Disseminated on behalf of SolarBank Corporation.
The U.S. energy system is changing fast. In 2025, the country is expected to add about 97 gigawatts (GW) of new electricity capacity. Most of this growth will come from solar power and energy storage, showing strong momentum for clean energy, even as fossil fuels remain part of the mix.
A report from S&P Global Market Intelligence says that more than 59 GW of new solar and wind projects are planned for 2025, along with over 31 GW of energy storage. This means nearly 90% of new electricity projects next year will be tied to renewable energy and batteries.
Solar Shines Brightest
Solar energy is growing quickly across the United States. Nearly 49 GW of solar power is in line to connect to the electric grid. That’s enough to power more than 35 million homes for a year.
Texas is leading the solar race, with more than 12 GW of planned solar capacity. Other large amounts are planned in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) region with 8 GW, and the PJM Interconnection area with over 6 GW.

The growth of solar is being pushed by several things:
- Falling prices of solar panels
- Government tax credits and incentives
- Demand for clean electricity from businesses and households
According to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), the U.S. solar market grew by 51% in 2023, and similar strong growth is expected in 2025. By 2034, the High Case scenario shows a 17% increase in solar deployment.

Batteries or Energy Storage Take the Grid to the Next Level
Energy storage systems, mostly large batteries, are important because they help store solar and wind power for use when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing. In 2025, over 31 GW of new storage capacity is expected to be built.
California and Texas are the leaders in battery storage. The California Independent System Operator (CAISO) is set to add about 6 GW of storage next year, while Texas plans to add nearly 12 GW.
Storage growth is important because it makes renewable energy more reliable. Batteries can help keep the grid stable and reduce blackouts.
Wind Picks Up, But Slower
Wind energy is still expanding, though not as fast as solar. More than 2 GW of new wind capacity is expected in Texas alone in 2025, and around 2 GW more across the rest of the country.
Offshore wind projects have faced delays due to high costs and supply chain problems, but some are moving ahead. For example, the Vineyard Wind project off the coast of Massachusetts began delivering power to the grid in early 2024 and plans to expand.
Fossil Fuels: Still in the Field
While renewable energy is growing fast, fossil fuels like natural gas and coal are still part of the energy system.

In 2025, the U.S. plans to add 6.4 GW of new natural gas capacity. At the same time, 4.6 GW of older gas plants are expected to retire, resulting in a net gain of 1.8 GW.
Coal power continues to decline. About 6.2 GW of coal-fired power plants are scheduled to shut down in 2025. This follows a long-term trend, as more utilities move away from coal due to high costs and pollution concerns.
Still, some recent government actions could slow coal’s decline. In April 2025, President Trump signed orders calling coal a “critical mineral” and pushed for its use in powering data centers. His administration declared a “national energy emergency” and said the grid was becoming less reliable without coal and gas.
Even so, experts say coal is unlikely to see a big comeback. Most utility companies are not planning to build new coal plants, as they worry about being left with stranded assets—plants that cost more to operate than they earn.
Natural Gas Eyes a Bigger Role
As electricity demand rises, especially from electric vehicles and data centers, natural gas could play a larger role in some parts of the country.
There’s going to be a lot of momentum for natural gas, per Steve Piper, director of energy research at S&P Global Commodity Insights. He noted that areas like the Marcellus and Utica shale regions, which have low-cost gas, could see more gas power plants being built.
Still, challenges remain for natural gas. High capital costs, slow permitting, and supply chain delays could limit how fast new plants are built.
Grid Growth by Region
Each part of the U.S. energy grid has its own plans for new projects in 2025. These include the following:
- ERCOT (Texas): 27 GW of new capacity, with only 574 MW of retirements. Major growth in solar and batteries.
- PJM (Mid-Atlantic and Midwest): 7 GW of new projects, mostly solar. About 3 GW of fossil fuel plants will retire.
- CAISO (California): 10 GW of new capacity, including 6 GW of storage.
- MISO (Midwest): 11 GW of new capacity, mostly solar. Coal retirements are expected.
- ISO New England: About 2 GW of new power, mostly solar and storage.
- NYISO (New York): 1.4 GW of new capacity, with gas retirements.
- SPP (Southwest Power Pool): 6 GW of new capacity, mainly from solar and gas.
- Non-ISO/RTO areas (Southeast and Western U.S.): 33 GW of new capacity, including 17 GW of solar and 11 GW of storage.
Toward a Cleaner Grid
Overall, the U.S. is set to add nearly 86 GW of new net power capacity in 2025. Most of this will come from solar and storage. These technologies are key to cutting emissions and meeting climate goals. And one company that stands out in this field is SolarBank Corporation (Nasdaq: SUUN) (Cboe CA: SUNN) (FSE: GY2).
SolarBank is a leading independent renewable energy developer focused on distributed and community solar projects in Canada and the U.S. The company specializes in solar, battery storage, and EV charging solutions for utilities, municipalities, commercial clients, and homeowners.
Notably, SolarBank completed a $41 million USD deal with Honeywell for three New York-based solar projects and began work on a 1.4 MW rooftop project for Fiera Real Estate in Alberta. Major community solar initiatives include the Geddes, Greenville, and Nassau projects in New York, set to power thousands of homes. In Nova Scotia, SolarBank is developing up to 31 MW of solar capacity with TriMac Engineering, targeting 4,000 households.

Looking ahead, SolarBank is advancing projects in New York, Pennsylvania, and Nova Scotia, including agrivoltaic systems that combine solar power with farming. These efforts highlight the company’s role in accelerating the clean energy transition through innovative, community-based solar solutions.
However, fossil fuels are still needed to meet rising demand and ensure grid reliability. Policymakers and energy companies face tough choices as they try to balance clean energy growth with keeping the lights on.
Even with political shifts, experts say the energy transition is moving forward. Market forces, customer demand, and lower costs for renewables are driving long-term change.
As more projects get built in 2025, the U.S. will come closer to a cleaner energy system—one that can power homes, businesses, and vehicles while cutting carbon pollution.
-
READ MORE: Trump’s New Tariffs Wipe Out $2.5 Trillion: How Can It Stall America’s Clean Energy Future?
This report contains forward-looking information. Please refer to the SolarBank press release entitled “SolarBank Announces 2024 Highlights” for details of the information, risks and assumptions.
Disclosure: Owners, members, directors, and employees of carboncredits.com have/may have stock or option positions in any of the companies mentioned: None.
Additional disclosure: This communication serves the sole purpose of adding value to the research process and is for information only. Please do your own due diligence. Every investment in securities mentioned in publications of carboncredits.com involves risks that could lead to a total loss of the invested capital.
Please read our Full RISKS and DISCLOSURE here.
The post U.S. Solar and Energy Storage Set for Major Growth in 2025 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

