This July, we marked a milestone, Climate Generation’s 20th annual Summer Institute! For two decades, this cornerstone event of the Teach Climate Network (TCN) has brought educators together to share teaching tips, instructional resources, and build community.
Each year, the TCN Cohort Coalition and participants of the Summer Institute help shape the TCN offerings by identifying what teachers need most. In 2025, needs are changing quickly. With the Trump Administration back in the White House, shifts at the Department of Education, and a steady stream of discouraging climate headlines, uncertainty is high. But one thing remains steady: educators’ commitment to their students and to teaching climate change with honesty and hope.
That’s why this year we are taking a fresh approach to reground in how we center the realities educators face and help them build resilience in the classroom and beyond. Here are five key lessons we’re carrying forward from the Summer Institute into another year TCN programming:
- Strengthen relationships, especially local ones
If there’s one thing we know, it’s that we thrive on connection. Over 80% of Institute attendees said they loved building local connections and wanted to stay connected with their cohort leaders.
Why does this matter? Because climate change isn’t a faraway problem and it shows up differently in every community. What flooding looks like in Vermont isn’t the same as wildfire smoke in California or heat waves in Phoenix. When educators build local connections, they’re better equipped to ground climate lessons in the realities their students see and feel around them. These place-based connections help make climate change less abstract and more personally relevant, sparking deeper student engagement.
Local networks also act as support systems for educators themselves. Teaching climate change can feel isolating or even politically charged. But when teachers connect with others in their district, county, or region, they gain confidence, share strategies, and learn how to navigate challenges together. These relationships don’t just strengthen individual classrooms, they strengthen entire communities.
As one Summer Institute participant put it:
“Being part of a group with shared interests was refreshing. Despite being in different regions, we faced many of the same challenges. It helped me see the power of collective learning and the importance of localized solutions within a global issue.”
Climate Generation will keep nurturing these connections throughout the year, because when educators feel supported by one another, they’re more empowered to bring climate education to their students in impactful ways.
- Pair accurate information with actionable tools
In a time when reliable climate information can disappear from websites overnight, educators need trusted sources they can count on. But here’s the thing: resources alone are not enough. Teachers also need support and time to translate information into age-appropriate, standards-aligned lessons that resonate with their students. When educators have both reliable information and support for embedding it into their classrooms, they can shift from simply delivering content to equipping students with tools for understanding, critical thinking, and meaningful action. That’s why the Teach Climate Network provides practical examples, activities and curriculum, ready-to-use strategies offered in 1:1 coaching, and workshop time.
The Teach Climate Network remains a go-to hub for both accurate content and instructional strategies. And we’ll continue sharing resources, lesson guides, and professional development opportunities from our partners because we know building from what already exists is how we can best move forward together.

- Use multiple entry points to make climate approachable
Yes, science matters. But teaching climate change isn’t only about graphs and greenhouse gases. It’s also about art, storytelling, history, civic engagement, and student empowerment. By weaving climate topics into subjects students love and are already learning, educators can make learning both accessible and inspiring.
Why does this matter? Because not every teacher or student connects with climate change through the same lens. For some, data spark curiosity. For others, exploring climate themes through a novel, a piece of art, or a local history project creates the “aha” moment. Having multiple entry points makes it easier for educators to integrate climate content into their existing curriculum without feeling like it’s one more thing to teach. It also helps students connect climate issues to their personal interests, which deepens learning, strengthens retention, and encourages students to imagine how climate can be woven into their anything they do. When climate education is relevant to a student’s life, they’re more likely to remember it and more likely to act on it.
As one Summer Institute attendee shared:
“I came in focused mainly on the science, but I now see the value of a broader, more inclusive approach — one that connects climate issues to equity, local communities, and student empowerment. This experience reshaped how I think about teaching climate change.”
This year, the TCN will highlight teaching pathways that span disciplines, science, english language arts, social studies, health, and more, so educators can find entry points that feel engaging and tailored to their classrooms. By broadening how we approach climate change, we give teachers the tools to feel confident and students the opportunity to connect meaningfully with the most important issue of our time.
- Recognize that every classroom is different, and that means every teacher’s needs are different
Teaching climate change in the U.S. is a patchwork. Some districts fully embrace it, others barely mention it. While 44 states, representing 71% of U.S. students, have science standards that include climate change, the how it’s taught varies widely. In some places, climate shows up as a single unit in science; in others, it’s integrated across disciplines; and in many classrooms, it’s still left out entirely.
Because of this, teachers’ needs differ dramatically. Some are searching for ready-to-use lesson plans that fit into a tightly scripted curriculum. Others are looking for strategies to navigate political pushback in their communities. Still others want to connect climate content with student well-being, resilience, or social justice. In short, the way climate change is taught shapes what support teachers need most.That’s why Climate Generation remains committed to being needs-based in our work. We’ll keep a pulse on what’s happening in classrooms by staying connected with Teach Climate Network members throughout the year. That way, our resources and professional development remain grounded in the real challenges and opportunities that educators face every day.

- Offer flexible ways to engage
Let’s be real; life happens. This year, 20% of registrants couldn’t attend the Institute after signing up. Schedule changes, strikes, job loss, burnout; sometimes it’s just too much. We get it.
That’s exactly why flexibility matters. Teaching climate change isn’t just another item on an already packed to-do list, it’s something educators want to do well, but it can feel overwhelming without the right kind of support. Some teachers are just starting their journey and need quick, approachable entry points. Others are ready to dive deep into interdisciplinary curriculum or community projects. And many fall somewhere in between.
Providing multiple pathways helps ensure that every educator, no matter their time, experience level, or teaching context, can find a way to build confidence and capacity. Short online workshops give teachers fast tools they can use tomorrow. Recordings allow busy educators to catch up on their own time. Longer-term fellowships provide a space to collaborate, reflect, and grow as leaders in climate education. Together, these options make climate professional development more accessible, equitable, and impactful.
We’ll continue offering a range of opportunities in different formats so educators can plug in however it works best for them.
Find the schedule of events and recordings of past workshops on our website.
Moving Forward Together
Even if it feels like climate change is being pushed to the back burner nationally, it remains the most pressing issue of our time. As educators, we have the opportunity to empower the next generation not only to understand the challenges ahead, but to lead with creativity, courage, and care. If you aren’t a Teach Climate Network member yet, we encourage you to join!

Lindsey Kirkland supports on-going climate change education programs for K-12 educators and public audiences. As the Education Manager, she also develops a vision for and provides strategic coordination for programs focusing primarily on professional development for teachers and informal educators. Lindsey is adjunct faculty at Hamline University and supported the development of their Climate Literacy Certificate, a contributing author of NSTA’s Connect Science Learning journal, and an active member of Climate Literacy and the Energy Awareness Network (CLEAN) and the North American Association of Environmental Education (NAAEE) Guidelines for Excellence writing team. Lindsey has served as an environmental educator with the AmeriCorps program the NJ Watershed Ambassadors, worked as a naturalist and education program coordinator for the NJ Audubon Society, and assisted in program development for museums, universities, and new nonprofit organizations in the United States and Australia. Lindsey holds a BS in Environment, Conservation and Fisheries Sciences from the University of Washington in Seattle, WA and a MEd in Science Education from Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ. In her spare time, Lindsey enjoys spending time with her husband and her son.
The post What Educators Need This Year, and How We’re Showing Up appeared first on Climate Generation.
Climate Change
‘This is a fossil fuel crisis’, Greenpeace tells Senate gas tax Inquiry, citing homegrown renewables as path to energy security
CANBERRA, Tuesday 21 April 2026 — Greenpeace Australia Pacific has slammed gas corporation war profiteering and environmental damage in a scathing Senate hearing today as part of the Select Committee on the Taxation of Gas Resources, urging fair taxation of gas corporations and the transition to secure, homegrown renewable energy to protect Australian households and the economy from future energy shocks.
Speaking at the hearing, Greenpeace said the US and Israel’s illegal war on Iran has laid bare the fundamental flaws of an energy system built on fossil fuel extraction, geopolitical power plays and corporate greed, and will be a defining moment for how the world thinks about energy security.
Greenpeace’s submission and full opening remarks can be found here.
Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
“This is not an energy crisis, it’s a fossil fuel crisis. The crisis we’re all facing lays bare the dangers of fossil fuel dependence, for our energy security, our communities, and for global peace and stability.
“Gas corporations like Woodside, Santos, Shell and Chevron — the same companies whose CEOs refused to front this Inquiry — are making obscene war profits, using the illegal war on Iran to price gouge, profiteer and push for more gas we don’t need — while people and our environment pay the price.
“Australians are getting smashed by soaring bills and the impacts of climate disasters — gas corporations should be paying their fair share to help this country, instead of sending billions offshore, tax-free.
“But we’re at a turning point — while gas corporations cynically push to open up more of our oceans and land to drilling for fossil fuels, our allies like the UK are doubling down on renewables in response to the fossil fuel crisis. Our trading partners in Asia are making the same reassessment of fossil fuels.
“Which is why the hearing today is crucial: an effective and well-designed tax on the gas industry’s obscene war time profits is a chance to channel funds to people and communities, fast-track the rollout of clean, secure homegrown wind and solar energy, while holding polluters accountable.
“Our dependence on fossil fuels leave us overexposed to the whims of tyrants like Trump — it’s in Australia’s national interest to end the fossil fuel chokehold for good and usher in the era of clean energy security.”
-ENDS-
Media contact
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
Climate Change
Rearranging the deck chairs!
HOW WOODSIDE’S BROWSE GAS PROPOSAL THREATENS SCOTT REEF’S GREEN TURTLES AND PYGMY BLUE WHALES

Woodside’s Browse to NWS gas project is under assessment by the WA and Federal Governments right now. This is a project that involved drilling up to 50 gas wells around Scott Reef off the coast of WA. Gas would be extracted directly underneath Scott Reef and Sandy Islet and pumped through a 900-kilometre subsea pipeline to the NWS gas processing facility.
Woodside’s Browse gas project’s impact on Scott Reef’s marine habitats?
Scott Reef is one of Australia’s most ecologically significant marine environments, where green turtles breed, pygmy blue whales feed, and an array of at-risk species, including sharks, dolphins, whale sharks, rays, sawfish and sea snakes thrive. It is home to many threatened species, including some found nowhere else on Earth or in genetically isolated groups, magnifying its importance from a conservation perspective.

This delicate reef’s ecosystem faces multiple threats if Woodside’s Proposed Project goes ahead, including seismic blasting, gas flaring, noise pollution, artificial lighting, pipe laying and fast-moving vessels. The reef also faces the risk of a gas well blowout, which could have catastrophic and irreversible consequences for the region’s reefs and marine parks.

Woodside’s woeful marine impacts management plan
To secure their approvals, Woodside had to develop a plan for how they would manage the significant risks to threatened green turtles and endangered pygmy blue whales if the project proceeds. We’ve had two independent scientists provide a technical assessment of Woodsides management plan for whales and turtles and their findings are gobsmacking.
Their assessment found that Woodsides management plans for these species misrepresents or does not assess the risks the Browse project poses to Scott Reef’s pygmy blue whales and green turtles. They’ve also surmised that if the project goes ahead the impacts contradict the Australian government’s own recovery plan for turtles and Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for Blue Whales.
The State and Federal Governments now have the opportunity to define their legacies on nature protection and save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan
Prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific by Dr Ben Fitzpatrick of Oceanwise Australia with Dr Olaf Meynecke of Griffith University.
The full technical assessment is available HERE

Scott Reef is a vital feeding, foraging and resting habitat for pygmy blue whales.
Pygmy blue whales feed, forage and rest in the Scott Reef region every year. Scott Reef is recognised as a Biologically Important Area for the pygmy blue whale and is an important stop-over on their annual migration.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
- Woodside’s management plan claims of “no credible threat of significant impacts” are not supported by scientific evidence.
- The management plan relies on outdated whale population information.
- Woodside has claimed it is unclear whether Scott Reef is a foraging habitat for pygmy blue whales, despite the presence of pygmy blue whales and significant concentrations of krill being documented in the area.
- The PBWMP ignores the impacts of industrial noise on whale-to-whale communication. This is especially concerning as mother-calf pairs migrate through the Scott Reef Biologically Important Area shortly after calves are born. Mother-calf pairs rely on continuous, uninterrupted communications to maintain their connection.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Turtle Management Plan
Prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific by Dr Ben Fitzpatrick of Oceanwise Australia.
The full technical assessment is available HERE

Scott Reef is a vital nesting ground for unique green turtles.
The green turtles that nest at Scott Reef’s low-lying Sandy Islet sand cay and nearby Browse Island are genetically unique and are classified as ‘Extremely Vulnerable’ in Australia’s Recovery Plan for Marine Turtles.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could make Scott Reef’s unique green turtles extinct.
- The Browse project would operate within 20 kilometres of nesting habitat that’s critical to the survival of Scott Reef’s genetically unique and vulnerable green turtle population.
- Woodside’s Browse Turtle Management Plan (TMP) misrepresents the risks the Browse project poses to Scott Reef’s green turtles.
- Claims in Woodside’s TMP about Scott Reef’s green turtle population size, nesting success and hatchling numbers are not backed by scientific evidence.
- The TMP proposes gathering updated data after the Browse project is approved.
- Woodside’s TMP proposes adding sand sourced elsewhere to Sandy Islet to counter subsidence and erosion, but fails to properly assess the associated risks.
To save Scott Reef and protect our oceans and animals, the State and Federal Governments must reject Browse.
Climate Change
Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Turtle Plan
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan
To secure their approvals, Woodside had to develop a plan for how they would manage the significant risks to threatened green turtles if the project proceeds. We’ve had two independent scientists provide a technical assessment of Woodside’s management plan for whales and turtles and their findings are gobsmacking.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could make Scott Reef’s unique green turtles extinct.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
