Connect with us

Published

on

In the face of escalating climate change challenges, Indigenous Peoples worldwide remain steadfast as the stewards of the Earth’s most ecologically vital regions. Their knowledge systems, sciences, and philosophies have sustained human and non-human relations with nature for millennia, offering profound insights into resilience and adaptation. Recognizing this, establishing a Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience would be a monumental step toward leveraging Indigenous expertise in shaping a sustainable future.

This imagined Indigenous-led institution would provide a global platform for Indigenous Nations to unify their voices and influence climate policy, adaptation strategies, and resource management. Free from political interference, this Centre would operate on co-definition, co-design, and co-development principles—ensuring the perspectives of Indigenous communities, ecosystems, and non-human relations are equally represented in shaping the planet’s future.

Serving as a hub of innovation and action, where Indigenous leaders, scientists, policymakers, educators, and knowledge keepers collaborate on meaningful solutions. The Centre would focus on preserving Indigenous ways of knowing and integrating them into cutting-edge climate science, policy development, and implementation strategies.

Four Critical Pillars of Climate Action

To address the pressing issues of climate change, the Centre would focus on four fundamental pillars universally recognized within climate action frameworks:

  1. Climate Change Adaptation

Adaptation is the process of adjusting to current and expected climate conditions. Indigenous knowledge systems have long mastered adaptation, developing ways to work harmoniously with natural cycles. The Centre would facilitate:

  • Knowledge-sharing hubs that connect Indigenous Nations and researchers across different regions, ensuring that adaptation strategies are customized to diverse environments, from the Arctic to the Amazon.
  • Community-driven initiatives focus on reviving traditional ecological knowledge, such as sustainable water management, climate-resilient agriculture, and nature-based solutions to prevent soil erosion, flooding, and habitat loss.
  • Education and training programs tailored for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities to implement adaptation solutions that honour the land, promoting resilient food systems, wildfire mitigation, and habitat restoration.
  • Developing climate-resilient infrastructure using Indigenous construction methods that have been perfected over generations, such as passive heating and cooling techniques, eco-friendly building materials, and sustainable urban planning.
  1. Climate Change Mitigation

 Mitigation focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing natural carbon sinks. Indigenous Nations have maintained balanced ecosystems for centuries, making them essential leaders in climate mitigation. The Centre would:

  • Advocate for sustainable land management practices, such as rotational grazing, agroforestry, and controlled burns, which have been scientifically proven to increase biodiversity and carbon sequestration.
  • Support Indigenous-led renewable energy projects, including off-grid solar, wind, and hydroelectric initiatives that provide clean energy while respecting the land and natural cycles.
  • Develop policies promoting circular economies, reducing dependency on extractive industries, and fostering regenerative economic practices that emphasize environmental harmony over mass consumption.
  • Enhance forest and ocean conservation efforts by expanding Indigenous land tenure rights and supporting Indigenous-led initiatives that protect rainforests, mangroves, and marine ecosystems—some of the planet’s most significant carbon sinks.
  1. Resilience and Restoration

 Resilience is about building stronger ecosystems and communities in response to climate disruptions. Indigenous approaches recognize that nature itself is a regenerator, and human intervention should focus on supporting these natural cycles. The Centre would:

  • Implement land and water healing initiatives, applying Indigenous ecological restoration practices such as wetland renewal, seed banking, and permaculture to revitalize degraded ecosystems.
  • Promote Indigenous architecture and urban planning models, ensuring that future city and community development aligns with land-based principles rather than extractive, unsustainable infrastructure.
  • Establish cooperative agreements with global institutions, ensuring Indigenous ecological governance is fully integrated into international resilience strategies, from the UN to grassroots environmental organizations.
  • Develop Indigenous-led disaster response frameworks, incorporating traditional knowledge in disaster mitigation, early warning systems, and emergency response planning.
  1. Policy and Governance

 Effective climate action requires policy reform grounded in Indigenous worldviews. This Centre would advocate for Indigenous-led policies at the global level and work towards embedding Indigenous governance in national and international climate strategies. This includes:

  • Creating an Indigenous Climate Policy Advisory Council that influences global climate agreements, ensuring that Indigenous perspectives are represented at climate negotiations such as COP summits.
  • Establishing legal protections for Indigenous lands, advocating for international recognition of Indigenous land rights as essential to climate mitigation and biodiversity protection.
  • Partnering with governments, academic institutions, and NGOs to promote co-managed conservation areas where Indigenous governance and traditional ecological knowledge inform land-use policies.
  • Leading policy reform efforts to ensure Indigenous values—such as the Seven Generations Model—are incorporated into long-term climate planning, shifting away from short-term profit-driven models.

The Professions Needed for Success

To operate effectively, the Centre would require a diverse range of Indigenous professionals, including:

  • Climate Scientists & Environmental Researchers – Experts in Indigenous earth sciences, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration.
  • Traditional Knowledge Keepers & Elders – To ensure teachings and methodologies are rooted in cultural wisdom and land-based traditions.
  • Community Planners & Architects – Specialists in sustainable Indigenous urban design and eco-friendly infrastructure.
  • Legal Experts & Policy Advocates – Champions for Indigenous rights in climate governance and policy frameworks.
  • Agricultural and Forestry Specialists – Practitioners of regenerative farming and forest management.
  • Water and Marine Experts – Leaders in protecting freshwater and oceanic ecosystems.
  • Data Analysts & AI Specialists – To integrate Indigenous knowledge with emerging technologies for climate modelling.

How This Centre Benefits the World

The proposed Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience would benefit Indigenous communities and serve as a transformative model for non-Indigenous Nations. By demonstrating effective climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, the Centre would inspire global partnerships that prioritize ecosystem health over profit-driven agendas.

Examples of its impact include:

  • Guiding governments in climate-resilient land management through Indigenous stewardship models.
  • Assisting corporations in transitioning to sustainable business practices, ensuring economic growth aligns with ecological responsibility.
  • Providing training for urban and regional planners to integrate Indigenous land-use principles into modern cities, fostering more resilient communities.
  • Enhancing conservation efforts by implementing Indigenous-led biodiversity protection initiatives, ensuring that conservation efforts do not displace Indigenous communities but rather empower them as stewards of the land.

A Call to Action

Indigenous Peoples are not passive observers in the climate discourse; they are the solution-bearers. It is time for the world to listen, learn, and act—for the benefit of all life on Mother Earth. By establishing a Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience, we take a monumental step toward securing a future that honours the land, respects ancestral knowledge, and provides a sustainable path forward for all.

(Disclaimer: The proposed Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience is not a project in progress by the author—it provides information and inspiration for consideration by academics, NGOs, and climate leaders. All ideas presented are open-source, and organizations and individuals are welcome to use the information to benefit climate change initiatives and projects.)

– By Rye Karonhiowanen Barberstock

(Image Credit: ChatGPT AI-Generated Image)

The post Proposing A Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience: A Vision for the Future appeared first on Indigenous Climate Hub.

Proposing A Global Indigenous Centre for Climate Change Resilience: A Vision for the Future

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Paris Agreement committee names three countries snubbing it over NDCs

Published

on

Three countries have been named by the Paris Agreement’s compliance committee for failing to submit a nationally determined contribution (NDC) and repeatedly snubbing offers of help with their climate plans.

After months of internal debate over whether to identify serial non-responders, the Paris Agreement’s Implementation and Compliance Committee (PAICC) named the three countries which have failed to engage with it over their NDCs on Friday.

It named Democratic Republic of Congo, Senegal and North Korea in a footnote of its annual report, adding that it decided to name them “with a view to facilitating engagement”, adding that representatives of the three nations had been invited to its meeting in early 2027 “with the purpose of identifying any challenges and constraints”.

“The Committee noted the importance of Parties engaging with the Committee in a timely manner, while noting that some delays may be due to the national capabilities and circumstances of the Parties”, the report said.

    In July, PAICC said 12 countries had ignored its repeated attempts to discuss why they had not published an NDC as required every five years under the 2015 Paris accord.

    Members of the committee had been divided over whether to name them, but at a September meeting decided to do so in their annual report to the annual climate COP summit.

    By the time the report was published on Friday, only Congo, Senegal and North Korea “had not communicated an NDC or submitted a [Biennial Transparency Report] and had not yet responded to any of the Committee’s notifications, despite several reminders issued by the Committee in this regard”.

    Rainforest and renewable energy ambitions

    The silence from Congo and Senegal is notable because the former is home to much of the Congo Basin rainforest while the latter has sought billions of dollars in climate finance to support its renewable energy ambitions.

    After Brazil, Congo has more rainforest than any country in the world. This forest, and the country’s peatlands, absorb huge amounts of greenhouse gas but are fast being lost to expanding farmland, charcoal production, logging and mining.

    Senegal signed a Just Energy Transition Partnership with Canada and wealthy European nations in 2023, to help it meet its renewable energy targets under the-then government of Macky Sall. It was chair of the Least Developed Countries group between January 2022 and December 2023.

    Greenpeace campaigner Raoul Monsembula in the peatland forest around Mbandaka, Democratic Republic of Congo, on September 15, 2017 (Daniel Beltra/Greenpeace)

    Tejas Rao, who is researching the PAICC as part of a doctoral thesis at Cambridge University, said the governments of the three countries should engage with the committee.

    “Engagement costs these governments very little and the committee has shown it will listen,” he said.

    “Silence leaves the committee with no basis to help, and it leaves the [governments] exposed to the narrative that they are simply disengaged,” he told Climate Home News.

    Paris Agreement requirement

    The 2015 Paris Agreement requires all parties to publish an NDC every five years outlining their emissions reduction targets, with each plan meant to be more ambitious than the country’s last NDC.

    The latest set – the third round of plans, with new targets for 2035 – was due in February 2025. While most countries missed this deadline, all but around 30 – mostly small emitters but including Egypt, Vietnam and Argentina – have now submitted them.

    Over the year, the PAICC – which is made up of government climate officials from developed and developing countries – has been communicating with governments that have not submitted NDCs and trying to overcome barriers to them doing so.

    Some nations have cited exceptional circumstances as the reason for not submitting an NDC, a process that requires a significant amount of work in tracking emissions and consulting on how to curb them across the economy. For example, a letter from a Sudanese official to the PAICC, seen by Climate Home News, said that the country’s civil war had led to the suspension of its NDC preparation.

      The US and Iran are not signed up to the Paris Agreement and so do not have active NDCs, nor does Taiwan, which is not a UN member state.

      Rao said that because the PAICC is “facilitative and non-punitive”, naming the countries “is meant to open a door, not close one – the invited consultation is the point”.

      “In recent months, governments that explained their constraints, whether capacity, finance or domestic process, have been met with follow-up and support rather than sanction, and the number of silent governments has fallen sharply,” Rao said.

      The post Paris Agreement committee names three countries snubbing it over NDCs appeared first on Climate Home News.

      Paris Agreement committee names three countries snubbing it over NDCs

      Continue Reading

      Climate Change

      Q&A: Why a pivotal IPCC meeting in Ethiopia ended in ‘profound disappointment’

      Published

      on

      Article Contents