. It is a natural progression of our strategy and portfolio simplification, which created a platform to enable exactly this sort of transformative transaction. Bringing together our world-class copper assets, premium iron ore and zinc operations and an outstanding pipeline of high-quality growth projects provides enormous resiliency and optionality. This transaction will create significant economic opportunity in Canada, while positioning Anglo Teck to deliver sustainable, long-term value for shareholders and all stakeholders.”
Thus, Anglo Teck is all set to play a pivotal role in the energy transition with copper at its core. By blending operational excellence, strategic partnerships, and exploration innovation, the new company can meet rising global demand for minerals sustainably.
The post Anglo American and Teck Create a $50B Copper Giant to Fuel the Clean Energy Revolution appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.
The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.
Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.
Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.
You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.
Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings
The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.
Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.
Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.
What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.
The three commodity exposures that hit margin first
For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.
- Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
- Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
- Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.
TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes
The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.
For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.
The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.
What procurement and finance can do now
Three actions matter near-term.
Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.
Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.
Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.
Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.
If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.
More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits