The Northern Lights project is expanding its carbon capture and storage (CCS) capacity, with the big oil firms making their final investment worth around $714 million. This will help lower carbon emissions from industries in Europe.
The project will now store at least 5 million tonnes of CO₂ per year, up from 1.5 million tonnes. The decision comes after a deal with Stockholm Exergi, a Swedish energy company. The company will send up to 900,000 tonnes of CO₂ each year for 15 years.
A Bold Vision for European CCS
Equinor, Shell, and TotalEnergies are the companies behind the Northern Lights. Each of them has an equal share of 33.3%.
The European Commission also supports the project. It provided €131 million through the Connecting Europe Facility for Energy (CEF Energy) fund. The Norwegian government has played a key role in making the project possible.
Initiated as part of Norway’s Longship project, Northern Lights represents the world’s first cross-border, open-source CO₂ transport and storage service. Its primary objective is to provide industries across Europe with a reliable solution for capturing and securely storing CO₂ emissions beneath the North Sea seabed.
Phase one of the project became operational in September 2024, offering an annual storage capacity of up to 1.5 million tonnes of CO₂.
The project is key to Norway’s climate strategy. It helps industries cut emissions that are hard to reduce otherwise. Northern Lights also offers a cost-effective way for heavy industries to transport and store CO₂. This helps them meet stricter environmental rules.
Scaling Up: From 1.5M to 5M Tonnes of CO₂
In March 2025, the consortium announced a substantial investment of 7.5 billion Norwegian kroner (approximately $714 million) to fund the second phase of the project. This expansion aims to increase the storage capacity from 1.5 million to over 5 million tonnes of CO₂ per year by the latter half of 2028.
To facilitate this growth, the development will include additional onshore storage tanks, a new jetty, and more injection wells, leveraging existing infrastructure to expand operations efficiently.
The enhanced capacity will help accommodate a growing demand for carbon storage services from European industries seeking compliance with stricter emissions regulations and ambitious net-zero targets.
The first phase of Northern Lights is already finished. The project will begin operating in mid-2025. The first CO₂ shipment will come from a cement factory in Norway. This is part of Norway’s Longship CCS project.
- RELATED: The “Northern Lights” Shines: Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies JV Powers the Norway CCS Project
The project is expected to be ready by late 2028.
A Step Toward a CCS Market in Europe
Leaders of the companies involved see this as a major step for CCS in Europe. Tim Heijn, Managing Director of Northern Lights, said the project will provide a real solution for cutting emissions. He believes it will help create a strong CCS market.
Anders Opedal, CEO of Equinor, said this project shows how governments and companies can work together. He added that CCS is key to reducing risks and attracting more customers.
Huibert Vigeveno from Shell said that CCS plays an important role in reaching net-zero emissions. He also noted that Northern Lights is part of Shell’s global CCS efforts. Nicolas Terraz from TotalEnergies agreed, saying the expansion will help industries in Europe cut emissions.
Anders Egelrud, CEO of Stockholm Exergi noted:
“I am very pleased that Northern Lights has decided to move forward with its project. This is a crucial step in our collaboration. Permanent carbon storage will play a key role in achieving the climate targets. Together, we are laying the foundation for what could become an entirely new industry – one with the potential to make the Nordics and Europe global leaders in this field.”
The expansion of the Northern Lights could substantially reduce Europe’s industrial CO₂ emissions. The project will boost storage capacity to over 5 million tonnes each year, which will tackle almost 10% of Norway’s annual emissions. It offers a scalable solution for industries looking to reduce their carbon footprint.
Stockholm Exergi Joins Northern Lights
As part of this expansion, Northern Lights has signed a deal with Stockholm Exergi. The company runs a biomass power plant in Stockholm. Their plan is to capture and store biogenic CO₂, which comes from burning organic materials. This process, known as Bio-Energy Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), can create negative emissions. This means it removes more CO₂ from the air than it releases.
Anders Egelrud, CEO of Stockholm Exergi, said he is happy to see Northern Lights move forward. He believes permanent CO₂ storage will help meet climate goals. He also said this project could help Europe become a leader in CCS.
Per the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (IOGP Europe), the carbon storage injection capacity in the region could hit 200 million tonnes by 2038.
Aker Solutions Wins CCS Contract
Aker Solutions, a Norwegian engineering company, has won a contract for the expansion. The company will handle engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) for the onshore facilities. While the exact contract value is not disclosed, it is estimated to be between 1.5 billion and 2.5 billion NOK ($142–237 million).
Aker Solutions has worked on other CCS projects before. Henrik Inadomi, an executive at the company, said this is their fourth CCS project. He also noted that their past experience has helped lower costs. Work on this expansion will begin in the second half of 2025.
Why CCS Matters for Net-Zero Goals
Carbon capture and storage is important for reaching net-zero emissions. Many industries, like cement and steel production, produce a lot of CO₂. Some emissions are hard to eliminate using renewable energy alone. CCS provides a way to capture and store CO₂ instead of releasing it into the air.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) says CCS needs to capture about 1.6 billion tonnes of CO₂ per year by 2030 to meet global climate goals. Right now, the world only captures about 40 million tonnes per year. This shows there is still a long way to go.
CCS is especially useful for “hard-to-abate” sectors. These are industries where cutting emissions is very difficult. Northern Lights and other CCS projects are helping these industries reduce their carbon footprint.
Northern Lights is one of the first large-scale CCS projects in the world. Many experts see it as a model for future projects. If successful, it could inspire other CCS developments in Europe and beyond.
As governments and companies focus on cutting emissions, CCS will likely play a bigger role. Northern Lights’ expansion is an important step in that direction. It shows that with the right investments and partnerships, CCS can become a key tool in fighting climate change.
The post Shell, Equinor, and TotalEnergies Expand Northern Lights CCS with $714 Million Investment appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Most businesses that decide to act on their net-zero targets reach the same point of friction. Buying carbon credits has meant tracking down brokers, sitting through sales calls, and requesting a quote just to learn a price, sometimes with limited proof of what you are buying.
The earnings calls that quietly reframed climate from sustainability question to operating risk.
Three earnings calls in the last 18 months tell the story without any help from a press release.
Hershey, May 2024: cocoa price exposure compresses margin, and the company attributes part of the cost shock to West African weather. Olam, July 2024: coffee climate exposure quantified in the annual report. JBS, January 2025: supply chain climate disclosures expanded materially in response to investor pressure and regulatory expectation. None of these companies issued the announcement as climate news. They issued it as financial news. The climate-linked supply chain risk did not arrive with a sustainability framing; it arrived as a P&L line.
You are probably reading this article because you suspect the same thing is happening to your business. This piece walks through what is showing up on which earnings calls, how procurement and finance leaders are quantifying the exposure, and what serious corporates are doing about it before the regulator asks.
Where climate risk has already appeared in earnings
The pattern is consistent across resource-intensive sectors. A weather event compresses supply, the price spikes, the cost flows through the income statement, and the analyst on the call asks whether the event is anomalous or structural. Increasingly, the honest answer is the second one.
Cocoa is the cleanest example. The 2023 to 2024 West African harvest fell sharply on the back of erratic rainfall and disease. Cocoa futures more than tripled. Companies with concentrated West African sourcing absorbed the cost; companies with diversified sourcing absorbed less. The exposure was not climate as ESG topic. It was climate as cost of goods.
Coffee follows the same pattern. Brazilian and Vietnamese harvests have moved on weather more sharply across the last several seasons. Roasters with long-tenor supplier relationships and origin diversification have managed the volatility; roasters with spot-market exposure have not. Wheat, sugar, palm oil, beef: the same dynamic in different commodities, a pattern the IPCC AR6 Working Group II report projects will intensify across agricultural systems through mid-century.
What this means: climate risk is no longer a footnote in the 10-K. It is a line item the CFO has to explain on the call.
The three commodity exposures that hit margin first
For most companies with material Scope 3 exposure, three exposures dominate the near-term P&L risk.
- Concentrated single-origin sourcing in a climate-vulnerable region. If your tier-one supply for any material commodity sits in one geography, you have a concentration risk that climate amplifies. Diversification across origins is the obvious hedge, but it takes years to build and requires relationships you cannot acquire by tender.
- Supplier financial fragility under climate stress. Smallholder farmers, who supply a large share of the global cocoa, coffee, and palm oil market, do not carry the balance sheets to absorb yield shocks. When yields collapse, they exit. When they exit, your supply base shrinks, and the surviving suppliers raise prices. The risk is structural, not cyclical.
- Logistics and storage exposure to extreme weather. Hurricane disruptions to Gulf shipping, drought-driven Panama Canal restrictions, flooding in European inland waterways: each of these has moved input costs in the last three years, a pattern documented in Munich Re’s natural catastrophe data. The exposure shows up as a one-quarter event in the financial press but accumulates over time on the cost line.
TCFD and ISSB disclosure changes
The disclosure architecture has now caught up with the risk. The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, whose recommendations are now embedded in the ISSB’s IFRS S2 climate standard, requires companies to disclose climate-related risks across physical and transition categories, with quantification where possible.
For physical risk specifically (the climate-linked supply chain risk you are reading about), the disclosure must address both acute exposures (extreme weather events) and chronic exposures (gradual changes in temperature, precipitation, and growing seasons). The disclosure must address the time horizon over which the risk is material, the parts of the value chain exposed, and the financial impact under different scenarios.
The CSRD imposes similar requirements under European law, with double materiality (both financial and impact materiality) embedded in the assessment. The practical effect: your auditors and your investor relations team now need a defensible answer to the climate-linked supply chain risk question, and the answer needs to be quantified.
What procurement and finance can do now
Three actions matter near-term.
Map your exposure. Most companies do not have a clear view of which tier-one and tier-two suppliers sit in which climate-vulnerable geographies. Without the map, you cannot quantify the risk, and without the quantification, you cannot disclose it credibly. The map is the foundation, and World Resources Institute climate risk research provides useful public tooling to start.
Diversify and deepen, in that order. Diversification across origins reduces concentration risk, but the deeper move is to invest in the resilience of the suppliers you already have. Regenerative practices, agroforestry, soil health interventions: these reduce yield volatility under climate stress and protect your input cost trajectory.
Embed the climate spend inside procurement, not outside it. Treating climate risk as a sustainability cost line subordinates it to the ESG budget. Treating it as a procurement and resilience investment puts it in the budget that matters, which is the cost-of-goods budget that the CFO defends quarterly.
Nature-based supply chain investments are the asset class designed for exactly this purpose. They sit inside the value chain, they reduce climate-linked supply risk, they generate verifiable Scope 3 reductions, and they produce the documentation an auditor and a regulator can both test.
If you are quantifying climate-linked supply chain risk in advance of the next earnings cycle or the next disclosure period, the carbon and sustainability experts at Carbon Credit Capital can help you map your exposure and structure a Dual-Value Model response that addresses reduction, resilience, and disclosure-readiness in a single program. Schedule a consultation.
More and more small and medium-sized businesses are hearing the same question from their larger customers: What is your carbon footprint? That question now travels down entire supply chains, and it arrives next to tender requirements, certification criteria, and rising customer expectations.
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy11 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿：探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits