The U.S. is reigniting its nuclear ambitions—and it just took a big leap forward. The Department of Energy (DOE) recently conditionally selected Oak Ridge, Tennessee-based Standard Nuclear as the first company to join its newly launched nuclear fuel line pilot program, part of the Trump administration’s broader strategy to rebuild America’s nuclear energy leadership.
This initiative, announced in July 2025, directly supports President Trump’s Executive Order on Deploying Advanced Nuclear Reactors for National Security. It aims to end the country’s reliance on foreign enriched uranium and critical nuclear materials by building a secure, domestic fuel supply chain—one built on innovation, speed, and private sector partnership.
U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said,
“With President Trump’s leadership, the Energy Department is moving at a rapid pace to unleash innovation and maintain American leadership in nuclear energy development,”. “Advanced nuclear reactors will be a game-changer for the United States, and with that comes the need to fabricate the fuel for these reactors. The Department of Energy is partnering with private sector innovation with DOE expertise to assure stronger U.S. nuclear supply lines.”
Powering the Future: Advanced Reactors Need Advanced Fuel
Advanced nuclear reactors are central to America’s clean energy and national security goals. But to power them, the country needs more than just designs; it needs the right fuel.
That’s where Standard Nuclear steps in. It’s now the first company conditionally approved under DOE’s fuel pilot program, giving it access to fast-track processes and support. The company will focus on producing TRISO (TRi-structural ISOtropic) fuel, a next-generation nuclear fuel known for its unmatched safety, durability, and performance.
Standard Nuclear will lead the construction, operation, and eventual decommissioning of the fuel fabrication facility. Meanwhile, reactor developers will source nuclear material feedstock potentially through the DOE’s high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) program, for conversion into TRISO fuel.
TRISO Fuel: The Toughest Fuel on Earth
TRISO fuel is engineered for extreme performance. Each tiny fuel kernel—about the width of a human hair—is coated in multiple layers of ceramic and carbon. These layers act like a built-in containment system, ensuring that even under high temperatures (up to 1,600°C), the fuel doesn’t melt or release harmful materials.
TRISO Particles

Key highlights of TRISO fuel:
- Microscale safety: Each particle is a self-contained barrier, lowering the risk of large-scale radioactive release.
- High performance: TRISO can operate at much higher temperatures than traditional fuels, increasing thermal efficiency.
- Unmatched resilience: The fuel resists mechanical failure, corrosion, oxidation, and neutron damage.
This design makes TRISO a perfect fit for advanced reactors, especially those planned outside traditional nuclear sites—including defense, microreactors, and space power systems. Also, compared to traditional nuclear fuel rods, TRISO’s structure is safer, more resilient, and ideal for new reactor types under development in the U.S.
Dr. Kurt Terrani, PhD, Chief Executive Officer of Standard Nuclear, said,
“Most of the long-anticipated wave of advanced reactors finally arriving to the market are harnessing the unique, inherent advantages of TRISO fuel—benefits that have been validated through decades of DOE and NRC investment and scientific rigor. These reactors can’t run without fuel, and we’re here to ensure there are no uncertainties in that supply. We’re not just delivering TRISO fuel at scale—we’re doing it at a cost that enables a robust, competitive, and sustainable advanced reactor industry.”
Standard Nuclear’s Reactor-Agnostic Advantage
What makes Standard Nuclear stand out is its reactor-agnostic model. Unlike traditional nuclear companies, it doesn’t develop its own reactors. Instead, it focuses exclusively on nuclear fuel, allowing it to serve a wide range of reactor designs.
Founded in 2024 at the historic K-25 Nuclear Site in Oak Ridge, the company operates a fully permitted, 19,000-square-foot radiological facility on a 36.8-acre campus. Its team brings over 150 years of combined experience from the U.S. Department of Energy National Labs.
The company booked more than $5 million in contracts in early 2025 and is projecting over $100 million in non-binding fuel sales for 2027. Clients include private firms like Radiant Industries, Antares, Nano Nuclear Energy, and Jimmy Energy, as well as U.S. government agencies such as the DOE and the Department of Defense.
Teaming Up with SHINE Technologies for Nuclear Fuel Recycling
Standard Nuclear recently announced a strategic partnership with SHINE Technologies to support nuclear fuel recycling and close the fuel supply loop. SHINE will supply recycled uranium and plutonium from its planned used nuclear fuel recycling plants to Standard Nuclear. The materials will be used in TRISO fuel production and to create heat-generating isotopes like strontium-90 and americium-241 for compact power systems.
This partnership will enable the development of a circular nuclear economy. By recycling materials once considered waste, both companies aim to make nuclear fuel production more sustainable and secure.
From Bankruptcy to Breakthrough
Standard Nuclear emerged by acquiring the assets and fuel technology of the bankrupt Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation (USNC) for $28 million. The acquisition gave the company a head start with proven technology and permitted infrastructure.
To support its rapid expansion, Standard Nuclear raised $42 million in funding led by Decisive Point, with participation from Andreessen Horowitz and Washington Harbour Partners. The funding will be used to expand production capacity and meet growing demand from the advanced nuclear sector.
Standard Nuclear is Backing the Trump Nuclear Renaissance
Standard Nuclear’s selection is part of a broader plan under the Trump administration to reignite nuclear innovation. On May 23, 2025, President Trump issued four executive orders aimed at streamlining reactor testing and accelerating the deployment of advanced reactors for national security purposes.
Executive Order 14301 specifically directed the DOE to reform its national lab processes and launch a pilot program for testing next-gen reactor designs. The goal is to reach criticality for at least three advanced reactors outside of national labs by July 4, 2026.
This announcement coincides with other moves such as funding for the Palisades restart, development of microreactor test beds, and expanded HALEU production. Together, these initiatives represent a coordinated national effort to reclaim nuclear leadership.
The Bigger Picture: Why This Matters
Standard Nuclear’s rise signals a major milestone for America’s nuclear sector. Its work supports national energy security by reducing reliance on foreign fuel supplies and boosting domestic capabilities.
It also directly enables the rollout of advanced reactors, which promise cleaner, safer, and more resilient energy systems. These reactors, many of which are smaller and modular, require specialized fuels like TRISO that Standard Nuclear is uniquely positioned to provide.

From grid-scale power and remote installations to military bases and even future space missions, the role of advanced nuclear energy is expanding. Standard Nuclear is helping to ensure the U.S. has the fuel infrastructure to meet that demand.
The post America’s Nuclear Comeback Begins: Standard Nuclear Joins DOE’s Fuel Pilot Program appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

