Published

2 years ago

December 28, 2023

Alice Rush

For far too long, low-income communities, especially communities of color, have borne disproportionate impacts of pollution and climate change. Black, African American, and Latino individuals, as highlighted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), are projected to face higher impacts of climate change.

In November, through Executive Orders 14008 and 13985, the Biden administration allocated $2 billion in grants through the Inflation Reduction Act Community Change Grants Program (administered by the EPA) to uplift lower-income communities overburdened by environmental hazards. The program seeks to fund projects to bolster resilience and monitor air and water quality in communities grappling with pollution and the impacts of climate change. This initiative empowers disadvantaged communities to seek change on a grassroots level and improve their surroundings.

The Community Change Grants Program from the EPA can be a game changer in addressing environmental justice concerns and empowering communities to have a stake in the process.

Awards range between $1-3 million for projects focusing on engaging disadvantaged communities; but importantly, multi-faceted initiatives tackling pollution, climate change, and other priority issues may secure $10-20 million awards. Eligible entities encompass partnerships involving two or more community-based non-profit organizations (CBOs); as well as partnerships between a CBO and a Federally-Recognized Tribe, local governments, or higher education institutions. Additional organizations can also participate as collaborating subrecipients or procurement contractors.

This investment highlights a shift to empower historically disadvantaged communities to participate actively in environmental initiatives. The Community Change Grants aren’t merely financial support – they also serve as a catalyst for change at the grassroots level. The program lays the groundwork for a more equitable and sustainable future by empowering disadvantaged communities with resources and support to address environmental challenges.

Community Driven at the Core

At the heart of the Community Change Grants lies their commitment to community-driven projects. By granting decision-making power to local organizations, the grants ensure projects are tailored to address each community’s unique challenges. The Community Change Grants do more than just throw money at environmental injustice: they demonstrate a commitment to embed environmental justice into government programs and actively address the root causes of environmental injustice in communities nationwide.

Communities that are interested in applying for the grants and would benefit from some assistance with the application process can utilize EPA’s technical assistance programs. These programs, such as the Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Technical Assistance Center (EJ TCTACs) network, are set up to serve diverse applicant needs. They offer crucial support, guiding applicants through application, project management, implementation, and reporting.

The urgency for climate action and environmental justice is met with a rolling application deadline. This design allows for swift awarding of grants while maintaining necessary oversight and fiduciary responsibilities.

For organizations ready to make a difference, the time is now. Actively participate in the Community Change Grants application process, leverage the technical assistance programs in the plans, and be a driving force in pursuing environmental justice. Find more information about the Community Change Grants on EPA’s website here.

The post EPA’s Community Change Grants: Empowering Grassroots Action appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

EPA’s Community Change Grants: Empowering Grassroots Action

Renewable Energy

Renewable Energy Concepts Can’t Violate the Laws of Physics

Published

10 hours ago

February 28, 2026

Alice Rush

In the early days of 2GreenEnergy, my people and I were vigorously engaged in finding solid ideas in cleantech that needed funding in order to move forward.

I vividly remember a conversation with a guy in Maryland who was trying to explain the (ostensible) breakthrough that he and his team had made in hydrokinetics. When I was having trouble visualizing what we was talking about, he asked me to “think of it as a river in a box.”

“Oh!” I exclaimed. “You mean you take a box full of standing water, add energy to it get it moving, then extract that energy, leaving you with more energy that you added to it.”

“Exactly.”

I politely explained that the laws of physics, specifically the first and second laws of thermodynamics, make this impossible.

He wasn’t through, however, and insisted that, in his office, his people had constructed a “working model.”

Here’s where my tone descended into something less than 100% polite. I told him that he may think he has a working model, but he’s wrong; if he believes this, he’s ignorant; if he doesn’t, but is conducting this conversation anyway, he’s a fraud.

“But don’t you want to come see it?” he implored.

“No. Not only would not fly across the country to see whatever it is you claim to have built, I wouldn’t walk across the street to a “working model” of something that is theoretically impossible.”

—

I tell this story because the claim made at the upper left is essentially identical. You’re pumping water up out of a stream, and then claiming to extract more energy when the water flows back into the stream.

Of course, social media today is rife with complete crap like this. We’ve devolved to a point where defrauding money out of idiots is rapidly replacing baseball as our national pastime.