Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

US Moving Back to Coal? Iowa Sticks with Wind

Energy Secretary Chris Wright visits Iowa to announce plans to end wind energy subsidies, despite Iowa generating 60% of its electricity from wind power that has become cheaper than fossil fuels. While the Trump administration pushes to revive coal and reduce renewable research funding, market forces continue driving utilities toward wind and solar.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on FacebookYouTubeTwitterLinkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

This week’s news flash is about power and politics. And the two collided in Iowa of all places.

Iowa is farm state in the middle of America’s heartland crucial for presidential hopefuls. It’s the first major contest where candidates rise or fall. Smart politicians know: upset Iowa voters at your own peril.

But here’s what makes this interesting. Iowa generates more electricity from wind than any other state. Sixty percent of their power comes from those spinning turbines. Wind energy has become Iowa’s economic engine.

The irony? US Energy Secretary Chris Wright just visited Ames National Laboratory in Iowa. He praised the lab as a premier scientific institution. Then he dropped a bombshell: it’s time to end government support for wind energy.

Wright says wind power has been subsidized for thirty-three years. Time to compete without training wheels.

But here’s what he didn’t mention: wind energy is now one of the cheapest sources of electricity in America. Even without subsidies, renewables cost less than oil, gas, and coal.

Energy costs are everything in America. What we pay for electricity determines what we pay for everything else. Manufacturing, artificial intelligence, keeping the lights on at home.

Energy Secretary Wright talks about reindustrializing America. He wants to win the race on artificial intelligence. Stop upward pressure on electricity prices.

Those are noble goals. But here’s the twist: the cheapest electricity in America comes from wind and solar power. Not oil. Not gas. Not coal.

The Lazard LCOE analysis proves it year after year. Renewable energy costs have plummeted while fossil fuel prices remain volatile.

Iowa figured this out years ago. They didn’t choose wind power because they love polar bears. They chose it because it’s cheap, reliable, and keeps electricity bills low.

Wright’s DOE budget would slash renewable energy research by more than fifty percent. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory would lose half its funding.

But markets don’t care about politics. They care about profits. And the lowest-cost energy wins every time.

Here’s where the story gets complicated.

Wright is absolutely right about one thing: America depends too heavily on China for critical minerals. Sixty percent of rare earth elements. Ninety percent of processing.

These materials power our phones, electric cars, and military equipment. China’s grip on this supply chain threatens national security.

The Energy Department will invest one billion dollars to bring mining and processing home. Smart move.

But here’s the irony: many of these critical minerals are essential for wind turbines and solar panels. The very technologies Wright wants to defund.

Alaska holds forty-nine critical minerals. Refining them increases their value by six hundred fifty percent.

So which is it? Do we want energy independence through domestic mining? Or do we want to slow the industries that need those materials most?

Wind turbines do need rare earth magnets. Solar panels need refined silicon. Energy storage needs lithium and cobalt.

You can’t have domestic energy security without domestic renewable energy. They’re the same fight, they are just wearing different uniforms.

Recently, Secretary Wright commissioned five scientists to review climate assessments. Their conclusion: carbon dioxide warming appears less economically damaging than believed.

Climate activists call this science denial. Wright calls it getting discourse back to facts.

But here’s what both sides miss: the economics have already decided.

Wind power in Iowa didn’t grow because of climate regulations. It grew because Iowa farmers could lease their land for guaranteed income. Because utilities could buy cheap electricity. Because manufacturers wanted stable energy costs.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says human influence on warming is established fact. Wright says climate change isn’t the world’s greatest problem.

Meanwhile, Iowa keeps building wind farms. To save money on electric bills.

The beauty of market economics? You don’t need to agree on the problem to agree on the solution.

Cheap energy is cheap energy. Whether you’re a climate scientist or a climate skeptic.

Mother Nature doesn’t vote. But she does send the bill.

Solar and wind stocks soared after a leaked Treasury document revealed the Trump administration’s plans for safe harboring of renewable projects. Instead of killing renewable tax credits, they’re preserving most of them.

The guidance requires actual construction to start, not just spending five percent of costs. But it allows work to begin offsite and maintains four-year completion windows.

NextEra Energy stock jumped about 5% on the news. First Solar surged around 13%

Why the market optimism? Because investors understand something politicians sometimes forget: cheap energy creates wealth.

Iowa’s wind industry will survive these changes. Why? Because wind power in Iowa is profitable with or without tax credits. The economics work.

That’s the difference between subsidizing infant industries and supporting mature technologies that already win on price.

The market has spoken.

Here’s the final chapter in our energy story.

Secretary Wright renewed the National Coal Council charter, terminated under President Biden. Coal supports hundreds of thousands of jobs, he says. Adds tens of billions to the economy.

True enough. Coal built industrial America. Coal powers steel mills. Coal byproducts build roads and fertilize crops.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: even with government support, coal can’t compete with wind on price. Utility companies know this. They’re retiring coal plants and building wind farms.

Not because bureaucrats order them to. Because shareholders demand profits.

Iowa proves the point. This state didn’t abandon coal for environmental virtue. They embraced wind for economic advantage.

Coal will always have a role in steelmaking and chemical production. But for electricity generation? The future is blowing in the wind.

Literally.

You’ve heard six stories about America’s energy future. They seem disconnected. Politics and science. Markets and ideology. Iowa and Washington.

But they’re really one story wearing six different masks.

The story is this: energy costs drive everything else. The cheapest energy source wins. Not eventually. Not after government picks winners and losers. Now.

Wind power generates more electricity in Iowa than any other source. Not because politicians mandated it. Because Iowa farmers, utilities, and businesses chose it.

They chose it because wind power in Iowa costs less than coal. Less than natural gas. Less than anything else that plugs into the grid.

Secretary Wright can defund renewable research. President Trump can eliminate tax credits. Congress can support coal.

But they can’t repeal the law of supply and demand.

Iowa will keep building wind farms. Iowa will continue to build solar farms.

The wind blows free. The sun shines free. Coal must be dug. Oil must be drilled. Gas must be fracked.

Which would you choose if you were paying the bills?

The future is renewable because the future is profitable.

https://weatherguardwind.com/us-coal-iowa-wind/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Before Trump, “Contempt of Court” Used to Be a Big Deal

Published

on

Most Americans, me included, are puzzled as to how the Trump administration can openly thumb its nose to the findings of our courts. Until recently, behavior like this would have wound you up in jail.

Before Trump, “Contempt of Court” Used to Be a Big Deal

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

How Households Saved $1,200 with VEU & Air-Con Upgrade? 

Published

on

Over the decades, many households across Victoria have resided in older suburban homes equipped with traditional ducted gas heating and aging split-system air conditioners.

However, today the scenario has changed significantly. As energy prices rise, families are feeling the pinch, with annual heating and cooling costs often rising $2,000.

But what are the main issues?

Gas systems that waste energy heating unused rooms, old non-inverter aircons that struggle to maintain even temperatures, and confusion among residents about how rebates, such as the Victorian Energy Upgrades (VEU) program, actually work.

That’s where trusted providers like Cyanergy Australia step in!

By replacing outdated systems with efficient reverse-cycle multi-split air-conditioning and applying VEU rebates, we help many households to cut energy bills, reduce emissions, and enjoy year-round comfort, all in one smart upgrade.

This air conditioning upgrade can lead to a smoother transition from gas to clean, efficient electric heating and cooling, building a smarter, more sustainable home.

So, let’s break down how the household saved $1,200 with the VEU & Air-Con upgrade, what the program offers, and how you can take advantage of similar rebates to cut costs and enjoy a more energy-efficient home.

Cyanergy’s Energy Assessment: What We Found!

From the beginning, Cyanergy’s focus was to remove or disconnect the old gas ducted heater, install a modern
reverse-cycle multi-split air conditioning system, claim the VEU discount, and significantly reduce your annual
energy bills.

Simply via the effective air-conditioner upgrade, households can “Save
up to $2,000 a year on your energy bill.

Here are the findings after Cyanergy’s initial home energy visit:

  • In many Victorian households, the ducted
    gas heater
    is still in use, with high standing and fuel costs.

  • The older split system had poor efficiency. Some of them were oversized for the room and lacked zoning
    options.

  • The electrical switchboard had spare capacity to support a multi-split installation. For example, one
    outdoor unit
    with multiple indoor units for different zones.

Home Heating & Cooling Upgrade| The Step-by-Step Path

It’s well-known that the upgrade path usually involves replacing old systems with modern, energy-efficient solutions.

So, from gas to an energy-efficient electric system, let’s have a look at the upgrade story:

Choosing the right system

For the households that want to upgrade under the VEU air
conditioner rebate
, we proposed a multi-split reverse-cycle system:

  • One efficient outdoor inverter unit connected to three indoor units

  • One in the main living area, one serving the upstairs bedrooms, and

  • One for the downstairs zone, which had very little heating or cooling.

  • Going multi-split provides flexibility: you only run the zones you need, resulting in lower energy
    consumption.

However, in Victoria, Cyanergy is a renowned company that handles design, quoting, installation, and also guides
families through rebate
eligibility
.

Decommissioning the old gas ducted heater

As part of eligibility for the VEU discount, the existing gas heater needed to be decommissioned in most cases.

This involves removing the system or disconnecting the ducted unit from the gas supply, following proper procedures
and obtaining certification, and utilizing expert installers.

Installation Process & Timing Period

  1. Initially, after checking the eligibility, apply for the quotes.

  2. The quote needs to be accepted and dated.

  3. Then the installers will remove the old ducted heater, seal off the vents, and remove or disconnect the gas
    appliance.

  4. The outdoor inverter unit should be mounted externally in these households. The indoor units need to be
    installed in each zone, minimising the intrusion of ductwork and piping.

  5. The wiring and electrical breaker must be upgraded as needed.

  6. The system will then be commissioned, and the necessary documentation will be submitted to the accredited provider for the VEU scheme.

Choosing efficiency over just cooling

Rather than improving just cooling, the Victorian households treated the upgrade as a heating & cooling renovation, switching to a system that uses electricity rather than gas.

Modern inverter systems are more efficient, as they modulate their output, offer better zoning, and can both heat and cool, allowing you to enjoy both winter comfort and summer cooling in one system.

At Cyanergy, we emphasise this home upgrade path:

“Efficient and Eco-Friendly Electric Multi-Split Air Conditioner. Take advantage of up to $7,200 in Victorian Government Energy Upgrade incentives, save big this winter on your gas bill.”

Out-of-pocket and rebate

Here is recent data from the average estimation for a household from the aircon rebate case study in Victoria.

In the quotation, the family had an installation cost of approximately $8,000 for the new multi-split system, including the decommissioning.

The VEU discount for gas-ducted to multi-split upgrades in Victoria was approximately $2,500.

So, their net out-of-pocket cost was ($8,000 – $2,500), which is approx $5,500.

How to Apply for the VEU Rebate: Are You Eligible?

The Victorian Energy Upgrades (VEU) program provides rebates for eligible energy-efficient upgrades such as
installing a high-efficiency reverse-cycle air conditioner to replace an older heating or cooling system.

Before we discuss how
the rebate works
, here are the eligibility criteria.

So, to qualify under the VEU program:

  • The property must be more than two years old.
  • The existing heating or cooling system must be removed or replaced.
  • The new system must be an eligible high-efficiency reverse-cycle unit installed by an accredited
    provider.

How the Rebate Works

In this case, the quote from Cyanergy already included the VEU discount, meaning the price shown was the net cost
after applying the rebate allocated to the installer.

After installation:

  1. The accredited provider registers the upgrade with the VEU program.
  2. They create and claim Victorian Energy Efficiency Certificates (VEECs) for the upgrade.
  3. The value of those certificates is passed on to the customer as an instant discount on the invoice.

The homeowner simply has to:

  • Signs off that the old system was removed or decommissioned.
  • Provides any required evidence or documentation, like serial numbers or photos.

The Result

The rebate is applied instantly at the point of installation, reducing the upfront cost — no need for the homeowner
to submit a separate claim.

Why is the VEU rebate significant?

Rebates like this make a big difference in the decision-making process. As the website says:

On average, households that upgrade
can save
between $120 and $1,100 per year on their energy bills.

Additionally, the government factsheet notes that households can save between $120 and over $1,000 annually,
depending on the type of system and upgrade.

Thus, the rebate reduces the payback period, making the system more widely available.

Energy Bill Before vs After: See the Savings!

Here’s where the real story says: the household’s actual bills before and after the upgrade.

Before Adding Air Conditioning System

  • Ducted gas heating and an older split system.
  • In Victoria during winter months, the average monthly gas cost is approximately $125, and for electricity,
    and other supplementary costs, an additional $30. So roughly $155 per winter month. Therefore, over the
    course of four months, the price can reach nearly $620.

  • In summer cooling months, if their older split system ran for 2 hours per day, for example, from May to
    October, it would cost around $50 per month. Over the 6 months, it will be, $300.

  • Total annual heating and cooling cost is approximately $920

After Adding the Air Conditioning System

  • Household that installed a Multi-split reverse-cycle system.
  • During the winter months, running the zones efficiently and utilizing the inverter system resulted in a
    decrease in heating electricity costs.
  • Let’s say the average is around $70 per month over four months, totaling approximately $280.

  • In the summer months, efficient cooling costs approximately $30 per month over six months, totaling around
    $180.

  • So, the annual heating
    and cooling
    cost is approximately $460.

Net Savings

Annual savings: $920 (before) – $460 (after) = $460 per year.

At that rate, the upgrade pays for itself in net savings and an upfront rebate.

However, as they also removed gas connection fees and standing charges, improving comfort, therefore, the “effective”
savings were perceived to be higher, around $1,200 in the first year with the air conditioning upgrade.

This figure also includes avoided gas standing charges of $150, lower maintenance costs of the old system, and
improved efficiency.

Maximising Your Savings| Key Insights from the VEU Rebate Program

Based on the case study and Cyanergy’s experience, here are some lessons and actionable tips for homeowners
considering an upgrade.

  • Don’t wait until your system dies.
  • Replace outdated or inefficient gas or electric resistance systems immediately. Once the system starts
    failing, you
    may have fewer options or higher installation disruption.

  • Choose a provider who handles the rebates.
  • Dealing with the rebate or discount component (VEU) on your own adds complexity, like documentation,
    compliance, and
    installation. So look for an accredited provider.

  • Understand the actual savings potential.
  • It’s not just the rebate amount; consider running costs, efficiency improvements, zoning, and the ability to
    heat and
    cool.

  • Ensure proper sizing and zone control.
  • As many families discovered, the benefit came from zoning: you only heat and cool rooms you use. Oversized
    units or
    whole-home heating can reduce savings.

  • Factor in non-energy benefits.
  • Better comfort, for example, quieter systems and more consistent temperatures, as well as the removal of gas
    standing
    charges, less
    maintenance
    , and improved resale appeal for eco-conscious buyers, all benefit you.

  • Check the accreditation and compliance.
  • With rebate programs, there’s always a risk of non-compliant installations or companies that don’t follow
    through.

    So, do your homework: check that the installer is accredited for VEU, ask for references, and ensure that the
    documentation is completed appropriately.

  • Request detailed quotes that include estimates for both “before rebate” and “after rebate”
    costs.
  • This helps you see how much you’re actually paying, the discount you receive, and ensures transparency. The
    rebate is
    not always the full difference; minimum contribution rules apply.

  • Monitor your bills after installation.
  • Keep track of your energy bills (gas & electricity) before and after for at least 12 months. This will
    indicate
    whether the savings are as expected and aid in budgeting.

    Be realistic about pay-back

    Although the rebate helps upfront, large systems still cost thousands of dollars. Don’t expect payback in one
    or two
    years (unless you have extreme usage).

    However, with a well-designed system, rebates, and efficiency gains, a payback of 5-10 years or better is
    possible,
    depending on usage.

Final Notes

This aircon rebate case study illustrates the VEU saving. By working with Cyanergy Australia, households transformed a traditional, inefficient gas-ducted heating and older split cooling system into a modern, efficient, zone-controlled multi-split reverse-cycle air-conditioning system.

This was made more affordable through the VEU scheme discount.

The result? A net cost of around $5,500, improved comfort, and savings of approximately $1,200 in the first year.

This real-world “VEU saving example” shows that:

  1. Rebates matter as they make the upgrade financially viable.
  2. Efficiency matters as modern multi-split reverse-cycle systems deliver lower running costs.

  3. Removing inefficient gas heating can unlock significant savings.
  4. A reliable installer who navigates the rebate process effectively is crucial.

So, if you are looking for an accredited provider in Australia, Cyanergy is here to help!

Contact us today to receive a free solar quote. We will handle all your paperwork to ensure a fast and smooth installation process.

Your Solution Is Just a Click Away

The post How Households Saved $1,200 with VEU & Air-Con Upgrade?  appeared first on Cyanergy.

How Households Saved $1,200 with VEU & Air-Con Upgrade? 

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Air Power

Published

on

About 20 years ago, a friend asked me if I was aware that cars could run on air.  I asked, delicately, what she meant, and she explained that cars can run on compressed air.

“Ah,” I replied. “Of course they can. But where does the energy come from that compresses the air?”  End of conversation.

Now, it’s back.  Now there are enormous swaths of the population who know so little about middle school science that they believe we can put cars on the road, in an ocean of air, and extract energy out of that air to power our automobiles.

If you’re among these morons and want to invest with some heavy-duty fraud/charlatans, here’s your opportunity.  They say that it’s “self-sustaining and needs no fuel.” If that makes sense to you, be my guest.

Air Power

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com