Published

2 months ago

March 26, 2026

Alice Rush

Carbon tends to sit at the forefront of climate considerations, but there’s another important, interconnected piece of the sustainability puzzle that often gets overlooked: water.

Globally, 4 billion people face severe water scarcity for at least one month out of every year, according to the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH).

Like with global warming, human activities have had a major impact on water systems. Not only are we often using too much water, but issues like land use change and rising temperatures also stress freshwater ecosystems and the water cycle.

If we ignore these issues, more water systems will be permanently damaged. That likely means more people will live with insufficient access to clean water, agricultural production will become more difficult and expensive, and many businesses will face economic risks, like supply chain delays and shortages.

Fortunately, there are ways to reduce water risks and even improve water systems.

One option is to purchase water credits. Similar to how carbon credits emerged as a solution for offsetting hard-to-avoid greenhouse gas emissions, water credits provide a market-based solution for conserving and restoring water systems.

Here, we’ll take a deeper dive into:

What are Water Credits?
How do Water Credit Projects Work?
Water Credit Project Types and Examples
Benefits of Water Credits
Why Individuals and Businesses Should Buy Water Credits

What Are Water Credits?

If you’re familiar with carbon credits, you already get the gist of water credits.

Similar to how one carbon credit represents one metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent avoided or removed from the atmosphere, one water credit represents 1,000 gallons of natural freshwater flow that has been improved or restored.

Water credit projects involve protecting, restoring, or conserving water flows to ultimately help natural systems like rivers, wetlands, and aquifers, along with the communities that rely on them.

Source: Bonneville Environmental Foundation

For example, leading project developer Bonneville Environmental Foundation (BEF) issues Water Restoration Certificates® that are third-party verified, namely by Watercourse Engineering or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. All BEF WRC® projects are also tracked and registered on S&P Global’s Markit registry to avoid double-counting.

Other water credit programs exist, but BEF WRCs® are arguably the most established market-based solution for addressing your water footprint.

Terrapass offers BEF WRC® certificates that support projects like the Middle Deschutes River Flow Restoration project in Oregon, which in turn helps support a healthy ecosystem for local wildlife and communities.

Buy BEF WRCs® through Terrapass today.

How Do Water Credit Projects Work?

Water credit projects work similarly to carbon credit projects in terms of directing financing toward initiatives that support the restoration of natural freshwater flows and ecosystems.

Water restoration project developers like BEF work with farmers, conservation groups, and local irrigation districts to identify these opportunities and manage the projects. Water restoration projects also meet additionality requirements, meaning that without the funding from water credits, the projects would not be possible.

For example, funding might go towards the cost and effort of securing legal agreements that help restore river flows. This is necessary to help overcome challenges like “use it or lose it” water rights policies in the Western U.S. By maintaining a water source for ecological purposes, water rights holders can maintain their water rights while addressing old and inefficient requirements like the obligation to use all of their allotted water.

Note that since water issues are largely regional, best practice is to purchase credits from water restoration projects that help relieve water stress in the same basins where you’re using water. However, water credit projects are mostly concentrated in the Western U.S. where water stress is more severe, so matching projects to your location isn’t always possible. If that’s the case, buying a mixed portfolio of water credits can still compensate for your impact, it just might not directly address water issues in the areas you operate.

Water Credit Timing

Each water credit directly translates to 1,000 gallons of natural freshwater improved or restored over an 18-month cycle.

Note that while these projects might provide long-lasting water benefits, along with other associated environmental and social benefits, best practice is for buyers to only count water credits against their water footprint for the year in which these certificates are purchased.

To address your water footprint for multiple years, buyers can purchase water credits for each year they want to balance their water impact, similar to how you would purchase carbon credits corresponding to each year’s emissions.

Also note that water credits have vintages, which refer to the primary year when the water restoration took place. Like with carbon credits, best practice for water credits is to buy ones with recent vintages — generally within the last five years, but ideally within the past three. However, you don’t have to match vintages with the year of your own water consumption, as you’re still funding water improvements that help balance your own footprint.

Water Credit Project Types and Examples

BEF WRC® projects fall into one of three main categories:

Restoring Flows: These projects often involve legal transactions like water rights transfers and partnerships with local groups to help keep water flowing in rivers and streams, rather than overly diverted, like for inefficient agricultural practices.

Example — Jordan River Flow Restoration: This project uses Environmental Water Transactions (EWTs) to help secure more water flowing from the Jordan River into the Great Salt Lake in Utah, which helps address the critical shrinking of this lake.

Restoring Natural Systems: While similar to restoring flows, this project category focuses more on physical interventions to help restore freshwater systems like rivers and wetlands to their natural state, thereby increasing freshwater and potentially providing co-benefits like cleaner water.

Example — Pine Tree Brook Dam Removal: This project removes dams in the Pine Tree Brook in the Boston area to support the movement of local trout and improve water quality. For example, one of the dams on this brook was previously put in place to create a local ice rink, but that was no longer needed due to the 1950s construction of a nearby ice rink facility that does not rely on this water source. So, removing it helped return the brook to more of its natural order.

Improving Efficiency: Some water credit projects focus more on conservation and efficient water use, which can thereby help retain or restore water in natural systems.

Example — Mason Lane Headgate: In Arizona, the Mason Lane Ditch diverts a tributary of the Verde River to irrigate agricultural land. This project funds the replacement of an inefficient headgate system with a modern, automated one to enable more precise control of the diverted water.

Benefits of Water Credits

In addition to directly supporting freshwater restoration, water credits provide a wide range of co-benefits, such as supporting:

Groundwater conservation: Projects that minimize groundwater usage not only can improve water volume but also provide benefits like stabilization of river beds. That helps to avoid problems like sinking land and enables water systems to maintain natural filtration capabilities.
Biodiversity: Water restoration projects often support biodiversity, like providing a healthier habitat for local fish and bird populations. That can provide associated environmental and economic benefits, like supporting pollinators and keeping local fisheries well-stocked.

One example of biodiversity co-benefits can be seen in the Merced County Seasonal Wetland Habitat project, which aims to provide an annual spring habitat for migratory birds in central California.

You can support projects like these by buying BEF WRCs® through Terrapass today.

BEF Water Restoration Certificates Illustration Infographic

Recreation: Maintaining freshwater ecosystems helps provide communities with recreational opportunities, such as fishing, boating, and hiking. That can correlate with economic opportunities for these areas, while also supporting the health of local populations.
Agricultural economies: The funding from water credits can directly support farmers and ranchers, providing an important income stream that can help mitigate issues like crop shortages. Long term, water credits can also support a more stable water supply that sustains these agricultural businesses season after season, even amidst increasing floods and droughts caused by climate change.
Community empowerment: Water credits often involve working with tribal groups and other local communities. The economic, ecological, and recreational benefits can help protect these communities’ cultures and rights.
Lower emissions: While water credits are separate from carbon credits, there can be interconnected benefits. For example, more efficient irrigation systems can use less water and energy. More reliable water supplies can also reduce the need for high-emitting fertilizers.

Why Individuals and Businesses Should Buy Water Credits

Water risk sometimes gets overshadowed by carbon emissions risk, but it’s important for both individuals and businesses to consider their water footprints. Buying water credits enables you to account for the impact of your water usage while supporting a broad range of environmental, economic, and social benefits.

In particular, consider the following:

For Individuals

You likely use far more water than you assume, particularly when accounting for indirect usage, like the water that went into making the jeans you bought. One survey from American Water found that most Americans think they use less than 100 gallons of water per day, when really total usage adds up to over 2,000 gallons daily, based on data from Water Footprint Network.

While it’s important to be mindful of your water usage, we’re all inevitably going to use water throughout our daily lives. So, purchasing water credits helps you take responsibility for the impact of this water usage while funding projects that have a wide range of co-benefits you may value.

For Businesses

Just as many companies acknowledge climate risk and commit to addressing greenhouse gas emissions, water scarcity and overuse can have direct economic effects on businesses, along with creating risks like reputational damage. By 2050, 31% of global GDP is projected to be exposed to high water stress, according to the World Resources Institute.

So, buying water credits can address your company’s direct water footprint and contribute to solving water scarcity and quality issues that can harm your operations going forward. Meanwhile, businesses can potentially increase goodwill with customers, employees, and the local communities where they operate by supporting water credit projects that have meaningful co-benefits.

Buying water credits can also align with other standards and certifications that many businesses value. Some examples include:

WRI’s Volumetric Water Benefit (VWB) Accounting 2.0: Water credit projects can potentially align with this VWB accounting standard, and Bonneville Environmental Foundation was one of WRI’s partners involved in creating it. Still, consider looking into the details of this accounting standard and project specifics to determine alignment.
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Depending on the specific project, there can be benefits that align with multiple SDGs. For example, a project might align with SDG 6: Clean Water and Sanitation, while also supporting local economic development that aligns with SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities.
LEED Certification: Water credits can be matched to a building’s annual water usage and counted toward this green building certification.
1% for the Planet: BEF is an environmental partner of 1% for the Planet, so buying BEF WRCs® can qualify a company for membership.
B Corp: Buying water credits can also count toward earning B Corp certification.

Ready to Support Water Restoration?

Terrapass makes it easy for you to balance your water footprint while supporting sustainable ecosystems and community development.

You can directly purchase BEF WRCs® through Terrapass today or reach out to speak with one of our sustainability experts who can help you build a custom portfolio of carbon credits and water credits that align with your sustainability goals.

Talk to a Sustainability Expert

The post The 2026 Complete Guide to Water Credits (WRCs) appeared first on Terrapass.

Carbon Footprint

The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares

Published

3 days ago

May 28, 2026

Alice Rush

Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.

Carbon Footprint

Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain

Published

2 weeks ago

May 20, 2026

Alice Rush

“…Protecting nature makes our business more resilient…”

Julie Brown, Chief Financial Officer, GSK, and Co-Chair, A4S CFO Leadership Network (Europe)

Tweet

For companies with land, water, food, fiber, or commodity exposure, the supply chain may be the most practical place to turn nature from a risk into an operating asset.

Your supply chain already has a nature strategy. It may be undocumented. It may live in procurement files, supplier contracts, commodity maps, and one spreadsheet nobody opens without coffee. But it exists.

If your business depends on farms, forests, water, soil, packaging, rubber, timber, fibers, minerals, or food ingredients, nature is part of your operating system. The question is whether you manage that system with intent, or discover it during a disruption, audit, or difficult board question.

That is why more companies are asking how to find Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain. Do not begin by shopping for offsets. Begin by asking where nature already affects cost, continuity, emissions, regulatory exposure, and supplier resilience.

What Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain Means

The European Commission defines nature-based solutions as approaches inspired and supported by nature that are cost-effective, deliver environmental, social, and economic benefits, and help build resilience. They should also benefit biodiversity and support ecosystem services.

In supply-chain terms, that becomes practical. Nature-based solutions in your supply chain can include agroforestry in cocoa, coffee, rubber, or palm supply chains. They can include soil health programs for food ingredients, watershed restoration near water-intensive operations, mangrove restoration linked to coastal sourcing regions, and avoided deforestation in forest-linked commodities.

The key test is business relevance. If your procurement team relies on a landscape, watershed, crop, or supplier base, that is where opportunity may sit. The best projects do not hover outside the business like a framed certificate. They plug into the system that already produces your revenue.

Why the Boardroom Should Care

For many companies, the largest climate and nature exposure sits outside direct operations. The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard gives companies a method to account for and report value-chain emissions across sectors. Purchased goods, land use, transport, supplier energy, and product use can make direct emissions look like the visible tip of a very large iceberg.

The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures notes that many nature-related dependencies, impacts, risks, and opportunities arise upstream and downstream. That is why nature-based supply chain investments matter to boards. You are managing supply security, audit readiness, investor confidence, and regulatory preparedness.

For companies exposed to EU markets, this also connects to rules and expectations such as CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, and SBTi FLAG.

Step One: Map Where You Touch Land, Water, and Living Systems

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain starts with mapping, not marketing.

Begin with procurement and Scope 3 data. Which categories carry high spend, high emissions, or high sourcing risk? Which suppliers depend on agriculture, forestry, mining, water-intensive processing, or land conversion? Which regions face water stress, heat, flood risk, soil degradation, deforestation, or biodiversity pressure?

The Science Based Targets Network uses a clear process for companies: assess, prioritize, set targets, act, and track. That sequence keeps companies from treating nature as a mood board. You identify where the business has exposure, then decide where intervention can create measurable value.

Step Two: Look for Operational Value Before Carbon Value

This is the center of CCC’s Dual-Value Model. A nature-based supply chain investment should do useful work for the business before anyone counts the carbon.

Agroforestry may improve farmer resilience, shade crops, protect soil, and reduce pressure on forests. Watershed restoration may reduce water risk for beverage, textile, or manufacturing sites. Soil health programs may improve the stability of agricultural inputs.

Carbon and sustainability value can still be created. In some cases, the project may support Scope 3 insetting. In others, it may generate verified carbon credits. Sometimes the main value may be resilience, readiness, and better supplier data.

The IPCC has found that ecosystem-based adaptation can reduce climate risks to people, biodiversity, and ecosystem services, with multiple co-benefits, while also warning that effectiveness declines as warming increases. That is a sober argument for acting early.

Step Three: Separate Insetting, Offsetting, and Resilience

Nature-based solutions in your supply chain are not automatically carbon credits. They are not automatically Scope 3 reductions either.

An insetting opportunity usually sits inside or close to your value chain. It may support Scope 3 reporting if the accounting rules, project boundaries, supplier connection, and data quality are strong enough.

An offsetting opportunity usually involves verified credits outside your value chain. High-quality credits can still play a role for residual emissions, but they should not distract from direct reductions or credible value-chain work.

A resilience opportunity may deliver business value even if you cannot claim a Scope 3 reduction immediately. That may include water security, supplier capacity, land restoration, biodiversity protection, or regulatory readiness.

Gold Standard’s Scope 3 value-chain guidance focuses on reporting emissions reductions from interventions in purchased goods and services. Verra’s Scope 3 Standard Program is being developed to certify value-chain interventions and issue units for companies’ emissions accounting. The direction is clear: stronger evidence, tighter boundaries, and more disciplined claims.

Step Four: Design for Audit-Readiness From the Beginning

Weak data is where promising nature projects go to become expensive anecdotes.

Before public claims are made, you need to know the baseline. What would have happened without the project? Who owns or manages the land? Which suppliers are involved? How will outcomes be measured? How will leakage, permanence, and double counting be addressed?

The GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Standard gives companies methods to quantify, report, and track land emissions, CO2 removals, and related metrics. This matters because land projects are rarely neat. Farms change practices. Suppliers shift volumes. Weather changes outcomes.

What Recent Corporate Examples Show

Recent case studies show that supply-chain nature work is becoming more serious, and more scrutinized.

Reuters has reported on insetting to reduce emissions within supply chains, including examples linked to Reckitt, Danone, Nestlé, Earthworm Foundation, and Nature-based Insights. The same article highlights familiar problems: measurement, double counting, supplier incentives, and credibility.

Reuters has also reported on companies using the Science Based Targets Network process to examine nature impacts. GSK, Holcim, and Kering were among the first companies with validated science-based targets for nature.

The Financial Times has covered the promise and difficulty of soil carbon in corporate supply chains, including a PepsiCo example in India where yields reportedly increased while greenhouse gas emissions fell. The lesson is that carbon, soil, biodiversity, farmer economics, and measurement need to be handled together.

A Practical Screening Checklist

A supply-chain nature-based solution deserves deeper review when you can answer yes to most of these questions:

Does it sit in or near a material supply-chain hotspot?
Does it address a real business risk?
Can you connect it to supplier behavior, land management, or sourcing practices?
Can the outcomes be measured?
Are the claim boundaries clear?
Does it support Scope 3 strategy, SBTi FLAG, CSRD, CSDDD, EUDR, or investor reporting needs?
Are permanence, leakage, land rights, and community issues addressed?

Build the Asset, Then Make the Claim

Finding Nature-Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain is about identifying where your business already depends on living systems, then designing interventions that make those systems more resilient, measurable, and commercially useful.

For companies with material Scope 3 exposure, the right project can support supplier resilience, emissions strategy, regulatory readiness, and credible climate communication. The wrong project can become a glossy story with a weak audit trail.

Carbon Credit Capital helps companies design nature-based carbon and sustainability assets that embed directly into corporate supply chains. Through CCC’s Dual-Value Model, you can assess where sustainability investment may support operational resilience, Scope 3 insetting eligibility, regulatory readiness, and high-quality carbon or sustainability value.

Schedule your consultation with the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital to explore how nature-based supply chain investments can support your next stage of climate strategy.

Sources

Carbon Footprint

How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living

Published

2 weeks ago

May 19, 2026

Alice Rush

Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.

For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.

Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.

The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.

More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)

Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.

Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.

Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:

Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs

The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?

How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs

There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.

Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)

According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)

In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)

The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)

After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)

For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.

How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

A light bulb, a pen, a calculator and some copper euro cent coins lie on top of an electricity bill

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.

Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.

Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)

As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)

These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)

Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)

For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.

How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates

On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.

Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.

As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)

While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.

How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes

Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.

The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.

These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.

Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action

While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.

While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.

For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:

Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.

Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.

Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.

The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.