When we lay our feet upon the ground whether walking through forests, fields, or city streets we often walk unaware of the stories held beneath us. The soil is not lifeless dirt but a vibrant archive, holding millennia of memory. Within its dark layers lie the echoes of fire, flood, frost, and footsteps, stories imprinted by plants that once flourished, medicines that healed, and foods that sustained entire communities. This earth remembers, and if we pause to listen, it will teach us how to heal and regenerate what has been lost.
The Responsibility of Humanity: Healing Takes Time
Healing the earth is no simple task. The scars of human impact from industrial extraction to sprawling urban growth are deep and lasting. These wounds are not mended within a single lifetime but unfold across generations, measured in ecological cycles far older than our own. The process of bio-regeneration, the natural ability of ecosystems to renew, repair, and restore themselves, depends on intricate relationships between soil nutrients, native plants, and healthy water systems. It is a slow, fragile, and profoundly relational dance, reminding us that human urgency must make room for earth’s rhythms.
The Knowledge Beneath Our Feet: Roots, Networks, Life
Indigenous Peoples have long understood that beneath the surface lies a hidden world of interconnected roots, intertwined fungi networks, and microorganisms working unseen yet essential to the health of all life. These subterranean relationships weave resilience and communication, binding ecosystems together. When native plants vanish or are displaced, these lifelines weaken, unravelling the fabric that sustains water retention, nutrient cycling, and soil fertility.
Restoration is not merely about planting seeds above ground; it is about rekindling these ancient, living connections below the surface. This is where true regeneration begins, life branching out in all its richness, supporting the ecosystem in ways both visible and hidden.
Plant Foods and the Sacred Return to Place
The resurgence of Indigenous plant foods, including ancestral varieties of corn, beans, squash, wild rice, and berries, as well as traditional medicines, embodies a sacred act of returning. It is not just about food security; it is about restoring memory, balance, and a sense of belonging. These plants are not strangers but kin, evolved alongside the waters, soils, pollinators, and seasons of their birthplaces. Their reintroduction reignites that timeless conversation between earth below and sky above, between roots and leaves, a reciprocal renewal of biodiversity and cultural survival.
This symbiotic dance reconnects us to place and each other, reminding us that healing the land means healing the relationships we hold with all living beings around us.
Plant Memory and Indigenous Worldview: Teachers and Relatives
In Indigenous worldviews, plants are not mere objects; they are teachers, relatives, and keepers of knowledge. Their memory is holistic, carried in seeds, genetic code, and the stories they bear. These plants remember the pollinators that visit them, the soils that nourish them, and the people who have harvested and cared for them through generations.
When invasive species erase native plants from a landscape, entire ecosystems lose their stories and identities. Returning to Indigenous plants means reclaiming cultural memory and restoring the deep reciprocity between people, plants, insects, animals, and the earth, a tapestry vital to resilience.
The Challenge of Invasive Species: Disrupting Balance, Disrupting Culture
Across regions like the Great Lakes, invasive species garlic mustard, phragmites, and buckthorn disrupt soil chemistry, shade out seedlings, and monopolize resources crucial to native biodiversity. Aquatic invaders, such as zebra mussels, choke lakes and rivers, threatening native plants and fish that are central to Indigenous lifeways.
These invasives are not just ecological invaders; they fracture cultural relationships cherished for generations. Healing the land thus calls for revitalizing native populations, respecting cultural ties, and reclaiming places from disruption.
The Science of Soil in a Changing Climate: Living Systems Under Siege
Beneath what many call “dirt” lies a living, breathing community of minerals, fungi, and microbes, all orchestrating fertility and resilience. Climate change, however, exerts a significant impact on soil systems. More frequent droughts, harsh floods, and unchecked erosion strip away nutrients and vitality.
Without healthy soil, plants falter, medicines become scarce, and entire livelihoods falter. The foundation of plant-based economies, from Indigenous harvests to broader food systems, wavers as soil health declines.
Indigenous Stewardship: Seeds, Sanctuaries, and Sovereignty
Across Turtle Island, Indigenous communities answer this call with fierce care. Community seed banks protect ancestral varieties, not merely genetic stock, but living relatives that hold stories, teachings, and ecological memory. Each seed is sovereignty in waiting.
Restoration efforts abound: the Haudenosaunee nurture seed libraries that preserve heirloom plants, while the Anishinaabe work tirelessly to heal wild rice beds ravaged by industry. These projects are ecological and profoundly cultural, reinforcing responsibilities that begin beneath our feet.
Returning the Mind to the Earth: Reciprocal Healing
The soil is a patient teacher, reminding us that life thrives on reciprocity and balance. When humans take without giving back, the earth remembers. To restore ecosystems, revive plant medicines and foods, and safeguard biodiversity, we must ground our minds and spirits in the wisdom of the earth itself.
Healing is a long journey, a patient’s work of bio-regeneration and restoration. Returning Indigenous plants to their homes and honouring their relationships is a practice of humility. It calls us to be kin, caretakers, and students of the land’s memory.
Only then can we fully step into our role as stewards of the soil, the plants, and the possibilities for generations yet to come.
Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock
(Image Credit: Erone Stuff, Unsplash)
The post The Earth Remembers: Soil, Seeds, and the Future of Indigenous Plant Life appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.
The Earth Remembers: Soil, Seeds, and the Future of Indigenous Plant Life
Climate Change
‘This is a fossil fuel crisis’, Greenpeace tells Senate gas tax Inquiry, citing homegrown renewables as path to energy security
CANBERRA, Tuesday 21 April 2026 — Greenpeace Australia Pacific has slammed gas corporation war profiteering and environmental damage in a scathing Senate hearing today as part of the Select Committee on the Taxation of Gas Resources, urging fair taxation of gas corporations and the transition to secure, homegrown renewable energy to protect Australian households and the economy from future energy shocks.
Speaking at the hearing, Greenpeace said the US and Israel’s illegal war on Iran has laid bare the fundamental flaws of an energy system built on fossil fuel extraction, geopolitical power plays and corporate greed, and will be a defining moment for how the world thinks about energy security.
Greenpeace’s submission and full opening remarks can be found here.
Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
“This is not an energy crisis, it’s a fossil fuel crisis. The crisis we’re all facing lays bare the dangers of fossil fuel dependence, for our energy security, our communities, and for global peace and stability.
“Gas corporations like Woodside, Santos, Shell and Chevron — the same companies whose CEOs refused to front this Inquiry — are making obscene war profits, using the illegal war on Iran to price gouge, profiteer and push for more gas we don’t need — while people and our environment pay the price.
“Australians are getting smashed by soaring bills and the impacts of climate disasters — gas corporations should be paying their fair share to help this country, instead of sending billions offshore, tax-free.
“But we’re at a turning point — while gas corporations cynically push to open up more of our oceans and land to drilling for fossil fuels, our allies like the UK are doubling down on renewables in response to the fossil fuel crisis. Our trading partners in Asia are making the same reassessment of fossil fuels.
“Which is why the hearing today is crucial: an effective and well-designed tax on the gas industry’s obscene war time profits is a chance to channel funds to people and communities, fast-track the rollout of clean, secure homegrown wind and solar energy, while holding polluters accountable.
“Our dependence on fossil fuels leave us overexposed to the whims of tyrants like Trump — it’s in Australia’s national interest to end the fossil fuel chokehold for good and usher in the era of clean energy security.”
-ENDS-
Media contact
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
HOW WOODSIDE’S BROWSE GAS PROPOSAL THREATENS SCOTT REEF’S GREEN TURTLES AND PYGMY BLUE WHALES
Woodside’s Browse to NWS gas project is under assessment by the WA and Federal Governments right now. This is a project that involved drilling up to 50 gas wells around Scott Reef off the coast of WA. Gas would be extracted directly underneath Scott Reef and Sandy Islet and pumped through a 900-kilometre subsea pipeline to the NWS gas processing facility.
Woodside’s Browse gas project’s impact on Scott Reef’s marine habitats?
Scott Reef is one of Australia’s most ecologically significant marine environments, where green turtles breed, pygmy blue whales feed, and an array of at-risk species, including sharks, dolphins, whale sharks, rays, sawfish and sea snakes thrive. It is home to many threatened species, including some found nowhere else on Earth or in genetically isolated groups, magnifying its importance from a conservation perspective.
This delicate reef’s ecosystem faces multiple threats if Woodside’s Proposed Project goes ahead, including seismic blasting, gas flaring, noise pollution, artificial lighting, pipe laying and fast-moving vessels. The reef also faces the risk of a gas well blowout, which could have catastrophic and irreversible consequences for the region’s reefs and marine parks.
Woodside’s woeful marine impacts management plan
To secure their approvals, Woodside had to develop a plan for how they would manage the significant risks to threatened green turtles and endangered pygmy blue whales if the project proceeds. We’ve had two independent scientists provide a technical assessment of Woodsides management plan for whales and turtles and their findings are gobsmacking.
Their assessment found that Woodsides management plans for these species misrepresents or does not assess the risks the Browse project poses to Scott Reef’s pygmy blue whales and green turtles. They’ve also surmised that if the project goes ahead the impacts contradict the Australian government’s own recovery plan for turtles and Conservation Management Plan (CMP) for Blue Whales.
The State and Federal Governments now have the opportunity to define their legacies on nature protection and save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan
Prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific by Dr Ben Fitzpatrick of Oceanwise Australia with Dr Olaf Meynecke of Griffith University.
The full technical assessment is available HERE
Scott Reef is a vital feeding, foraging and resting habitat for pygmy blue whales.
Pygmy blue whales feed, forage and rest in the Scott Reef region every year. Scott Reef is recognised as a Biologically Important Area for the pygmy blue whale and is an important stop-over on their annual migration.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
- Woodside’s management plan claims of “no credible threat of significant impacts” are not supported by scientific evidence.
- The management plan relies on outdated whale population information.
- Woodside has claimed it is unclear whether Scott Reef is a foraging habitat for pygmy blue whales, despite the presence of pygmy blue whales and significant concentrations of krill being documented in the area.
- The PBWMP ignores the impacts of industrial noise on whale-to-whale communication. This is especially concerning as mother-calf pairs migrate through the Scott Reef Biologically Important Area shortly after calves are born. Mother-calf pairs rely on continuous, uninterrupted communications to maintain their connection.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Turtle Management Plan
Prepared for Greenpeace Australia Pacific by Dr Ben Fitzpatrick of Oceanwise Australia.
The full technical assessment is available HERE
Scott Reef is a vital nesting ground for unique green turtles.
The green turtles that nest at Scott Reef’s low-lying Sandy Islet sand cay and nearby Browse Island are genetically unique and are classified as ‘Extremely Vulnerable’ in Australia’s Recovery Plan for Marine Turtles.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could make Scott Reef’s unique green turtles extinct.
- The Browse project would operate within 20 kilometres of nesting habitat that’s critical to the survival of Scott Reef’s genetically unique and vulnerable green turtle population.
- Woodside’s Browse Turtle Management Plan (TMP) misrepresents the risks the Browse project poses to Scott Reef’s green turtles.
- Claims in Woodside’s TMP about Scott Reef’s green turtle population size, nesting success and hatchling numbers are not backed by scientific evidence.
- The TMP proposes gathering updated data after the Browse project is approved.
- Woodside’s TMP proposes adding sand sourced elsewhere to Sandy Islet to counter subsidence and erosion, but fails to properly assess the associated risks.
To save Scott Reef and protect our oceans and animals, the State and Federal Governments must reject Browse.
Technical Assessment of Woodside’s Browse Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan
To secure their approvals, Woodside had to develop a plan for how they would manage the significant risks to threatened green turtles if the project proceeds. We’ve had two independent scientists provide a technical assessment of Woodside’s management plan for whales and turtles and their findings are gobsmacking.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could make Scott Reef’s unique green turtles extinct.
Woodside’s Browse gas project could delay or prevent the population recovery of the endangered pygmy blue whales that rely on Scott Reef, heightening their extinction risk.
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits