HiWi is the abbreviation for the German term ‘Hilfs-Wissenschaftler*in’, which translates to research assistant, and describes a job position for students, often offered by faculties or research institutes. I am definitely not talking about the second definition given by German Wikipedia.
For nearly six years I’ve been one of many HiWis, going through research groups and following up on a range of tasks. I spent weeks of my life literally just scanning documents, but I also went on 10 international research missions. I met great people, built friendships and networks. I also found myself in situations that I wouldn’t wish on anyone. But to leave no room for any doubt; I loved being a HiWi, jumping at any field work opportunity, often taking the initiative, actively asking to join projects or research cruises. To this day I have good relations with my previous superiors, and I know that they only want the best for me. I’ve been very lucky in all of this.
However, I saw the flaws in the system and there are many stories out there, where inexperienced but motivated students/early-carrier scientists were taken advantage of, often under false pretenses and promises. So, I would like to take the opportunity to address some of these issues.

First and foremost is the critical, yet nuanced point of wages. At the core of it, a HiWi position remains a student job and is therefore a source of income. Personally, I was in a financial situation where I needed to generate an income and there are many others out there that similarly rely on a regular income to cover the cost of living. A HiWi position is particularly attractive because it pays while offering contacts and experience in your research field. However, it is no secret that there is little money in research. No surprise that the usual hourly HiWi pay corresponds to the minimum wage, often regardless of the experience or the degree that may be brought along. In contrast, for most other public positions, a higher degree is acknoweledged with a higher salary.
An argument often brought forward is that HiWi positions are not meant to provide a living (really, no student job should since you are a fulltime student) but are about gaining experience. While clearly, I’ve gained a lot of experience and have certainly been benefiting from that in many ways, this argument leaves a bitter aftertaste: does this mean that research experience is a financial privilege? That only those that can afford to earn less, have the opportunities to gain experience in laboratories and in the field outside of their curriculum? And that this is an acceptable state at research institutes? The German Federal Office of Statistics stated in a press release that 38.5 % of students in Germany are at risk of poverty (https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2022/11/PD22_N066_63.html). This is a systematic issue and nobody expects HiWi hiring institutes to solve this, but I want to put it out here, that many students can simply not afford to be a HiWi. Yet, agreeing to a salary is a decision everyone needs to make for themselves. As you can guess from my brief intro, I agreed and managed to work for most of my studies at minimum wage because of comparably low rents in Kiel, a low budget lifestyle, financial aid, and because I really burn for that whole going-to-sea-shit.
Casually putting the big discussion about the ever growing socio-economic gap in Germany aside, I’d like to address another salary aspect: the real hourly wage. Many HiWis work significantly more hours than their contract calls for without claiming them, effectively decreasing their hourly wage.
Often, working hours are kept flexible or are restricted to a period of field work, which works better for student’s timetables. Rather than agreeing on fixed working hours, it is often about a certain task that needs to be finished by a certain time and date. While this seems attractive at first, in many cases, this leads to HiWis putting in extra time, as tasks may take longer than anticipated by superiors. This is particularly true, when there are only poor instructions given – often because tasks seem trivial to a person working in the field for years already – and honestly, in that moment it feels embarrassing to ask for more explanations as a HiWi. Especially field work is a HiWi trap because many students are extremely eager to get their hands dirty. To make sure we get to go in the field again we accept long working hours, wild working times and poor supervision, trying our hardest to leave a good impression. In 2022 I spend roughly 6 months at sea aboard research vessels. What do you think? Did I work my contractually agreed 20 hours a week?

This brings me to the more emotional and therefore trickier aspects: responsibilities and reputation. And as we gain experience and prove ourselves, we are ‘awarded’ with more responsibilities, which is a double-edged sword. Of course, it is a great feeling to do something yourself, maybe flattering even to know your superiors trust in your abilities, and yes, it will probably look great on your CV. But it is important to see when tasks are simply above your pay grade. I had to face this rather brutal reality after I had worked myself towards the brink of mental and physical health. During a two-month long research cruise I worked very long hours as a laboratory lead, feeling permanently sleep-deprived, stressed, insufficient, and lonely. Months later, I properly counted the hours I had worked and reflected on the emotional toll this had taken on me. I came to the sobering conclusion that I scraped the edge of a mental break-down for less than 2,50 € an hour, receiving little to no recognition. While I was able to communicate and discuss this situation with my superiors, I’ve seen other HiWis working roughly 800 % of their contractual hours, never being paid for the extra time spend. So please, whatever you do: know your worth! So even though it can be hard to formulate such issues to your superiors, it is important to discuss workload and -times.
Additionally, many institutions expect travel expenses to be paid upfront, reimbursing employees later, after an application process. This hits particularly hard when you are a student with little financial freedom (again, according to the press release stated above, every 4th student isn’t even in the financial situation were they are able to pay for unexpected, bigger expenses). Additionally, insecurities arise when you are unfamiliar with bureaucratic applications. The system of reimbursement is often slow, hard to understand, and generally rather opaque for students. Some of my reimbursement processes took more than 9 months and did often not clearly state, which trip it was for. Do better than me: keep track of that shit! And ask more experienced people for help, or if it is possible, avoid this kind of situation all together and find solutions with your superiors.

This brings me to another point that often seems to fall under the table: as a HiWi you have normal employee rights. This may seem obvious when reading, but many students are not aware of that when starting on a HiWi position. For instance, you are entitled to receive continued payment when you are sick, and you are also insured by your employer during working hours and on your way to and from work. There are first motions of unionizing and many information points or counseling centers at universities so make sure to get informed (some links are provided below).
Last but not least, the social aspects: again, especially field work is a minefield because you get to know people on a much more intimate level than in an office. While many great relations may grow from this, there might also be situations where feelings are not mutual. Worst case scenario, there is a misunderstanding between people of different levels of responsibility, maybe even crossing of boundaries. Situations in which I felt uncomfortable include being asked to leave a professional meeting because of my political views, people regarding me as unfit for tasks due to my gender, questions about my sexuality, unasked voicing of opinions on my body, and even proposals of higher positions in exchange for sexual favors. Again, I’ve been lucky enough to have had good people around me, and to have been at an institute with strong gender equality representatives, but even so, some of these experiences were hard to talk about and for several ones I didn’t even grasp the scope until much later. If you ever find yourself in a situation like this, or realize in hindsight that something was not okay, please talk about it to a trusted person!
Finally, I can only repeat that I loved being a HiWi and I would not be where I am today without it. I would have probably quit my studies if it wasn’t for my HiWi job reminding me what I was working towards. But I wished I would have stood my ground firmer on a few occasions, demanded more, been more critical with the system and had better knowledge of my rights and exercised them more vigorously. I’ve been told that the system has come a long way already – but I find that is no argument to accept a situation that still has a lot of room for improvement.
I hope that addressing some of these issues helps with progress. So, to all students, look out for yourselves. And to all superiors, don’t underestimate your impact. I’m hoping this helps someone out there, and with this,
Peace out
Johanna
Some helpful links in case you are now motivated to learn about HiWi rights (unfortunately most in German, sorrey):
https://www.verdi-studierende.de/tv-stud/material-tv-stud/broschuere-studentische-hilfskraefte.pdf
https://www.verdi.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/++co++71a27128-98a2-11ed-9291-001a4a16012a
https://www.meinpraktikum.de/ratgeber/studentische-hilfskraft-faq
Ocean Acidification
Keeping the Record Alive: Long-Term Ocean Observations in the Tropical Atlantic
By Naomi Krauzig (GEOMAR)
One of the most rewarding aspects of M219 has been contributing to the maintenance of the long-term GEOMAR mooring arrays that quietly monitor the tropical Atlantic year after year.
While CTD/LADCP casts and other shipboard measurements provide invaluable snapshots of the ocean, these anchored instruments provide something that cannot be obtained otherwise: continuous observations spanning minutes, days, seasons, years, and even decades. As an observational oceanographer, it is difficult not to appreciate the value of these datasets. They form the foundation for understanding ocean variability in regions that are critical for Atlantic climate variability and allow us to detect and quantify long-term changes that would otherwise remain hidden within the ocean’s natural variability.
Our first major operations took place off the Brazilian coast at 11°S, where the K1 to K4 moorings form part of a long-term observing system monitoring the western boundary current system and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). Within just a few days, the four deep-sea moorings were successfully recovered, assessed, serviced, and redeployed.


Every recovery felt a bit like opening a treasure chest. After spending a year or more beneath the ocean surface, these instruments returned carrying an invaluable record of currents, temperature, salinity, oxygen, and other key ocean properties. It was incredibly rewarding to see how well they had performed. Nearly all instruments operated successfully throughout the entire deployment period, delivering high-quality datasets with remarkably few gaps.
From Brazil, we continued north to the equator at 23°W, home to another key long-term mooring at exactly 0°N. Since 2006, this mooring has been monitoring the Equatorial Undercurrent and the deep equatorial circulation from the surface to nearly 4,000 m depth. Its successful recovery and redeployment mean that this unique 20-year time series will continue, helping us better understand how the tropical Atlantic influences climate, oxygen and nutrient transport, and marine ecosystems across the basin.
Our final mooring destination brought us to the Cape Verde Ocean Observatory (CVOO), one of the flagship long-term ocean observatories in the eastern tropical Atlantic. Here, physical, biogeochemical, and ecological observations come together to track how the ocean stores heat and carbon and how marine ecosystems respond to environmental change. Like the moorings at 11°S and the equator, the value of CVOO lies not in a single measurement, but in the continuity of the multi-decadal record.



For me, one of the most memorable aspects was seeing how many people contributed to the success of the mooring operations. Careful planning laid the foundation, while having a dedicated person keeping track of every step ensured that everything ran smoothly (kudos to Anna Christina Hans, aka Tina!). On deck, crew, technicians, and scientists worked together like a well-oiled machine, stepping in where needed and solving problems on the fly.
The teamwork extended all the way back home to GEOMAR. Thanks to Rebecca Hummels’ mooring toolbox, data from several instruments could already be processed and checked while parts of the moorings were still in the water, providing an early look at the quality of the observations. On top of that, mooring experts were available around the clock to provide information, advice, and troubleshooting whenever needed. I believe the high success rate of the recoveries and redeployments is a testament to the experience, teamwork, and dedication of everyone involved.

With the major milestone of the successful mooring work behind us, another exciting operation was still ahead. Waiting in Mindelo was a brand-new surface buoy, ready to begin its own contribution to these invaluable long-term observations. Stay tuned to learn more about that deployment in a future blog post.
Keeping the Record Alive: Long-Term Ocean Observations in the Tropical Atlantic
Ocean Acidification
30 Days at Sea, 30 Ways to Make Potatoes
By Joelle Habib (Laboratoire d’Océanographie Villefranche)
When you go on a scientific cruise, you always think about the instruments you’re going to deploy, the great data you’re going to acquire, or the experiments you’ll conduct. What you almost always forget is the small thing that isn’t actually small at all: food. And how are you going to eat it!
For those not familiar with scientific cruises: once you’re on board, most of your time goes to the science. You don’t really have time for food or food preparation. But there are always hidden heroes preparing your breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and, most importantly, the dessert for the dessert break. Today, instead of shedding light on the science, we’re going to talk about people, starting with the two chefs our lives basically depend on.
Rainer Götze and Peter Wernitz are the chefs of the last METEOR cruise. Rainer has been cooking on this ship for over 23 years, while Peter has been doing it for 13. Together they cook for 60 people on board, seamen and scientists alike. You’re probably wondering, like I was, how they pull it off. I had the chance to talk to them, and here are some of the ship’s secrets.
Let’s start with the planning. They don’t prepare the whole month’s menu before going on board, they plan it day by day. That said, a few dishes are practically law: fish on Tuesday and Friday, stew on Saturday (the stews are good, but it’s still my least favorite food day), and roasted meat on Sunday. Ice cream shows up for dessert on Sunday and Thursday lunches. And no matter the day, there’s always a vegetarian option on the table, nobody on board goes without something to eat.
So, all this cooking, but how many ingredients does it actually take? Let’s start with numbers. Every morning for breakfast there’s a choice of eggs (scrambled, boiled, fried…), pancakes, and more. So how many eggs are on this ship? For a one-month cruise, there are 3,000 eggs in storage, and the cooks go through around 90 of them a day. They also bake fresh bread every single day, about 3kg of flour goes into roughly 60 loaves. Coffee breaks happen all day, every day, there’s about 60kg of coffee on board. And since we’re on a German ship, and Germans do love their potatoes, there are 300kg of potatoes stored in a refrigerated, dark room so they don’t go bad.
You might be wondering why I’m talking so much about potatoes. Well, my dear reader, lunch has plenty of variety, but the one constant is potatoes. We’re on day 20 of the cruise, and I think we’ve worked through most of the varieties by now: fried, baked, soufflé, mashed, boiled and more still to come.
Another question I had was what happens if one of them gets sick. Rainer is a tough seaman who doesn’t get seasick anymore; Peter still does, occasionally. But either way, they’re always there, cooking through good conditions and bad. People generally love the food, though the chefs did tell me the one thing that never goes down well is old-school dishes like veal liver. (I can confirm.)
I think the message I’m trying to convey here is: a scientific cruise wouldn’t really be possible without Peter and Rainer. Science at sea is not only the science, but it’s also the work and effort of everyone on board. Especially the chefs!

Ocean Acidification
Where the sky meets the ocean
By Leonie Jaeger (ICBM Oldenburg)
The ocean is the dominant climate regulator of our Earth. I am on board the RV Meteor to conduct measurements that helps us better understand the critical processes at the interface between the atmosphere and the ocean. The focus of these measurements is heat and freshwater fluxes, two key drivers that both influence and regulate Earth’s climate.
The ocean stores and transports vast amounts of heat across the whole globe. The exchange of heat between the atmosphere and the ocean is controlled by different surface heat fluxes. The sun emits shortwave radiation, which warms the surface ocean, though part of this radiation is reflected at the water surface. At the same time, the ocean emits longwave radiation towards the sky due to its temperature, some of which is reflected and absorbed by water vapor and clouds. To quantify these fluxes, I use radiometers: sets of upward- and downward-looking sensors that measure radiation coming from the sky and from the ocean. Specifically, pyranometers measure shortwave radiation, while pyrgeometers measure longwave radiation.

Over the open ocean, freshwater fluxes result from two processes: evaporation and precipitation. Approximately 80% of the global freshwater flux occurs over the ocean, underscoring the ocean’s dominance in the global water cycle and its influence on climate over land. In a warming climate, evaporation is expected to intensify as temperatures rise and the atmosphere’s capacity to hold moisture increases. That makes is very important to better understand these fluxes. However, high-quality measurements of precipitation and evaporation using remote techniques remain challenging. On this cruise, I am using a disdrometer, an instrument that measures rain in high resolution. It allows us to investigate not only the total amount of rain but also the velocity and size of individual raindrops, enabling a detailed characterization of rain events.

Our cruise track crosses the Atlantic Ocean from South to North, passing the equator. This transect will provide a valuable dataset. Importantly, we will cross the Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), a region near the equator characterized by heavy rain and thunderstorms. These storms originate from warm, moist air that rises continuously. As the air rises, it cools and condenses, forming thick clouds and intense precipitation. Because the ITCZ is driven by the convergence of trade winds from both hemispheres, it maintains persistent bands of convection. In this zone, these convective systems can trigger even more convection in the atmosphere driving the tropical climate. Together with warm surface temperatures, these high-energy processes can lead to the genesis of tropical cyclones. Thus, the atmosphere influences the ocean, and the ocean influences the atmosphere. Direct measurements at their interface are essential to better understand these processes shaping our climate. My responsibilities include installing and maintaining the measurements systems, as well as data validation and data storage. Maintaining sensors close to the ocean requires frequent cleaning, because sea spray leaves salt deposits everywhere, leading to corrosion. Together with ship-based measurements such as air temperature, wind speed and humidity, and oceanographic underway measurements including continuous observation of the water temperature, salinity, turbidity and chlorophyll, our data will provide a comprehensive dataset to study fresh and heat water fluxes between the ocean and the atmosphere.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy8 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
