By John Kerry, Visiting Statesman at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former US Secretary of State, and former Special Presidential Envoy for Climate
Many eyes in the climate community are focused on COP30 in Belem this November, but there’s another critical climate moment happening now in September: London International Shipping Week.
This can be a moment to put industry’s muscle behind the decisions that need to be made to reap the benefits and accelerate the opportunity presented by the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) April embrace of the Net-Zero Framework, which is to be formally adopted by governments next month.
The maritime community understands the significance of this agreement, the very first to align action with the IMO’s 2023 climate strategy words: combining a mandatory greenhouse gas fuel standard with a pricing mechanism that can reward first movers, and stimulate a rapid, worldwide transition that’s just and equitable.
First, though, that Framework must be adopted, and I encourage all Member States to support its passage at October’s extraordinary session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee. This deal agreed in April is the result of long and complex negotiations and a victory for multilateral cooperation.
A cornerstone to this approach is ensuring that all greenhouse gas emissions – not just CO2 – are addressed as soon as the protections enter into force in 2027. Similarly, emissions will be regulated on a well-to-wake basis.
While some details remain open for further negotiation, the shipping sector must now plan for a clean energy market – with opportunities for asset managers and fleet owners to reap the advantages of being first movers.
The details of the Framework shouldn’t cut corners or dodge emissions commitments with teeth; fuel production should be backed by a robust sustainability criterion that accounts for elements of production such as indirect land uses changes.
These standards will help ensure the market accelerates and rewards solutions which are truly sustainable, scalable, and capable of delivering deep greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Current evidence suggests the e-fuels, or fuels made from renewable energy and green hydrogen, meet these criteria best. Use of these fuels must also be properly rewarded within the IMO’s Framework and supported by further national and private actions.
Some shipowners are already accelerating their turn towards this growing market and should continue to do so. In 2024 supply of alternative fuels such as ammonia or e-methanol was projected to be 50% higher than it was just in 2023. Their example is an important one for others who may believe that short-term fixes are a path of least resistance. Economic opportunity awaits those who act now to race to the other side of the shipping transition.
Customers are clearly ready and waiting for additional shipowners to make the jump. In February the second tender from the Zero Emission Buyer’s Alliance was launched, with 40 member companies looking to ship 1.5 million containers’ worth of goods on e-fuels. These commitments are commendable. More companies must join, and more investment is needed for this effort to succeed.
Beyond opportunity, it’s important to also consider risk. Reinvesting in the old way of doing things or patchwork short term solutions such as liquified natural gas could translate into stranded assets for these companies in short order.
Beyond fuels, to meet the full goals of the Revised Strategy energy efficiency solutions or technological innovations such as wind-assisted propulsion power should be deployed at greater scale. Many remain relatively underutilized.
Shippers can reverse this trend, not just for the immediate fuel savings, but for the degree of resilience these technical measures offer in the face of strengthening climate regulations. More tools exist today to help shipowners navigate these decisions, and the financial sector can offer more creative products to accelerate the transition.
At COP 26, as Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, I stood with CEOs from the world’s largest companies and we launched the First Mover’s Coalition to demonstrate a simple proposition: a gigantic industry-led demand signal for the climate solutions hard-to-abate sectors were longing to create.
In a short time, global shipping has risen to the challenge and developed many of the tools envisioned in that initiative. We now have enabling frameworks backing up the growing market for solutions that everyone at London International Shipping Week can embrace.
We are on the cusp of something exciting – proof that “if you build it, better solutions will come.” It’s an historic moment to stop waiting for perfection, get to work, and decide that we’re all first movers now – for our economy, and our future.
The post Diplomacy accelerated shipping climate action; it’s time to seal the deal appeared first on Climate Home News.
Diplomacy accelerated shipping climate action; it’s time to seal the deal
Climate Change
The Land Came First
An older teaching about land acknowledgement
As I have come to understand the spirit and intention of land acknowledgement, I often return to fond memories of my grandmother and her words of wisdom. She taught that the health of the places we call home comes first, because the wellbeing of the people depends on it.
In her teaching, land acknowledgement began with the land. Long before it became a paragraph read at the start of a meeting, it was a way of recognizing a homeland: its waters, its species, its seasons, and the spirit that revealed whether the place was well.
Her teaching echoes a practice found across many Indigenous Nations. Haudenosaunee gatherings, for example, have long opened with the Ohén:ton Karihwatéhkwen, the Thanksgiving Address, often translated as “the words that come before all else.” The speaker greets and gives thanks to the people, the earth, the waters, the plants, the animals, the winds, the sun, the moon and the stars. Only after everything that sustains life has been acknowledged does the gathering turn to its own business.
That order changes what an acknowledgement is for. Its purpose was to share the story of a place with neighbours and to draw them into the work of tending it. People entered the story second, as the ones responsible for what had just been named.
Understood this way, an acknowledgement does more than open a meeting. It asks us to reconsider where we stand, and what we owe the ground beneath us.
Nations among nations
In her teaching, people are one nation among many. The salmon are a nation. So are the cedars, the bison, the medicine plants, and the pollinators. Each belongs to a place, carries its own responsibilities, and offers gifts no other nation can give.
This idea of kinship runs through many Indigenous philosophies. The phrase “all my relations,” heard in ceremonies and gatherings across Turtle Island, is a reminder that family extends beyond people to the animals, plants, waters and lands that make life possible. Some Indigenous languages carry the same understanding in their grammar, speaking of many plants, animals and natural forces as living beings rather than objects.
Sovereignty, understood through this relationship, is a kind of standing more than a form of control. Each nation belongs fully to its place and carries its share of that place’s life. No nation thrives alone, and none thrives by taking over the whole.
The land is also the source of instruction. Over generations, people watched how a river valley or a stretch of prairie kept itself well: who arrived when, who fed whom, and how much could be taken before the giving stopped. In my grandmother’s telling, those observations became instructions, and those instructions helped shape law and protocol. They guided when to harvest, where to camp, how to enter a neighbour’s territory, and what was owed in return.
Indigenous legal scholars today often describe this as law that comes from the land itself, learned by watching how living systems sustain one another. A plainer name for it is knowing how to live somewhere.
The host and the guest
One of the clearest teachings in this understanding of the world is the relationship between host and guest. My grandmother invited us to recognize that relationship in the lives of plants and animals.
A host prepares the place before anyone arrives. A beaver family dams a stream, and the pond becomes a home for fish, frogs, birds and plants. A fallen tree becomes a nurse log, feeding the next generation of seedlings as it returns to the soil.
A host offers first. A flowering plant sets out nectar. A berry bush ripens fruit. These provisions come in their own season, not whenever a visitor happens to want them.
A host also makes its presence known. Birdsong, scent and the marks left along a trail tell newcomers that a place is already inhabited. The visitor does not arrive in an empty world.
The guest has responsibilities too. A guest attends to the season and to what the place can offer. A guest does not assume that everything within reach is theirs to take. A guest leaves something that helps sustain the relationship.
A bee takes nectar and carries pollen. Read through this teaching, that exchange offers an image of visiting well: receiving a gift while helping the host continue its life.
Many Indigenous harvesting protocols carry the same ethic into daily practice: ask before taking, take only what is needed, offer thanks, and leave enough for others and for the plant or animal to recover.
None of this suggests that every relationship in nature is peaceful or generous. These are ways of seeing responsibilities that people can learn to carry.
Everyone is both
No being is only a host or only a guest.
A tree makes room for other life while depending on soil, water, sunlight, fungi, and relationships beyond itself. People, too, may welcome others into their homes while remaining dependent on the larger homeland that sustains them.
The distinction between host and guest is therefore about roles, not ranks. Everyone receives. Everyone has something to give.
The question is whether the exchange sustains the place.
A visitor who takes without restraint leaves less for those who come next. A host who neglects the place has less to offer. Both have responsibilities, and neither can fulfil them alone.
This is the heart of reciprocity, a principle found across Indigenous philosophies: relationships stay healthy when gifts move in both directions. The Haudenosaunee teaching of the seventh generation extends that exchange across time, asking that decisions made today leave the place well for those not yet born.
Mutual benefit begins here, with the recognition that different beings carry different gifts and obligations.
What people carry forward
My grandmother’s teaching connects these relationships to the ways people meet their neighbours.
The host prepares a place, offers food and rest, and explains where the visitor has arrived. The guest makes themselves known, explains why they have come, listens to the terms of the visit, and brings something in return. The gift may be material. It may also be labour, knowledge, news, or a commitment to help.
Nations around the Great Lakes carried this ethic into treaty. The Dish with One Spoon, an agreement among the Haudenosaunee, Anishinaabe and allied Nations, describes shared hunting grounds as a single dish. Everyone eats from it with one spoon, takes only what they need, leaves enough for others, and keeps the dish clean. The Two Row Wampum, between the Haudenosaunee and European newcomers, shows two vessels travelling side by side on the same river, each keeping its own ways and neither steering the other.
In this understanding, acknowledgement is more than naming the people associated with a territory. It is learning enough about a homeland to behave responsibly within it.
Whose home is this? What sustains it? What laws and agreements guide our presence? What can we receive, and what must we return?
These questions make acknowledgement a relationship rather than a recital.
They also make it diplomatic. A guest who recognizes the host’s homeland recognizes that they have entered a place with its own relationships and responsibilities. A host who welcomes the guest makes room for an encounter governed by those relationships.
Neither arrives without standing. Neither arrives without obligations.
Beginning with place
I write from the shores of the Bay of Quinte. Here, the teaching asks me to begin with the water, the shoreline, and the life they sustain. Before I describe myself, I must attend to where I am.
That does not make people or history less important. It places them within the homeland that gives them meaning. The people, their laws, their agreements, and their responsibilities all belong to the place.
In a time of longer fire seasons, troubled waters, and uncertainty about what the next season will bring, this teaching asks something difficult and useful of us: pay attention before you speak.
An acknowledgement cannot tell the story of a place if the speaker has stopped noticing it.
The land came first. Beginning there again means learning to name what sustains us, and accepting that what sustains us also asks something of us.
By Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock
Photo by Andrik Langfield on Unsplash
The post The Land Came First appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.
