The voluntary carbon market (VCM) is growing quickly as companies and project developers look for new ways to support climate action. Northern Trust recently partnered with the Ecosystem Certification Organisation (ECO). This partnership aims to simplify the management of digital carbon credits and will also make the process more transparent and secure.
A Forest-Friendly Deal Takes Root
Northern Trust, a global wealth and asset management firm, has signed a deal with ECO, a UK-based company. They will manage digital carbon credits that are certified under the Natural Forest Standard (NFS).
Under this deal, Northern Trust will provide recordation, settlement, and custodial services for carbon credit units issued through NFS-certified projects.
The Natural Forest Standard backs big natural forestry projects. These projects help stop deforestation and keep forests healthy. It credits projects for their carbon benefits. It also recognizes their positive effects on biodiversity and local communities.

ECO oversees the NFS by working with project developers from start to finish. That means from project implementation to the issuance of carbon credits.
ECO is outsourcing its recordation and settlement services to Northern Trust. This move aims to boost independence between the standard’s governance and the registry’s operations. This move helps ensure transparency and builds trust in the voluntary carbon market.
How the Natural Forest Standard Works
The NFS’s goal is to support forestry projects in the voluntary carbon market. It focuses on projects that avoid deforestation and degradation in large natural forests. These projects can earn carbon credits. They do this by showing clear benefits for carbon storage, biodiversity, and local communities.
ECO plays a key role in making sure projects using the NFS methodology follow clear and credible processes. It guides developers through every step — from setting up projects to verifying results and issuing credits.
-
The credits NFS generated are known as Natural Capital Credits.
Each NCC shows that 1 metric tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) emissions has been avoided by an NFS project. These projects also help protect wildlife and support local communities in a fair and responsible way.
NCCs are special to the NFS and can only be created through the NFS Crediting Program. Once issued, the credits are recorded in the NFS Registry, where they can be held, traded, or permanently retired.

These credits are valuable in the VCM because they offer more than just carbon reductions. They provide broader environmental and social benefits. This makes them appealing to companies and investors who want to back nature-based solutions.
Northern Trust Steps In: The Digital Backbone
Northern Trust will now handle the back-end services needed to track and manage these credits, which include:
- Recording all issued credits,
- Processing transfers,
- Settling transactions, and
- Providing custodial services for the digital assets.
To do this, Northern Trust will use its Carbon Ecosystem™, a digital platform launched in 2024. The platform supports the full lifecycle of digital voluntary carbon credits — from asset creation and trading to custody and reporting. It runs on Northern Trust Matrix Zenith™, a tool for digital asset services. It handles important tasks like trading, pricing, and reporting for digital assets.
By providing these services, Northern Trust helps ECO focus on its main task: supporting project developers and maintaining the integrity of the Natural Forest Standard.
Victoria Kelly, Director at ECO, said the appointment of Northern Trust will ensure transparency and traceability for all credits issued, noting:
“Appointing The Northern Trust Carbon Ecosystem to administer the Natural Capital Credits will provide full lifecycle management of all digital carbon credits today and in the future, ensuring transparency and traceability for all Natural Capital Credits issued to projects verified under the Natural Forest Standard.”
What This Deal Means for the Voluntary Carbon Market
The VCM allows companies to buy carbon credits to offset their greenhouse gas emissions. In 2024, about 180 million credits were retired or used to offset emissions, as seen in the chart below. Nature-based projects are those in green bars, e.g., REDD+.

As the market grows, buyers and sellers want better safeguards. They need clear governance and trustworthy systems for managing carbon credits.
ECO and Northern Trust are addressing these concerns by separating governance from registry operations. Northern Trust ensures the accurate recording of NFS carbon credit transactions. They also make sure ownership is clearly documented. This builds confidence among market participants and helps the market mature.
Justin Chapman, Group Head of Strategic Partnerships, Digital Assets and Financial Markets at Northern Trust, shared the following insights with the CarbonCredits.com team:
Q: How does Northern Trust’s digital platform, the Carbon Ecosystem, improve transparency and efficiency compared to traditional carbon credit registries?
A: The Northern Trust Carbon Ecosystem provides convenient access for project developers and buyers to connect directly to explore, transact and retire voluntary carbon credits, allowing all actors to know who they are engaging with and for what reason.
Once transaction terms are agreed, a purchase and sale agreement is completed through The Northern Trust Carbon Ecosystem with the movement of carbon credits and cash automatically managed in accordance with the agreement. This increases efficiency while reducing transaction risk as the project developer receives funds just before the credits are delivered to the buyer, through a delivery vs. payment settlement process.
Q: In what ways do you see Northern Trust’s role supporting the growth and credibility of the voluntary carbon market over the next five years?
A: Northern Trust, as a leading global bank and asset servicing provider, applies financial rigor to the voluntary carbon market by providing independent infrastructure, registry, and settlement. As evidenced by our agreement with ECO, separating the role of the standards body from the registry helps remove potential conflicts of interest. The segregation of duties makes for a more efficient, transparent VCM with greater trust and aligns closer to solutions seen in other financial services models.
The Northern Trust Carbon Ecosystem construct has been built for the future, defining a suitable regulatory construct, asset definition and legal framework. Each digital voluntary carbon credit is deemed to be an intangible commodity, hence can be treated as a financial asset, allowing Northern Trust to act as a Designated Custodian of each credit on the ecosystem and provide the opportunity for credits to be considered for potential project financing opportunities.
Northern Trust adds credibility and strength, thanks to its long history in asset servicing. As of March 31, 2025, Northern Trust had $16.9 trillion in assets under custody and administration and $1.6 trillion in assets under management.
Clearing the Path for Future Climate Solutions
The partnership between Northern Trust and ECO is a key move to enhance the VCM’s infrastructure. By combining ECO’s expertise in forestry project standards with Northern Trust’s digital asset management capabilities, the two organizations aim to make carbon credit transactions smoother, safer, and more transparent.
Their teamwork might also inspire other standards groups and service providers in the voluntary carbon market. As companies worldwide look for ways to meet their climate goals, trust and clarity in carbon credit systems will become even more important.
The post Northern Trust and ECO Partner to Simplify Carbon Credit Management appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

