Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

GE Vernova Slows in Q2, 2024 Election Impact on Wind

GE Vernova recently held their Q2 investor presentation, sharing the company will focus on their the 3.6-154, 6.1-158 Cypress, and Haliade-X 15.5-250 turbine lines. So far, the company’s wind division is not headed toward profitability in 2024. What can the company do to turn their financials around? And then a focus on the 2024 US presidential election–what implications will it have on the wind industry? Does the IRA bill hang in the balance? In other news, Siemens Gamesa will resume production of their 4X wind turbines this year, Dogger Bank A has installed interarray cables, and a carbon-free cement plant is planned for Massachusetts.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on FacebookYouTubeTwitterLinkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com

Allen Hall: Joel, we’re moving to the 2020s. We now have our email newsletter, Uptime Tech News on Substack. Ooh, nice. I like it. It’s slick. It’s almost super modern. And if you haven’t subscribed to Uptime Tech News, you need to, because who else is going to go through the news? The right way and pick out those articles that the technical people working in wind and the financial people working in wind need to know besides us engineers who filter through it and get all the riffraff out and give you the stuff that you need.

That is the whole point of Uptime Tech News. So if you haven’t subscribed to it, do it. You can actually go on Substack and search Uptime Tech News. You can subscribe via Substack. And it’s on LinkedIn. The newsletter is nuts, crazy busy. There’s thousands of people who are subscribed to our newsletter, Uptime Tech News on LinkedIn.

I like LinkedIn, but I like the Substack version even more.

Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m Allen Hall, and I’ll be joined by the rest of the Uptime host after these headlines. Kicking off our headlines, Siemens Gamesa is set to breathe new life into its turbine production. The company plans to resume manufacturing of its 4X wind turbines later this year, following a pause due to technical issues.

This move is expected to reactivate sales of the 4X turbine, with production of the 5X model slated to follow next year. The news comes as a welcome relief to staff, as the current order book has been running low, and this development could signal a turning point for Siemens Gamesa, which has faced challenges in recent months.

Shifting our focus offshore, a major milestone has been reached at the world’s largest offshore wind farm. Over 200 miles of interarray cables have been successfully installed at Dogger Bank A, the first phase Of this ambitious project. The 66 kilovolt cables manufactured by Hellenic cables will connect 95 massive Haliade-X 13 megawatt turbines to the offshore converter station.

The EU is doubling down on its commitments to renewables reelected EU commission president, Ursula von der Leyen. Has announced a new clean industrial deal, emphasizing homegrown clean energy. This plan includes support for clean tech manufacturing and a new EU competitiveness fund. Von der Leyen has also promised to cut red tape and expedite permitting processes for renewable projects in the coming years.

Vestas is pushing the boundaries of onshore wind technology. The company has completed the installation of its V172 7. 2 megawatt prototype at its test center in Denmark. This behemoth is Vestas largest and most powerful onshore wind turbine to date. Based on the Inventus platform. It promises a 12 percent increase in annual energy production compared to its predecessors in low to medium wind conditions.

Meanwhile, in the U S the town of Nantucket in Massachusetts is making waves in the legal arena. Town officials are contemplating legal action against vineyard wind following a turbine failure that left debris scattered on local beaches. The incident, which occurred on July 13th, prompted federal officials to suspend operations at the wind farm.

The town’s concerns center around potential hazards to swimmers and sailors, highlighting the importance of safety measures in offshore wind development. A Massachusetts startup is making strides in zero carbon cement production. Sublime Systems is planning on building a 150 million carbon free cement plant in Holyoke, Massachusetts, and they have secured a 2, 000 ton cement order from Vineyard Offshore.

The cement will be used for offshore wind turbine platforms and onshore projects, significantly reducing the carbon footprint of future wind developments. Wrapping up our update, according to Level 10 Energy, which runs an online marketplace for energy transactions, wind power purchase agreement prices rose 7 percent in the second quarter, while solar PPA prices saw a modest 3 percent increase.

Wind PPAs continue to face ongoing challenges, including land scarcity, interconnection delays, and rising insurance premiums, while solar prices remain relatively stable thanks to recent government incentives. That’s this week’s top news stories. Now let’s welcome our co hosts, CEO and founder of IntelStore, Phil Totaro, and the Chief Commercial Officer of WeatherGuard, Joel Saxom.

Mark your calendars for AMI’s Winter in Blades conference happening October 2nd and 3rd in historic Boston, Massachusetts. This two day event, which is similar to the well established edition in Europe, We’ll bring together the whole blade value chain to examine market outlook, innovations in blade materials, design, manufacturing, testing, and lifecycle management with a special focus on the North American market.

Gain insights from experts from Vestas, along with scientists and engineers from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Plan your trip to Boston this fall by visiting the link in the show notes or just Google 2024 Blades Boston. GE Vernova just had their Q2 investor event and it was quite a show Phil.

I don’t know if you got to watch this online but It was a real stage show, right? They had the first speaker was about safety and the culture of safety and safety is job one, and then the CEO gave presentation. Great talking about the overall GE Vernova performance and where they were going.

There’s really good pieces of GE Vernova at the minute that are making money and they have growth opportunities for sure. When Vic Abate was talking about GE Wind. Those the wind part was rather, um, maybe the word is troubling in terms of where they want it to be right now. Maybe that’s where I’ll put it is that if they were hoping to be cash flow positive this year, right now, and they’re not going to be, and that is from a couple of different sources.

Problems that they’re sorting through right now, which is one, I think they’re still dealing with supply chain and what it seems price increases coming up through that supply chain, the ability to sell product at a decent margin, plus the backlog they’re going through, particularly offshore. There is a lot of concern outside of GE about their offshore.

Portfolio that they’re going to lose money on this thing, and they locked into it. So they have to produce it, lose the money, and then come out on the other side. So as I put into Slack today for everybody what GE, the win part was saying was, we’re going to be profitable sometime in 2025, maybe 2026.

That’s the way I read it, which is a little bit of a setback. And if you, and also the orders have come in. It’s about year on year, about half of where they were in 2023. That I think is due to a large order. I think that was Sunzea probably that was driving some big numbers there, but still seeing an uphill climb for GE Vernova on the, in the wind sector.

Now, guys, I think there’s a lot going on in the United States at the minute. And I wish Rosemary’s here because she could give us some Australian point of view. Is GE going to turn that corner on the wind side? Because the other parts of GE Vernova are profitable.

Philip Totaro: Allen, if you remember about a little over a year ago, we had a chat about Vic Abate being brought back in, at which point, this was obviously before the Vernova spinoff, and they were talking about things like, the power generation business, including wind being profitable by the end of 23.

Yeah. I think they technically achieved that, but the wind business has taken longer to turn around for some of the reasons Allen mentioned. But at the end of the day, it their order book is down because we’re still stuck with a lot of projects in the consenting queue. And the interconnection queues and the price increases that have, necessarily so subcomponent costs are increasing, the turbine prices are increasing and the cost of capital is still very high because interest rates are still high.

Everyone was deferring orders in anticipation of all these costs coming back down a little bit. And now that the market’s kind of realizing that these prices are high, it’s getting baked in more and more. And a fundamental kind of tenet of economics, if the price keeps going up, demand is going to keep going down a little bit eventually.

And that’s just the situation we’re in at the moment. Until everybody can acclimatize to the new the new market reality.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. Interesting thing here in some of these metrics that they put out in their Q2 report here is that services are doing well. Their service revenue year over year has grown.

I think they’re up like 12 percent or 15%. It’s the new order book, like you said, Phil, that’s falling down. That’s not doing as well. So that’s the developer side of things, right? There’s two different customer bases. You have the developers, IPPs looking at building some wind farms, and then you have the people that are, we’ve got wind farms in play and we’re servicing them.

We’ve got work to do on them. So the services revenue is high now. Is that driven from, more work out there or is it driven from, we actually have to work on bearing failures and generator swap outs and these kinds of things, because not all of those, some of those are just invoices, right?

Purchase orders. They’re not part of an FSA.

Allen Hall: This is what Vic Abate was talking about in terms of the three platforms that they were gonna go forward with. And it was only three. The 3.6 megawatt 1 54, which is the one that’s being used in Sun Zia, the New Mexico, the 6.1 1 58, so a 1 54 for the Con SunZia project.

Large project was. Good capacity factors, 158 for land constraints. So if you have two, three turbines somewhere, and then the Haliad and the offshore seem to get downplayed quite a bit, in my opinion, reading between the lines, the vast majority of their income is going to come onshore. And if they’re having basically two specific platforms, there are trying, it looks like trying to reduce the amount of factory people needed to build turbines.

And bringing it down to two base models and emphasizing that they are, all of them, offshore, onshore, are all US manufactured.

Joel Saxum: Now, that’s new. That is very new, and I don’t believe it. There’s, they may have some components US manufactured, but the reality is if they’re going to put these out at scale, they can’t. manufacture them all in the United States. There’s not enough capacity.

Allen Hall: This is where they’re trying to combine the different segments of GE Vernova. So one of the areas in which the gas turbines and wind turbines are combined is in Schenectady, New York. So there’s an existing gas turbine factory has been there forever.

They put the nacelle plant in there for the 6. 1 megawatt machines in basically the plant, the same plant or next door. Using the same basically work crews to go do that. So they’re cross training as how I read it is that they’re using this knowledgeable work group, bunch of employees that have been doing gas turbines, it’s not out of their capability to start building some nacelles, which it looks like they’re doing.

Which means, to me, smaller footprint, factory wise.

Philip Totaro: Yes, although let’s also be clear, because even on the, their supply chain for the 2 megawatt platform, some of it comes, blades are made all over the place. So a lot of their gearboxes come from China to be blunt. I don’t, again, I, they may be doing final assembly in Schenectady for the Cypress.

But that’s, as Joel said, it’s still, I would also question whether or not it’s going to be a hundred percent U. S. made everything inside.

Allen Hall: They didn’t say a hundred percent, Bill. They did not say a hundred percent, but they say it’s U. S. manufactured, which means I, I read that as assembled.

Philip Totaro: But again, yeah, exactly. So the final assembly is one thing, but like we even talked about, what, a week or two ago? What’s the difference if it’s, Is it really a U. S. made turban if it’s a bunch of Chinese parts inside a fiberglass shell that’s manufactured in the U. S.? Which, by the way, it might not even be, because some of their suppliers for the nacelles are down in Brazil.

They may be doing final assembly here, but that’s not quite a U. S. made product. But do you see where they’re headed though, Phil?

Allen Hall: Do you feel the draw to U. S. territory and that G. E. Vernovas is going to claim the U. S. as their prime real estate and try to keep everybody else off of their playground?

Philip Totaro: Yes and we’ve been here, we’ve been here before, when They first bought the assets of Enron Wind. That’s exactly what they tried to do as well, and they developed the 1. 5 megawatt platform to do precisely that. And it was, for the most part, domestically manufactured. Eventually, they started having to get international suppliers because of the scale of what they had.

But, they had, they had some of the fabrication happening in Greenville, South Carolina in various factories throughout the U. S. With these two, future focused platforms, the 3. 6154 and the 6. 1158. It looks like they will domesticate most of the production here, or final assembly here.

The blades, it, my understanding is that anything for the the 3. 6154 will be done by either GE to a certain extent, but mostly by TPI domestically. And, but again, potentially if they need to source from Mexico, there’s nothing stopping TPI from, putting some blades across the border.

It’s also my understanding that LM in South Dakota would be retooled to do the blades for the 158. But I don’t think that decision has been made final yet, because there’s obviously some conversations still going on about LM and the future under GE. And, taking into consideration now what’s happened at Vineyard Wind.

LM is under even more of a microscope than they, they were before.

Allen Hall: Yeah. So now LM is having financial difficulty. They’ve been having financial difficulty for a while, but in more recent news reports, they’re bleeding about a hundred million dollars a quarter kind of number, roughly speaking.

So the turnaround hasn’t happened at LM. They’re still going to be involved in GE, at least in the short term, from what it appears, Phil. I understand the TPI involvement in GE and it gives them a lot of flexibility, but LM is still, at least at this point, still part of GE, Vernova, does the restructuring that’s happening at GE now, and obviously they’re taking their pain pill now, mostly because they have to.

Does that put them at a stronger position against their main competitor in the U. S., which is going to be Vestas?

Joel Saxum: Let me preface that one, Phil. An interesting point, right? So we’re looking at this 6. 1 megawatt machine, 158 meter rotor. That competes with the V162 directly. Because the V162 is a 6 megawatt machine.

There is zero to date GE installed 6. 1 machines. And there is a small handful of the V 162s that are already on the ground. So I think there’s some in, I know there’s some in Oklahoma cause Allen and I saw them. And I think there’s some up in Michigan or Pennsylvania or something like that.

Pennsylvania. And there’s a few in Michigan too, right on the tip of the thumb. There’s a dozen of them or something. So there’s, while that’s going to be the, that’s the two competing ones there. I think what one of the things that GE is doing to be more competitive here is we all know the struggles that they’re having at this time with the one 16 and one 27, whether it’s lightning rotors, gearboxes, these kinds of things.

If you’re bringing this you’re basically signposting that you’re going to bring all of, as much as you can, manufacturing into the United States. That gives them the ability to have, in my mind, a better QAQC mechanism over their operation, over their Manufacturing operations. And I think that’s part of the problem that we’re seeing is when you have, like Allen, we’ve seen those wind farms with the same turbine with four different blade manufacturers from 10 different places in the world.

That’s a hard thing to get right. A hundred percent of the time. So if you can narrow down your models that you’re putting out there, which they say they’re going to do. And then domesticate some of your production. It’s easier for, an engineer from Greenville or an engineer from Schenectady to take a rip out to Iowa or South Dakota, North Dakota, or wherever you’re going to be building these things at and do a site, do a factory visit, sit with the technicians, make sure everything’s going well.

While you’re building these. So I think that in the long run, it may not change something But in the long run, I think that’s a good angle to get some quality injected back into the GE brand. Can’t

Allen Hall: argue with that. Right? Making the turbines simpler, less variations, is going to produce more consistency in the product.

I think that’s where GE recently has had trouble. Right? Bearings blades, pretty much the whole thing at a million suppliers and sub suppliers from all over the world. A lot of suppliers, right? And they’re trying to manage that managing suppliers is not easy, especially if they’re spread out all over the world, which currently has done.

So it definitely looks like a change in direction, or maybe more loudly proclaiming the change in direction than when they were part of GE, the larger GE.

Philip Totaro: I would agree. The thing that’s interesting about that though is to shift supply chain in that way. The more global diversity you have, the more you have the ability to negotiate for better price.

You, you start narrowing down the number of suppliers and you’re going to have to price take a lot more than you would. If you had at least two competing suppliers or three competing suppliers for, the same spec of components. So the interesting thing there to me is. Are they going to go back to doing more build to print versus build to spec components for these?

And I don’t know that I’ve heard enough about that from them, not specifically their engineers telling me stuff they’re not supposed to, but I, I don’t know that I have a sense of whether or not they would have the ability to go get a secondary or a tertiary supplier, because, again, just Siemens Gamesa, having a supplier issue, if you don’t have a backup in place that can provide you with, something of comparable quality at a comparable price, it’s going to shut down your entire production capacity for, months on end.

So it’s a risk.

Joel Saxum: Phil, can you gimme do me a solid here once, and this is for my benefit and for the rest of the listeners as well, can you gimme the middle school? Differences between build to print and build to spec.

Philip Totaro: Yeah, no, so this is a great question because it’s timely in, in terms of when we started off as an industry.

Everything was build to print, which what that means is I’m an OEM. I’m going to design everything, down to the smallest detail. My CAD model gives you, everything you could possibly ever need to see about how this product is, what it does, how it’s supposed to function, all the parts that go into it, how it’s assembled, everything.

If I’m then contracting you as a subcomponent supplier, you’re gonna build me what I’m telling you to build me according to my CAD drawings and, again, all the assembly instructions, everything. Okay? So that’s more or less build to, to print. Build to spec is I’m going to create a broad based product specification, but I don’t do the CAD drawings, you do them as a supplier.

You come back to me with something if it’s a bearing, it’s gotta fit into, my main shaft and my drivetrain architecture. If it’s a pitch bearing, same thing, or whatever it is. It’s got to plug into my system, but I’m leaving it to you to have more control over what that thing is, how it, again, I, there’s a lot of different ways to skin a cat.

I’m going to allow you to tell me what the best, your preferred way of doing it, and it might be different from that of a different supplier. Now, when you do a lot more stuff from a supply chain standpoint and a servicing standpoint, particularly with wind, when you do more stuff, that’s build the spec.

All those little things I just talked about somebody may have some kind of specialized way of making their component and while it might physically fit into my wind turbine, if I have a problem with it, I’m basically dependent on going back to you as a subcomponent supplier to, to get the thing fixed.

If there’s a problem. And that’s actually what’s going on with GE right now, with this whole, SKF thing, and we talked about that, last week, I think, on, or two weeks ago, on, on the show. Shifting your product strategy and your supply chain strategy back to a build to print model makes you more potentially vertically integrated, and as you mentioned, Joel, it takes more of the quality control and brings it back in house.

Because then, even if you have a subcomponent supplier, they have to do it your way, not, or the way that the OEM is specifying, not necessarily their way. Yeah, so the nice thing

Joel Saxum: would be, like, if you’re, if you buy a fill to taro turbine, and fill to taro turbines are all built to print, then if you have an issue with that turbine, you can go back to fill and get an answer.

If it’s built to spec and Phil basically subs everything out and you have someone in India making your bearings and someone in Brazil making your generator and someone, yeah. And six different people making your

Philip Totaro: blades. Everybody starts going, pointing fingers at each other saying how do I get an answer?

Exactly. Exactly.

Joel Saxum: So in your opinion, is that why we have some of the large problems within the wind industry? If you went, if some of these manufacturers would bring more of it back in house.

Allen Hall: Yeah, Joel. All right. Boeing went through the same issue, right? And we’ll just put it a little broader context.

And I know we’re focusing on GE here, but this is a wider More complex issue, right? So Boeing did a similar thing where they outsourced pretty much everything and they were the final assemblers of the large components and they let all the sub tier suppliers design the component and Boeing just went to meetings and sat through a little design reviews and went, yep, that looks good.

And meets the spec and off they went. And then we had the seven, eight, seven, and then we have. Just enormous problems with that sort of system. And so now Boeing’s trying to pull it all back. So they got rid of Spirit Aerospace to build fuselages, inspect it all out. And then Boeing is buying that whole company back because neither system is perfect.

It all depends on the economics of the particular time and who you have for employees and all kinds of things. But as Phil’s going to point out, there is no winners. You have to pick one or the other.

Philip Totaro: And you may have picked the wrong one. And Allen, you just also nailed it because it’s dependent on the state of maturity of the market.

And when the market was really immature, you have to almost do a build to print because the supply chain companies aren’t sophisticated enough to know how to build something to spec, even if you went to them. Once the industry matures up to a point, you can start D vertically integrating, if that’s a word or, D, centralizing your supply chain and even some of your engineering work out to your subcomponent suppliers, because they’ve developed that expertise, the reason at this state of the industry that everybody wants to vertically integrate again.

Is because of this profitability question. And it’s not just, I talk about interest rates and all that crap all the time, but it’s more if you’re at a point where you’re not profitable enough, you probably will get more levers to pull, to get profitability out of your own system. If you’re vertically integrated, you’re doing everything in house as opposed to outsourcing it where yes, you might have more negotiating leverage, but you’re still theoretically paying a price premium because in addition to.

If I, again, if I’m an OEM And I’m selling to a developer. I charge them, for, the build cost plus margin. But if I’m doing build to spec, everybody else that’s supplying me components also has a huge amount of margin built in and all those margins stack up exactly, Joel. That’s where you get stuck a little bit because.

It, it can be less profitable to do that, but you also might be able to react faster to customer requirements or a new order or what have you. So again, as Allen saying, there’s just different reasons why you would want to vertically integrate at any given time.

Joel Saxum: The trouble with any of that is, is if you’re going to bring the engineering in house it’s a function of human resources, right?

How much engineering horsepower do we have? And can we take this on?

Allen Hall: Engineers are not making the decision there. Financial people are making the decision there. And then that’s what trips that decision, right? In the aerospace world, because I lived through all this multiple times, when they start specking out systems to suppliers, and they force the suppliers to participate financially in this aircraft project, which they don’t have any control over, It’s a huge deal, right?

So there’s actually bidding going on to participate in a project. They’re upfronting money to the main company to participate. And then they’re going to make all the money in the backend, but the program is severely at risk, whether you’re going to get to an actual product or not. It’s highly risky. So as the top level, top dog in the supply chain, I am the OEM.

I control everybody. That’s the Boeing move, right? It, it was a GE move for a number of years, but Phil’s pointed out that has to happen in a developed industry where everybody knows what they’re doing. When Boeing decided to outsource 787, totally new stuff, composites, carbon fiber, all this cool stuff, but supply chain didn’t know how to manufacture it.

That was a wrong move because now you have suppliers that are way out of their element trying to create something new that they’re not very good at and they failed time and time again. Boeing ended up buying facilities, buying whole companies, and it continues to do it. Because of the logic they put into the 787 financial decision years ago, and GE is going to go through that too, right?

GE is going to go back through that because technology advanced faster than the suppliers could manage. Blades being one of them bearings being another that’s what I was just gonna say is blade

Joel Saxum: now take blades, right? So now you have again, you’ve got ten different manufacturers all over the world that are new models all the time now we’re introducing carbon fiber now we’re doing this There’s these different ideas and they can’t keep up and so that’s what I think one of the reasons why we and then on the same card we turn around we talk about this on the podcast all of a sudden you see in massive engineer layoffs So it’s here’s an issue.

Yeah. It’s here’s an issue that you need this engineering resources for. What is your response? We just fired all of our engineers. What? Everything’s driven by the market, right? So you can go to, we can point at wall street for that decision.

Allen Hall: Well, Joel, but listen to the language like GE, Brnova gave today, they’re focused on, at least it looks like on the U S market.

So they’ve truncated the amount of work that they’re going to possibly do. So what engineering, somebody had to do the numbers like you did Joel in the back of your envelope there, you go, Hey, you don’t have the engineers to support the whole world. Guess what? We’re pulling out of Brazil.

We’re pulling out of India. We’re going to start pulling slowly out of Europe to some measure. We’re going to pull out of parts of Asia because we can’t support that right now. We have to totally restructure our business to bring, I think Phil’s pointed out, bring it in house until it becomes stabilized, which is where Vic Abate is talking about.

We’re going to have free platforms. We’re going to do them really well. And then we’re going to go back down the supply chain to have people make these parts for us over time. We just can’t do it today. We just can’t. Isn’t that the pathway out of this, Phil?

Philip Totaro: Yes. And I here’s what’s also interesting.

If you compare and contrast this philosophy that we’re talking about right now for Vernova versus what the Chinese OEMs are doing with, hey, let’s build a new, bigger turbine all the time. They haven’t yet gotten to that critical mass of All of these problems that the Western OEMs have just faced. Now, that’s also the reason why you see companies like Vestas and Siemens Gamesa saying, We don’t necessarily need or want to be part of that, bigger turbine size contest.

It’s a scenario where they can, everybody’s starting to wrap their head around the fact that, all these other things that impact profitability are tied to not only your product development strategy, but your supply chain strategy. And if you don’t have the right philosophy in place at the right time, as Allen’s talking about, you’re necessarily going to end up going through this huge period where, your margins are just destroyed because you’re going to be servicing You know, 13 types of different turbines instead of one platform.

Joel Saxum: But I think that the fundamental difference between say a Vestas, whoever, and a Chinese manufacturer is in the, for the most part, the Chinese manufacturers in better control of their supply chain. Cause it’s local. They’re not getting, they’re not sending stuff around the world as much as we are to get these turbines built.

They’re doing a lot of it themselves.

Allen Hall: Their economics are different. Can we say that?

Philip Totaro: Although they are getting a lot of their control electronics from Europe, by the way, particularly for the larger turbines, because they don’t have the capability to do it over there. But what’s also interesting is, by contrast, they are now starting to put in place a lot of the castings and forgings facilities that They do it themselves.

Exactly.

Joel Saxum: That we don’t have. Allen, you said their economics are different. I agree. We all know their economics are different. However, that doesn’t change the fact that they have a local supply chain that they can rely on to Change, adjust, make moves get things out the door. And they’ve shown that by the amount of turbines that they’ve installed in the last five years.

Allen Hall: It’s all driven by government policy in China for the most part, right? They’re making strategic investments into infrastructure there in specific industries. And I want to talk about this after the break, the U. S. is going through an election cycle and there’s been a lot of changes in the last two weeks to who could possibly be heading up the country.

When we come back, I want to talk about that and get back to your point, Joel, what it means for U. S. industry.

Dealing with damaged blades? Don’t let slow repairs keep your turbines down. Blade Platforms get you back up and running fast. Blade Platforms truck mounted platforms reach up to 100 meters, allowing for a quick setup, improved safety, and efficient repairs. Book soon to secure your spot and experience a difference in blade access, speed, and efficiency.

Visit bladeplatforms. com and get started today.

Okay, we’re back with the Uptime Podcast. During the break, oh my gosh a lot of heated talk about the U. S. elections. And obviously there’s been a number of changes. President Biden is not going to run for president anymore. And it looks like Vice President Harris is going to be the Democrat nominee Which is astounding.

Okay, so we live in strange times and former President Trump was attacked, be the nice way to say it. Both sides are heated at the moment, and I do think this has implications on what happens in renewables, for sure. I think there’s two pieces to this, Phil. First is, what’s going to happen to the IRA bill and the financial structure that exists around renewable projects.

I think that’s one piece. The second piece, I think, is a broader economy, which is what’s driving, I think, driving the slowdown of renewables worldwide at the moment, more than any IRA bill. So first off is if Trump or Harris are elected, does anything really happen to the IRA bill here?

Philip Totaro: Probably not wholesale.

What if Harris is elected, presumably the current kind of status quo from the Biden administration would be continued, if not potentially improved upon, particularly around permitting and a quicker pace at which the manufacturing tax credits are doled out. Because that’s one thing that’s been holding up a little bit of progress in addition to the interest rate situation, which I’ll come back to.

Thank you. If Trump’s elected, the biggest thing that He, his administration would have an impact on would be the pace of permitting of anything that’s not already consented, but what’s interesting about it is we’ve got a ton of projects that are actually stuck in the interconnection queue and the consent queue right now, both onshore, offshore wind, solar batteries, everything that, they’re looking for transmission is one thing.

And they’re also looking for capital. Transmission’s hard to come by just because it’s not physically available. Capital’s hard to come by because there are people who would rather be investing it in other things in the current interest rate environment. That’s the second piece of this is, okay, if Harris wins, presumably the current pace of Federal Reserve rate cuts is going to be maintained, albeit at this kind of slow, a bit of droning pace, if you will, that, that has been holding back at the potential investment in renewable energy, both from, institutional investors, private investors, and the importantly, the oil and gas companies who in a high interest rate environment have gone and plowed their money back into what they know best.

Thank you. Rather than taking a punt on, renewables that are, if they were getting, 150 or 190 a megawatt hour offshore wind PPA, but their production costs were down lower than what they are, they might still be investing and they might still be pursuing that. But that’s, the simplest way to, to say, or explain why they haven’t they haven’t continued.

Now, here’s the thing. If you look at Trump’s previous administration, during 2017 through 2020, That time frame actually saw one of the biggest build outs of onshore wind, certainly, in the country’s history. About a third of what we now have installed was built during that time frame. But as I’ve talked about before on the show, nothing gets built, in five minutes.

It has to go through a consent process, and a environmental approvals, all that sort of thing. It, that occurred largely during Obama’s second term. So there was a lot of projects in the queue that were ready to go for the period of time when Trump was president, but we also had lower inflation and therefore lower interest rates back then.

So capital was a plenty for those projects because of COVID, but also just because of other macroeconomic things that happened between, you 2021 and today. We are in a, an environment where a lot of the project permitting got slowed down during Trump’s administration, which it took Biden’s administration a long time to catch back up.

And they’re now trying to, ram a crapload of projects through the consent process, particularly an offshore wind. It’s certainly not happening as fast as it could be, by the way, but that’s a different conversation. But we’re now getting to a point where, you know, and I talked about, alright if Harris wins, interest rates might probably stay higher than, they would if Trump was actually president.

So with a massive queue of projects, By the end of Biden’s term, plus the likely outcome of Trump’s administration would be to, get rid of the chairman of the federal reserve, put somebody in place that’s going to lower interest rates faster. You’re going to have a dearth of projects plus lower capital or, cheaper or access to cheaper capital, more plentiful access to cheaper capital.

Let’s say it that way. That is potentially going to unlock a deluge of new project construction between 2025, 2026. The real question then becomes, is Trump’s administration going to do anything to slow down the pace of permitting and consenting again, which would have an impact on, In the latter years of his second term and potentially well into whomever would be president from 2028 or well, 2029 onwards.

Allen Hall: So the heated talk about Trump shutting down all kinds of renewable projects that I hear on the clean energy side of the political spectrum, it seems really overblown, right? You had four years of history there and Trump essentially did nothing, right? There was too many other things going on in that time frame where you can’t focus on that It’s not something that is focusable

Philip Totaro: and let’s be clear to he That’s why the Biden administration right now is rushing to get a lot of stuff rammed through this consent queue, because if something’s already consented, and it’s just looking for capital, everybody, the next eras of the world, the Invenergys, the, mid Americans of the world, they’re gonna, they’re gonna be screaming bloody murder if they can’t build these projects that have been consented because the plug gets pulled on the projects themselves.

At the end of the day, the Republican president is not going to do anything to undercut business. Largely speaking, anything that’s already consented is going to be fine. It’s the, anything that’s in an earlier stage of project development that is desiring to be consented, what kind of, you know, enthusiasm is that going to receive versus, having the administration’s attention go towards, approval of oil and gas, drilling out in the Gulf of Mexico or wherever.

Allen Hall: You really can’t pump more oil or petroleum products than the United States is doing at the minute. It’s at all time record highs, right? So there’s no lever that Trump has gone to pull to pump more oil and Joel’s seen that business. It’s crazy how much. Petroleum products, the United States is pumping and delivering outside the United States.

On the economic side, though, I think every administration has levers that it wants to control, right? A Trump administration is going to want to control the Fed a little bit better, I think. A Democrat administration is going to want to pass bills in Congress, which seems to be their thing. Both of those have widely different responses in the U.

S. economy. You pump money into the U. S. economy today, inflation is going to go crazy.

Joel Saxum: But what is one thing that both sides of that aisle And that’s a good jobs reporting.

Allen Hall: You’re not going to get it. If you cause inflation, the wind farm of the week is the North Bend wind

Joel Saxum: farm out in South Dakota, near the river.

It’s got 71 GE 2. 8 to one 27 rotor wind turbines with 89 meter towers. The total height of these things is 152 and a half meters, which is right at 500 feet. The cool thing about this, if you look online about this wind farm, they actually. Posted some of their service and maintenance. That they’re going to be doing contractually to the South Dakota state government.

So this is once operational, the project service and maintenance carefully plan and divide into the intervals. So they have it posted right online. The first service inspection will take place one to three months after the wind turbines have been commissioned, and they will pay particular attention to tightening bolts and a full greasing of the turbine, then they will also have semi annual service inspections, which is every six months after commissioning.

And the same thing, lubrication and safety tests of each turbine. Then they also have an annual service inspection, which is lubrication, safety checks, checking bolt assemblies, tightening and loosening or tightening and logging loose bolts if they’re detected. And they also have a two year service inspection, which is an annual inspection plus checking and tightening of all of the terminal connectors in the entire turbine.

So a lot of work to be done out at the North Bend Wind Farm out by Chamberlain, South Dakota. So you guys are our wind farm of the week.

Allen Hall: That’s going to do it for this week’s Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. Thanks for listening. And please give us a five star rating on your podcast platform and subscribe in the show notes below to Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter.

And check out Rosemary’s YouTube channel, Engineering with Rosie. We’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

https://weatherguardwind.com/ge-investor-call-2024-election-wind-industry/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

UK Drops Offshore Wind Tariffs, Ming Yang in Germany

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

UK Drops Offshore Wind Tariffs, Ming Yang in Germany

The crew discusses the UK removing tariffs on offshore wind equipment, Vineyard Wind’s final blade shipment from New Bedford, and Ming Yang joining Germany’s offshore wind association.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTubeLinkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by Strike Tape, protecting thousands of wind turbines from lightning damage worldwide. Visit strike tape.com. And now your hosts. 

Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall. I’m here with Matthew Stead, Rosemary Barnes and Yolanda Padron.

And the UK is really gearing up for offshore wind and they’re making some really smart moves and. One of them is, uh, the change in tariffs. So the British offshore wind manufacturers have been fighting really an uphill battle for a long time and for years. The companies that build turbines and components in the UK have faced import tariffs on the materials needed most, which tends to be steels like steel.

Uh, cables, specialized parts from overseas all carried a tariff with it. Well, now the federal government has acted to [00:01:00] remove those tariffs on offshore wind equipment. The move is expected to save UK manufacturers tens of millions of pounds every year. And for an industry trying to cut costs and scale up that kind of relief could make the difference between winning.

Losing contracts, and I’m surprised the UK has waited this long and I think other countries have the same problem. Obviously the US is taring the heck out of everything at the minute, but uh, a lot of European countries do put tariffs on the raw materials and the components that are used to make wind turbines.

That’s not a smart long term move if you’re trying to deploy. Gigawatts of offshore wind.

Matthew Stead: Well, I, I think, uh, the recent events in the world show that energy security and not importing energy is a wonderful thing. And so this completely aligns with that, um, that objective. So I think that’s why we all agree with you, Alan.

Allen Hall: Well do, is there a, a. A threshold here where other countries start to do it [00:02:00] and for whatever reason there’s, there’s tends to be tariffs on energy in all forms of it. Right. And there and on steel in particular, that seems to be a big area of concern. Are we gonna start to see some of those come down just to lower the cost of wind turbines and to deploy the middle of the water?

’cause there is a lot of steel in an offshore wind turbine.

Matthew Stead: It’s been like China. I mean China has, you know, a lot of clean energy, low cost energy and it is to their advantage. So I, I think it’s a entirely logical approach and I would’ve thought it’s, if you’re a good on policy, you would definitely be looking at this.

Allen Hall: Is this has been a concern of the UK steel industry, which has been diminishing over the years? Uh, so it’s always been a pain point with the uk. They’ve been trying to stand up their own steel industry and forever they had a big steel industry In the uk you think of all the. The steel that was built from late 18 hundreds all the way up to the 1980s and nineties.

Uh, but it does sound like you, you gotta pick and choose your battles here. And maybe the UK has [00:03:00] finally said, okay, the, the steel battle is a separate issue within offshore wind, and maybe we gotta do something different.

Matthew Stead: I mean, I think Australia did the same thing ages ago. I mean, we had a car, car industry and you know, we just didn’t have the scale.

So, you know, Australia’s picking its battles and um, yeah, I mean, you can’t be good at everything, so you know why not. Uh, get the, the lower cost energy and um, deal with it that way.

Rosemary Barnes: Australia has actually just announced, you know how Australia’s got the policy to support clean energy technology manufacturing in Australia.

And they started with, um, solar panels and then they’ve also got something related to battery cells. Well, they just announced wind turbine tower manufacturing, um, which is very simple. The reason why Australia doesn’t have, um, wind turbine tower manufacturing anymore. Is just because we can’t compete on price with Asia, um, in general and China specifically.

It’s interesting now to be like, okay, let’s support Australian [00:04:00]manufacturing of wind turbine towers when like there’s no technological barrier. It’s pure cost, cost issues. I would really love to see the Australian government supporting some of the new manufacturing methods and you know, like we’ve seen that Fortescue has invested in.

Um, in Ena Lift, the Spanish, Spanish company, um, ESCU has, has bought their tower manufacturing. Um, it’s, it’s like modular, advanced thing that’s gonna work well for remote areas. Otherwise it’s just like, pay a bunch of money so that we can make towers more expensively, but we can sell them at a competitive rate with the Chinese.

And I don’t know, to me that’s not very strategic. I always prefer we support the next, the next thing.

Allen Hall: Whatever happened to spiral welding and making towers on site. I think that died about a year or two ago because they were trying it here in the United States and about building ’em at the wind farm.

But it sounded like just setting it up to [00:05:00] build the spiral mechanism, the, the cold, uh, forming plus all the welding on top of it. It got to be so expensive to install on site that it was just easier to, to build a central location, which I think they were going for. I’m not even sure that in today’s world, because of the advanced technology in the existing way of manufacturing is so good and inexpensive that it makes any sense to try anything else.

It just seems like it’s, there’s just stamping out parts right now.

Rosemary Barnes: Oh, no. I mean, we definitely need new, new methods because we’re really constrained on how tall towers can get if you just wanna make a steel cylinder and ship it out in, you know, whole pieces, like whole cross sections and. Um, put them together vertically.

That’s you. You know, like we’ve, we’ve gotten about as tall as we’re gonna get for that because if you want to go any taller, you’re gonna have to start massively increasing the thickness of the tower to make it stiffen up. And that just means way more steel to keep material costs reasonable. You need to increase the diameter, um, beyond [00:06:00] what you can transport on the road.

Um, but I think that it’s like the, the, the problem is definitely real and well established, but it’s like with many other. Problems. You know when you start thinking, okay, we’ve got a solution to this problem at that time, there aren’t other solutions, so you’re sure that you know you’re gonna win. And so spiral welding was one of the early ones.

Oh, we can fix this problem, but. While they’re developing that and trying to get the capabilities where it needs to be, the cost down, you’ve got a dozen other competing ways that you could solve that problem. And they include like, um, some manufacturers, I think Vestus is one. They’re cutting longitudinally.

And so instead of, um, shipping out towers in a single cross section, it’ll be like four. And then they’re bolted together on site. Um, and then Concrete Towers is another one. The Naber Lift, um, thing that I mentioned.

Matthew Stead: Wooden towers.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, wooden Wooden towers is, uh, another one I’ve covered, uh, [00:07:00] on my YouTube channel.

Matthew Stead: They really should make them out of carbon fiber, shouldn’t they?

Rosemary Barnes: Well, I have, it’s not, it’s You’re saying that as a, as a crazy thing. It’s not, it’s not such a crazy thing. And I have, I have, I have looked into it. You wouldn’t do it outta carbon fiber. You’d do it outta glass. Um, there’s a lot of. There’s a lot of benefits to it, and I actually do believe that we might eventually see like 3D printed glass, um, towers.

Allen Hall: No.

Rosemary Barnes: Now we’re just getting into our standard. I, I believe the future might look different to the, to the present day, and Alan never thinks that anything’s ever gonna change.

Matthew Stead: I would’ve. 3D uh, printed concrete towers would have some logic.

Rosemary Barnes: There’s been pilots of 3D printed concrete, concrete towers. I’m, I’m pretty sure GE had a, um, a project on that and there might have been somebody else that did, took it a bit further.

It’s all possible. It’s also like concrete towers are, are good, but it is local. Like it depends on having the right materials around locally. ’cause you don’t want to have to transport Hess of. Concrete and water to site. Um, [00:08:00] so yeah, anyway, the point is that like, just because you’ve identified a real problem and you’ve got a solution to it, if you are gonna take five or 10 years to develop your technology and get it to the right price point, you are not gonna be the only, the only solution anymore.

So people often like massively overestimate how valuable their idea is. Um, and by the time that it’s ready, it’s not the best solution anymore. So I think like the lesson from that is to just. You need to just move really, really fast and keep your peripheral vision available to see what other technologies are developing in tandem and know when, when to pull the pin.

If you are no longer, you no longer have a path to be the best solution, then. Stop. Even if you’ve got 90% of a solution, don’t bother with the last 10%. If you’re never gonna sell it, you know it’s a waste go. Um, let, let all your smart people work on something else.

Allen Hall: Delamination and bottom line, failures and blades are [00:09:00]difficult problems to detect early. These hidden issues can cost you millions in repairs and lost energy production. C-I-C-N-D-T are specialists to detect these critical flaws before they become expensive burdens. Their non-destructive test technology penetrates deep to blade materials to find voids and cracks.

Traditional inspections, completely. Miss C-I-C-N-D-T Maps. Every critical defect delivers actionable reports and provides support to get your blades. Back in service, so visit cic ndt.com because catching blade problems early will save you millions.

Can we pull the pin? On digital twins. I came across another company that was pushing digital twins in the wind turbine space. And I thought, I thought we got rid of that a year ago. Can we stop doing that?

Rosemary Barnes: I, um, in general, like I think a lot of times you see digital twins and I can’t see the point, but there are some applications where you [00:10:00] definitely can,

Matthew Stead: uh, I can add on the digital twin, so the IEC 61 400 dash 32, the new blade o and m standard has in the, in its current draft, it has a section on digital twins.

Um, and um, at the last meeting there was a debate as to whether that should be taken out because actually, um, AI, ml, um, all these, um, approaches will just overrun the concept of the traditional digital twin. So, um, I was voting for it to be removed, um, but. Other people didn’t. And so it’s still in the current draft.

Yolanda Padron: I am a little bit tired around digital twins at the idea of, like, I’ve seen the title slapped around a lot of things that just aren’t digital twins. And I think that gets even more confusing to a lot of people who are just new to the space or new to the idea that then they, they, they hear digital twin, they have like an idea about it or like, oh, it’s really great, and then they pursue something that just [00:11:00] really isn’t, it’s just a.

A monitoring system that they wanted to name something else.

Allen Hall: Yes, that’s it.

Rosemary Barnes: I’ve seen it used well in manufacturing, which is not usually what people are selling it as, but you know, if you have a new composite part, for example, and like a wind turbine blade is a really good example, you design it. And then you can only test it to a certain extent.

Um, and you never know exactly what you’ve made, right? And so it’s really hard to kind of relate, like to validate your design tools when not every blade is the same. You know, it’s aiming to be the same. The design is the same every time, but you’re gonna get different results every time you test it. But with some advanced, uh, manufacturing, like my favorite thing to argue with Alan about 3D printing, um, fiber reinforced composites.

You can really precisely know exactly what your part looks like all through the structure. You know where every void is. Um, you know where every fiber is and then so you know that exact part. Then you can test that exact part, and you do that with, you know, a dozen of them and you can really [00:12:00] build up a model of what kinds of defects are really, um, you know, doing what to the performance output.

And then that can help you to get your quality, um, acceptance to really, like you, you can do the things that matter instead of guessing, oh, okay, yeah, we know that we want this much. Bond line, you can actually know, okay, well like where does that matter? Where doesn’t it? What’s the actual threshold?

However, it’s very expensive to do that, and I don’t know that it would make sense for wind turbine blades economically, maybe. Maybe it will one day. I mean, if we can get the quality data that we need, there are big pro quality problems that need to be solved with blades so. I think it’s something to not totally rule out anyway.

Matthew Stead: That’s quality control. That’s not a digital twin.

Rosemary Barnes: No, but it is. You have the di you have the make up a digital twin of the, of the part that you’ve made, and then you test it and then you can, um, digitally test the [00:13:00] part that you, the model that you have. So it is a digital twin. Um, it’s just used in a very different way to what digital twins are usually sold as.

It’s not at the right level yet for a hundred meter long. Composite wind turbine blade. Um, and also because you would need to destructively test, you know, a, a whole bunch of blades which no one can afford to, to do that.

Yolanda Padron: What if we were to take all the money from like FSAs and stuff that they have to spend, like the OEMs actually have to spend from all of the manufacturing defects from, oh, I tweaked this on this blade type in this.

Factory and set it to print and then I tweaked it over here and then I set it to print for like hundreds and hundreds of blades. Um, you know, all of that money spent accumulates too, if we really wanna look at the business case. But eventually, I think maybe it’d be great if it were to work out. I am also.[00:14:00]

Hoping

Rosemary Barnes: I, I think it would be a really interesting project to work, and I bet I could. I, I bet that, you know, a good project manager could get, get a positive business case out of it. At the end. One of the problems is that like service, the service department bucket of money is not at all related to the manufacturing bucket of money.

Um, so, or the, yeah, the engineering back of the money that, that, that would be a really big problem and make it harder to find a positive business case. But I still think that it’s, um. Yeah, it, there’s a lot of potential there. It would be really interesting project to work on.

Matthew Stead: In terms of the operational phase, I, I think, um, like I said before, the A IML tools.

A way more powerful with anomaly detection rather than building a, a fancy digital model, which is not accurate. Um, actually you’re better off looking at the deviations and then the anomalies from what you expect. And I, and there are quite a few people that are doing that, and I, I personally think that’s a way more effective method during the operations and maintenance phase.

Rosemary Barnes: But I think that that [00:15:00] would be related. It would be a way to improve what you’re doing there because you said, yeah, digital twin, that’s not. Accurate. So you would need to be accurate. That would be the project to figure out like how you can get accuracy in the right places that you need it. You wouldn’t be able to afford to have accuracy over the entire blade ’cause it’s just way too much data.

And then, um, it would help you to figure out like what anoma, what anomalies do we need to look for that are the, the critical ones. I, I think that they would, they would work in partnership. Um, not as two separate things. Can I just plug, because I’m gonna go to China in April and can I just plug that if anyone has any projects, I’ll be there anyway.

And um, yeah, so I am sharing the cost of the trip between a few different collaborations and there will be a chance. To, to get me out there to see some manufacturing, et cetera. Would be really excited to go visit some Chinese [00:16:00] manufacturing, some Chinese development. Got a few, few tentative irons in fires at the moment, but would love to have Chinese companies reach out to me and see if we can arrange a collaboration

Allen Hall: as wind energy professionals.

Staying informed is crucial, and let’s face it difficult. That’s why the Uptime podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine. PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need.

Don’t miss out. Visit PS wind.com today. It has been a turbulent chapter in offshore wind in America. No doubt about that vineyard wind. The first large scale offshore wind project in the US has faced a crazy difficult road after months of uncertainty, partial construction, and a federally ordered pause.

The [00:17:00] project has reached a telling milestone the first. And final shipment of the last blade has departed the port of New Bedford, Massachusetts. And, uh, the blades were just sitting on port for a little while. Uh, Keyside. So this is the last blades or set of blades that’s going out to a turbine. This should sort of wrap it up.

I, although I do think there are a couple of blades that may still need some modification updates, something of the sort. But in terms of getting termites out in the water. This should be it. And remember a few months ago, GE and uh, a number of others, vineyard was saying that they’re trying to be done in March.

So they’re going to come really close to doing that. And that I know they’re trying to get power all turned on for the site. Because once that happens, it’s really hard for the, uh, the federal government to put any stops on them. I, I guess the question is now, is there any future for offshore wind for [00:18:00]ge now that this is complete and, and it’s kind of off the books, which is what they’ve been trying to do for the last roughly two years, is get it off the books.

Matthew Stead: Um, as a positive, I mean. You know, every industry goes through challenges and improve. So I mean, despite all the turmoil, you know, there has to be some good come from it, even though it is been a painful, horrible process. You know, surely there’s some good come from it in terms of improved quality in the future, improved processes, so,

Allen Hall: well, I, I guess that’s the question is are they taking some of these lessons learned and applying them, or are they taking the lessons learned and saying we’re not gonna do that again in, in terms of going down the pathway for offshore wind.

Matthew Stead: Well, I think if, uh, if they don’t apply the lessons, that’s sort of, it shows a massive failure of an organization.

Allen Hall: Yeah. It may, I guess it’s a question if it’s a technical failure or a financial failure. Maybe it’s both at the minute until they get everything up and running. But I think the financial side has been.

Driving a number of the, of the decisions because the [00:19:00] technical side hasn’t gone all that well.

Matthew Stead: Uh, I think, uh, I think the financial side is an art, which I don’t understand.

Allen Hall: Yeah. Yeah. There’s a lot of moving pieces in financing offshore wind. Now, Vestas has won a, a couple of big. Uh, orders from RWB offshore and Vestus has obviously been in, in some offshore, not at the scale as originally as some of the other OEMs.

It does look like the future is bright for Vestus offshore. Is that just gonna continue on that? Vestus is going to invest heavily in offshore and basically dominate that market. Or compete against a a Chinese manufacturer. It doesn’t seem like Siemens is gonna win a lot of offshore contracts off. At least today it doesn’t.

You don’t see a lot of noise about that. You see mostly Vestas winning these gigawatt orders. It almost seems inevitable they’re gonna win most of them.

Matthew Stead: Um, I don’t, being long way, way away from where these projects are being made, uh, installed. Um, I don’t have the same sort of insights. [00:20:00] Um, but, um, I mean, obviously yeah, vest, MHI, the previous, um, you know, joint venture with MHI, which especially heavy industries.

Um, obviously they’ve come from a, a long pedigree of, um, working offshore, so yeah, I mean, why not? And, um, it seems to be a more of a gradual ramp up, um, and a more orderly, systematic ramp up for offshore. So, yeah. Why, why wouldn’t that work?

Allen Hall: Well, we should hop on the. China discussion because, uh, China’s when turbine makers obviously been trying to build turbines in, in Europe at scale for quite a while now.

Uh, and Ying Yang is talking about focusing their efforts on. Germany and they have joined the German Offshore Wind Association BWO. And this is not just a membership cards, uh, that they have subscribed to. It is really like, in a lot of people’s opinion, a strategic signal that Ming Yang intends to compete in the European off.[00:21:00]

Market, maybe starting with Germany. Ming Yang was trying to get into Scotland originally, and they were talking about a billion and a half pounds being poured into Scotland to develop factories for offshore wind. Maybe that has come, uh, time has passed and Ming Yang is moving on to Germany. That’s what it reads like to me.

Or, or they’re gonna hedge their bets and, and look at both places to see if they can get a foot. Print established in either country.

Matthew Stead: I mean, reputation matters. So you really need to build up a, a footprint. And why would you apply a scatter gun approach? So, I mean, you know, just targeting, you know, one region or, um, you know, makes complete sense to me.

So, you know, get, get, get some turbines in the water, get them up and running, get them, get the reliability and the, the reputation, and then, and then go from there. I mean, made complete business sense.

Allen Hall: Well, does that mean that, uh, a mean yang is going to have to lose a little bit of money early on to get some turbines in the water just to demonstrate that they [00:22:00] can do it at scale in Europe?

Matthew Stead: I might defer to Rosie, but I would’ve thought they don’t need to, you know, cut costs. I think they’re already cost effective. So you would’ve thought they would just go in, um, with their, their normal product offering and still be successful. Uh, but maybe I’m, I’m on the wrong mark there.

Rosemary Barnes: My understanding is, and I, I don’t know heaps.

But my understanding is with Chinese when turbines, that there’s a separate version for the Chinese market, and then if they wanna sell it internationally, then they need to make a new version of it that will pass the IEC, um, standards and the kinds of, you know, certification testing that everybody in those markets is used to.

So you’re not always getting, or I don’t think you, I think you’re usually not getting the exact same product. So just because the product exists in China doesn’t mean that it is. Um, without risk in new markets.

Allen Hall: Well, I’m, I’m just curious if ING Yang will have to do a complete IEC certification process because they haven’t done it yet.

Uh, is that what you’re saying?

Rosemary Barnes: They do [00:23:00] a, actually a redesign so that they can pass the, um. Certification and then they, yes, they do the whole certification process. However, Mingan hasn’t sold no turbines outside of China. So they have, or it’s not like this is a brand new thing for them that they’ll have to have to, you know, figure out as they go.

Um, they’ve, they’ve, you know, I, I, if they haven’t done it for these specific turbines that they’re planning to manufacture in that factory, they’ve at least done it for others and know the process. Um, yeah, and I think we all know it’s not that hard to pass a certification test, so it’s not like a huge obstacle for them.

But it will add, it will add cost to the, um, to the process and to the product. Probab probably, you know, there are some design changes that will be needed that will increase the cost of the product. So I don’t think that we’re gonna see, um, you know, Chinese turbines from any, any manufacturer outside of China that are as cheap as the prices that you see within China.

Matthew Stead: To be fair though, um, there is a strong, um, Chinese involvement in the IAC committees. So, um, [00:24:00] definitely the, the standards are being used. So, you know, the standards are being used in China, and so I, I don’t think it’s a huge stretch from, you know, the, the domestic product versus the international product.

Allen Hall: That wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you. Reach out to us on LinkedIn. Don’t forget to subscribe. So if you never miss an episode, and if you found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review.

It really helps other wind energy professionals discover this show for Rosa, Yolanda, and Matthew. I’m Alan Hall, and we’ll see you here next time on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

UK Drops Offshore Wind Tariffs, Ming Yang in Germany

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vineyard Wind Finishes, Maersk Viridis Heads to New York

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vineyard Wind Finishes, Maersk Viridis Heads to New York

Allen covers a week of offshore wind milestones including the Maersk Viridis sailing toward New York, Revolution Wind’s first power delivery, Vineyard Wind’s final blade, RWE’s Thor project in Denmark, and Kinewell Energy’s fundraise in England.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTubeLinkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Good morning, everyone.

There is a ship sailing toward America right now. And when it arrives, it will be the most powerful wind turbine installation vessel ever to work in United States waters. Her name is Maersk Viridis. Built by Seatrium in Singapore. Forty thousand tonnes of steel. A main crane reaching one hundred and eighty meters into the sky. Designed to lift the next generation of fifteen-megawatt turbines. At her naming ceremony, godmother Charlotte Norkjer Larsen smashed a bottle of champagne against the main crane pedestal. Viridis — the Latin word for green. The Viridis is headed for Equinor’s Empire Wind project off the coast of New York. When complete, five hundred thousand homes will have power.

Now, there is something worth noting. This vessel was built as a Jones Act-compliant solution. That means it can work legally in United States offshore waters. It was built with zero lost time injuries. And while one great ship sails west, the wind industry is moving forward on every front.

In New England, the Revolution Wind project delivered its first power to the grid. Seven hundred and four megawatts. Power enough for up to three hundred and fifty thousand homes. Built by local union workers logging more than two million hours. That same week, workers installed the last turbine blade on Vineyard Wind. A project that endured a fractured blade in July of twenty twenty-four, a legal battle to survive a federal stop-work order, and came out the other side — still standing.

On the other side of the world, Denmark is doing what Denmark does. The first turbine is now installed at the Thor offshore wind project. In the North Sea, off the west coast of Jutland. When finished, Thor will be Denmark’s largest offshore wind farm. Seventy-two turbines. Each capable of fifteen megawatts. Each turbine rising one hundred and forty-eight meters above the sea. Total project capacity — one-point-one gigawatts. The installation vessel is the Brave Tern, operated by Fred. Olsen Windcarrier. She carries three turbines per trip. Some blades on Thor are recyclable. That is not a headline you could have written ten years ago. And the developer building Thor? That would be RWE. RWE is everywhere right now.

Now, for a small story with a large idea behind it. In Wallsend, England, a twelve-person company called Kinewell just raised seven hundred and fifty thousand pounds. Founded by an engineer named Andrew Jenkins while he was earning his PhD at Newcastle University. Kinewell builds software — software that optimises the design of offshore wind farms. Cable layouts, turbine placement, transmission systems. All three, working together. Their clients include Equinor, SSE Renewables, and Eurus Energy. The new funding unlocks a further six-figure grant, bringing total new capital to more than one million pounds. Ten new jobs in the next six months. Their software has saved clients hundreds of millions of pounds. That is what the right tool can do.

So let us step back and look at the week. A ship christened and sailing to New York. A New England grid receiving its first offshore wind power. Vineyard Wind — finished at last. Denmark’s largest wind farm, growing turbine by turbine. And a twelve-person software firm in northeast England, helping shape the invisible architecture of the energy transition.

That is the Wind Energy News for the 16th of March, 2026. Join us for the Uptime Wind Energy podcast tomorrow.

Vineyard Wind Finishes, Maersk Viridis Heads to New York

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Are Muslims the Enemy?

Published

on

In today’s world, a significant number of Americans hate everyone but straight white Christian males.

Hatred of other people has replaced baseball as our national pastime. Ignorance is what we’ve become known for around the globe.

Are Muslims the Enemy?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com