It’s no secret that Toyota’s hydrogen fuel cell Mirai has not been successful in sales as the carmaker itself admitted. But that didn’t discourage the Japanese automaker from planning to accelerate the adoption of hydrogen fuel cell (FCEV) technology.
In its latest sales and production report, Toyota has shown year-on-year growth in both performance results globally.
Total sales of electrified vehicles, both inside and outside Japan as well as per region (North America, Europe, Asia, China, and other) have increased significantly. It’s also true across the board for reporting coverage – for September 2023, total from January-September 2023 and from April-September 2023.
Toyota’s FCEV Sales Performance
Toyota’s worldwide electric vehicle (EV) sales were up about 52% for the month of September. The same positive performance was achieved for 2023 (31%), and for the first half of fiscal year, April-September, (38%).
For FCEV sales, positive results are also observed for global sales but not for the outcome for Toyota’s home country. Hydrogen fuel cell EVs are also using an electric motor like a battery EV but it sources power from a fuel stack where hydrogen is stored.
Worldwide sales for FCEV increased for September, last nine months, and last six months by 166%, 22%, and 77%, respectively.
The remarkable results are all thanks to the carmaker’s sales outside Japan, with a whopping 289% increase for September. For the last 6 months and 9 months, figures were both up about 94% and 47%, respectively.
Looking at the yearly achievements, FCEV sales peaked in 2021 and painted a good picture overall. 2023 data is through September only, which the company believes to also increase YoY.
As Toyota aims to sell more by 2030, the company plans to tap into this technology that’s been touted as the future of mobility.

The Fight for Hydrogen Vehicle Goes On
The largest carmaker by sales has long placed a huge bet on FCEV as an alternative to fossil fuels. But the company’s sales of hydrogen vehicles weren’t that significant. It has only sold fewer than 22,000 hydrogen fuel cell Mirai since 2014.
The average annual number of FCEV sold was so insignificant compared to Toyota’s total vehicle sales. Expensive cost of the fuel and lack of hydrogen fueling stations are the two largest bottlenecks hindering sales growth.
Yet, this didn’t dissuade the car company to continue investing in and developing its hydrogen fuel cell technology.
In October, Isuzu and Toyota joined forces to mass produce a light hydrogen fuel cell truck. The truck is based on Isuzu’s light-duty truck platform and will be powered by Toyota’s hydrogen fuel cell system.
Toyota’s FCEV technology is also facing close rivalry from its peers, including Hyundai, Honda, Nissan, and Daimler. Hyundai has had fuel cell vehicles on the market for several years already. Meanwhile, Honda has also been experimenting with FCEV and improving it for some time.
Nonetheless, Toyota made headlines last July when it revealed plans to roll-out 200,000 hydrogen-powered vehicles, targeting Europe and China.
Such revelation is a major shift in Toyota’s focus, which announced intent to commercialize its game-changing solid-state battery by 2027. These next-gen batteries can potentially cut carbon emissions of EV batteries by 39%.
Reducing planet-warming emissions is one of the key drivers prompting Toyota, as well as other automakers, to invest in fossil fuel alternatives like FCEV. The ultimate goal is to bring the world to net zero emissions by 2050.
Toyota’s Net Zero Targets
For the Japanese car marker, that means achieving zero carbon emissions in three areas: lifecycle, new vehicle, and production at plants.
Life Cycle Zero CO2 Emission Target
The company aims to reduce GHG emissions by 30% throughout a vehicle’s life cycle by 2030 versus 2019 levels. As seen below, life cycle includes emissions from making materials and parts to vehicle manufacturing, logistics/delivery, driving, and recycling.
GHG emissions cover energy consumption in Toyota Motor Corporation and financially consolidation subsidiary corporate activities (Scopes 1 and 2). It also includes GHG emissions from suppliers and customers in relation to vehicles under the company and its subsidiaries (Scope 3).
New Vehicle Zero CO2 Emissions Target
In making new vehicles, Toyota aims to achieve carbon neutrality for average emissions (emissions from production of fuel and electricity and during vehicle operation) by 2050.
Reaching that goal means achieving its near-term targets for new vehicle average GHG emissions by 2030 and 2035 as follows:
- 2030: 33.3% GHG reduction from new vehicles vs. 2019 levels for passenger light duty vehicles and light commercial vehicles. For medium and heavy freight trucks, that’s 11.6% emissions reduction.
- 2035: over 50% GHG emissions reduction from new vehicles compared to the 2019 baseline.
Plant Zero CO2 Emissions Target
Finally, Toyota plans to achieve zero CO2 emissions from production at plants by midcentury. This includes CO2 emissions from energy use in Toyota and its subsidiary plants, as well as CO2 emissions from producing other Toyota brands, involving Scope 1 and 2 emissions).
Under this target, the Japanese automaker plans to tackle the environmental challenge at its factories with the following strategy.
Part of the plan is to purchase carbon credits from other companies to neutralize CO2 emissions. However, Toyota didn’t disclose how much of that emissions would be addressed using the credits.
Toyota’s pursuit of hydrogen fuel cell technology continues, showcasing global sales growth despite challenges in its home country. With a focus on reducing planet-warming emissions and achieving net zero targets, the company remains committed to advancing its FCEV technology.
The post Toyota’s Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Sales Saw 166% Increase appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

