Occidental (Oxy) and its carbon-focused subsidiary 1PointFive have partnered with XRG, ADNOC’s energy investment company, to build a large Direct Air Capture (DAC) facility in South Texas. XRG is considering an investment of up to $500 million to support the project. The proposed plant would pull 500,000 tonnes of CO₂ from the air every year.
Occidental and 1PointFive: Driving Low-Carbon Energy Solutions
The global energy leader has major operations in the United States, the Middle East, and North Africa. In the U.S., Oxy ranks among the top oil and gas producers, with strong operations in the Permian Basin, DJ Basin, and the Gulf of Mexico.
But the company isn’t just focused on fossil fuels. Through its subsidiary Oxy Low Carbon Ventures, Occidental is taking major steps toward a cleaner future. In 2020, it launched 1PointFive to develop and scale up carbon removal and storage technologies for industries that are hard to decarbonize.
1PointFive has a clear mission to reduce CO₂ in the atmosphere and help limit global warming to 1.5°C by 2050, in line with the Paris Agreement. To achieve this, the company focuses on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) as a key tool in the fight against climate change.
Pioneering Direct Air Capture and Clean Fuels
One of 1PointFive’s flagship technologies is Direct Air Capture, developed with Carbon Engineering. It also offers AIR TO FUELS, a clean fuel solution made using captured CO₂. These technologies are backed by large-scale underground storage hubs that safely lock away carbon.
Furthermore, Occidental brings years of experience in CO₂ transportation, use, and storage, making it well prepared to lead low-carbon energy projects. Together, they aim to grow responsibly, cut emissions, and support global climate goals.
Supporting Oxy’s Net Zero Strategy
Oxy aims to reach net-zero emissions from its operations and energy use by 2040. A key part of this plan is led by Oxy Low Carbon Ventures, which follows a four-part strategy: revolutionize, reduce, reuse/recycle, and remove.
In 2023, 1PointFive made significant progress by signing agreements to sell direct air capture (DAC) carbon dioxide removal (CDR) credits to major global companies. These credits help organizations reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints.

DAC CDR credits are unique compared to other carbon credits because:
-
They’re long-lasting: CO₂ is captured from the air and stored deep underground, where it stays safely for thousands of years.
-
They’re trustworthy: These credits use strong monitoring, reporting, and verification standards to ensure transparency and effectiveness.
By developing high-integrity, science-backed solutions like DAC, Occidental and 1PointFive are paving the way toward a lower-carbon future.

Unlocking the Oxy-ADNOC Carbon Capture JV
Now talking about XRG, the global investment arm of ADNOC, based in Abu Dhabi, has a valuation of over $80 billion. It invests in lower-carbon energy and essential chemical solutions.
This potential joint venture exemplifies the fight against climate change using carbon capture technology. The press release revealed that the agreement was signed by Occidental CEO Vicki Hollub and ADNOC CEO Dr. Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber during a visit by former U.S. President Donald Trump to the UAE.
Vicki Hollub, President and Chief Executive Officer of Oxy said,
“We are proud to advance our decades-long partnership with ADNOC and XRG on our South Texas DAC Hub, which we believe will deliver game-changing technology to support U.S. energy independence and global goals. Agreements like this, along with U.S. DOE support, demonstrate continued confidence in DAC as an investable technology that can create jobs and economic value in the United States and Texas.”
What’s DAC and Why South Texas?
Direct Air Capture (DAC) pulls CO₂ directly from the atmosphere, which can then be stored underground or reused. As per the IEA, so far, 27 DAC plants are running globally, capturing only about 0.01 million tonnes of CO₂ per year. However, more than 130 large-scale DAC projects (each designed to capture over 1,000 tonnes annually) are now in the pipeline.
If all proposed facilities move ahead, DAC could capture 65 million tonnes annually by 2030. This figure is close to the level needed under the Net Zero Emissions by 2050 scenario. DAC plants typically take 2 to 6 years to build, making this target possible with strong policy backing.

According to BloombergNEF, the global market for carbon capture and removal could reach $100 billion by 2030. This growth comes from stricter climate rules, net-zero goals, and rising investment in clean tech.

Currently, most projects are still in early planning stages and need market incentives to move forward. Supportive policies and pricing mechanisms will be key to making these carbon removal services viable.
U.S. Backs Big Direct Air Capture Projects
The IEA also highlighted that the United States has significantly invested in Direct Air Capture technology. Two large hubs in Texas and Louisiana will share $3.5 billion in federal funds and could pull 2 million tonnes of CO₂ from the air each year.
New incentives make these projects more attractive:
- The Inflation Reduction Act raised the 45Q tax credit to $180 per tonne of CO₂ stored through DAC.
- Projects as small as 1,000 tonnes per year can now qualify.
- A federal buying program promises long-term contracts to purchase the CO₂ that DAC plants capture.
These moves aim to boost deployment and build a strong market for carbon removal in the U.S.
Moving on, this South Texas Project is planned at King Ranch in Kleberg County, a site near Gulf Coast industrial zones and energy infrastructure. This location is ideal for transporting and storing CO₂.
- The hub has the potential to store up to 3 billion tonnes of carbon underground across 165 square miles.
Ongoing Progress and Support
- Occidental is already building a DAC facility called STRATOS in West Texas. It’s expected to begin operations in 2025.
- The U.S. Department of Energy has awarded Occidental up to $650 million to support DAC development in South Texas.
- The technology behind DAC is becoming more reliable and cost-effective.
Interestingly, Occidental and ADNOC have been working together since signing an MoU in 2023. They are exploring opportunities in carbon capture and storage across both the U.S. and the UAE. They also partner on major energy projects like Al Hosn Gas, one of the largest gas developments in the Middle East.
Khaled Salmeen, Chief Operating Officer, XRG, also commented on this JV,
“Our longstanding partnership with Occidental continues to drive scalable, high-growth and strategically attractive projects that create long-term sustainable value. The U.S. is a priority market for XRG and we look forward to building on this partnership as we continue to invest in strategic projects across the energy value chain.”
This partnership could mark a major step forward in the use of carbon capture to tackle climate change. With significant backing, ideal location, and proven collaboration, Occidental, 1PointFive, and XRG are aiming to scale up climate tech with South Texas as its base.
The post Occidental and ADNOC’s $500M Texas DAC Deal Marks a Global Milestone in Carbon Removal appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

