Connect with us

Published

on

Indigenous agricultural practices, developed over thousands of years, have long been a model of sustainability and resilience. As climate change alters growing conditions across Canada, many Indigenous communities are turning to their traditional food systems and agricultural knowledge to adapt, ensuring food security while maintaining cultural connections to their homeland.

The Importance of Traditional Food Systems

Traditional Indigenous food systems represent complex networks of relationships that connect people, land, culture, and spirit. These systems embody generations of ecological knowledge while sustaining cultural identity and community well-being through sacred connections to ancestral practices.

The cultural and spiritual significance of traditional food systems runs deep within Indigenous communities. Sacred relationships with food sources guide ceremonial harvesting practices and spiritual food preparation protocols. Traditional food-sharing customs strengthen community bonds, while connection to ancestral teachings ensures cultural continuity. These practices align with seasonal celebration cycles, creating rhythms of community life marked by food ceremonies honouring both the sustenance received and the relationships maintained.

Knowledge systems within traditional food practices preserve crucial ecological understanding. Sustainable harvesting methods passed down through generations reflect sophisticated knowledge of species relationships and environmental indicators. Traditional preparation techniques and preservation practices ensure both food security and the maintenance of cultural knowledge. Traditional food knowledge integrates physical and spiritual health, recognizing food’s role in holistic wellness.

Community well-being flourishes through these food systems. Intergenerational knowledge transfer occurs naturally through collective harvesting practices and family teaching opportunities. Community food-sharing networks strengthen social bonds and support traditional economies. These practices build cultural identity while maintaining vital connections between community members of all ages.

Territorial connections remain strong through food practices that maintain relationships with traditional lands. Sacred site protection and traditional territory knowledge guide environmental stewardship practices. Seasonal land use patterns respect wildlife habitat and protect water systems, ensuring biodiversity maintenance for future generations. These connections remind communities of their responsibilities as land stewards.

Physical and spiritual nourishment intertwine within traditional food systems. Beyond providing nutritional well-being, these foods offer spiritual connection and cultural healing. They support mental health through community engagement and physical strength through active harvesting practices. This holistic approach to health recognizes the inseparable nature of physical, spiritual, and emotional well-being.

The contemporary relevance of traditional food systems grows as communities face modern challenges. These systems offer proven strategies for climate change adaptation and food security. Their sustainable practices provide models for environmental protection while supporting cultural revitalization and community resilience. Economic development opportunities emerge through traditional food practices, demonstrating how ancestral knowledge can address current needs.

Climate Impacts on Indigenous Agriculture

Climate change is affecting traditional food systems in various ways across Turtle Island:

  1. Changing Growing Seasons: Longer, warmer summers in some regions alter planting and harvesting times.
  2. Unpredictable Weather Patterns: Increased frequency of droughts, floods, and storms threatens crop stability.
  3. Shifting Species Ranges: Some traditional food plants and animals are moving to new areas or declining in population.
  4. Water Availability: Changes in precipitation patterns are affecting water resources for agriculture.

Adapting Traditional Practices

In response to these challenges, many Indigenous communities are adapting their agricultural practices, often by blending traditional knowledge with modern techniques.

The Three Sisters: Adapting an Ancient Practice

The Three Sisters agricultural system stands as a living testament to Indigenous agricultural brilliance, representing far more than a planting method. This sacred Haudenosaunee practice demonstrates how traditional food systems create complete cultural economies that define communities’ relationships with their territories while providing sustainable economic foundations.

At its core, the Three Sisters agricultural system reveals sophisticated agricultural knowledge that has evolved over generations. The intricate understanding of how corn, beans, and squash support each other mirrors broader Indigenous principles of reciprocity and balance. This agricultural wisdom encompasses complex soil management practices, traditional climate adaptation strategies, and careful seed selection methods that ensure crop resilience. The system’s ability to maintain ecological balance while providing complete nutrition demonstrates Indigenous peoples’ deep understanding of sustainable food systems.

The cultural and economic significance of the Three Sisters extends throughout community life, supporting traditional trading networks and establishing robust food economies. These practices create pathways for cultural exchange, strengthen economic sovereignty, and maintain systems of social reciprocity. Through these food-based commerce networks, communities build intergenerational wealth while maintaining sustainable livelihoods honouring traditional values.

Sacred agricultural ceremonies and traditional planting protocols root the Three Sisters in spiritual practice, connecting current generations to ancestral teachings. Creation stories guide planting practices, while harvest celebrations mark important community gatherings. These cultural foundations strengthen community cohesion and maintain vital connections to traditional territories and ancestral knowledge.

Innovative Approaches to Traditional Agriculture

Modern applications of the Three Sisters system demonstrate its remarkable adaptability to climate change. Communities select drought-resistant varieties and develop heat-tolerant crops while maintaining traditional knowledge systems. These adaptations enhance biodiversity and build ecosystem resilience, showing how ancient wisdom can address contemporary challenges.

The Three Sisters system powerfully supports food sovereignty, providing communities with food security while maintaining traditional diets and economic independence. This sovereignty extends beyond food to encompass cultural preservation and health independence, demonstrating how traditional agricultural practices support comprehensive community well-being.

The contemporary evolution of the Three Sisters practice shows how traditional systems can adapt while maintaining cultural integrity. Integration of scientific research validates traditional knowledge, while innovative planting techniques address modern challenges. Urban agriculture models and educational programs engage youth, ensuring these practices continue to support community development and economic sustainability.

Policy Support and Challenges

While Indigenous communities are leading the way in adapting traditional agriculture, policy support is crucial for scaling up these efforts. The importance of policy frameworks in this context encompasses multiple critical dimensions:

Funding and Resource Allocation:

  • Sustainable funding mechanisms for Indigenous agricultural initiatives.
  • Support for infrastructure development and maintenance.
  • Resources for training and capacity building.
  • Investment in research and development of climate-resilient varieties.

Legal and Regulatory Framework:

  • Protection of Indigenous intellectual property rights over traditional seeds and farming methods.
  • Recognition of traditional land management practices.
  • Support for Indigenous food sovereignty initiatives.
  • Removal of regulatory barriers that may impede traditional agricultural practices.

Knowledge Protection and Transfer:

  • Support for documenting and preserving traditional agricultural knowledge.
  • Resources for intergenerational knowledge transfer programs.
  • Protection of Indigenous seed sovereignty.
  • Framework for ethical research partnerships.

Capacity Development:

  • Technical support for climate adaptation strategies.
  • Access to agricultural extension services.
  • Training in combining traditional and modern agricultural methods.
  • Support for Indigenous-led agricultural research.

Market Access and Economic Viability:

  • Development of fair market opportunities for traditional crops.
  • Support for Indigenous agricultural enterprises.
  • Recognition of traditional farming certifications.
  • Infrastructure for processing and distribution.

Climate Change Adaptation:

  • Integration of Indigenous agricultural knowledge into climate policy.
  • Support for climate-resilient agricultural practices.
  • Resources for monitoring and responding to environmental changes.
  • Recognition of traditional ecological knowledge in adaptation strategies.

These policy frameworks are essential for:

  • Ensuring the long-term sustainability of Indigenous agricultural initiatives.
  • Supporting the scaling of successful practices.
  • Protecting Indigenous agricultural heritage.
  • Facilitating broader adoption of climate-resilient farming methods.
  • Creating systemic support for Indigenous food systems.

The Broader Impact: Lessons for Sustainable Agriculture

The adaptations being made in Indigenous agriculture offer valuable lessons for the broader agricultural, tech and business sectors in Canada and globally.

Research demonstrates that Indigenous agricultural practices, characterized by their emphasis on biodiversity, local adaptation, and sustainability, provide valuable frameworks for climate-resilient agriculture. These traditional approaches offer significant insights for developing world food systems that can withstand environmental challenges.

Rooted in Tradition, Growing Towards the Future

As climate change reshapes the agricultural landscape of Turtle Island, Indigenous communities are demonstrating remarkable resilience and innovation in adapting their traditional food systems. By drawing on ancestral knowledge while embracing new technologies and approaches, these communities are not only ensuring their own food security but also providing a blueprint for sustainable agriculture practices in a changing climate.

As Canada and the world grapple with the challenges of feeding a growing population in an era of climate uncertainty, the adaptive strategies of Indigenous agriculture offer hope and practical solutions. These approaches demonstrate that by respecting traditional knowledge, working in harmony with local ecosystems, and remaining flexible in the face of change, we can create food systems that are not only resilient to climate change but also sustainable and environmentally regenerative.

Blog by Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

(Image Credit: Shutterstock, Licensed)

The post Traditional Food Systems and Climate Change: Adapting Indigenous Agriculture appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

Traditional Food Systems and Climate Change: Adapting Indigenous Agriculture

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit

Published

on

SYDNEY, Saturday 28 February 2026 — Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US announce they will seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision with the North Dakota Supreme Court following a North Dakota District Court judgment today awarding Energy Transfer (ET) USD $345 million. 

ET’s SLAPP suit remains a blatant attempt to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Greenpeace International will also continue to seek damages for ET’s bullying lawsuits under EU anti-SLAPP legislation in the Netherlands.

Mads Christensen, Greenpeace International Executive Director said: “Energy Transfer’s attempts to silence us are failing. Greenpeace International will continue to resist intimidation tactics. We will not be silenced. We will only get louder, joining our voices to those of our allies all around the world against the corporate polluters and billionaire oligarchs who prioritise profits over people and the planet.

“With hard-won freedoms under threat and the climate crisis accelerating, the stakes of this legal fight couldn’t be higher. Through appeals in the US and Greenpeace International’s groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case in the Netherlands, we are exploring every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for multiple abusive lawsuits and show all power-hungry bullies that their attacks will only result in a stronger people-powered movement.”

The Court’s final judgment today rejects some of the jury verdict delivered in March 2025, but still awards hundreds of millions of dollars to ET without a sound basis in law. The Greenpeace defendants will continue to press their arguments that the US Constitution does not allow liability here, that ET did not present evidence to support its claims, that the Court admitted inflammatory and irrelevant evidence at trial and excluded other evidence supporting the defense, and that the jury pool in Mandan could not be impartial.[1][2]

ET’s back-to-back lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the US organisations Greenpeace USA (Greenpeace Inc.) and Greenpeace Fund are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs — lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, push them towards bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent.[3] Greenpeace International, which is based in the Netherlands, is pursuing justice in Europe, with a suit against ET under Dutch law and the European Union’s new anti-SLAPP directive, a landmark test of the new legislation which could help set a powerful precedent against corporate bullying.[4]

Kate Smolski, Program Director at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “This is part of a worrying trend globally: fossil fuel corporations are increasingly using litigation to attack and silence ordinary people and groups using the law to challenge their polluting operations — and we’re not immune to these tactics here in Australia.

“Rulings like this have a chilling effect on democracy and public interest litigation — we must unite against these silencing tactics as bad for Australians and bad for our democracy. Our movement is stronger than any corporate bully, and grows even stronger when under attack.”

Energy Transfer’s SLAPPs are part of a wave of abusive lawsuits filed by Big Oil companies like Shell, Total, and ENI against Greenpeace entities in recent years.[3] A couple of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies’ SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024.

-ENDS-

Images available in Greenpeace Media Library

Notes:

[1] The judgment entered by North Dakota District Court Judge Gion follows a jury verdict finding Greenpeace entities liable for more than US$660 million on March 19, 2025. Judge Gion subsequently threw out several items from the jury’s verdict, reducing the total damages to approximately US$345 million.

[2] Public statements from the independent Trial Monitoring Committee

[3] Energy Transfer’s first lawsuit was filed in federal court in 2017 under the RICO Act – the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a US federal statute designed to prosecute mob activity. The case was dismissed in 2019, with the judge stating the evidence fell “far short” of what was needed to establish a RICO enterprise. The federal court did not decide on Energy Transfer’s claims based on state law, so Energy Transfer promptly filed a new case in a North Dakota state court with these and other state law claims.

[4] Greenpeace International sent a Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer on 23 July 2024, informing the pipeline giant of Greenpeace International’s intention to bring an anti-SLAPP lawsuit against the company in a Dutch Court. After Energy Transfer declined to accept liability on multiple occasions (September 2024, December 2024), Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive on 11 February 2025 by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. The case was officially registered in the docket of the Court of Amsterdam on 2 July, 2025. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers’s back-to-back, abusive lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. The next hearing in the Court of Amsterdam is scheduled for 16 April, 2026.

Media contact:

Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump

Published

on

The Trump administration’s relentless rollback of public health and environmental protections has allowed widespread toxic exposures to flourish, warn experts who helped implement safeguards now under assault.

In a new report that outlines a dozen high-risk pollutants given new life thanks to weakened, delayed or rescinded regulations, the Environmental Protection Network, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group of hundreds of former Environmental Protection Agency staff, warns that the EPA under President Donald Trump has abandoned the agency’s core mission of protecting people and the environment from preventable toxic exposures.

Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Cheniere Energy Received $370 Million IRS Windfall for Using LNG as ‘Alternative’ Fuel

Published

on

The country’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas benefited from what critics say is a questionable IRS interpretation of tax credits.

Cheniere Energy, the largest producer and exporter of U.S. liquefied natural gas, received $370 million from the IRS in the first quarter of 2026, a payout that shipping experts, tax specialists and a U.S. senator say the company never should have received.

Cheniere Energy Received $370 Million IRS Windfall for Using LNG as ‘Alternative’ Fuel

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com