The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to cancel $7 billion in solar energy grants, according to official sources. These grants were given to states, tribes, and nonprofits through the Solar for All program. This program, made possible by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), helps low- and moderate-income families access clean energy. It supports rooftop and community solar installations.
The EPA said it is preparing formal notices to 60 recipients, informing them that their contracts may be revoked. The “Solar for All” program aimed to help solar installations in communities that have been underserved.
Many grant recipients had signed contracts and started their projects when the EPA froze the funds earlier this year. Now, these organizations worry about getting the support they were promised.
The move is part of the Trump administration’s effort to rethink or cancel some climate programs set up during Biden’s presidency. According to officials, the EPA is reviewing whether the “Solar for All” grants were issued in compliance with federal rules. Still, critics warn this change might hurt clean energy growth and access in struggling areas.
Sunset Before Sunrise: Projects Stalled Midway
Before the freeze, the Solar for All program was expected to help install solar systems for up to 900,000 households. The grants aimed to lower electricity bills for families by up to 20%. They also sought to boost energy reliability and create jobs in clean energy.
Some grant recipients, like tribal governments, state energy offices, and local nonprofits, started using the funds. They hired workers, planned construction, and designed outreach programs. These early actions relied on signed contracts, meaning many projects had legal and financial commitments.
With the EPA’s proposed cancellation, these efforts may now be on hold or completely abandoned. Community groups say some residents who signed up for solar panels are unsure about their installation status. Others say job training programs funded by the grants may lose momentum just as they were gaining interest.
Nonprofit legal groups and state attorneys general are looking into legal action to stop the cancellation. Some say that stopping the grants might break the Administrative Procedure Act. They believe this could also mess with the separation of powers in the U.S. Constitution, since the grants were part of an approved federal budget.
Boom Meets Policy Headwinds: Can Solar Keep Rising?
The U.S. solar industry remains one of the fastest-growing parts of the energy sector. In early 2025, the country added 10.8 gigawatts (GW) of new solar capacity—the fourth-highest quarterly total ever recorded.

Moreover, solar makes up about two-thirds of all new power generation capacity in the United States. Solar projects are on the rise. California, Texas, and New York are leading in residential, commercial, and utility-scale installations.
However, experts warn that policy reversals like the EPA’s could harm this momentum. Community solar, especially in low-income areas, depends on public funding and federal incentives to thrive. Without grants like Solar for All, many developers may choose not to build projects in these areas due to cost and risk.
A report from the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) found that solar deployment might drop 23% below expected growth by 2030. This could happen if tax credits and clean energy programs are removed.
- This includes the risk of losing up to 54 GW of planned capacity, affecting both grid reliability and job creation.
As demand for electricity rises due to data centers, electric vehicles, and AI, losing clean energy growth may lead to more reliance on fossil fuels.
Equity in the Dark: Who Loses When Solar Stops?
The Solar for All initiative was created not just to promote clean energy, but also to reduce energy poverty. Many of the households targeted by the program pay a large share of their income on electricity.
Solar power can lower bills and also offer backup power during emergencies. Plus, it improves indoor air quality by cutting down on gas appliances.
The program also supported energy justice goals by prioritizing tribal communities, rural areas, and urban neighborhoods most affected by pollution. It aimed to support battery storage, job training centers, and workforce programs. This would focus on areas with high unemployment or limited clean energy projects.
Canceling the program could increase the energy gap. Wealthy communities can afford rooftop solar, but many others cannot. It could also slow down organizations that were finally making progress after years of struggling to fund small clean energy projects.
What Comes Next for Clean Energy Grants?
At the time of this writing, the EPA has not yet finalized the cancellations, but plans to do so in the coming weeks. In the meantime, legal challenges are expected to move through the courts. Some judges have blocked parts of the climate funding freeze. More rulings may decide if the Solar for All grants should be honored.
The U.S. solar industry is still strong. However, changes in federal funding policies may impact where and how quickly future projects happen. Developers might move to larger commercial and utility-scale projects in more profitable areas. This shift could neglect the community solar market, which programs like Solar for All have supported.

In 2024, the U.S. community solar market added 1.745 GWdc, the largest-ever annual total—a 35% increase over 2023. Growth was led by states like New York, Maine, and Illinois, with New York adding 861 MWdc, up 66% year-over-year.
However, the Q2 2025 SEIA/Wood Mackenzie report predicts a 22% drop in community solar installations for 2025. This decline is due to policy uncertainty and backlog issues. Still, the longer-term outlook is cautious yet hopeful.
Despite the setback, many local groups and clean energy advocates like Powerbank (formerly Solarbank) remain committed to expanding access. They hope funding will come back. If not, they want state incentives or private financing to help fill the gap. Still, the EPA’s decision marks a key moment for federal support of clean energy in low-income communities.
The EPA’s proposed cancellation of $7 billion in solar grants highlights the tension between climate goals and political shifts. While the solar market is growing, policy uncertainty creates risks. This is especially true for low-income households that need government help to access clean energy.
The courts may either allow the grants to move forward or uphold the cancellation. This shows that clean energy success relies heavily on stable policies, clear laws, and long-term commitment.
The post U.S. EPA Plans to Cancel $7 Billion in Solar Grants: What It Means for Solar Industry appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia
The voluntary carbon market is changing. Buyers are no longer focused only on large volumes of cheap credits. Instead, they want projects with strong science, long-term monitoring, and clear proof that carbon has truly been removed from the atmosphere. That shift is drawing more attention to high-integrity, nature-based projects.
One project now gaining that spotlight is the Sabah INFAPRO rainforest rehabilitation project in Malaysia. Climate Impact Partners announced that the project is now issuing verified carbon removal credits, opening access to one of the highest-quality nature-based removals currently available in the global market.
Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems
The project is located in Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. This region is home to tropical dipterocarp rainforest, one of the richest forest ecosystems on Earth. These forests store huge amounts of carbon and support extraordinary biodiversity. Some dipterocarp trees can grow up to 70 meters tall, creating habitat for orangutans, pygmy elephants, gibbons, sun bears, and the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.
However, the forest within the INFAPRO project area was not intact. In the 1980s, selective logging removed many of the most valuable tree species, especially large dipterocarps. That caused serious ecological damage. Once the key mother trees were gone, natural regeneration became much harder. Young seedlings also had to compete with dense vines and shrubs, which slowed the forest’s recovery.
To repair that damage, the INFAPRO project was launched in the Ulu-Segama forestry management unit in eastern Sabah.
- The project has restored more than 25,000 hectares of logged-over rainforest.
- It was developed by Face the Future in cooperation with Yayasan Sabah, while Climate Impact Partners has supported the project and helped bring its credits to market.
Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention
What makes Sabah INFAPRO different is not only the size of the restoration effort. It is also the way the project measured carbon gains.

Many forest carbon projects issue credits in annual vintages based on year-by-year growth estimates. Sabah INFAPRO followed a different path. It used a landscape-scale monitoring system and waited until the forest moved through its strongest natural growth period before issuing removal credits.
- This approach gives the credits more weight. Rather than relying mainly on short-term annual estimates, the project measured carbon sequestration over a longer period. That helps show that the forest delivered real, sustained, and measurable carbon removal.
The scientific backing is also unusually strong. Since 2007, the project has maintained nearly 400 permanent monitoring plots. These plots have allowed researchers, independent auditors, and technical specialists to observe the full growth cycle of dipterocarp forest recovery. The result is a large body of field data that supports carbon calculations and strengthens confidence in the credits.
In simple terms, buyers are not just being asked to trust a model. They are being shown years of direct forest monitoring across the project landscape.
Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence
Independent assessment has also lifted the project’s profile. BeZero awarded Sabah INFAPRO an A.pre overall rating and an AA score for permanence. That places the project among the highest-rated Improved Forest Management, or IFM, projects in the world.
The rating reflects several important strengths. First, the project has very low exposure to reversal risk. Second, it has a long and stable operating history. Third, its measured carbon gains align well with peer-reviewed ecological research and independent analysis.
These points matter in today’s market. Buyers have become more cautious after years of debate over the quality of some forest carbon credits. As a result, they now look more closely at durability, transparency, and third-party validation. Sabah INFAPRO’s rating helps answer those concerns and makes the project more attractive to companies looking for credible carbon removal.
The project is also registered with Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard under the name INFAPRO Rehabilitation of Logged-over Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah, Malaysia. That adds another level of market recognition and verification.
A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery
Sabah INFAPRO also shows why high-quality nature-based projects are about more than carbon alone. The restoration effort supports broader ecological recovery in one of the world’s most important rainforest regions.
Climate Impact Partners said it has worked with project partners to restore degraded areas, run local training programs, carry out monthly forest patrols, and distribute seedlings to support rainforest recovery beyond the project boundary. These efforts help strengthen the wider landscape and expand the project’s environmental impact.
That broader value is becoming more important for buyers. Companies increasingly want projects that support biodiversity, ecosystem health, and local engagement, along with carbon removal. Sabah INFAPRO offers that mix, making it a stronger fit for the market’s shift toward higher-integrity credits.

The post Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy5 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?








