NuScale Power Holdings’ (NYSE: SMR) share price surged after the U.S. made a historic commitment to use its small modular reactor (SMR) technology. The company’s clean-energy credentials are now in the spotlight. This matters not only for investors but also for governments and industry leaders who aim for net-zero goals.
John Hopkins, NuScale’s President and Chief Executive Officer, remarked:
“We are honored that ENTRA1 has selected NuScale’s U.S. NRC-approved SMR technology for this historic deployment in delivering power to the TVA region…Together, we are ready as partners to meet America’s surging demand for reliable, carbon-free baseload power—powering AI data centers, critical mining, semiconductor manufacturing, and the energy-intensive industries that are driving our nation’s economic future.”
Historic Nuclear Deal Drives Stock Rally
NuScale stock has been in the spotlight since its late August surge. Shares rose over 25% after the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) made a historic agreement. This deal marks the largest SMR power commitment in U.S. history.
As of September 4, NuScale stock is up nearly 16% today. This rise shows continued investor confidence and extends its rally.

The TVA deal sets NuScale up to build the first SMR nuclear power station in the U.S. Many analysts view this as a key moment for nuclear energy in the country.
Bank of America raised its price target on the stock. They see the TVA agreement as proof of SMRs’ commercial potential. Reports also suggest the planned capacity is more than 5x the size of all existing global SMR projects combined.
Industry watchers note that SMRs have key advantages over traditional nuclear plants. Unlike large reactors, they can be factory-built, modularized, and deployed incrementally. This lowers costs, improves flexibility, and makes SMRs an attractive option for utilities transitioning toward carbon-free energy.
Wall Street Backs Nuclear’s Next Chapter
NuScale’s stock reaction followed nearly immediate upward revisions by Wall Street analysts. Analysts reported the stock jumped when Wells Fargo and other firms raised their ratings. Their new price target is US$4.50, up from about $3. This change shows expected growth in construction contracts and licensing revenue.
The TVA project is expected to cost between US$2–3 billion. It will also generate significant ongoing revenue from operations, maintenance, and long-term fuel services. This financial commitment is seen as a credible revenue pipeline extending into the next decade.
SMRs and ESG: A Green Power Game-Changer
NuScale SMRs provide low-carbon energy. They help grid operators close coal or gas plants, which supports net-zero goals. As mini nuclear reactors with passive safety systems, they offer several environmental and social advantages:
- Lower emissions: SMRs emit zero CO₂ at the point of generation, with life-cycle emissions similar to renewables.
- Land efficiency: A single SMR needs only ~32 acres, compared to hundreds for solar or wind projects of similar output.
- Grid stability: SMRs deliver steady, 24/7 power. Renewables often can’t match this without storage.
- Local economic impact: SMR sites create hundreds of jobs in construction and operations. They often help communities shift away from fossil fuels.

NuScale’s main plant will generate up to 600 megawatts (MWe). This can power about 500,000 homes. It will also cut emissions by over 1 million metric tons of CO₂ each year, compared to similar coal plants.
These features reinforce ESG portfolios for utilities and investors prioritizing both return and sustainability.
Scaling SMRs: The Outlook for Clean Nuclear Power
NuScale’s move with TVA may be the first of many SMR deployments in the U.S. and abroad. Key dynamics impacting future growth include:
- Licensing progress: NuScale received NRC approval in 2024 as the first SMR ever, paving the way for future units.
- Global interest: Countries like Poland, the U.K., and Canada are looking at NuScale-style modular reactors. They want to expand clean energy options.
- Electric grid synergy: Utilities view SMRs as a partner to solar, wind, and batteries. They help balance variable energy sources with reliable nuclear power.
Several hundred SMRs are proposed worldwide using mirror designs. This places NuScale at the heart of what analysts see as the next wave in nuclear deployment.

Small modular reactors could reshape nuclear energy as demand for clean power rises. Current plans target 25 GW of SMR capacity, rising to 40 GW by 2050 under existing policies.
With stronger support, capacity could hit 120 GW—over 1,000 SMRs—requiring investment to grow from $5 billion today to $25 billion by 2030 and $670 billion by 2050. If costs fall to match large reactors, capacity may reach 190 GW, sparking $900 billion in global investment.
NuScale’s Net-Zero Promise for Industry and Grid
NuScale Power’s small modular reactor technology offers clear advantages for ESG-focused investors. It also supports global goals for net-zero emissions, with these facts:
- First-of-its-kind NRC approval
NuScale’s advanced light-water reactors are the only SMR design certified in the U.S. They help utilities close coal and gas plants. This ensures reliable baseload power, which is vital for deep decarbonization.
- Low lifecycle carbon:
NuScale’s SMRs produce zero on-site CO₂ and emit carbon on par with renewables when accounting for the full fuel cycle. They provide clean, continuous energy, unlike solar or wind, which require storage to match baseload demand.
- Multi-sector decarbonization potential:
The SMR modules provide electricity and steam. They can be used for industrial heat, desalination, and hydrogen production. A single 60-MWe module could power ~70,000 fuel-cell vehicles or replace up to 40% of refinery CO₂ emissions.
- Coal-to-clean transitions:
NuScale enables the repowering of retiring coal plants, preserving jobs and grid infrastructure. Each 12-module plant can create about 1,600 construction jobs and 270 operating jobs. It can also support around $470 million in local economic activity each year.
- Global decarbonization alignment:
The nuclear company is involved in global clean energy projects. Their SMR deal with Romania’s state utility might cut around 4 million metric tons of CO₂ yearly.
- Strategic grid services:
SMRs provide flexible load-following, black-start, and dispatchable carbon-free power. These features are key for grids with a lot of renewable energy.
Challenges and What to Watch
While NuScale’s stock momentum is accelerating, several challenges remain. The first TVA plants are not expected to deliver power until the late 2020s, with subsequent units coming online gradually after that.
Even though SMRs are modular, they still need billions in upfront costs. So, support from utilities and government agencies will be crucial. The chart below shows SMR construcion costs in key markets.

NuScale must also show it can grow operations. This means building a reliable supply chain and mastering serial manufacturing. Both steps will help reduce costs over time.
Public perception is still a challenge. Nuclear energy faces local resistance and cautious regulations. This is true even with the passive-safety features in SMR designs.
Investors will be watching closely for several milestones:
- Final investment decisions from TVA in 2026.
- NuScale’s ability to deliver 2nd and 3rd units (economies of scale).
- Expansion into new markets under international SMR tenders.
NuScale at the Forefront of Clean Energy Evolution
NuScale Power’s recent stock surge reflects more than a headline deal—it signals the shifting economics of nuclear energy. SMRs now provide a compact, safe, and ESG-friendly option. They offer a solution for modern grids, especially as traditional SMRs face issues with cost and scale.
The TVA agreement marks a turning point: nuclear power—once considered too slow or expensive—is now viable again, at scale. For investors, NuScale offers exposure to climate-aligned innovation with tangible revenue potential. For utilities and policymakers, it offers a path to deep decarbonization.
The post NuScale Power Stock Surges After U.S. Biggest SMR Nuclear Deal appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

