Connect with us

Published

on

A new investigative report released by Greenpeace Southeast Asia, in collaboration with the Uniting Church in Australia, Synod of Victoria and Tasmania, has uncovered disturbing links between suspected forced labour in the Indonesian tuna fishing industry and seafood sold in Australia.

The investigation analysed testimonies from 25 fishers working on 17 Indonesian tuna fishing vessels that supply the Australian market. These vessels supply five Indonesian processing companies, which in turn export to 18 Australian seafood companies, including major brands seen on our supermarket shelves.

The findings raise urgent questions about human rights protections at sea and the integrity of seafood supply chains reaching Australian supermarket shelves.

The crew of an Asian-flagged tuna longliner at work during a transshipment to a carrier mothership. © Greenpeace

What the Investigation Found

Fishers interviewed described experiencing multiple internationally recognised indicators of forced labour.

Of the 11 forced labour indicators identified by the International Labour Organisation, the most frequently reported were:

  • Abuse of vulnerability (56%)
  • Debt bondage (56%)
  • Deception (40%)

The report reveals a multi-layered recruitment network in Indonesia that channels vulnerable workers from rural areas into exploitative situations. Labour brokers, known locally as calo, collaborate with vessel administrators and manage recruitment. Fishers reported being lured with promises of high salaries and advance loans, only to be charged illegal and inflated fees for travel, training and documentation.

Diver Joel Gonzaga of the the Philippine purse seiner ‘Vergene’ at work in the international waters of high seas. © Alex Hofford / Greenpeace

The investigation also found that labour exploitation at sea is intertwined with environmental crime. Companies allegedly pushed vessels and fishers to engage in illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing practices, including shark finning and the deployment of illegal fish aggregating devices.

75 kilograms of shark fins from at least 42 sharks found in the freezer of the Shuen De Ching No.888. Under Taiwanese law and Pacific fishing rules, shark fins may not exceed 5% of the weight of the shark catch, and with only three shark carcasses reported in the log book, the vessel was in clear violation of both. © Paul Hilton / Greenpeace

The link between labour abuse and environmental destruction is not accidental. It reflects an extractive system that externalises both human and ecological costs to sustain profit margins.

Industrial fishing not only exploits vulnerable workers and undermines human rights, it also strips life from our oceans, degrading fragile ecosystems and pushing marine wildlife toward collapse.

What Needs to Happen Now

The report calls for urgent action from both governments and industry.

The Indonesian Government must:

  • Enforce decent and effective work at sea policies aligned with international standards.
  • Ensure ethical recruitment practices.
  • Guarantee fair wages and protections for Indonesian fishers.

The Australian Government must:

  • Prohibit seafood products linked to labour exploitation and forced labour from entering Australian markets.

Seafood companies in both countries must:

  • Conduct robust human rights and environmental due diligence across their supply chains.

These are not abstract policy fixes. They are necessary steps to prevent modern slavery at sea and to stop environmental crime from being embedded in global seafood trade.

Environmental Justice and Ocean Protection Go Hand in Hand

This investigation highlights something fundamental. Human rights and ocean protection are inseparable.

Environmental justice means the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of everyone in creating a healthy environment. When workers are exploited and forced into dangerous conditions, environmental laws are often ignored too. Abuse at sea and ocean destruction are two sides of the same industrial system.

Destructive industrial fishing methods such as longlining and bottom trawling continue to pillage and industrialise the ocean. They kill wildlife, destroy fragile habitats and undermine the resilience of marine ecosystems.

If we want a thriving ocean, we must protect both the people who work on them and the ecosystems themselves.

Why This Matters for Australia and the Global Ocean Treaty

The Australian Government is on the cusp of ratifying the Global Ocean Treaty, the legal instrument allowing governments to create high seas ocean sanctuaries free from industrial fishing. Once Australia has ratified, it has the critical tool it needs to protect the ocean and safeguard beautiful and endangered species like whales, dolphins and sharks from destructive fishing methods in the high seas.

A silky shark and other marine life. © Paul Hilton / Greenpeace

Vast, robust ocean sanctuaries are a crucial solution to the ocean crisis. These high seas sanctuaries will provide a blue haven where wildlife can rest, recover and thrive. Greenpeace Australia Pacific is calling on the Australian government to champion multiple high sea ocean sanctuaries in our region, starting with a first generation ocean sanctuary in the South Tasman Sea between Australia and Aotearoa, free from industrial fishing, whaling and the threat of deep sea mining.

As this investigation shows, the stakes are not only environmental, they are deeply human.

Australia has an opportunity to lead by cleaning up seafood supply chains at home and by championing ambitious ocean protection globally by creating fully protected ocean sanctuaries. Protecting workers’ rights and protecting ocean wildlife must happen together.

https://www.greenpeace.org.au/article/new-investigation-reveals-forced-labour-tied-to-tuna-sold-in-australia/

Continue Reading

Climate Change

What the US Could Learn About Mining on Indigenous Peoples’ Ancestral Lands

Published

on

Tribes navigating the U.S. lithium boom have little power to influence decisions on homelands seized from them. Governments in other countries have begun to build systems that offer stronger legal protections.

In the U.S., many Native American tribes maintain deep cultural and historical ties to ancestral lands outside of reservation boundaries. A 19th-century mining law still governs much of today’s lithium boom—and it doesn’t require the federal government to consult tribes before mining projects advance on these ancestral lands.

What the US Could Learn About Mining on Indigenous Peoples’ Ancestral Lands

Continue Reading

Climate Change

How We Tracked the Lithium Rush

Published

on

More than 100 projects to mine for the metal powering the green-energy transition have been proposed in the U.S. alone.

There’s a global rush for new sources of lithium to power the green-energy transition, including a major push for mining the critical metal in the U.S. Columbia Journalism Investigations and Inside Climate News teamed up to track this development trend. Here’s how we collected and analyzed data on new lithium projects—and examined which communities may be most affected by them.

How We Tracked the Lithium Rush

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Mining the Metal of the Future

Published

on

Go behind the scenes with senior editor Michael Kodas, ICN reporter Wyatt Myskow and Columbia Journalism Investigations reporter Johanna Hansel as they discuss the complicated push to build up lithium mining in the United States.

Today, just one lithium mine operates in the U.S. By 2030, at least six new projects are expected on American soil, with 13 more close behind, mostly in the dry Southwest.

Mining the Metal of the Future

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com